Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical views of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Adaptive leadership is an approach to command based on the situation and factors such as mission, Soldier capabilities, geography, weaponry, and more. This ‘reality on the ground’ approach to leadership can give you as an Army leader both a strategic and a tactical ( ).” Winston Churchill was an adaptive leader in London during World War II. Prime Minister Churchill was a key part in the Allies victory over the Axis power due to his ability to rally not only his countryman but also rally the leader of another nation such as the United States or Russia into fighting Hitler. It’s evident what type of leader he was by just this one quote “To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.” Prime Minister Churchill exemplifies the characteristics and factors of adaptive leadership. He was like an Old English Bulldog -, resilient, and driven. …show more content…
Winston Churchill was a driven leader.
He had a goal in his mind and he was going to do whatever it took to accomplish that goal. “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.” He was driven to save the British Isles from the hand of Hitler. His internal motivation to save his country is like a bulldog they may be stubborn and arrogant, but will stop at nothing to protect his family. He was key in getting the U.S. involved in World War II and securing aid from the U.S in the lend Lease Act which provided the good need to fight a war like gun, planes, and other supplies ammunition to Britain, Russia, and China. If Winston Churchill failed in this time period, Britain would have certainly fall, but the entire World was at risk of falling. Mr. Churchill was only madly driven; he was as tough as they
come. Winston Churchill also showed how to be resilient during hard times. “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.” Mr. Churchill could have easily sundered like his French counterpart but instead he fought back. Hitler’s plan were to destroy Royal Air Force bases, but the Luftwaffe failed to do any substantial damage; after eight weeks of utter failure Hitler turned his sight toward the British people. Where the Luftwaffe dropped nearly thirty thousand ordnances killing over six thousand people and injuring well over twelve thousand people nevertheless Mr. Churchill kept fighting the good fight for not just Britain but for the world. Mr. Churchill was not only resilient but he was very confident in the Allies and that they would eventually win. Mr. Churchill embodied Adaptive Leaderships Characteristics of being resilient and driven when faced with adversity. His internal motivation and his compulsion for better world without a leader lead him to be the type of leader he was able to become. He was really able to understand the environment that he is place in and be able to act accordingly; he was also able command Britain on factor of troop and the limited resource that he had.
Winston Churchill was a British prime minister from 1940-1945. Churchill was a statesman, orator, and author, most importantly he was a great leader. He is best remembered for successfully leading Britain through World War II. He held authentic, and inspiring speeches in attempt to keep his country’s spirits up. In which he succeeded.
Like I said before, he uses his words to paint a picture of everything, which leads to manipulation. Using detailed descriptions, Churchill is able to manipulate everyone who watched or listened to his speech. The tone of seriousness that Churchill uses hypnotized some people, as well as his words did. He uses words to manipulate people into actually realizing how bad Hitler is, and what the Nazis planned to do. “Behind all this glare, behind all this storm, I see that a small group of villainous men who plan, organize, and launch their cataract of horrors upon mankind” (Churchill). Furthermore, Churchill was very well-respected in Britain, and was given the name “the British bulldog” for his work ethic and fearlessness. People believed what he was saying because of his reputation, along with the details and language he provided. He used everything he could, and this led to powerful manipulation from
Winston Churchill was born unexpectedly at Blenheim Palace, a country house in Woodstock, Oxfordshire. He was the youngest son of Randolph Churchill and Jennie Churchill. Addison stated, “Winston’s father, Lord Randolph Churchill, was a younger son of the seventh duke of Marlborough, a substantial Tory statesman who had held office under Disraeli” (Addison 8). His father was a successful man. Addison added, “His mother, Jennie Churchill, was the daughter of a New York financier, Leonard Jerome, and his wife Clara” (Addison 7). He did not spend much time with his parents. Addison comments, “Neither of Churchill’s parents lacked affection for Winston, but they saw little of him and he felt profoundly neglected” (Addison 11). His parents were pushy and did not think much of him. Winston Churchill had two brothers, one of which was a bad person and the other was calm. The author describes the oldest brother, George, by stating, “He scandalized contemporaries with his adulterous affairs, sold off the Blenheim art collection, and died in his laboratory at Blenheim ‘with a terrible expression on his face” (Addison 9). Winston Churchill’s oldest brother had a bad history that he was known for. Winston Churchill had a wife name Clementine Hozier. He proposed to his wife at Blenheim Palace and they had five children. Clementine Hozier supported him through all of his fights and elections. However, Winston Churchill was a big achiever during his lifetime. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for Literature in 1953. He achieved many goals, such as being a soldier, politician, prime minister and writer. Winston Churchill knew that he was capable of failing and when he did, he did not let that stop him from being successful. He was one of the world’s ...
Through his speeches, he tried to persuade America to join in the fight against the growing power if Nazism. One of his speeches are “The Lights Are Going Out”. He said this speech in 1938, to the people of the United States. The purpose of his speech was to encourage the US to join forces with Britain to overtake Nazi Germany. The subject of his speech is the loss of other countries, and America joining the war, and the tone of the speech is urgency. Churchill’s word choices in his speech “The Lights Are Going Out” are effective through his use of rhetoric and vocal techniques.
