Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Romeo and juliet Figurative language notes and impression
Dramatic irony in a shakespeare play
Theme of ambition in Hamlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When something bad happens, it’s easy to get angry, to point fingers; however, it eventually gets difficult to silence the sneaky voice in our heads whispering that it was all our own fault, that we deserved it. In this soliloquy, Wolsey is coming to terms with his own downfall, and he flies through this myriad of emotions. Shakespeare evokes the elements of allusion, figurative language, and tone to depict the full scope of Wolsey’s complicated, divided reaction to being removed from his job. Within the very first few lines of Wolsey’s soliloquy, Shakespeare immediately establishes the tone of the passage. Angry at his dismissal, angry at the world for betraying him, Wolsey cries out “Farewell? a long farewell to all my greatness!” One can imagine him screaming this, wrecked by his demotion. Within moments, the audience/reader understands the situation and his pain. Rather than beginning with figurative language or deep …show more content…
allusions, Shakespeare begins by introducing the tone, which is what allows the reader to gain meaning from this piece. For instance, had he reversed the order of lines 3-9 and 1-2, it would have appeared that Wolsey was working up to this rage and disappointment; Shakespeare’s artistic choice keeps the audience in the loop. Instead, we know that Wolsey feels fury right off the bat. Shakespeare, a gifted, skilled playwright, continues to drop in hints of Wolsey’s tone throughout the excerpt, assisting the audience’s understanding. At one point, about ⅔ through the piece, Wolsey shouts “Vain pomp and glory of this world, I hate ye!” This intelligent line not only provides a continuation of the tone- righteous fury- but also gives the reader insight into Wolsey’s mental state-- he blames an unjust world for his problem. A final, subtle tone shift occurs at the very end of the passage, following an allusion to Lucifer. Shakespeare ends the soliloquy with a depressing last few words, once one “falls like Lucifer,” he is “never to hope again.” This marks a difference from the heated resentment to a new challenge- dealing with the hopelessness of one’s fall. Shakespeare uses tone brilliantly, for he uses it to point the reader in the right direction: it helps us to get inside Wolsey’s head, to understand his speech, to comprehend his torment. On a similar note, the use of allusion in this excerpt is also incredibly influential. In the last few lines, Wolsey compares himself to Lucifer, God’s fallen angel. “There is, betwixt that smile we would aspire to, the sweet aspect of princes, and their ruin, More pangs and fears than wars or women have; And when he falls, he falls like Lucifer, never to hope again.” The parallels between Wolsey’s own fall and that of Lucifer are apparent. Lucifer, of course, was once God’s favorite angel, His most trusted advisor, just like Cardinal Wolsey was to the king, the highest ruler. However, Lucifer’s pride got in the way, and he was damned to Hell. Likewise, Wolsey blames his “high-blow pride” for his fall from grace. This means that we can carry Wolsey’s last piece of wisdom about Lucifer to also be an expression of Wolsey’s own emotions: they are “never to hope again.” By drawing this comparison, Shakespeare makes clear to the audience Wolsey’s depression and hopelessness. However, this is not the only function of this allusion. It also gives insight into Wolsey’s own judgement of himself-- while he does blame a “hate[d]” world, he also blames himself. It is Cardinal Wolsey, one of the highest ranking church members, who is saying these things; it is he who is making this comparison, and he is viewing himself as the Devil, blaming himself. Clearly, he is very conflicted about how he feels regarding his dismissal, and by using this allusion, Shakespeare reveals this inner turmoil. In addition to this, it is with these lines that he ends the poem- the final thoughts Wolsey expresses are self-blame, very different to the beginning where he was furious at the world. Figurative language also plays a big role in this excerpt.
