A person’s setting can tell you a lot about why they do certain things or behave a certain way. What’s taboo to us is normal to them. Their time and surroundings set the scene. Hamlet by William Shakespeare is set in Denmark during the late medieval time period: a time of dominant monarchies, a time of war. All of which plays into why the characters behave the way they do. They’re power hungry and hold a grudge like no other. Why? Social status, social status was everything throughout this time period, before this time period and very much after this time period. Thus they slaughtered each other and executed their tasks in secrecy, in hopes they would not be subject to the wrath of the one they wronged, to move up the social ladder. Throughout the time of kings and queens people struggled to climb the social ladder, not caring who they hurt in the climb to gain power. The power struggle that remained prominent throughout the ages is the underlying cause of most tragic events in Hamlet.
Ambition is the desire for power, honor, fame, wealth and the will to do anything to obtain them. Claudius is full of ambition and commits nefarious acts against his own family to gain power. In Act one; Scene five, Hamlet has been blessed by the presence of his father’s ghost. King Hamlet, who is absolutely irate, tells Hamlet exactly how he died. Murdered, more specifically poisoned, by his brother in his sleep. Not only did Claudius murder him but he robbed him “Of life, of crown, of queen.” All of these are things he viciously snatched from King Hamlet to fulfill ambitious life style. Although in Denmark the people elect their king Claudius is of royal blood, he knows the ins and outs of governing a body of people, thus possibly the reason...
... middle of paper ...
...th until it consumed its maker.
Ambition can be a good thing; however too much ambition can be deadly. In this case it was extremely deadly. The establishment of social statuses gave people a reason, not a justified reason, but a reason to step on others to move up the social ladder. Claudius murdered his brother for his crown. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern betray their best friend Hamlet, because he would have been the downfall of them. Too much ambition eliminates morals and judgment. Too much ambition makes only one person important and that person is the person it has infected. Due to the deadly nature of an ambition overload the ending result in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet was death of the royal family. The determination of Claudius to get to the top of the social ladder fell through and brought him and everybody associated with him down with him.
All the tragedies in Hamlet were because of a single man and his ambitions, greed and fear, which led him down a dark path. There are seven deadly sins, which all humans have: Wrath, Greed, Sloth, Pride, Lust, Envy and Gluttony. Claudius had three major “sins,” which led him down a dark path, and led him and many other people to their early deaths. His three major “sins” were Envy, Greed and Lust. Claudius’s ambitions, desires and fear are responsible for all the tragedy and chaos in Hamlet.
Hamlet is a normal person which brillant ideas. He waited so long to kill Claudius because he wanted people to be able to know the story of really happened and did not want to seem like a bad guy. Hamlet’s soliloquy, “To be or not to be” (Act 3,Scene 1 Line 64) also means should he live to do as his father or or die to betray him. Hamlet knew everything that was going on in the kingdom but wanted to act as if he did not to get even further in and have more information. He did this because he wanted to think a more brilliant plan to kill Claudius and anyone else that was dealing with it, that is how he killed
Let us look at Claudius. Claudius is devious and intelligent, but also selfish. Claudius kills his brother, the King, to gain social, political, and economic power. “Of those effects for which I did the murder: My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen.” (3.3.Lines) Claudius from a Marxist point of view would be looked at as a figure who was been corrupted in his craving for political power. In fear and to protect his power, Claudius convinces Hamlets friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, to spy on Hamlet to make sure he goes to England. “By letters congruing to that effect, The present death of Hamlet. Do it, England, For like the hectic in my blood he
This is demonstrated through the admiration of the people in Denmark and how he was well liked and respected keeping the chain intact. The murder of Hamlet’s father disrupted the Chain of Being as killing a King is a huge violation since they are the highest in the chain directly under angels. This allows the audience to feel this sympathy for Hamlet because losing someone in the Elizabethan era, who is near the top of the Chain of Being like a king, is able to make the audience feel Hamlet’s sadness and mourning. As well, the audience would believe that there would be a vast impact on the kingdom. Also, in the speech, Hamlet talks about how he needs to be serious and take action when he says, "Oh, from this time forth/My thoughts be bloody, or be worth nothing!” (IV. iv. 64-65). This shows that Hamlet’s thoughts on wanting to start planning Claudius’s death lets the audience feel that
Claudius' Greed for power is to blame for all the tragedies in the play Hamlet. Claudius was jellous of his brother and did go through exstemes inorder to gain power through greed. Relying on others was another tragedy. Polonius' death was not the fault of Claudius' greed. Hamlet killed Polonius. Don't assume because assuming lead to sticky situalions. Nevertheless, Hamlet was obsessed with killing Claudius because Claudius had killed his father and Hamlet wanted to seek his father's revenge. Keep your nose out of other people's buisness and find another solution to making your fatther proud. The bottom line is that Claudius craved power fortune and lust therefore leading to corruption, greed, jeallousy, and death.
