Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln made history through their leadership journey on their land. When comparing Caesar and Lincoln, one detail comes to mind, and that is their assassination. Therefore, comparing the murder of an American president to that of a Roman politician and general discloses each similarity and dissimilarity. Eventually, the crucial comparison between both is the assassinations. People disagreed with Caesar and Lincoln in how they carried out and used their authority and power.
Julius Caesar is considered an agitator and an oppressor. Therefore, his murder was then an act to protect the republic. Caesar was a Roman politician and general who portrayed a critical role in the events that steered to the death of the
Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. Caesar joined Crassus and Pompey to establish a political association that ruled the Roman politics for many years. They aimed to gain power within the Roman Senate and among them was also Cato the Younger and the support of Cicero. Caesar constructed a bridge across the Rhine and Channel, which made him the first Roman general to cross over both the "Channel and the Rhine" after the Gallic Wars ended. Then Caesar was able to intrude Britain, which granted him the military power. The Senate commanded Caesar to resign from his military command and return to Rome, after the Gallic Wars. Caesar refused the order and crossed the Rubicon by leaving his state and entering Roman Italy illegally under arms. The Civil War resulted in his favorable placing him in a stronger position of power and influence. Caesar assumed that he had the control of the government and began an agenda of social and governmental reforms as well as the creation of the "Julian calendar." Caesar became the administration of the Republic and was finally declared the "dictator in perpetuity," allowing him additional power. Abraham Lincoln served as the 16th President of the United States from March 1861 until he was murdered in April 1865. Lincoln has been an "American Statesman and a Lawyer." He led the United States through its Civil War, which was the bloodiest war and maybe its significant moral, constitutional, and political crisis. Lincoln conserved the Union, paved the way for the abolition of slavery, reinforce the federal government, and updated the economy. On April 11, President Lincoln promoted the rights for blacks to vote during his speech outside the White House. Lincoln was also seeking to use his power to improve the equality in America and end slavery. In 1861, Lincoln suspended the constitution to fulfill his desire to balance the Americans and the blacks. Right after the suspension of the law, a Civil War was declared due to the controversy over slavery. After the suspension of the Constitution, an executive order announced. The President needed to suspend the Constitution to be allowed to make an executive order in which people looked at this as an abuse of office. In comparison, Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln have many similarities and differences. They had an enormous impact on their countries and a lot of power. Both were leaders who changed the world. They both fought in a war for what they believed. Ceasar was a soldier that fought in many battles and do to his triumph; he earned the Roman Empire. On the other hand, Lincoln was already in power due that he was the President of the United States. Lincoln protected the Union Civil War and ended slavery while in office. Both leaders were assassinated for trying to change the world in their ways. Caesar and President Lincoln are well-known for their roles that made significant influences in the shaping of Rome and the United States. Some aspects can be used to compare the two, but the fact that people assassinated the two against their use of authority is the ideal mode of comparison. President Lincoln was killed for his support of equal black rights and the end of slavery. His act was noble, but the society at that time was stubborn to comprehend such change. On the other hand, Caesar's assassination came down to his abuse of office and power.
When someone hears the name George Washington, they instantly think of the one dollar bill, the first president, or the quarter. Some people might even think of Mount Vernon, Virginia, his favorite place because his name is associated with Mount Vernon. But, someone would never consider the fact that George Washington and his friends rebelled against their current world power and beat them in odds that were extremely poor to create one of the greatest world powers in history. Furthermore, when someone hears the name Julius Caesar, they would most likely think of the Shakespearean play, or the famous saying, “E tu Brute” which was said by Caesar when he saw Brutus stabbing him. But, someone would assume that Caesar’s death gave way to Rome’s first emperor, Augustus. Even though Julius Caesar may be well known for his great accomplishments, he is nothing compared to who George Washington was and what he did to change history. Julius Caesar did have many accomplishments which consisted of his climb up the military chain to become Rome’s first king in five-hundred years and his part in the famous triumvirate rule (Pompey, Caesar, and Crassus) that came to power in Rome some time after Caesar's first decrees (Julius Caesar Definition). One of his many failures includes the dividing of Rome’s upper and lower class which eventually led to his assassination. George Washington’s achievements includes the rebellion against the greatest empire in the current time era and the development of one of the most powerful empires ever created in history. His failures include many losses in battle and the rebellion against Great Britain. Although Julius Caesar may be known for his great ruling ability, he came no where close to the power an...
Creon and Brutus both shared high position in the governments of their countries, maintaining power and some level of control. Both of the two, when faced with the threat of losing control turned to unjustified courses of action. Creon threatened death to anyone who defied his rule, fearing that mass hysteria would follow. Brutus on the other had, while less extreme, found that when an overly ambitious ruler threatened Rome the only possible answer was murder. They resorted to the actions with true zeal and completely believed in their cause. Sincerity makes each character share the same beliefs in what they were doing. The country's well-being was the only thing on the leaders' mind.
