Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chimpanzee sign language research paper
Nonhuman primate communication
Nonhuman primate communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chimpanzee sign language research paper
Project Nim is a documentary that focuses on attempts to teach Nim the chimpanzee language, specifically sign language. It follows the different environments Nim lived in—some conducive to the project’s goal, and others not. The film focuses on the relationship between Nim and his ‘teachers’ and caretakers, especially his interactions with them as he matured and started expressing more aggressive, chimp-like behavior, despite being raised similar to a human child in many aspects. In 1973, an infant Nim was taken from his mother and sent to live with the LaFarge family as part of a Columbia University psychology experiment. Herbert Terrace aimed to see if Nim could be conditioned to learn language if he was raised like a human child in a normal, human …show more content…
household.
LaFarge raised the chimp among her own children, even breastfeeding it at times. While Nim learned basic sign language, his environment was not at all structured, and the family often let him run rampant, giving him both alcohol and marijuana. Nim continued act like a chimpanzee despite being raised as a ‘human child,’ becoming more aggressive as he grew older. Inevitably, intern Laura-Ann Pettito decided that it was not conducive to the project for the family to care for Nim. For several years, Nim was under the care of researchers at the University; however, as he grew older his behavior became more and more aggressive until he was causing serious harm to the researchers. Once Terrace decided that the project should end, Nim was moved to the University of Oklahoma primate facility, where he lived in a cage with other chimps. Research assistant Bob Ingersoll noted that the experience was “distressing” to Nim, and that he kept a close eye on the chimpanzee in order to make sure he was not harassed by the other chimps and was adjusting well. Ingersoll continued to communicate with Nim through sign language in order to ease his transition,
and smoked marijuana with him as well. Eventually, the University sold Nim to a facility that tested pharmaceuticals on chimps. Once the facility closed, he was sent to animal sanctuary where he lived out the rest of his life. Despite the trouble in Nim’s later years, the project was inconclusive, and researchers were unable to determine whether or not Nim had a real grasp on language, or if he was just repeating the motions his caretakers taught to him without any real understanding. The film’s main focus is the effect of these different environments on Nim’s development. Most of those who worked with Nim agreed that the conditions he lived in were unhealthy for a chimpanzee, and ended up being harmful to him, especially later in life. It was clear that many of Nim’s caretakers did not have a clear understanding of how chimpanzees actually behaved, believing that Nim could be molded to behave like humans. As is normal for chimpanzees, Nim grew more aggressive as he aged, and the environments he lived in were not suitable to a chimpanzee’s natural behavior. As far as educational value, the film is strong in that it portrays that chimpanzees cannot be conditioned to act like humans, no matter their upbringing. It details the damage done to Nim due to the unnatural environments he lived in, and how he was never fully integrated into either a human or chimpanzee community. The film also had educational value in that it had Nim’s caretakers give accounts of their personal and professional experiences, allowing the viewer to fully understand what Nim’s life and learning environments were like. It was fair in its depiction of Project Nim in both successes and shortcomings.
Before being introduced to any chimpanzees, Fouts was a psychology master’s student, and was originally planning to work with children. However, he was introduced to a couple, the Gardeners, who asked him to assist them on a research project at their home. The Gardeners were the first people to
After eighteen months, Jane had finally been accepted into the animals’ group – she was finally considered to be one of them. Chimpanzees are a lot like humans in their behaviour. They are extremely smart since they are able to make and use tools and weapons. The female mothers are very affectionate and protective of the young and the rest of their family. The young chimps are also very dependent on their mother for necessities such as food, shelter and warmth.
Inside the chimp habitat, I noticed a sign which read: Look here for a “zoo” born! When I saw it, I recalled that earlier during the day, a senior docent named Rhonda who worked with the gorillas had told me that there was recently a newborn chimp. She said to look very closely to find the baby because the mother was extremely protective of it. She had also mentioned that the newborn’s furless skin would be very pink. At first, I looked very keenly for the small new chimp who had just been born this year, but I couldn’t find it. I finally spotted the baby after I moved to a different position to view the chimps from the open air viewing area. The infant was just as Rhonda had described it: nestled in its mother’s arms as she shielde...
There are contrasts in tool kits used by different groups of chimpanzees, which seem to be a result of the environment in which they live as well as information that is shared by the group. For example, in 1973 it was reported that chimpanzees in Gombe did not use hammer stones, but those of Cape Palmas did. We will explore the tool use of Chimpanzees from the wild, including Gombe, Tai National Forest, and the Congo Basin---and contrast those with Chimpanzees in captivity in locations of Zoo’s both in the United States and abroad.