In other words, he displays the natural rise and fall of a deceiver. As the illusionist and criminal, Claudius is the owner of secrets he wishes would never be discovered since the throne isn’t the only thing at risk for him. To understand Claudius, one must understand that the severity of his crime comes at the price of his own head. In effect, this is Shakespeare hinting at the idea that the illusionist will eventually hurt himself through his own illusions. In the beginning, Claudius acts like a true noble king. To most characters he was of strong character and perhaps he only took the throne because he was told to since nothing was out of nature. However, as he quickly realizes that Hamlet knows of his faults, Claudius’ character makes a sharp turn in personality. This is shown through the way he addresses Hamlet. Before the meta-theatre occurs, Claudius is shown to be comfortable in addressing Hamlet, the son of the man he murdered, as his own; “But now, my cousin Hamlet, and my son—" (1.2.64). In comparison, as his fear begins to further develop into paranoia, he begins to address Hamlet as not his own child, but Gertrude’s child as he asks, “Where is your son?” (4.1.3). By doing this Claudius attempts to end relations with Hamlet physically and mentally. In spite of that, that didn’t seem to be enough for Claudius. In addition to considering Hamlet an enemy,
I believe envy to be the cause of the multiple tragedy’s in this play. Before Claudius could’ve been greedy or even act on his greed, he would’ve had to have been envious of his brother first. As it turns out he was jealous enough to kill him, “Upon my secure hour thy uncle stole, with juice of cursed hebona in a vial, and in the porches of my ears did pour the leprous distillment” (257). Claudius was jealous of his brothers money and title, not to mention he was coveting the queen as well. It could also be said that once Claudius took the throne that Hamlet may’ve been experiencing some jealousy of his own over the crown. Along with Hamlet’s plot to seek revenge over his father’s murder, he very well could’ve been seeking his
Both Claudius and Hamlet are similar in many ways. They both have trouble taking action and are very indecisive. This can be seen when Claudius wants to pray and repent for his sins but has trouble praying because he does not want to give up everything that he has gained from that sin. He refuses to let everyone know that it was in fact him that killed the king and deal with the consequences that would follow, like him losing the power and respect he gained from being king. This indecisiveness can also be seen in Hamlet when he has trouble deciding whether to avenge his father’s death or if Claudius even killed his father. Even though the ghost of his father came to him and told Hamlet that Claudius poisoned him to take his position as king, Hamlet has trouble acting
...ble that someday the legendary cultural baggage that accompanies Hamlet will be lost, and future generations may wish to judge the play on its dramatic merits and not on its required-reading position. If that is the case, they may very well "make" the play "bad" through their different perspective, one which we cannot yet appreciate, and Hamlet, already four centuries old, may disappear from our cultural consciousness. As the prince himself might say, perish the thought.
Hamlet lives in a country of different worlds. At the time, Denmark was in a state of transition between three metaphysical worlds; the heroic world, where a man's honour was foremost, killing was not accepted but expected, might was power, the Machiavellian world, an amoral world where politics and mind games were employed ruthlessly, the ends justified the means, and the Christian world of love and forgiveness. Hamlet was a Christian living in a dying Heroic world which was succumbing to the Machiavellian world. Hamlet's father, King Hamlet, belonged to the heroic world, and so for him revenge was of the utmost importance, shown by the fact that "but two months" (1:2, 136) after his death he returned to instruct Hamlet to avenge his murder. Hamlet's disgust at his mother's marriage to his uncle before "the salt of most unrighteous tea...
Ambition is a force of driving passion, one which inherently connotes neither a sense of right or wrong, the flavour of the ambition is defined by the selfish- or selflessness of the intent. In Hamlet, Shakespeare draws focus mostly upon the malevolent face of ambition, which arises from greed, lust, ignorance, and fury. Through this exploration of ambition and its effects, Hamlet encapsulates the cause of suffering, as Claudius’ act of regicide is the first boulder in a terrible rockslide of woe and madness which ensues. While this tale may be fiction, it teaches the very true nature of suffering, and coerces the audience to reflect on the effects of their actions, and to take responsibility for the pain and suffering which happens around them. Every instance of sorrow and death which arises throughout the play can be traced back to the original coup d’état of King Hamlet, exemplifying how deeply corruption can effect one’s surroundings. Although, just as the first drop of water into a vase cannot be defined as the one responsible for filling it1, the ambition of others – mainly Hamlet and Laertes – also contribute to the suffering of the royal community.
The motivation behind his act of killing his brother in the first place is told by MB where “Gertrude is uppermost in [his] mind It is to possess her that he has killed his brother. He enumerates the prizes of his crime: ‘My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen.’ The queen is at the top of the series.” (185) Claudius is motivated by his greed for power and for the love of a person that he previously could not have to commit the first crime to trigger the order of events after. In addition to this his “trick of sending Hamlet to England” (AT 142) is motivated by the fear of Hamlet being after him because he knew that Hamlet was suspicious of him. As many know, the tables turn when Hamlet returns to Denmark and reveals to Horatio that he actually sent Guildenstern and Rosencrantz to their deaths. This is act is motivated by his will to of course, return and do what he need to do, not thinking of the consequences that will result in the death of his two previous friends. Throughout the entirety of the play, “revenge remains the dominant motive,” (AT 170) so the motivation to take “revenge by a son for a father that is directed by the latter’s ghost,” is the first motivation that can be seen within the play. As Hamlet continues to try and “assure us that he has strength and means [to take revenge],
Claudius will do absolutely anything to keep him in his position because he knows Hamlet wants to kill him. The only way for Claudius to get away with killing King Hamlet was to act torn up about the tragedy and to take over as king to make it look like he was doing his best to cover up his sin by becoming king. He was not even supposed to be king, Hamlet was next in line, but Claudius took over before Hamlet even had a chance to take over his father’s place. Claudius takes over Denmark because he desires control, so he does not give Hamlet a chance to take his rightful place as king.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragedy that revolves around three central themes. These themes are death, betrayal, and revenge. In order to both advance the plot and produce character motivations, Shakespeare uses a plethora of literary devices; including foreshadowing, imagery, symbolism, and indirect characterization. These devices have the additional effect of conveying a sense of suspense and danger, while also offering psychological insight into the characters’ minds.