Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Global social inequality
Social inequality and global inequality
Social inequality and global inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Wilkinson & Pickett, (W&P) assert that society on the whole would be healthier, more successful and happier if the gap between the affluent and the poor was tightened. The ‘Spirit Level Book’, written by them in 2010, is one of the most influential books on social policy to date and it argues that not only does inequality affect the ones down the bottom of the ladder but everyone across the board. Affluent countries perform better when social indicators are more equal across society. This essay will assess the validity of Wilkinson & Pickett’s conclusions by comparing the works of authors that support similar arguments, to the work of authors who disagree with them. A comparison of these different approaches, with a critical look at what and how inequality is being measured reveals that there is no definite answer to the problems raised by Wilkinson and Pickett, although many of their statements are valid.
Supporting arguments/authors
Wilkinson and Pickett draw on a broad range of elements such as, health and wealth, income, mental well being and homicide in order to make their argument. They measure health and happiness in relation to people’s income and they find that in every society rich people on average tend to be happier and healthier than poorer people in the same societies
Furthermore, Wilkinson and Pickett (2010) argue that health and social problems are worse in more unequal societies. Because of inequality, poverty, social exclusion with the underclass and their welfare dependency, life expectancy is less, mental illness and drug use is high and educational success and social mobility is limited. Data about the United States’ society also finds a correlation between lower death rates and higher incomes, a core t...
... middle of paper ...
...icy, Cambridge: Policy Press.
Deaton, A. (2003). “Health, Inequality, and Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Literature. 41(1), 113-158.
Gadrey, J. and Catrice, F,J. (2006). The new indicators of well-being and development. New York::Palgrave Macmillan.
McKay, S. (2010). Where do we stand on inequality? Reflections on resent research and its implications. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. (18), 19-33.
Rowlingson, K. ( 2011). Does inequality cause Health and Social Problems? Birmingham: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Snowdon, J, C. (2010). The Spirit Level Delusion: Fact-checking the Left's New Theory of Everything. London : Little Dice.
Stiglitz, J. E. Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J,P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives. New York: The New Press.
Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.
Economic inequality and injustice come in the same hand. Poor people are more likely to experience inequality and injustice. The negative assumptions of poor people are created by the media and politicians. Promoting economic justice by offering people living in poverty some form of social support. Barbara Ehrenreich found in her experiment the workforce for low-wage was difficult. Conley talks about the different types of social inequalities and how they have been unsuccessful.
Falconer, D. (2013, November 5). 'Theme 5: Work’ Lecture conducted in 'Introduction to Social Justice, 38-101' from the University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario.
People in lower classes are more likely to get sicker more often and to die quicker. People in metro Louisville reveal 5- and 10-year gaps in life expectancy between the city’s rich, middle- and working-class neighborhoods. Those who live in the working class neighborhood face more stressors like unpaid bills, jobs that pay little to nothing, unsafe living conditions, and the fewest resources available to help them, all of these contribute to the health issues.
Darity William A. Inequality, Gender." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Ed. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. 624-627. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 1 Dec. 2013.
Raphael, D. D. (2002). Poverty, Income Inequality and Health in Canada. CSJ Foundation for Research and Education, 1-32.
Working Group on Inequalities in Health (1982) Inequalities in Health (The Black Report), London, HMSO, 1982.
Louis P. Pojman and Robert Westmoreland, eds., Equality: Selected Readings (New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 1997), 33.
Ungen, M. M., Siegel, M. M., & Lauterbach, K. W. (2011). Could inequality in health be cured
Lynch, David J. - "The 'Standard'" How Inequality Hurts the Economy. Bloomberg Business Week. Bloomberg, 16 Nov. 2011. Web. The Web.
One reason described to be a cause of happiness is income. Don Peck and Ross Douthat indicate how, “National income appears to be one of the best single predictors of overall well-being, explaining perhaps 40 percent of the difference in contentment among nations” (352). With this statement, comes the explanation of how income can influence happiness in adults who strive to earn a living. Research illustrates how, “For individual countries, with few exceptions, self-reported happiness has increased as incomes have risen” (Douthat 352). While these two statements provide sufficient evidence for the reason of income bringing happiness, income itself is not relevant.
Pettinger, Tejvan. The “Pros and Cons of Inequality.” Economics Help. 18 Oct. 2011. Web.
It seems that economic inequality in the US is one of the most debated topics in politics today. Throughout the years, the numbers of those who suffer from
Capeheart, L., Milovanovic, D. (2007). Social Justice: Theories, Issues and Movements. USA: Rutgers University Press
Kasser first shows that people who are rich are not necessarily happier than those who are not rich, provided ba...
There were three reasons for the existence of a weak relationship between subjective well-being and indicators of well-being such as income and consumption, first, a person is much more than a consumer; second, the role of heterogeneity in human perceptions; and third, the existence of heterogeneity in purposes of life. The understanding of poverty would be better served by a concept of human well-being which incorporates subjective well-being indicators and which is based on the wholeness and complexity of human beings. It is reasonable to accept that a poor person is one whose well-being is low; poverty depends on the specific concept of human well-being (Kahneman et al. 1999; Argyle 2002)