... he was killed, all hope for the Roman Republic to be cured and survive was lost. By killing him, the senators ensured that the Roman Republic would either fall or continue to be corrupted. Had Julius Caesar not been killed, the Roman Republic could have been revived and cured of corruption and the Roman Empire might never have existed.
When someone hears the name George Washington, they instantly think of the one dollar bill, the first president, or the quarter. Some people might even think of Mount Vernon, Virginia, his favorite place because his name is associated with Mount Vernon. But, someone would never consider the fact that George Washington and his friends rebelled against their current world power and beat them in odds that were extremely poor to create one of the greatest world powers in history. Furthermore, when someone hears the name Julius Caesar, they would most likely think of the Shakespearean play, or the famous saying, “E tu Brute” which was said by Caesar when he saw Brutus stabbing him. But, someone would assume that Caesar’s death gave way to Rome’s first emperor, Augustus. Even though Julius Caesar may be well known for his great accomplishments, he is nothing compared to who George Washington was and what he did to change history. Julius Caesar did have many accomplishments which consisted of his climb up the military chain to become Rome’s first king in five-hundred years and his part in the famous triumvirate rule (Pompey, Caesar, and Crassus) that came to power in Rome some time after Caesar's first decrees (Julius Caesar Definition). One of his many failures includes the dividing of Rome’s upper and lower class which eventually led to his assassination. George Washington’s achievements includes the rebellion against the greatest empire in the current time era and the development of one of the most powerful empires ever created in history. His failures include many losses in battle and the rebellion against Great Britain. Although Julius Caesar may be known for his great ruling ability, he came no where close to the power an...
George Santayana said, "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." As history is examined it is clear to see that some events that have taken place have similarities to other past events. If these events are studied, many lessons can be learned from them. If past events are ignored, valuable lessons are not taught. Some events that have similarities are the assassinations of Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln, and John F. Kennedy. The fear that these leaders would abuse their power motivated their assassins to eliminate them for the good of the people.
Julius Caesar elected himself as the dictator of Rome. He became a favorite of many of the people of the lower classes. Unlike many leaders, Caesar valued the poor. Most people agreed with his decision, but some of the higher classes’ did not. On March 15 44 BCE, now called the Ides of March, a few of Caesars’ closest peers decided to murder Caesar.
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
The book Julius Caesar is full of happiness, conspiracy, power, and betrayal. The people of Rome deeply loved julius Caesar and wished to make him their king. A group of senators however were not so fond of this idea and formed a conspiracy. The leader of this group was a man by the name of Cassius. In order to make sure that his scheme of killing Caesar would work and would look honorable he had to convince a senator by the name of Brutus to help. After being convinced that they had to kill Caesar to protect Rome from a tyrant Brutus joined the conspiracy and soon became the principal conspirator.On the day in which Caesar was to be crowned king he was on the way to the senate when he was stabbed by all the conspirators panic ensued and to convince Rome of their honorable intentions Brutus gave a funeral speech. Mark Antony, a very close friend of Caesar, gave his speech after Brutus had given his. Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive to the Roman people because of his outstanding use of pathos, sarcasm, and logos.
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
Julius Caesar (July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC) was a Roman general, statesman, Consul, and author of Latin prose. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. On March 15 44 B.C.E, the Roman dictator Julius Caesar was murdered. There are multiple accounts of this incident, while all accounts came after the death of Caesar, the writing on the incident portray Julius Caesar to have been a selfish dictator.
When the name Julius Caesar is heard, it can only trigger the image of a great leader that led Rome into prosperity. Caesar's military excellence brought more power and more land; that lead to the increase of size and strength in Rome. His dictatorship helped the stability and prosperity in Rome. Caesar's assassination lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. His death lead to a domino effect ending in the ultimate collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people of the 21st century follow the path of Julius Caesar and try to be as great as he was. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy due to the contributions he made to Rome's prosperity during his life, and the chaos that occurred in Rome after his death. The contributions that Caesar made towards the strength of Rome's success, and the chaos and collapse of Rome after his death made the assassination of Julius Caesar a tragedy.
The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the senate’s fear of losing political relevance. They were losing their freedoms and thought the only way to resolve this problem was to kill Caesar. Killing Caesar never really did anything to help make the government a democracy like the senate had wanted. Marcus Brutus and Cassius ended up leaving Rome, so their plot did not do anything to help them. Caesar was the leader of Rome, the top of the Roman Empire. The people he thought he could trust most, his so-called friends, took him to the bottom of the Roman Empire, to his grave.
Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.
...e murder because of his jealousy of Caesar's elevated power and mounting dominance over everyone, even his friends. Though they were close friends, their motives and descriptive character traits display a distinct contrast between them.
Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar are undoubtedly two men who made history by and through their governance on their own nations. When making comparison of these two great men, one significant feature or mode of comparison is their assassination. Comparing Julius Caesar’s assassination to that of Abraham Lincoln shows both differences and similarities. In either case, the Roman General and the U.S. President were killed by people who were threatened by their authority and power.