Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of the holocaust
Social impacts of the holocaust
The lasting impact of the holocaust
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of the holocaust
Along with rhetorical appeals, Wiesel also uses many rhetorical devices such as parallelism and anaphora. Wiesel depicts parallelism when he says, “to fight fascism, to fight dictatorship, to fight Hitler” (Wiesel lines 103-104). The parallelism and anaphora, in the quote, provide emphasis on the discrimination and abuse that has taken place around the world. Repeating the same initial phrase shows the significance of the words Wiesel is speaking. Wiesel mentions the victims of this extreme tragedy when he states,” for the children in the world, for the homeless for the victims of injustice, the victims of destiny and society.” (Wiesel lines 17-19). This use of anaphora and parallelism emphasize the amount of people the Holocaust has affected and impacted. The parallelism being used adds value to his opinions and balances the list of people Wiesel is making in his speech. …show more content…
Wiesel uses alliteration when he says, “the political prisoner in his cell, the hungry children, the homeless refugees” (Wiesel lines 73-74). This use of alliteration helps the audience to visualize the setting Wiesel was referring to. Meanwhile, antithesis is used to show different roles throughout the concentration camp. Wiesel displays antithesis when he states, “In the place I come from, society was composed of three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders” (Wiesel lines 53-54). Wiesel references the killers, victims, and bystanders to demonstrate the main theme of
Throughout his novel, Night, Wiesel’s use of figurative language paints a picture of the emotional impact on the Jews to help the reader visualize how traumatizing the Holocaust is for the prisoners. One type of figurative language Wiesel uses throughout this novel are metaphors. The first example is during the trip the trip to the concentration camps of Auschwitz on the cattle cars. Aboard the car that Wiesel is also on is an old lady named Mrs. Schächter. Wiesel establishes that Mrs. Schächter is becoming mad, when she shouts, “‘Jews, listen to me,’ she cried. ‘I see a fire! I see flames, huge flames!’ It was as though she were possessed by some evil spirit” (Wiesel 25). Wiesel uses a metaphor here to help the reader visualize how mad she
He conveys a powerful message using pathos: “There was… suffering and loneliness in the concentration camps that defies imagination. Cut off from the world with no refuge anywhere, sons watched helplessly their fathers being beaten to death. Mothers watched their children die of hunger.” Diction like “loneliness”, “defies imagination”, and “helplessly” create a solemn and helpless tone. It evokes vivid imagery, a tragic scene of death and despair. The juxtaposition of children, this idea of youth and innocence, and death evokes pity from the audience. With this in mind, Reagan would feel guilty if he forced the Jewish people to relive their suffering by going to the Bitburg cemetery. Wiesel then appeals to Reagan’s ethos. They both share a common goal – to attain reconciliation, and to do so, they “must work together with them and with all people” to “bring peace and understanding to a tormented world that… is still awaiting
In Elie Wiesel’s Night, he recounts his horrifying experiences as a Jewish boy under Nazi control. His words are strong and his message clear. Wiesel uses themes such as hunger and death to vividly display his days during World War II. Wiesel’s main purpose is to describe to the reader the horrifying scenes and feelings he suffered through as a repressed Jew. His tone and diction are powerful for this subject and envelope the reader. Young readers today find the actions of Nazis almost unimaginable. This book more than sufficiently portrays the era in the words of a victim himself.
One rhetorical feature that Elie Wiesel uses effectively is pathos. By including the story of the young boy and his journey, the audience gets a sense of somberness about the events that took place and the situations the Jews were put into. When the young boy says, “Tell me, what have you done with my future? What have you done with your life?” he is questioning Wiesel about the impact he has made in the world. Those questions make the audience wonder what they have done to help the oppressed and all those who have perished. This part of the speech makes the audience feel a sense of grief so strong, that they are moved to help him in his fight against the people who have forgotten and the people who have stayed silent.
