Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on sexism in the catholic church
Gender inequality religion catholicism
Homosexuality and the Roman Catholic Church
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on sexism in the catholic church
Butler, Sara. M.S.B.T. “Women’s Ordination: Is It Still an Issue?” accessed February
20th, 2017 http://www.laici.va/content/dam/laici/documenti/donna/teologia/ english/womensordination-still-an-issue.pdf. Sister Sara Butler’s article deals with the question of whether the ordination of women is still an issue within the Catholic Church (pp. 1). She argues that the reformation of gender bias, during the 1950’s, triggered the debate of the candidacy of women for the priesthood (pp. 3-5). Butler states that the Catholic Church used the gender complementarity argument as evidence for the male priesthood, not female subordination (pp. 6-8). Using theological arguments, Butler contends that the Magisterium adheres to Church Tradition since Jesus
…show more content…
766). Identifying the work of Paul Quay as the foundation of his argument, Koterski stipulates that the human reproductive cycle is symbolic (pp. 769). Since sexual intercourse is a means through which humans communicate their love for one another, Koterski argues that abstinence from sexual intimacy can be an alternative manner by which two persons communicate their love for each other (pp. 776). Koterski states that the importance given to bioethical issues such as contraception and IVF in today’s societal agenda is originates from the modern belief that the human reproductive system can be manipulated. (pp.774) He emphasizes that children are conceived by God’s will, not man’s own, and concludes by theorizing that although abstinence is not wrong per se, it is the reasons for it that determines whether or not NFP, as a means of contraception, is morally acceptable (pp. 777). Koterski’s essay clarifies the Church’s teaching on sexuality. By intertwining scientific and theological points of view he provides guidance on the moral acceptability of abstinence within the context of a marital relationship. The sacredness of sexual intercourse in marriage should motivate priests to master a clear understanding on the concept of abstinence as an acceptable form of love. Doing so would empower a priest assisting a couple in preparation for marriage to communicate the importance of developing a deeper appreciation of each other’s needs outside the context of sex. Koterski’s definition of intentionality is consistent with Schillebeeckx’s, who states that conscious acceptance of the reception of a sacrament is a necessary prerequisite for the manifestation of God’s saving grace (Schillebeeckx,
Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood by Kristen Luker, analyzes the historical and complex sociology of abortion. Luker focuses on three important factors: a historical overview of abortion, the pro-life and pro-choice views, and the direction the abortion debates are going (11, Luker, Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood p. 000). Abortion has always been seen as murder and with the idea that those who are already living have more rights. Back in the days, the laws didn’t give fetus personhood. Also, the laws against abortions weren’t strictly enforced upon anyone. In addition, abortion didn’t seem to be a huge problem, which explains why abortion was ignored in the past.
In the Judith Jarvis Thomson’s paper, “A Defense of Abortion”, the author argues that even though the fetus has a right to life, there are morally permissible reasons to have an abortion. Of course there are impermissible reasons to have an abortion, but she points out her reasoning why an abortion would be morally permissible. She believes that a woman should have control of her body and what is inside of her body. A person and a fetus’ right to life have a strong role in whether an abortion would be okay. Thomson continuously uses the story of a violinist to get the reader to understand her point of view.
In her essay “Abortion, Intimacy, and the Duty to Gestate,” Margaret Olivia Little examines whether it should be permissible for the state to force the intimacy of gestation on a woman against her consent. Little concludes that “mandating gestation against a woman’s consent is itself a harm - a liberty harm” (p. 303). She reaches this conclusion after examining the deficiencies in the current methods used to examine and evaluate the issues of abortion. Their focus on the definition of a “person” and the point in time when the fetus becomes a distinct person entitled to the benefits and protections of the law fails to capture “the subtleties and ambivalences that suffuse the issue” (p. 295). Public debate on the right to life and the right to choose has largely ignored the nature of the relationship between the mother and the fetus through the gestational period and a woman’s right to either accept or decline participation in this relationship.
In Dan Marquis’ article, “Why Abortion is Immoral”, he argues that aborting a fetus is like killing a human being already been born and it deprives them of their future. Marquis leaves out the possible exceptions of abortion that includes: a threat to the mom’s life, contraceptives, and pregnancy by rape. First, I will explain Marquis’ pro-life argument in detail about his statements of why abortion is morally wrong. Like in many societies, killing an innocent human being is considered morally wrong just like in the United States. Second, I will state my objection to Marquis’ argument through examining the difference between a human being already born future compared to a potential fetus’s future. Thus, Marquis’ argument for his pro-life
In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. In particular I will take a close look at her famous 'violinist' argument. Following will be objections to the argumentative story focused on the reasoning that one person's right to life outweighs another person's right to autonomy. Then appropriate responses to these objections. Concluding the paper I will argue that Thomson's 'violinist' argument supporting the idea of a mother's right to autonomy outweighing a fetus' right to life does not make abortion permissible.
