Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chomsky's theory on language development
Full analysis of animal communication
Full analysis of animal communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chomsky's theory on language development
1. Introduction The world still revolves around many unanswered mysteries. Through time and science, some have been illuminated and understood, but many are still left unexplained. One of these mysteries is the mind. In this essay I am going to be examining the relationship between animal communication, and our own human language. I will be discussing relevant theories such as evolution from animals and whether or not animals have minds, therefore debating the mind body problem and consciousness, which was most famously addressed by René Descartes as well as many other philosophers. I will also be studying Noam Chomsky’s theories on human language structure and generative grammar that oppose the ideas of various philosophers. Included within this topic I will research Washoe and Nim Chimsky, chimpanzees who were the primary focus of studies of animal language acquisition. The aim of this essay is to see if there is a relationship between human language and animal communication, based on evidence and theories that I will be researching. 2. My research question for this essay is If humans and animals are so alike, in so many different ways, why can’t we speak the same language? I know that I often find myself attempting to have a full conversation with my dog, wondering if she understands me when tilting her head at certain words or a different pitch. What does what I am saying mean to her? Is it actually just the tone that she understands rather than language? 3. Main argument Before beginning the main discussion in this essay, the difference between language and communication must be outlined. The Penguin English Dictionary (2003) defines language as ‘the ability to make and use audible, articulate, and meaningful sound by the a... ... middle of paper ... ...he caretaker] in just this way when she finally returned to work with the chimps. Kat made her apologies to Washoe, then decided to tell her the truth, signing "MY BABY DIED." Washoe stared at her, then looked down. She finally peered into Kat's eyes again and carefully signed "CRY", touching her cheek and drawing her finger down the path a tear would make on a human (Chimpanzees don't shed tears). Kat later remarked that one sign told her more about Washoe and her mental capabilities than all her longer, grammatically perfect sentences." The studies of these chimpanzees show that there is a possibility of animal communication, though maybe not through phonetic systems, but signs. 8. Semiotics and sound systems The use of sign language in apes brings me on to semiotics, which is the study of signs, sign processes and meaning making. C.S. Pierce and Charles Morris
The prehistoric times stand evidence to the power of language as a tool for communication and growth. Language has proven to be an effective medium and factor surrounding the evolution of man. Language has played a big role in the development of individuals and societies. What is spoken and/or written, help in the initiation of imagination, expression of feelings, and conveyance of thoughts and ideas. “The pen is mightier than the sword” (Bulwer-Lytton 1839).
Snowdon, C. T., Brown, C. H., & Petersen, M. R. (1982). Primate communication. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press].
Psychologist Steven Pinker is one of these critics. Pinker has said “No chimpanzee has learned sign language..... They’ve certainly learned some gestures, but sign language is not just a system of gestures. It’s a full, grammatical language with its own systematic grammar, like Latin” (Hart, “Apes and Human Language”). Many other researchers simply do not agree that animals using symbols and signs constitute human language. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics support this
Project Nim is a documentary that focuses on attempts to teach Nim the chimpanzee language, specifically sign language. It follows the different environments Nim lived in—some conducive to the project’s goal, and others not. The film focuses on the relationship between Nim and his ‘teachers’ and caretakers, especially his interactions with them as he matured and started expressing more aggressive, chimp-like behavior, despite being raised similar to a human child in many aspects.
Humans are aware that other humans have minds because we can share these experiences. The difficulty with validating whether animals have minds is that we cannot share experiences with animals, communication is difficult. Though this may be changing. Experts in symbolic language with chimps and apes are able to communicate with each other in sign language. ‘Experiments with chimps Koko and Washoe and gorilla Kenzi have shown that they are able to invent new words, construct abstract phrases and express their feelings using American Sign Language or computer-based symbolic language.’ This is hard scientific evidence proving that these primates do have intelligence and a mind nearly like our own, though the extent is far from being displayed.