One of the most significant metaphors occurs at the end of the novel. Shortly after Eliezer is rescued from the concentration camp, he sees his reflection for the first time since he has been invaded by the Nazis. Wiesel states in his novel, “He looks in the mirror and sees the face of a corpse staring back at him” (Tackach 3980). This is an extremely powerful message as Wiesel is demonstrating how the soul of every Jew died from what they experienced during the Holocaust. Most Jews could never look at themselves as the same person again. Wiesel uses this metaphor to illustrate the significant change that the concentration camps caused to each victim
to the dehumanization of the Jews. He uses descriptive adjectives to shed light on what is truly happening. He also uses irony to help the reader understand the cluelessness of himself and the Jews. Wiesel’s way of writing in the book demonstrates the theme of dehumanization through false
He says, “These failures have cast a dark shadow over humanity: two World Wars, countless civil wars, the senseless chain of assassinations,... so much violence; so much indifference.” (4). Indifference is shown by not only the people involved in these violent events, but also Wiesel’s audience as well, many clueless of these events. For one to fail to know and understand these events in order to stop and bring awareness to them is just as wrong as committing the event in the first place, according to Wiesel. One must also believe the event itself to escape the corruptive qualities of indifference. During the Holocaust, many did not believe what was happening and chose to then ignore it rather than do anything about it. The unaware audience and people in the 1940s thoroughly proves the corrosiveness of
In Wiesel’s speech tone is one of the most vital components established throughout his purpose. By using several different tones varying from sympathetic, to disappointment, to doubt, to anger Wiesel is able to captivate the audience to listen to his words while not being dogmatic or forcing the audience to disregard his purpose. The multiple tone shifts affect the reader in many ways so that the reader and audience is able to gain a new perspective without being yelled at or scorned for what they have done. In Wiesel’s speech tone is a key factor in keeping the audience intrigued so that he may present his purpose of the danger indifference and how it casts a dark shadow upon a society. By doing this, tonal shifts allow Wiesel to bash the
Throughout the memoir, Wiesel demonstrates how oppression and dehumanization can affect one’s identity by describing the actions of the Nazis and how it changed the Jewish people’s outlook on life. Wiesel’s identity transformed dramatically throughout the narrative. “How old he had grown the night before! His body was completely twisted, shriveled up into itself. His eyes were petrified, his lips withered, decayed.
The tone of the novel is greatly influenced through the fact that the story is autobiographical. There seems to be only one agenda utilized by Elie Wiesel in regards to the tone of the story as he presents the information for the readers’ evaluation. The point of the story is to provide the reader with an emotional link to the horror of the Holocaust through the eyes of one who experienced those horrors. Wiesel speaks from a distance that is often found in autobiographies. He presents the facts as to what he saw, thought, and felt during those long years in the camps.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
The tragedies of the holocaust forever altered history. One of the most detailed accounts of the horrific events from the Nazi regime comes from Elie Wiesel’s Night. He describes his traumatic experiences in German concentration camps, mainly Buchenwald, and engages his readers from a victim’s point of view. He bravely shares the grotesque visions that are permanently ingrained in his mind. His autobiography gives readers vivid, unforgettable, and shocking images of the past. It is beneficial that Wiesel published this, if he had not the world might not have known the extent of the Nazis reign. He exposes the cruelty of man, and the misuse of power. Through a lifetime of tragedy, Elie Wiesel struggled internally to resurrect his religious beliefs as well as his hatred for the human race. He shares these emotions to the world through Night.
Through a wide variety of rhetorical devices the orator, Wiesel, attempts to instill a form of guilt into his audience, as he makes his desperate plea to the American people, and to the president, to take a stand against the great evil he witnessed. Wiesel uses apostrophe, juxtaposition, and causal analysis to ensure he effectively drives his message home. He implements them each in their own way to ensure the necessary ethos and pathos is built so that Mr. Wiesel can sway his audience to his opinion, and ultimately encourage them cancel visit to Bitburg, achieving his final rhetorical goal.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
In the writing one is taken through Elie Wiesel's journey as a Jew in the Holocaust; which, is one of the greatest platforms to inhumanity there has ever been. There are many aspect of the Holocaust that are incomprehensible, but perhaps the most difficult to understand is how human beings could so callously slaughter human beings like they did. One could open to almost any page in the novel and see the inhuman treatment the Jews were put through by the Nazis. There was a moment in the book when they first arrived at the concentration camp where it can been seen on of the most cruel treatment of these simple human being took place. There were huge flames not far from where they were, they knew that something was being burned there. As the truck drew closer they were unloaded and all small children including babies were taken away and thrown into the fire. Elie saw this with his own two eyes and could not believe it was all happening to those innocent children (Wiesel 32). This was how Night demonstrated just how cruel these people were and how their cruelty breeds more cruelty. The Nazis thought this was all fine and what they were doing was for the better of their cause. How could they live with themselves treating human beings like they were nothing, not human at all. Elie had a hard time accepting that people could treat other people this what with such inhumanity. He simply states “I told him that I could not believe that human beings were being burned in our times, the world would never tolerate such crimes” (Weisel 33). His beliefs should has been correct how could the world tolerate what was happening to all of these human beings, these people. The world would not tolerate it thought, one might think, they just did not know what was happening to these people. As this is true to most of the world, they did not know what was happening to these people,