Between lines 3 and 9, Wolsey paints a picture of a man’s “tender leaves of hope” being destroyed by “a killing frost.” These leaves, he says, are the promises of “to-morrow’s blossoms,” and they offer great “honors thick upon” the man. Just as the man’s “greatness is a-ripening,” the plant’s “root” is “nip[ped].” This metaphor is referring to Wolsey himself, a man whose pride and hope have been dashed by an unexpected adversary. By saying that it’s the “frost” that destroyed the plant, Wolsey acknowledges that his destroyer was part of the natural order, part of the cycle. However, the man in the metaphor thought that he could overcome this and ignore nature’s wrath. This depicts Wolsey’s mindset: his dismissal was inevitable and partly his own fault. This striking metaphor, where Wolsey subtly reflects on his own mistakes while still blaming others, happens early on in the passage, so it plants the seed for his final allusion to Lucifer, where he takes responsibility for his
fall. Another incident of figurative language being used happens towards the middle of the passage, when Wolsey personifies his pride. “My high-blow pride at length broke under me, and now has left me… to the mercy of a rude stream that must for ever hide me.” This is important for a few reasons. Firstly, it shows that Wolsey does not initially accept his pride as part of himself- he speaks of it as if it is a distinct, independent entity that does not fully represent his true character. This shows that he is still coming to terms with his own involvement in his dismissal. By saying he’s now “weary and old” at the “mercy of a rude stream,” Shakespeare evokes water’s symbolic connotations. Water, while necessary for life and growth, can be dangerous and destructive; it is unpredictable and cannot be controlled by mankind. In this instance, it can effectively be used to represent fate. Wolsey’s “pride” has left him “far beyond [his] depth,” and he is now at the mercy of others, of destiny. Wolsey has just suffered a life-altering setback, and his emotions express this. He is angry at the world, but more importantly, he is also angry at himself. To reveal this, Shakespeare expertly employs tone, allusion, and figurative language.
Shakespeare uses metaphors, allusions to the bible, and a bitter tone to convey Cardinal Wolsey’s response to his dismissal from the court and the loss of his pride.
William Shakespeare is a renowned writer for his effectiveness in writing, which is hailed from crafting his pieces with various types of literary devices. Cardinal Wolsey's soliloquy after being fired in Shakespeare's Henry VIII is no different. Shakespeare uses allusion, figurative language, and a shifting tone to hone in the complex and passionate set of emotions Wolsey felt.
In the soliloquy, Shakespeare accentuates the shared characteristics between Hamlet and a submissive servant. Hamlet submits to his cowardice and falls victim to his tendency to reflect on his profound thoughts instead of acting upon them. Additionally, he accuses himself as a troublesome scoundrel. He views himself as a criminal although he had not done anything indictable yet. This metaphor introduces Hamlet’s perception in his current emotional state to the audience.
As you begin to read my review you will start off by hearing my voice throughout the first couple of lines. The words that I chose to start my review speak for all African American women/girls today who feel exactly the same way that I do. I focused my review on a young poet who talks about the consistent hardships that black women go through in America. By choosing that spoken word poem it really overall explains how it is for a lot of black women and girls. I wanted to focus on this topic because it is an important matter that needs to be told. It also reaches home for me because that is who I am. So, as you read my review I want you as the reader to hear every word loudly and take inconsideration the importance of this review.
At the heart of every great tragedy lies the universal struggle between the human inclination to accept fate absolutely and the natural desire to control destiny (Stockton). Like most of his plays, in Shakespeare’s masterpiece Hamlet one of the prevailing themes centers on the question, “Does fate and providence overrule man’s own choices and decisions?” Throughout the work, the main character Hamlet views Fortune in various differing lights as he plots and plans his revenge. This complex interpretation of Fate’s influence is also shared with Horatio, Hamlet’s most treasured friend. Their assessments seem to waver in different situations, or as they experience something in particular. Fate and Fortune, and Providence in all her ambiguity are all sometimes seemingly bound to the actions of man and other times they are inescapable.
Typical of Shakespeare’s works, the play Macbeth has a protagonist who ultimately experiences a downfall that lead to his demise. The protagonist or tragic hero of this play is Macbeth, once brave and honorable, who eventually becomes tyrannical and feared by many due to what Abrams describes as his “hamartia” or “error of judgment or, as it is often…translated, his tragic flaw.” In this case, Macbeth’s tragic flaw proves to be ambition; however, he cannot be held solely responsible for his downfall. As a result of many outside influential factors, including the witches’ prophecies and a rather coaxing and persuasive wife, one should not hold Macbeth entirely culpable for his actions and tragic end.
The Shakespearean play of Hamlet captures the audience with many suspenseful and devastating themes including betrayal. Some of the most loved characters get betrayed by who they thought loved them most. The things these characters do to the people they love are wrong, hurtful and disappointing. These examples lead to the destruction of many characters physically and emotionally. The characters in the play who committed the act of betrayal end up paying for what they have done in the form of death, either from nature, their selfishness, disloyalty and madness. The act of betrayal truly captures and displays the play of Hamlet as a sad tragedy.
