Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about the roman republic
Essays about the roman republic
Essays about the roman republic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar are undoubtedly two men who made history by and through their governance on their own nations. When making comparison of these two great men, one significant feature or mode of comparison is their assassination. Comparing Julius Caesar’s assassination to that of Abraham Lincoln shows both differences and similarities. In either case, the Roman General and the U.S. President were killed by people who were threatened by their authority and power.
The life of Julius Caesar is comparable to the life of Abraham Lincoln in a variety of ways. While unique similarities exist in the lives of these two men, distinct differences also exist. Abraham Lincoln was an orator; Julius Caesar a notable author of Latin prose. They were both leaders. Nowadays, people look up to them as heroes. They shared a significant amount of power in their respective nations. Both men were assassinated. Although a little similar, the manner of assassination of Julius Caesar was quite different from that of Abraham Lincoln. The Roman leader and the U.S. President both came from a different era; their backgrounds were also different.
Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome in July 100 BC. Rome was a Republic at this time. He was a statesman, Roman general, Consul, and notable author of Latin prose. He played a significant role in the events that led to the collapse of the Roman Republic and rise of the Roman Empire. He was a leader in a nation where the people were not involved in the government decision-making process. Thus, he had majority of the power in the Republic and was able to form a huge army. He was able to triumph, conquer new lands with the army at his grasp and command. As Caesar acquired more power over the years, som...
... middle of paper ...
...be used to compare these two men; however, their assassination by people opposed to their use of power is the ultimate method of comparison. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated because of his backing for equality and end of slavery. His deed was gallant and honourable; however the nation at the time was not too keen on embracing such a change. Conversely, Julius Caesar’s assassination stemmed from his abuse of power and office.
Works Cited
Parissien, Steven. Assassinated!: Assassinations That Shook the World, from Julius Caesar to Lincoln. London: Quercus, 2008. Print.
Furtwangler, Albert. Assassin on Stage: Brutus, Hamlet, and the Death of Lincoln. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007. Print.
Alvin B. Kernan. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print.
Morse, John T. Abraham Lincoln. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 2005. Print.
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
The two most discussed assassinations out of the four within the position of the United States President are that of Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. There are many similarities between the two and there are also some differences. There are many similarities associated with the assassination of Lincoln and Kennedy. They were both assassinated on the same day, and the men that were caught for the crime were born a century apart from each other and they were both killed before their trials. A difference between the two men is Lincoln was poor and worked his way to the top and Kennedy was born into a wealthy family in which his father was a large political figure. Both men had different struggles but they were similar in many ways.
Caesar was born into a traditional influential and respected family. It is this influence that he used to make his way to the top of the Roman leadership. His use in warfare and military conquests are legendary although he had at first concentrated in pursuing political actions. He won the first elections in his political career at the early forties. He was el...
Julius Caesar was born on the 13th day of the month Quintilis (now July) in the year of 100 B.C. His full name was Gaius Julius Caesar, the same as his father's name. Gaius was his given name and Julius was his surname. Caesar was the name of one branch of the Julian family. Its original meaning was "hairy.” Caesar's family was not prominent, but they claimed to be descended from Venus as well as the kings of Alba Langa. In spite of that fiction, Caesar was well connected through his relatives and received some important government assignments during his youth. Julius Caesar was the dictator of Rome from 61-44 BC. At the time of his birth, Rome was still a republic and the empire was only beginning. Caesar made his way to be considered a head of Rome by 62 BC, but many of the senate felt him a dangerous, ambitious man. The senate did their best to keep him out of consulship. He finally became consul in 59 BC. In Caesar, they saw only the threat of a king, a word that was linked with the word “tyrant” that is cruel or unjust rule.
Julius Ceaser was a ignorant but noble man. But what person can we compare him to in todays world. I think that man is JFK. This two men have a lot in common but they are also different in their own way. Today I am going to tell you some of those differences and a likes between these two noble men.
THESIS STATEMENT: The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the Senate's fear of losing their political relevance. PURPOSE STATEMENT: Through critical analysis and research, it has been shown that Caesar's gain in power worried the Senate. INTRODUCTION: On July 13, 100 B.C., Gaius Julius Caesar was born into a family that was proud of being patrician.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. N.d. Print.
Julius Caesars birth marked the beginning of a new chapter in Rome. He was a Roman general and statesman who turned the Roman Republic into the powerful Roman Empire. When Caesar was away from Rome it began an era, the rule of Rome being held by men who successively held the name Caesar, by birth or adoption. Caesar had most of the power, he could form large armies. With the armies help it was possible to conquer new territories and have the pleasure to know that your name will always be remembered or that they will have a statue built in your honor. Although Caesar was a dictator, he never had a crown. He started taking
Caesar and Brutus have many differences and many similarities. Some of their similarities are personal and some of them are not. Their differences are the same way, some are personal and some are not. Some similarities are going to be very close, and some will be barely related to the other person. This essay is going to explain how Caesar and Brutus are similar, and how they are not similar.
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln made history through their leadership journey on their land. When comparing Caesar and Lincoln, one detail comes to mind, and that is their assassination. Therefore, comparing the murder of an American president to that of a Roman politician and general discloses each similarity and dissimilarity. Eventually, the crucial comparison between both is the assassinations. People disagreed with Caesar and Lincoln in how they carried out and used their authority and power.
Julius Caesar came to power when Rome was a republic. He shaped Rome in enumerable ways. He was a charismatic public speaker and won the love of the people by focusing on helping the poor and looking after his soldiers with appointments and property. One of his most substantial contributions to Rome was his skill as a General. His brilliance allowed him to win many military campaigns and expand Rome’s territory. His talents made him a rich and popular man in Rome but this was a threat to conservatives in Rome. Ultimately, his
Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther king Jr. both have many similarities and differences. Abraham Lincoln had many great accomplishments (Abraham Lincoln 2014). Martin Luther King also, did as well (Foundation 2014). Abraham Lincoln had quite the working life as a child, before he became president (Website ). However, Martin Luther King’s childhood was very different from Lincoln’s (book). However, these men became some of the greatest leaders this country has ever had.
The Roman Republic has acted as a model for most Western countries and some empires have even tried to name themselves the heirs to this powerful empire. One of the most famous plays about this ancient empire describes the death of Julius Caesar, a well known general dictator of Rome. As we all know, Caesar was murdered by the Roman Senate in order to terminate his dictatorship. The play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was written by William Shakespeare and includes two speeches which are analyzed frequently for their rhetorical appeals and figurative language. One speech is given by Mark Antony while the other was given by Brutus. Both of the speakers were close friends of Caesar and delivered effective speeches using powerful rhetorical
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln have many similarities and differences. They both undeniably made history within their lifetimes. When comparing the two, one thing in their history comes to mind, their assassination. The assassinations are similar based on the fact that they were done by people who disagreed with Caesar’s and Lincoln’s ideas of ruining their countries. They were both in very different time periods, but they are still similar in reason.
The similarities between them is they both truly care about Rome and its people, they both are seen as a very noble by the people of Rome, and they respect each other. Their similarities also has some differences between them as Caesar wants to rule Rome as king as the event which he went to the senate even though he was warned several times but Brutus doesn’t think it’s great for Rome to have a king as he joined the conspiracist