Animals and humans are able to communicate nonverbally with sign language, hand motions, or body language. “Bees communicate the location of pollen to other bees in the hive by dancing” (Doc 2). Honey bees have two dances, a circular dance, and a tail wagging dance (Doc 2). Bees are able to tell other bees where to find pollen by making gestures or “dancing”, similar to how human can communicate with gestures and sign language. Chimps can't talk because they have a thin tongue and a high vocal box, however, humans have been able to communicate by teaching them sign language (Doc 6). Koko, a gorilla knows about one-thousand American sign language signs (Doc 6). Although Koko can't talk, she like deaf or nonverbal people, is able
This article discusses the form of communication that Gibbon monkeys use amongst their species. The argument that appears to be present throughout this article is that Gibbons are not only able to communicate with each other, but also that their communication system shares certain features with the human language system. Although I agree that this species’ communication system shares particular design features with the human language, the definition of language attests that this type of communication is not considered a language.
Chimpanzees and Bonobos are very similar species of apes and they both have very similar gestures that have alike meanings. While it is not surprising that some of the gestures are the same, it is more surprising that they also have the same intention. When comparing the gestures, the ASO, or Apparently Satisfactory Outcome, is taken into consideration. The ASO is used to help figure out the meaning of the gesture by showing how the receiver of the gesture responds to the action and if the signaller is satisfied with the outcome of their response. The gestures and meanings are then compared between bonobos and chimpanzees to determine how similar their actions are to each other.
In 1977 Irene Pepperberg, a recent graduate of Harvard University, did something very bold. At a time when animals still were considered automatons, she set out to find what was on another creature’s mind by talking to it. She brought a one-year-old African gray parrot she named Alex into her lab to teach him to reproduce the sounds of the English language. “I thought if he learned to communicate, I could ask him questions about how he sees the world.”
Gorilla’s have always had their own body language. They beat their chests and use sounds and simple gestures to communicate in the wild. Maybe that is why Koko could learn sign language so easily.
It's very difficult to determine when, how and why human language began. While fossil primates provide important clues about human evolution, the sounds they made and the soft tissue involved in making those sounds weren't preserved. But chimpanzees—one of our closest living relatives—provide important points of comparison for inferring the sorts of sounds our early ancestors may have made. During the 175th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, being held May 7-11, 2018, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Michael Wilson, an associate professor at the University of Minnesota, will present his group's work searching for similarities between the vocal communications of chimpanzees and humans.
This is best illustrated by psychologist Herbert S Terrace’s research of sign language communication with NimChimpsky in 1973, where he discovered that what they interpreted as Nim communicating with them by expressing his own thoughts, was more likely the ape responding to subconscious clues that hewas receiving from the researchers. (Rowe & Levine, 2015) This illustrates that even if animals were able to simulate language, they have not been proven to have the capability to understand it and be able manipulate it to deliver a
To start with, I do not want to narrowly define language as merely verbal communication. Language is far broader than that. In a few seconds a person walking past you on the street could tell you more about themselves with a sincere smile than they could with a few rushed words. Language encompasses all aspects of communication that enhance the level of our interaction. The tone in our voice demonstrating our feelings on a topic or our body language indicating our level of interest are just as important in interaction as verbally communicating content. There for I define language as any act that is involved in the interaction between two or more people.
Speaking is a natural ability given to most reluctant individuals. Since the beginning of time, it has been assumed that we have a right to speak and use words, thus we naturally begin our development of language during the early stages of live. After years of grasping and perfecting our vocabulary and language, it seems unnecessary to study the purpose of our development. Why, then, should we study “oral communication?” There are many purposes, benefits, and institutions that branch from oral communication. Of course, communication is the basis of interaction with other individuals through the use of expressions and words; however, through studying oral communication, one can take the words and expressions being used and apply them to his or her own life. After all, the most effective and useful knowledge is applied knowledge.
Communication can be described as the bestowing or trading of data by talking, composing, or utilizing some other medium (Oxford, 2017). Animals need to communicate for many reasons, such as exchanging their feelings, needs, and experiences. For instance, birds sing and dance to introduce themselves or to look for food. Furthermore, cats rub their fur with our clothes to leave their scents as an expression of ownership. Although animals communicate, they cannot talk like humans. The shape of the mouth and its components, such as lips and tongue are not similar to human. In addition, animals’ communication system does not show any of the four particular qualities that are frequently connected with language, which are discreteness, grammar, productivity,