In the second half of the twentieth century, started a process of decolonization, first in Asia and then in Africa. In 1949, India was one of the first country to gain its independence, followed by Burma, Malaysia, and Ceylon. In Africa the decolonization started a few years later, first in Libya and Egypt, and in the rest of the continent afterwards. The main colonists were the Great Britain and France. The history has shown that Great Britain succeeded to decolonize generally in peace while France had much more problems to give up its colonies, which led to numerous conflicts opposing the colonists and the colonized. It has been the case especially in Algeria where a murderous war lasted almost eight years. The philosopher Frantz Fanon has studied the outbreak of this conflict as he was working in Algeria and he spent some time working on the question of colonialism, drawing the conclusion that violence was the only way to get rid of colonists. This essay will analyse who was Fanon and why he came to such a conclusion along with the reasons why it could be said that he is right ,and finally, the arguments against his statement. Finally, it will aim to prove that even though Fanon had valid points, diplomacy could have been for efficient and less tragic rather than his support to violence.
Frantz Fanon was born on July 20th 1925 in Fort-de-France, Martinique. His biographer, Alice Cherki (2000) wrote that being part of the middle-class, his childhood was relatively happy and privileged but things changed when French naval troops where blockaded in Martinique after the invasion of Nazis in France. Indeed inhabitants experienced a violent racism and the scorn of the sailors towards natives. It is the first negative experienc...
... middle of paper ...
...3), Fanon: The Postcolonial Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gordon, L. R. (1996), ‘Fanon’s Tragic Revolutionary Violence’ in Denean Sharpley-Whiting, T., Gordon, L. R. and White, R. T. (eds.) Fanon: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 297-308.
Hall, S. (1996), ‘The After-life of Frantz Fanon: Why Fanon? Why now? Why Black Skin, White Masks?’ in Read, A. (ed.) The Fact of Blackness, Frantz Fanon and Visual Representation. Seattle: Bay Press, pp. 12-37.
Taylor, C. (1997), ‘The politics of recognition’, in Heble, A., Palmateer Pennee, D. and Struthers, J. R. (eds.) New Contexts of Canadian Criticism. Peterborough: Broadview Press Ltd, pp. 25-73.
Gates, H. L. (1991), ‘Critical Fanonism’, Critical Inquiry, 17 (3), pp. 457-70, Chicago Journal [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/view/1343794 (Accessed: 10 March 2014).
Taras, D. (2001). Power and betrayal in the Canadian media (2nd ed.) Peterborough, ON:Broadview Press.
It is as if being color blind was an alternative, when history has proven differently. Nonetheless, the reality still remained that Hurston’s identity was undeniable in a world where color mattered, but her pride and acknowledgment stayed
Heberle, Mark. "Contemporary Literary Criticism." O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. Vol. 74. New York, 2001. 312.
1970, pp. 7-8. Rpt. In The Chelsea House Library of Literary Criticism. New York.:Chelsea House Publishers, 1988.
Thompson, John Herd, and Mark Paul Richard. "Canadian History in North American Context." In Canadian studies in the new millennium. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 37-64.
...y too followed Frantz Fanon’s ideals on decolonization, and in doing so sought liberation themselves.
Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., & Treichler, P. A. (1992). Representing whiteness in black imagination. Cultural studies (pp. 338-346). New York: Routledge.
Lumumba: Race and Revolution In the French film entitled Lumumba, director Raoul Peck recreates the revolutionary struggle of Patrice Lumumba, the newly elected Prime Minister of The Congolese Republic. In the movie, we do not see much of the independence struggle against the Belgian government, but we begin to see the reconstruction of the African state in African hands. While no one ever claimed that decolonization was easy, maybe this particular example can best be explained by Fanon’s simplified little quip “decolonization is always a violent phenomenon. ” In this paper, I will seek to locate where this post-colonial violence is located in discourses regarding race, class and gender.
Turner, Darwin T. “Visions of Love and Manliness in a Blackening World: Dramas of Black Life since 1953.” Paradigm Publishers 25.2 (1995): 2-12. JSTOR. Web. 22 Feb. 2014. .
Guerin, Wilford L. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1979.
Fanon start off his argument with describing how colonialism and decolonization are violent affairs. He describes the colonized and colonizer as old adversaries whose first meeting was rooted in violence and continued relationship was sustained at the point of a gun (Fanon, p. 2). He goes on to state that the colonized person is a fabricated person created by the colonizer and that the colonizer validates themselves, via wealth, through the colonial relationship. Decolonization, therefore, is the destruction of these fabrications and the liberation of ...
As almost anyone with the slightest knowledge of European history can tell you, the French and the British do not like each other. Some French and British people still hate each other today for issues that occurred 100 of years ago. So on top of the conflict that is already present between France and Great Britain there is a new one in the pursuit of gaining more land and power for one’s cou...
Ulam, Adam B. "The Convolutions of Terror." Ideologies and Illusions: Revolutionary Thought from Herzen to Solzhenitsyn. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1976. 311-20. Print.
... Ed. W. Gordon West and Ruth Morris. Toronto, Canada: A Canadian Scholar? Press, 2000.
Parker, Robert Dale. Critical Theory: A Reader for Literary and Cultural Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012 . Print.