Why Is Caesar Responsible For The Fall Of The Republic

1305 Words3 Pages

The Fall of the Republic was more than a single man, but Julius Caesar was definitely to blame for being a large part of the destruction of the Roman Republic. Caesar was responsible for the fall of the Republic for several reasons, the the civil war from which the Republic never really recovered in January of 49 BC, Caesar 's appointment as dictator for life in 44 BC, and bringing into power the many of the men who would be important in the next set of civil wars.
What helped start the civil war was the death of Caesar 's daughter, Julia, in 54 BC. Julia was married to Pompey to help create a political alliance between him and Caesar, but when she died during childbirth, Caesar and Pompey’s relationship ended. After Julia’s death Caesar …show more content…

Though was Rome perhaps the most cosmopolitan place in the world of that day, it still didn 't take kindly to foreigners. And so Cleopatra and her son had to leave. If Caesar could not eve convince his people to accept his girlfriend, how could he be expected to convince his people to fully trust him to rule over them. He was not the traditional Republican politician that was expected during this time, even though he was an excellent politician, and a skilled writer, some of his lifestyle choices like his girlfriend and his child born out of wedlock, probably did not completely sit well with the Roman …show more content…

Most notably, two of his generals, Antony and Lepidus, were members of the second triumvirate. Some of his assassins even rose to prominence serving under him, like Decimus Brutus . And of course, Octavian could begin his rise to power because Caesar adopted him posthumously in his will. Even though a dead man could not adopt someone, Gaius Octavius changed his name and became Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus, and his position as Caesar 's son was incredibly important for him in the coming civil

Open Document