Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kant on lying
After reading the articles about lying, I concluded that it would be difficult to determine if lying is always wrong or sometimes acceptable. The complexity of this concept, as well as the infinite possibilities of different situations, makes it almost impossible for someone to claim that lying is always wrong or leads to the same result because, in the end, we do not have the power to determine the exact consequences of our actions or what occurs in the future. Therefore, I believe that, unlike Kant, that lying is not always wrong. I also believed the Stein’s argument is not applicable because, while he provides examples to show that lying leads to no grave consequences, his theory not does properly generalize to all lies (Stein, 2016). In …show more content…
One specific context where I find lying to be acceptable is when it results in protecting the lives, or emotions, of many or few individuals. My belief closely aligns with Carl Wellman, a utilitarian who believes “lying is wrong except to save a human life or to spare hurt feelings over unimportant matters” (Johannesen, Valde & Whedbee, 2017, pg 102). For instance, Anne Frank and her family lived in a secret room, known as the secret annex, to avoid the Gestapo, the secret police of Nazi Germany, during the Holocaust. Miep Gies was aware of Frank’s hidden location, and she lied to the gestapo, when they visited the home to search for any Jewish people, in order protect the Frank family because they knew that, if the police became aware of the truth, the Frank family would be sent to concentration camps where they would be killed. I find Gies’ lies to be ethical because she wanted to protect the lives of the Frank family. I believe that, under the theory of virtue ethics, Gies’ lies would also be deemed ethical because a good character, with good judgement, would understand that the Holocaust was unethical, thus they would want to prevent others from suffering or dying (Neher & Sandin, 2017). However, Kant would claim that Gies was unethical because lying, no matter the context, is always wrong (Neher & Sandin,
Richard Gunderman and Stephanie Ericsson each have written a piece explaining the impacts of lying on society. In Gunderman’s article, “Is Lying Bad for Us?” he outlines the health effects of lying, and how there are serious “mental and physical consequences,” (Gunderman 1). Ericsson’s essay, “The Ways We Lie,” focuses more on the different types of lying, and how each has a different impact. Although Gunderman’s and Ericsson’s pieces of literature both relate to the negative impacts of lying, their different thoughts of how lying impacts society, including types, health, and solutions, outweigh their similarities.
With different views on when it is OK to lie, the people continue to debate. But personally, I respect Kant’s views on the idea that lying is bad. Lying weakens the purpose to serve justice, destroys the liars’s dignity, and messes up the records. But I think that rare situations justify lies. I believe lies to save someone's life or just to protect someone from a big danger is the only type of lie that is justified. Those situations are the only times I think it is OK to lie. It might seem that lying to get yourself out of trouble is a situation that makes the lie justified. But I think that is a selfish reason for your own good and that people are thinking less about the society and more about their own good. Lying to get out of trouble is one of those many lies that are not justified.
Stephanie Ericsson’s The Ways We Lie, analyzes and reflects on how lying has simply become the norm in our society. We all lie, there is not one person in the world that does not lie. Most people lie because they are afraid of telling the truth, however what they do not know is telling a lie can lead them in the wrong direction because many things can happen when lying to a person. The person can find out when everything unravels that person will not have trust in you and you would be known as a liar. To every action there is a consequence, so why not deal with just one consequence when telling the
Lying is simply an act of not telling the truth, and this definition of lying will be used in future sections of this paper. There are three groups of lies t...
Others believe that lying is okay, but only in circumstances where it better to tell a lie to prevent the consequences of the truth. These two views are very good examples of utilitarianism and Kant’s ethical views. Utilitarianism believes that as long as the actions of a person are for the greater good, or, greatest number of greatest amount of happiness is achieved, then the action is morally right. Kant’s theory is the opposite where there are certain types of actions that are never to be permissible (lying, cheating, murder, etc.). Kant believed that the wrongness or rightness of a person’s action does not depend on the consequences but whether they fulfill our duty. A duty is defined as the action that we are obligated to perform out of respect for the moral law. The moral law is the definition of good and evil and is our inner conviction of that we ought to do good. Kantian ethics teaches that the only truly good thing in this world without needing qualification is the good
Kant viewed lying as a moral atrocity and there were never any reasons to lie. In fact, Kant believed “ that lying under any circumstances is “the obliteration of one’s dignity as a human being.”” (Rachels 2016 p139) The second most important was Kent’s rule is based on no exceptions. In Kent’s eye’s if we accept lying even as an exception, we then embrace it as natural law and conclude lying is okay for any and all reasons. If people accepted lying as natural law, then no one would take anyone’s word seriously, thus creating a cycle of disorder throughout society and the cycle in which society operates.
