Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about the roman republic
Essays about the roman republic
Essays about the roman republic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar are undoubtedly two men who made history by and through their governance on their own nations. When making comparison of these two great men, one significant feature or mode of comparison is their assassination. Comparing Julius Caesar’s assassination to that of Abraham Lincoln shows both differences and similarities. In either case, the Roman General and the U.S. President were killed by people who were threatened by their authority and power.
The life of Julius Caesar is comparable to the life of Abraham Lincoln in a variety of ways. While unique similarities exist in the lives of these two men, distinct differences also exist. Abraham Lincoln was an orator; Julius Caesar a notable author of Latin prose. They were both leaders. Nowadays, people look up to them as heroes. They shared a significant amount of power in their respective nations. Both men were assassinated. Although a little similar, the manner of assassination of Julius Caesar was quite different from that of Abraham Lincoln. The Roman leader and the U.S. President both came from a different era; their backgrounds were also different.
Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome in July 100 BC. Rome was a Republic at this time. He was a statesman, Roman general, Consul, and notable author of Latin prose. He played a significant role in the events that led to the collapse of the Roman Republic and rise of the Roman Empire. He was a leader in a nation where the people were not involved in the government decision-making process. Thus, he had majority of the power in the Republic and was able to form a huge army. He was able to triumph, conquer new lands with the army at his grasp and command. As Caesar acquired more power over the years, som...
... middle of paper ...
...be used to compare these two men; however, their assassination by people opposed to their use of power is the ultimate method of comparison. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated because of his backing for equality and end of slavery. His deed was gallant and honourable; however the nation at the time was not too keen on embracing such a change. Conversely, Julius Caesar’s assassination stemmed from his abuse of power and office.
Works Cited
Parissien, Steven. Assassinated!: Assassinations That Shook the World, from Julius Caesar to Lincoln. London: Quercus, 2008. Print.
Furtwangler, Albert. Assassin on Stage: Brutus, Hamlet, and the Death of Lincoln. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007. Print.
Alvin B. Kernan. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print.
Morse, John T. Abraham Lincoln. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 2005. Print.
Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on the villains who killed his beloved Caesar. After Antony turns a rioting Rome on him and wages war against him and the conspirators, Brutus falls by his own hand, turning the very sword he slaughtered Caesar with against himself. Brutus is unquestionably the tragic hero in this play because he has an innumerable amount of character flaws, he falls because of these flaws, and then comes to grips with them as he bleeds on the planes of Philippi.
Plutarch. "The Assassination of Julius Caesar, from Marcus Brutus (excerpts)." Translated by John Dryden. Reproduced by Internet Ancient History Sourcebook. August 2000. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/plutarch-caesar.asp (accessed 26 January 2014).
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. Elements of Literature. Ed. Deborah Appleman. 4th ed. Texas: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2009. 843-963.
Julius Ceaser was a ignorant but noble man. But what person can we compare him to in todays world. I think that man is JFK. This two men have a lot in common but they are also different in their own way. Today I am going to tell you some of those differences and a likes between these two noble men.
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
Julius Caesars birth marked the beginning of a new chapter in Rome. He was a Roman general and statesman who turned the Roman Republic into the powerful Roman Empire. When Caesar was away from Rome it began an era, the rule of Rome being held by men who successively held the name Caesar, by birth or adoption. Caesar had most of the power, he could form large armies. With the armies help it was possible to conquer new territories and have the pleasure to know that your name will always be remembered or that they will have a statue built in your honor. Although Caesar was a dictator, he never had a crown. He started taking
Caesar and Brutus have many differences and many similarities. Some of their similarities are personal and some of them are not. Their differences are the same way, some are personal and some are not. Some similarities are going to be very close, and some will be barely related to the other person. This essay is going to explain how Caesar and Brutus are similar, and how they are not similar.
Julius Caesar came to power when Rome was a republic. He shaped Rome in enumerable ways. He was a charismatic public speaker and won the love of the people by focusing on helping the poor and looking after his soldiers with appointments and property. One of his most substantial contributions to Rome was his skill as a General. His brilliance allowed him to win many military campaigns and expand Rome’s territory. His talents made him a rich and popular man in Rome but this was a threat to conservatives in Rome. Ultimately, his
Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther king Jr. both have many similarities and differences. Abraham Lincoln had many great accomplishments (Abraham Lincoln 2014). Martin Luther King also, did as well (Foundation 2014). Abraham Lincoln had quite the working life as a child, before he became president (Website ). However, Martin Luther King’s childhood was very different from Lincoln’s (book). However, these men became some of the greatest leaders this country has ever had.
The Roman Republic has acted as a model for most Western countries and some empires have even tried to name themselves the heirs to this powerful empire. One of the most famous plays about this ancient empire describes the death of Julius Caesar, a well known general dictator of Rome. As we all know, Caesar was murdered by the Roman Senate in order to terminate his dictatorship. The play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was written by William Shakespeare and includes two speeches which are analyzed frequently for their rhetorical appeals and figurative language. One speech is given by Mark Antony while the other was given by Brutus. Both of the speakers were close friends of Caesar and delivered effective speeches using powerful rhetorical
There have been four presidents that have been assassinated. Along with Lincoln and Kennedy, James Garfield and William McKinley were also assassinated as presidents. Lincoln and Kennedy are the two that are the most similar and are missed and talked about the most out of the four. Both men were heroes of their time and both were greatly respected and revered by most of the nation they led. Although Lincoln was born into poor home and Kennedy was born into the political world, they were able to accomplish many great things while they were in office. They were both reelected for another term but were then killed on November 8th exactly one century later. Although these men are dead they are still greatly missed by those that loved them.
In the novel “Julius Caesar”, people often argue on which is the true protagonist of this great novel whether it’s Julius Caesar or Brutus because Brutus had more character development than Caesar but people often counter this argument by stating that it is titled after Caesar, so we’re going to compare and contrast them.
Julius Caesar was a strong leader of the Romans who changed the course of the history for the Roman world decisively and irreversibly. With his courage and strength, he created a strong empire and guided the empire for almost 20 years. His life was short, but had many adventures. I will tell of some of this man’s remarkable life. He did many things, therefore, I will only discuss a few. His name, part of his reign, one of his greatest battles, and his death will be told.
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln have many similarities and differences. They both undeniably made history within their lifetimes. When comparing the two, one thing in their history comes to mind, their assassination. The assassinations are similar based on the fact that they were done by people who disagreed with Caesar’s and Lincoln’s ideas of ruining their countries. They were both in very different time periods, but they are still similar in reason.
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln made history through their leadership journey on their land. When comparing Caesar and Lincoln, one detail comes to mind, and that is their assassination. Therefore, comparing the murder of an American president to that of a Roman politician and general discloses each similarity and dissimilarity. Eventually, the crucial comparison between both is the assassinations. People disagreed with Caesar and Lincoln in how they carried out and used their authority and power.