It goes without saying that we all react to the experiences that we have. What differs from person to person is how those experiences affect our being and what each of us takes from those experiences and how we apply it to our lives from that point on. We see this happening not only in our own lives, but also in literature. The characters from Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Macbeth and those from Milton’s Paradise Lost show, through their conflicts, that the experiences that they are exposed to affect their lives in a negative way. In all three of these pieces of literature, the reactions the characters have to their experiences are what bring about their ultimate demise. Unfortunately, these characters don’t realize the error of their actions until it’s too late, but we, as the audience, can learn from the mistakes we see the characters make in Hamlet, Macbeth and Paradise Lost.
In Hamlet Shakespeare is able to use revenge in an extremely skillful way that gives us such deep insight into the characters. It is an excellent play that truly shows the complexity of humans. You can see in Hamlet how the characters are willing to sacrifice t...
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet gives the readers insight into Hamlet’s state of mind as his world comes crashing down with the knowledge of his father’s murder. In the well-known soliloquy from Act III, scene i, Hamlet concisely invokes his thoughts and feelings through the extended use of diction, imagery, and syntax. Hamlet’s powerful word choice conveys his deeply unresolved problems as he considers life’s cycle.
Subsequently, the spider, “holding up a moth” draws out the evil or cruelty, which is nature. Frost accents this in the subsequent verse, “Like a white piece of rigid satin cloth” (Frost, 593). His play on words here is prodigious, “a white piece of satin cloth” (Frost, 593) this stanza demonstrates ...
One of the most popular characters in Shakespearean literature, Hamlet endures difficult situations within the castle he lives in. The fatal death of his father, and urge for revenge leads Hamlet into making unreasonable decisions. In William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s sanity diminishes as the story progresses, impacting the people around him as well as the timing and outcome of his revenge against Claudius.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s behavior and actions cause readers to question his sanity. Hamlet’s character can be interpreted in many different ways. It could be said that he is indeed insane, or it can be disputed that he, as he made known, is simply putting on a good act. The complexity of knowing Hamlet’s true character derives from the fact that we, as readers, are unable to read Shakespeare’s or Hamlet’s minds. Therefore, judgments could be made solely by reading and interpreting his behavior and coming up with a satisfactory conclusion. Taking into consideration incidents such as Polonius’ murder and Hamlet’s contemplating suicide, it is natural for individuals who perform such acts to be categorized as crazy. Ignoring Hamlet’s actual actions, and paying keen attention to what altered his character, one can debate that Hamlet is not at all insane. It is important to consider the situations which triggered Hamlet’s different actions. By giving discreet thought to Hamlet’s position and what he endures, one will realize that he is not demented, but he is actually an angry, betrayed and emotionally devastated fatherless son.
Hamlet is one of the most often-performed and studied plays in the English language. The story might have been merely a melodramatic play about murder and revenge, butWilliam Shakespeare imbued his drama with a sensitivity and reflectivity that still fascinates audiences four hundred years after it was first performed. Hamlet is no ordinary young man, raging at the death of his father and the hasty marriage of his mother and his uncle. Hamlet is cursed with an introspective nature; he cannot decide whether to turn his anger outward or in on himself. The audience sees a young man who would be happiest back at his university, contemplating remote philosophical matters of life and death. Instead, Hamlet is forced to engage death on a visceral level, as an unwelcome and unfathomable figure in his life. He cannot ignore thoughts of death, nor can he grieve and get on with his life, as most people do. He is a melancholy man, and he can see only darkness in his future—if, indeed, he is to have a future at all. Throughout the play, and particularly in his two most famous soliloquies, Hamlet struggles with the competing compulsions to avenge his father’s death or to embrace his own. Hamlet is a man caught in a moral dilemma, and his inability to reach a resolution condemns himself and nearly everyone close to him.
Like all Shakespearean tragedies, Hamlet’s ending is no different in end-result. Hamlet’s separation from society and his self-imposed confusion caused by over-thinking results in the unnecessary deaths of most of the major characters. In turn, Hamlet’s pre-occupation with factors inessential to his mission of revenge slows down his action. It is this internal struggle that illustrates the intensity and complexity of Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, something that is often looked at from a psychological perspective.