Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marriage in other cultures
Marriage in ancient rome
The origins of wedding traditions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Marriage in other cultures
In early medieval England last names were not common, as people only used their first names. Once the population increased it was harder to distinguish between each person since some names were more common amongst the people. Thus, surnames or last names became more common often based on lineage. It wasn’t until the ninth century england where women began to take the same last name as their husband. The reason was for the women to become “one” with their husband and was then required to assume the husband’s surname as their own. In my opinion I believe women still take their husband's last name because it’s a tradition. That’s just what happened years ago. Not only that, to some women they change their last name because they want to be apart
of that family; they could view the man's family as an amazing family that she would want to feel officially apart of. Some women dream of meeting a guy to marry and take his last name as her own. However, the opposite could be play a role as some women my feel their identity is gone because they are using someone else’s last name, or they do feel like some sort of property owned by the man. The major reason why they take the last name is because of tradition, I believe that is the biggest reason along with the examples I presented abov
In the article “The Name Is Mine” by Anna Quindlen, she explains her story about her name, why she chose to keep it, and why it has such meaning to her. As a result of keeping her maiden name, there were many positive and negative aspects that went along with it.
The 17th and 18th centuries saw the embryonic stage of women’s quest for intellectual and social parity with men. The evolution of women’s fight for equal opportunities was bogged down by a long history of stereotyping and condescension. Women were weaker physically, bore children and nurtured them. The economics and culture of Europe at this time was strongly influenced by religion and resulted in prejudice against women. The dominating religions of Europe in the 1600’s and 1700’s (Catholicism and Protestantism), citing the bible, reinforced women’s roles as mother’s, wives, and homemakers. Women were considered the weaker sex both physically and mentally. Men and most women assumed that because women gave birth and produced milk for their infants, God intended that their place was in the home. Men’s egos, as well, did not allow for women to compete with them. Males thought their place was to rule, fight wars, provide income, teach and be the head of his family. Women were not accepted in academics, politics, church leadership, business, or the military. Despite these prejudices, women saw an opportunity in the sciences. As a discipline based on observations and deductive reasoning it did not necessarily require a comprehensive academic background. Since most women were deprived of the more advanced education that men received, it was the perfect field for them to begin their pursuit of equality. As a result, a growing number of women actively participated in scientific research in chemistry, astronomy, biology, botany, medicine, and entomology.
Therefore, the idea of a woman changing her last name is truly up to her. Each women has a personal belief when it comes to last names. Some may change theirs and some may not be so willing. Filipovic may have been rather biased on the issue but she was able to provide reasonable understanding of why a change in a woman's last name can be so significant for some women in this era. There are many reasons to keep or change a last name but in the end it all boils down to a woman's belief on what she considers to be the factors of her
Many of the ideas provided by Earnshaw were very intriguing as well as educational. His ideas were coherent with the novel and it is clear to see that Earnshaw took extra time to do extra research about the time period Jane Eyre was written in as well as any inspirations for the plot of novel. His explanation for how the last names tie in with the characters personalities was thought-provoking and well thought out. He states that due to Brontes’ Romantic influence, many of the characters names allude to nature and can be used to describe their individual personalities Eyre are good examples of the relationships that names take place in how a character’s personality develops. In his first paragraph, Earnshew describes how Eyre- an which was an earlier spelling of Aire- is actually a river that flows through Keighley, a town located in center of the United Kingdom. The river could be an excellent description of Jane, as the river can grow and form its own path similar to how Jane develops as a woman and find her own path in life or it can illustrate her switch from Jane starting as a young and lively young girl to a much calmer and steadier person-like a river does over the years.
In the early 1900’s, women who were married main jobs were to care for her family, manage their houses, and do housework. That is where the word housewife was come from. During the 1940's, women's roles and expectations in society were changing quickly and a lot. Before, women had very limited say in society. Since unemployment was so high during the Great Depression, most people were against women working because they saw it as women taking jobs from men that needed to work. Women were often stereotyped to stay home, have babies, and to be a good wife and mother. Advertisements often targeted women, showing them in the kitchen, talking with children, serving dinner, cleaning, and them with the joy of a clean house or the latest kitchen appliance.
Throughout history women have been underestimated. Society as a whole is patriarchal, and even though women have mead great strides in gaining equality, there are still crimes and prejudice against women. Women are capable of great feats, if they are given a chance. Some women ignored all social standards and managed to accomplish incredible things that changed the course of history.
19th-Century Women Works Cited Missing Women in the nineteenth century, for the most part, had to follow the common role presented to them by society. This role can be summed up by what historians call the “cult of domesticity”. The McGuffey Readers does a successful job at illustrating the women’s role in society. Women that took part in the overland trail, as described in “Women’s Diaries of the Westward Journey” had to try to follow these roles while facing many challenges that made it very difficult to do so. One of the most common expectations for women is that they are responsible for doing the chore of cleaning, whether it is cleaning the house, doing the laundry.
who would do anything for the children and the Medici families. They were loving wives as well, but supported their husbands in different ways. Lucrezia supported her husband politically, because he was ill and unable to govern to his full potential sometimes (Young, 107). In comparison to Contessina, who supported her husband emotional, by pleasing him with her house management skills. Their letters clearly illustrate their different personalities, and help historians and readers get a good sense of the change in women emerging in the renaissance.