Primates housed in organizations like zoos and laboratories have developed catastrophic behavior; due to the lack of their natural habitat and the lose of freedom to pursue their own lives. Chimpanzees have directed themself to attempt abnormal and often revolting behavior. During their life in captivity they exibit biting themselves, drinking urine, eating feces, pating genitals, rocking, plucking hair, and fumpling niples (Birkett and Newton-Fisher). Another factor that gives chimpanzees
Slater, A., and Muir, D., (1998). The Blackwell Reader in Developmental Psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
She took this time to recover from a failed marriage and the death of her late husband. She went back to Africa and was greatly saddened by all the harmful pesticides that people were using all around the world. She used her own healing time to study and actually understand inside of a chimp’s head. Her notes suggest that chimps and humans are very much alike. A human’s brain is more complex and can have a greater mind and thinking way beyond the average primate. She concluded while a human can ask further questions about the past, present, and future; chimps let their instincts come over. This explains why chimpanzees are very territorial and aggressive. Her findings also lead to that humans are forever revolving and chimps are not. Aside from her observations, she also unveiled the importance of the idea of conservation and animals’ rights. Goodall keeps pushing for humans to care for their world, wildlife, and themselves. (Editors)
Chimpanzees are part of the non-human primate group. Though we share a common ancestor, evolution has pushed us in different directions. However this common ancestor causes humans to be curious about these creatures. As discussed in Jane Goodall’s video Among the Wild Chimpanzees we were once considered to be human because of our use of tools but once we observed these non-human primates using tools, this perception was changed forever. The question now at hand is if having the chimpanzees that we study in captivity makes a difference between studying wild chimps. These interesting creatures can be found naturally in the rainforests of Africa.
Chimpanzees portray their emotions through a number of facial expressions and mannerisms. Just like humans, they undergo mood swings, jealous rages, and laughter. For instance, Goodall observed during her research that a male gorilla “would threaten [me] with an upward and backward movement jerk of his head…” Some of their emotions are easy to read, while at other times we have to look at multiple places on their faces to understand their feelings. A chimpanzee also uses its facial expressions and sounds to communicate with each other, such as hoots and yells.
...rain, wrist, shoulder, etc. Chimpanzees are highly intelligent where they know how to use tools for food and other purposes. They are also capable of having reasoned thoughts where they can use their memory and process information. Not only can they learn the American Sign Language, they also have a concept of self where they can recognize themselves in mirrors (something most animals can't do). Many people get caught up in the difference between animals and humans, but these animals should be given certain rights. For example, they deserve the right to freedom from suffering and abuse. Humans are primates just as chimpanzees are; just because they can't communicate in the same way we do, that doesn't mean they should be held prisoner against their will, or get tested on without having a say in that. I believe all animals have a right to a blissful, fulfilling life.
... (p. 116). In her article, “Babies Prove Sound Learners,” Sohn (2008), states, “Such studies show that, up to about 6 months of age, babies can recognize all the sounds that make up all the languages in the world” (para.24). B.K. Skinner suggest that the materialization of language is the result of imitation and reinforcement. According to Craig and Dunn (2010), “Language development is linked to cognitive development that, in turn, depends on the development of the brain, on physical and perceptual abilities, and on experiences. Biological and social factors also jointly influence the early development of emotion and personality” (p. 117). In her article, A natural history of early language experience. Hart (2000), states, “Talking is important for children, because complexity of what children say influences the complexity of other people’s response” (para. 1).
Wilder Penfield and Lamar Roberts first introduced the idea that there is a “critical period” for learning language in 1959. This critical period is a biologically determined period referring to a period of time when learning/acquiring a language is relatively easy and typically meets with a high degree of success. German linguist Eric Lenneberg further highlights Roberts and Penfield’s findings and postulated the Critical Period Hypothesis in 1967. According to the Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH), certain biological events related to language development can only happen in the critical period. During this time, the brain possesses a degree of flexibility (ability and ease of learning a language) and becomes lateralized (assignment of language functions becomes concrete – either in the left or right hemisphere) (Marinova-Todd, S; Marshall, D & Snow, C. 2000 9-10). This critical period lasts from childhood through the onset of puberty (usually at around 12 years of age). Once this period is over, it is more difficult to learn a language because language functions in the brain have become concrete. This hypothesis can be seen with the case of Genie, a woman who was isolated from human interaction and language up to the age of 13. By the time she was rescued, she was well after the critical period for language acquisition, and as such, she did not have a full command of the English language. Had she been rescued before the age of 13, she may have had more linguistic capability. However, this accounts for firs...
The study of language development, one of the most fascinating human achievements, has a long and rich history, extending over thousands of years (Chomsky, 2000). As the nature-versus-nurture argument is inevitable to arise whenever human behaviors are discussed, it is not surprising that language experts have debated the relative influences of genetics and the environment on language development (Hulit & Howard, 2002). Among the various proposals concerning the mechanisms involved in acquiring a language, two opposing theoretical positions, the behaviorist and the nativist, are the most prominent and influential ones (Ayoun, 2003; Garton & Pratt, 1998; Owens, 2001). Due to the indefinite explanation of the exact process, the continuous interest of the inquiring people, and the sheer significance of the precise result, the controversy remains ongoing and popular. In view of the more obvious limitations of the behaviorist interpretation and the prevailing contributions of the nativist interpretation, the latter one is more rational to accept.
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
This meant that humans have a built in mechanism to help them recognise and speak language. Chomsky believed that children simply neede... ... middle of paper ... ... rmal language acquisition early in life. q Sachs reported the case of Jim, whose parents deaf but who was surrounded by spoken language from the television and radio in the hope that he would learn normal language.