Wiesel Rhetorical Analysis

647 Words2 Pages

Along with rhetorical appeals, Wiesel also uses many rhetorical devices such as parallelism and anaphora. Wiesel depicts parallelism when he says, “to fight fascism, to fight dictatorship, to fight Hitler” (Wiesel lines 103-104). The parallelism and anaphora, in the quote, provide emphasis on the discrimination and abuse that has taken place around the world. Repeating the same initial phrase shows the significance of the words Wiesel is speaking. Wiesel mentions the victims of this extreme tragedy when he states,” for the children in the world, for the homeless for the victims of injustice, the victims of destiny and society.” (Wiesel lines 17-19). This use of anaphora and parallelism emphasize the amount of people the Holocaust has affected and impacted. The parallelism being used adds value to his opinions and balances the list of people Wiesel is making in his speech. …show more content…

Wiesel uses alliteration when he says, “the political prisoner in his cell, the hungry children, the homeless refugees” (Wiesel lines 73-74). This use of alliteration helps the audience to visualize the setting Wiesel was referring to. Meanwhile, antithesis is used to show different roles throughout the concentration camp. Wiesel displays antithesis when he states, “In the place I come from, society was composed of three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders” (Wiesel lines 53-54). Wiesel references the killers, victims, and bystanders to demonstrate the main theme of

Open Document