Through investigations of writers as diverse as Silvia Federici, and Angela Davis, Maria Mies, and Sharon Hays, Judith Butler, and Steven Gregory we have come to understand that confronting the categorization of gender differences is a complex and nuanced project. Whether one is an ontologist, exploring the metaphysical nature of gender differences (that may or may not lead down the road of essentialism) or a phenomenologist exploring how exactly it is that one “does” gender—to the extent that there even exists a concept called gender—one must employ a varied and multipartite approach. Writers such as Federici, Mies, and Davis sketched out a framework of the history of gender roles for us. From what Federici calls a time of primitive consumption through feudalism, to the time of slavery and rapid industrialization and, indeed, through our current technological revolution, we have seen the basic gender differences between the sexes evolve over time. To be sure, our notions of what is expected from both women and men have changed since prehistoric times, and they continue to evolve. Sharon Hays in the chapter “Pyramids of Innequality” of her book Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform shows us how, in the United States, poverty and access to the social safety net have been raced and gendered. She provides a springboard for further investigation.
During the 1800s, society believed there to be a defined difference in character among men and women. Women were viewed simply as passive wives and mothers, while men were viewed as individuals with many different roles and opportunities. For women, education was not expected past a certain point, and those who pushed the limits were looked down on for their ambition. Marriage was an absolute necessity, and a career that surpassed any duties as housewife was practically unheard of. Jane Austen, a female author of the time, lived and wrote within this particular period. Many of her novels centered around women, such as Elizabeth Bennet of Pride and Prejudice, who were able to live independent lives while bravely defying the rules of society. The roles expected of women in the nineteenth century can be portrayed clearly by Jane Austen's female characters of Pride and Prejudice.
Amelia Bloomer:Amelia Bloomer was born in Cortland County, New York, in 1818. She received an education in schools of the State and became a teacher in public schools, then as a private tutor. She married in 1840 to Dexter C. Bloomer, of Seneca Falls, New York. Dexter C. Bloomer was editor of a county newspaper, and Mrs. Bloomer began to write for the paper. She was one of the editors of the Water Bucket, a temperance paper published during Washingtonian revival. Mr. Bloomer lived in Seneca Falls in 1848, but did not participate in the Women’s Rights Convention. In 1849, Bloomer began work with a monthly temperance paper called The Lily. It was devoted to women’s rights and interests, as it became a place for women advocates to express their opinions. The paper initiated a widespread change in women’s dress. The long, heavy skirts were replaced with shorter skirts and knee-high trousers or undergarments. Bloomer’s name soon became associated with to this new dress, and the trousers became known as Bloomers. She continued to new dress and continued advocating for women’s rights in her paper. In 1854, Mrs. Bloomer began giving numerous speeches and continued to fight for equal justice for women.
Cultures can shape the identities of individuals. Kingston identity was shape by Chinese and Chinese American culture. "No Name Woman," begins with a talk-story, about Kingston’ aunt she never knew. The aunt had brought disgrace upon her family by having an illegitimate child. In paragraph three, “she could not have been pregnant, you see, because her husband had been gone for years” (621). This shows that Kingston’s aunt had an affair with someone and the result was her pregnancy. She ended up killing herself and her baby by jumping into the family well in China. After hearing the story, Kingston is not allowed to mention her aunt again. The ideas of gender role-play an important role in both cultures. Kingston in her story “No Name Woman” describes some of the gender roles and expectations both women and men had to abide. Some of the gender roles in Kingston story have a semblance with the contemporary American culture.
Women and gender studies contribute greatly to our understanding of the social and cultural world we inhabit. Studying the complex issues of this field has instituted many key insights. Two major insights that positively affected our society are the awareness through learning and through this awareness activism that can ensue.
I never thought of changing my name but authors do,so the can be able to publish a book. Well I have a few reasons why they do so. According to the article people like .J K. Rowling, she is a woman but people wouldn’t take her Harry Potter books serious if they knew. She was a woman so that’s why she has a pen name so they would not know who she really is. Another good reason according to the article Lewis Carroll he wrote the Alice in Wonderland. Since he is a man people didn’t like the idea of him writing a book about a girl fantasy, so he also had a pen name and disguised his self so people would think he is a woman, author have a pen name so they would be able to publish there books.
Pen names are an idea made in the past for social reasons of that time. there were many biases to writers of different genders, races, and social classes. Social classes were never equal, it was almost always white male supremacy. There will be three body paragraphs explaining why they wanted pen names. Also there are many other social biases, but for the time of this essay will only cover pen names.