Throughout life, people are faced with moral decisions that will impact not only themselves but also, the people they surround themselves with. One of these moral decisions people encounter daily is truthfulness in their actions and words. In Blackburn’s novel, “Being Good”, he states “It is not easy to find a stable attitude to the stringency of the prohibition of lying.” I agree with his quote because everyone tends to lie no matter the magnitude of the lie, in order to protect themselves and the people they care about. Although Blackburn believes it is only ethical to lie on occasion, German philosopher, Immanuel Kant affirms that lying is always morally wrong, no matter what the situation is. Though lying can be seen as a deplorable action,
The works of Shelly Kagan and Charles Fried will be studied in determining the wrongness of lying. The definition of lying will first be presented followed by the arguments as to why lying is perceived as wrong. It will then be argued that lying is not necessary wrong.
In society, some people are looked at as liars or “bullshitters,” as stated in the article, “Is Lying Bad for Us?” Honesty is not always the best policy, and in certain situations, liars are best not to tell the truth when protecting the innocent, or protecting oneself. Because of this, lying should be looked at as a standard in society and something that people recognize in every day life.
The right to lie predisposes the society to a place where an individual can lie in order to achieve his/her own desires while in complete disregard to other people’s interest. The Kantian principle seeks to ensure that people are treated respectfully as independent, rational, and moral beings. Through such kind of treatment, a person’s sense of dignity is respected and valued, which is an essential element of personhood. The right to lie violates the Kantian principle through deny a person the rational, moral, and independent choice of his/her essential personhood. Therefore, the right to lie should be denied in order to ensure that people are not treated as means of accomplishing some personal goals and desires at the expense of
There are many examples in history of lying to benefit others: the Underground Railroad, the Holocaust, or any revolution to overthrow unfair rule. Imagine the result of such events without the ability to lie. Picture a plantation owner inquiring as to the whereabouts of his slaves. Upon hearing a truthful response, he tracks down the slaves and all parties attempting to assist in their escape. They would then be made into examples for all, and the Underground Railroad would be rendered ineffective. This same concept can be applied to Nazi Germany, the Japanese Conquests of Eastern Asia, the establishment of the Unio...
Using Kantian philosophy a lie is always immoral and wrong, no matter what the situation is. Kantian ethics establishes the idea that good will be based on the action itself rather than outcome or any inclination one may have to perform an act could be good will.
He states that in no case should you lie (Bennett 2). What Kant focuses on is deontology, this focuses on duty-based ethics. What duty-based ethics consists of is, doing what you should do for the right reasons, your moral obligations (Bennett 2). Sometimes people will do something they know is right to do but, for the wrong reasons. Someone may save someone’s life because they know they will get money out of it while they should be doing it to save that person with or without a reward. Kant believes that lying is wrong and immoral for anyone in any case, no excuses. Kant believes in a good will (Bennett 5). He believes that happiness cannot be achieved through a bad will. A good will must consist of truthfulness, doing the right thing and doing it because you care to help. Kant believes that along with having a good will, you should be morally good. Being “morally good” has to do with following the moral law. Under any circumstance, a person should never corrupt the moral law (Bennett 2). Everyone should live their life knowing and living by this moral law, never making mistakes and always making the right decisions for the right reasons. With the scenario given, telling a small lie to a friend, Kant believes that lying is against the moral law. Bentham wanted to optimize happiness, in that case lying was the answer. Whereas, Kant says that people deserve more than that, each person deserves to know the truth and should
Growing up, we are always told to never lie because it is the worst thing you could ever do. “Lying will only lead to a horrible situation with less than mediocre results. While lying is not always good, it is not always bad either. Samuel Butler once said “Lying has a kind of respect and reverence with it. We pay a person the compliment of acknowledging his superiority whenever we lie to him.
“A man is never more truthful than when he acknowledges himself a liar.” – Mark Twain Lying is a common feature to human beings, and it plays an important role in allowing one to meet the expectations associated with the position that one occupies. Liars may differ in their motivation to lie, their preparedness to lie, or even the extent to which their lies will result in positive consequences for the relationship involved (Kraut, 1978). Lies can be beneficial, with no negative consequences, but other times they have catastrophic repercussions that may destroy one’s private and social life.