Mary Anne Warren’s “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” describes her justification that abortion is not a fundamentally wrong action for a mother to undertake. By forming a distinction between being genetically human and being a fully developed “person” and member of the “moral community” that encompasses humanity, Warren argues that it must be proven that fetuses are human beings in the morally relevant sense in order for their termination to be considered morally wrong. Warren’s rationale of defining moral personhood as showcasing a combination of five qualities such as “consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, capacity of communication, and self-awareness” forms the basis of her argument that a fetus displays none of these elements that would justify its classification as a person and member of the morally relevant community (Timmons 386).
Abortions have been performed for thousands of years. In the 1800s abortions began to be outlawed. The reasons for anti-abortion laws varied for each state. Some people did not want the world to be dominated by newly arrived immigrants. Abortion in the 1800s were very unsafe due to the fact that the doctors had a limited educations and hospitals were not common. The outlawing of abortions from 1880 to 1973 led to many woman attempting illgeal abortions. (add author). Almost two hundred women died from attempting illegal abortions in 1965. Between two hundred thousand and one million illegal abortions were given each year. In states where local laws restrict the availability of abortion, women tend to have the lowest level of education and income. Additionally, in those states, less money goes toawrds education, welfare, fostercare programs, and adoption services. (Anderson, 5).
Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis is an essay that claims that abortion is morally wrong, and uses one argument in particular to explain why. He argues that many of us would agree that it is wrong to kill a human, and if you believe that then you should also have that view on abortions. If you think killing is wrong then you think all killing is wrong and the persons biological state, whether it is when a person is a fetus, one years old, or thirty years old, makes no difference. He then explains that killing is wrong not only because it is immoral, but wrong because it deprives the victim of life and the enjoyments one would have otherwise experienced; which Marquis believes is the greatest lost one can suffer (Marquis, 189). Given certain circumstances Marquis agrees there are cases where killing is acceptable, but nonetheless it is immoral.
“On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” by Mary Anne Warren is an in depth analysis of what, in Warren’s opinion, it is exactly that defines a person and human being, the moral community, fetal development and the right to life, potential personhood and the right to life, and infanticide. Warren believes that emotion and morality should be entirely separate, and that abortion should be legal for all women, as denial would be stripping women of basic human rights, the rights that a woman holds over an unborn fetus. I personally agree with her arguments on these topics as I agree that women should be allowed to have abortions on their own terms, without subjection of authority or society telling her what she can and cannot do, as well as I agree for the most part on her view of what a person is, potential personhood not outweighing the choice of abortion, and her reasoning on what defines a person of the moral community.
This essay examines and critiques Judith Jarvis Thomson’s, A Defense of Abortion (1971). Thomson sets out to show that the foetus does not have a right to the mother’s body and that it would not be unjust to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is not threatened. For the sake of the argument, Thomson adopts the conservative view that the foetus is a person from the moment of conception. The conservative argument asserts that every person has a right to life. The foetus has a right to life.
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
In the later stages of her argument, Hursthouse goes through several arguments for how and why abortion might be a morally right decision and/or action, however, towards the end of that section, she makes a rather interesting (if not, peculiar) claim that “even in the cases where the decision to have an abortion is the right one, it can still be the reflection of a moral failing.” (262) Hursthouses reasoning behind this is that this is not to say that a person’s choice is itself one that is “weak or cowardly or irresolute or irresponsible or light-minded,” rather it is because one has failed to acquire or uphold various other character traits that are paradigm of a virtuous person, namely that they possess the traits of “strength, independence,
“Today I appeal to the whole Church community to be willing to foster feminine participation in every way in its internal life. This is certainly not a new commitment, since it is inspired by the example of Christ himself….nevertheless, he also involved women in the cause of his kingdom; indeed he wanted them to be the first witnesses and heralds of his resurrection. In fact, there are many women who have distinguished themselves in the Church’s history by their holiness and hardworking ingenuity.”
The Church’s idea about contraception is based on obedience to the scriptures. Contraception is considered a sin because it hinders natural sex therefore and is seen as ‘an unnatural evil closely linked to pagans or heretics.’ The evidence purported above gives an insight into the beliefs and ideas Catholics have on contraception. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) article on Contraception, dated March 8, 2009, invites us to believe that if contraception is approved by the Catholic Church it would breakdown the sacred institution of marriage. Catholics are enc...
The church, as the Christian community, should demonstrate maleness in authority and femaleness in loving care and service, and these phenomena must be seen to exist in the father and minister, as symbolizing one pole of the personality conti...