The average person does not give much thought to the way we perceive speaking and writing: event or thing? Writing and speaking It is so innate, or as Ong says of writing “deeply interiorized” in most of us that we use these methods of communication every day without considering what it means for how we communicate and even perceive ourselves and others. Ong describes writing itself as a technology which changes how we look at words in general whether spoken or written. These ideas can particularly be applied to computers and internet technology as methods of communication.
Ong makes the statement that writing is a thing as opposed to an event. Writing seems to be an extension of speech that makes it more permanent. To Ong speech is ephemeral and fleeting. Once something is spoken it is gone, an event past. Speech when put into words takes on a physicality, as a thing and thus permanency. Spoken words end and can be later forgotten. Written words can last as long as the material that holds them but the form of words as speech can only last as long as the words speaker issues them..
While Ong makes the the claim that the writing is not an event the claim can also be supported that both the written word and speech are events. Both communicate something in a certain place and time though their permanency is certainly different. To support that speech is an event Ong later makes the statement that speech is produced in a certain time, addressed by and for living persons, because the setting is “more than a context of words.” Writing has these characteristics as well, however, though Ong makes the distinction that writers must fictionalize an audience and a setting which disputes the claim that writing is an event....
... middle of paper ...
...e physical nature of writing has many repercussions for the transmission of ideas. Today it is impossible to imagine society without writing. We have volumes and volumes of literature preserved from ages past whether in science, history or religion. In an oral society this would not be possible The preservation of these works has enabled us to advance with each generation since. While Plato may not have appreciated writing as a useful tool it nonetheless has enabled us to study his works with an accuracy memory alone could not provide. Records in themselves are an important part of our functioning society, whether genealogical or financial.
Works Cited
Citations
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge, 1982.
Saenger, Paul. Space Between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Sanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1997.
While preparing for one of his college lectures, Dennis Baron, a professor and linguistics at the University of Illinois, began playing with the idea of how writing has changed the world we lived in and materials and tools we use in everyday life. This lecture slowly transitioned into “Should Everybody Write?” An article that has made many wonder if technology has made writing too easy for anyone to use or strengthens a writer's ability to learn and communicate their ideas. Baron uses rhetorical strategies in his article to portray to his audience his positive tone, the contrast and comparison of context and his logical purpose.
The communication system has been reduced to the use of “emoji’s” which is simply defined as a small digital image or icon used to express an idea, emotion and various forms of broken language are now used to communicate. This is an epidemic that has destroyed language conventions and turned them into language formulas. Verbal communication is hindered based on the use of these electronic communications which has translates itself into individuals informal contacts of which Frye says “[the]vast majority of things we here today are prejudice and cliches, simply verbal formulas that have no thought behind them but are put up as pretence to thinking”( Frye, 8). People passively accept these unfit word conventions and formulas of communication, which inadvertently influence and hinder verbal communication; Thus leading to the inability to articulate resulting in the impoverishment of the means of verbal communication. Indeed, while the most important aspect of the article containing Northrop Frye is his assertion that the inability to articulate thoughts and ideas results in the impoverishment of the means of verbal communication.
From walkmans to CD players to iPods, technology has evolved over the succession of the years; humans have taken extensive steps towards a technological transformation that has revolutionized the manner in which several individuals communicate with one another. Likewise, various humans have opted for more modern methods to connect and contact their loved ones such as speaking on a cell phone, video chatting, e-mailing, instant messaging, and conversing through social media. With these contemporary methods of communication, global interaction has now been facilitated and easily accessible; conversing with individuals from across the world is as transparent and prompt as speaking with individuals within the same city. Nonetheless, these technological
“On Writing – A Memoir of the Craft” is not written in the traditional textbook format. The structure of this book works as an educational tool is because it offers a personal look at how writing has affected one successful novelist's life. Each section of the book contains something important about the craft of writing. The book also includes a great deal of about the personal impact writing has had on Stephen King's life.
Jean Nienkamp says of Plato, "[He is] the writer who writes that nothing of importance can be conveyed through writing; the word-smith who argues that words are but imitations of imitations at the same time that he insists on precise definitions, divisions... " (1). In Phaedrus, Plato presents some of his more powerful arguments against writing. Most...
...writers? Looks were exchanged, pages were ripped out, and who knows what was kept from this document. Having a record is the best way to present the gift of knowledge, so that we can make the world better but so much is affected by the surrounding situation. Our knowledge is fallible.”
The cohesion of the members of the oral community is achieved because there is no separation of the knower from the known. The meters, sounds, and images can “not be abstracted beyond commemorative practices…they do not constitute information as a separable body of mental objects” (30), but rather function as an aid to memory. Print culture cannot bridge this gap. Although “writing” permits communication over space and time” (13), the reader is forever distanced from the content. There is no immediacy of knowing, no necessity for memory, and the print culture is provided a license to forget.
We live in a world where society continuously thrives, where new ideas are endlessly shaped, and where technology is constantly advancing. Depending on who you talk to, one person might say technology, due to its efficiency, is imperative, while another person might say it is destroying us, stripping away our true abilities. We rely on technology to entertain us, to speak for us, and even to think for us. So I ponder on the question, does the method of communication depends on individual circumstance? By examining both Paul Barnwell’s article, “My Students Don’t Know How to Have a Conversation” and Michael Scatturo’s article, “This Glove Could Help Deaf-Blind People Communicate With Anyone, Anywhere,” we can see how technology and its effects
Throughout history, writing has had many various uses that have helped record information from history to the present day. Writing has obtained many different uses as to how and what we use writing today. When writing was formed in 3200 B.C. it was used to record and communicate. We have since then used writing for numerous issues such as recording information in which we may learn about the past, and for poetry or literature for people, both children and adults, to read and learn from. People throughout history and today even use writing for religious reasons such as writing out a prayer to God or even taking note on what has happened or talked of in the sermon.
Any craftsman knows that you need the right tools to complete a project successfully. Similarly, people need the right language and usage to communicate in a positive way. How people write is often a problem because they don’t have the right tools, but a bigger problem occurs when a writer “is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything at all” (592). If a writer carries this mentality, why try to communicate in the first place? People need...
Computer has made the life easier by providing various applications and technologies. For example, while computer has replaced typewriter, it helps the students to become a better writer as they can “revise text, rearrange paragraphs, and experiment with the tone and shape of an essay” () while using word processing. Thus, the computer helps the students to improvise their writing. Human relationship with co...
Ong, Walter. “Writing is a Technology that Restructures Thought.” Writing Material. Ed. Evelyn Tribble. New York. 2003. 315-335.
“Man is an animal that lives in language as a fish lives in water and so written communication is just one of the ways that man can survive through” (English scholar Annie Dillard). Writing is a skill to give information. Like all skills, it is not inborn and so it needs to be learnt. To give information you need good communication skills including the ability to write simply, clearly and concisely (Harris & Cunningham, 1996).
Before beginning the main discussion in this essay, the difference between language and communication must be outlined. The Penguin English Dictionary (2003) defines language as ‘the ability to make and use audible, articulate, and meaningful sound by the a...
Text is product and process. Texts are spread through time and space. They keep changing, so they don’t have final forms. They are changed through undergoing different kinds of communication within