During the twentieth century, there were many people, some well known and others not so well known, who contributed to society in one way or another. When determining which one of these people was the biggest contributor to society during the twentieth century, and, therefore, the person of the twentieth century, their lives as a whole should be taken into consideration. In addition to contributing much to society in various ways, the best candidate for person of the century should also have had struggles and experiences that they overcame or went through and from which they learned. Winston Churchill is the person who contributed the most to society during the twentieth century and made it what it is today.
She utilized the “Creator Trait” from “Team Dynamics” when addressing the issue of strikers preventing those who wanted to work from doing so. She used the “Full Range Leadership” “Transformational Leadership” trait of “Individualized Consideration” when a member of her team needed additional coaching on speaking to the media. Margaret Thatcher was also an “Ethical Leader”. Her conviction to the “Critical Thinking” characteristic “Free Thinking” paved the way for Great Brittan’s economic recovery. Her ability to “Discern, Declare, and Do” turned Great Brittan’s economic woes around. On a much smaller scale, I was able to employ the “Visionary Leadership” trait “Individualized Consideration” when encouraging one of my members to volunteer. I was also able to use the “Ethical Leadership” principle of “Discern, Declare, and Do” to respond to a Staff Sergeant’s appointment request in an ethical manner. Margaret Thatcher was definitely a visionary and ethical leader. Even though the odds were stacked against her, with visionary and ethical leadership skills, Margaret Thatcher was able to successfully resolve both the union and financial crisis of Great
He was enabled to adopt a vision and concentrate on the bigger picture that eventually helped claim a strong victory for his nation. Although some felt that Churchill was a ruthless leader that didn’t take no for answer was able to perform his democrat leader duties not even from a totalitarian dictator could stand his way. With his communication skills, innovation and trustworthiness made his followers strongly believe in him and eventually becoming the one of the greatest leader in history. Despite Churchill being considered to be a ruthless leader, he knew what Hitler was doing was completely wrong and was able to put an end to
By examining Churchill’s use of rhetoric we can see what exactly made him such a great leader. His speeches were able to do more damage to the Nazis than any bomb could have done because his language rallied the people together. His use of repetition proved his points and reminded the country of what mattered most. His descriptive words helped build up anger against the Nazi rule and persuade everyone to pull through the tough times. He used pronouns in such a way that it would personalize everything and help unify his country. Through his unique use of words Churchill was able to convince many that if they could just endure that they would at last be victorious (Bungay).
Leaders posses a variety of personality traits, but there are only a few traits that define a great leader.
Winston Churchill spoke these words at the House Commons; his way of talking to people was a power which he held. Winston Churchill was born November, 30 1874, in Blenheim Palace. He was born into a wealthy family who treated Winston to a rich lifestyle. In 1893 Churchill entered the Royal Military College as a cadet, from here on he rose to the top ranks commanded with great authority. He began to have political speeches at the age of 23 when he talked to the primrose League. When he was 24 he wrote his first book entitled The Story of the Malakand Field Force. Churchill was elected to the House of Commons at the age of 26, being one of the youngest members. Winston was appointed Prime Minister of England on May 10th 1940. Winston’s 2 books that were published shows people that he is a respectable author who people can believe what he says during his speeches. In this speech Winston was talking to the members of the House of Commons, but this speech was more than trying to persuade elected officials, it was intended to speak to all people fighting against the Nazi Party. The purpose of this speech was to show the members of Commons that we must fight in this war and we must win, for if England shall lose the rest of the world would lose.
... of a good life. Leaders should answer the questions of the future and allow others to contribute what they have and to use vision to shape tactical decisions. According to Churchill, taking a leadership position means having a vision of what can be done and accomplished within a span of time. One should be committed to the goals and to the people that he or she leads. A leader must be responsible for the achievement of the objectives and the welfare of the followers. One should be in a position to take risks and accept failures whenever they occur and accept recognition for both.
We are likely to find that they all had the gift of intellect, and they all used that gift to achieve their goals. Without such intellect, these leaders likely couldn't have lead. Winston Churchill is widely regarded as a World War Two hero, and one of the leaders of the allied movement. His great strategy, and his ability to convince others to unite under his strategy, lead the allies to victory. Winston's ability to create brilliant tactics, and to sell those tactics to others, come from his intellect. He was smart enough to strategize, and smart enough to give powerful speeches that gave him a wide following. Great speeches are a product of intellect, showing that Churchill could not have accomplished the things that he did without such
Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Leadership theory will be discussed in relation to IT governance. De Haes, Van Grembergen and Debreceny (2013) formulate the main ideas of IT governance have only been around 20 years, but, the amount of literature is copious and is still providing a prolific amounts of current documentation. Both Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Leadership represent appropriate and critical leadership styles for organizations that strive to keep the pace of continuous technological advancements and that are focused on the rapid adoption of new business concepts and process improvements (Xenikou & Simosi, 2006). The specific benefits and problems associated with each leadership style have organizational opportunities and difficulties. The timing of each leadership style when applied requires timing and cooperation. Yet they both have similar operational goals, to improve the processes of IT governance using the innate strengths of each leadership style for the betterment of the organization. Knowing the strengths of each leadership style facilitate implementation, mastering the pitfalls of each leadership style improves metacognitive understanding of the risks and weaknesses involved in the process.
An effective leader adapts changes and communicates his vision to his followers until the followers believe in that vision as their own
Winsotn Churchill was dedicated to his work and had a strong will. He is the