Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain the purpose of suffering in the theological perspective
Christian belief in justice
The atonement theories and today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
First, I affirm and concur that Jesus was sent to show us a better way. Especially, one of love and, I might add, mercy. That said, a common pitfall that we—myself included—seemingly rush into when it comes to theology is we quickly choose our side, assume we are right, and begin declaring others as wrong. The atonement is one of those areas that has been hotly debated throughout the history of the Church. Origen, essentially, declared that the atonement was like a ransom. Satan had kidnapped humanity and taken ownership of them. As such, Jesus had to pay a ransom to the kidnapper get them back. Similarly, the view espoused by Martin Luther, ostensibly held by many pre-Enlightenment, and presently held by many Protestants is the view of Christus …show more content…
We will address the nation of divine child abuse in a moment. Lastly, more in alignment with your thoughts, the French philosopher, Peter Abelard argued that humanity did not know how to live, and so Christ came down as the perfect human to be an example reflecting the depth and breadth God’s love and in essence providing humanity with a new model—an example—of how to live. These are a few of the more prominent views of the atonement, but which one is …show more content…
Logically, we cannot say we want love without justice, nor do we want justice without love. Similarly, without justice there is no mercy, for what would we be forgiven? As such, although some views might seem “harsh,” they—I would argue—bring to light the glorious multi-faceted reality of the atonement. God was not merely accomplishing one thing but many. Together they bring the fullness and fruitfulness of the atonement to light. For example, God in Christ satisfies himself through substitution and propitiation of Christ (Gal. 3:13; II Cor. 5:14-15, 21; Rom. 5:17-19; Heb. 7:26-28; 9:11-14,25-10:10,12-14), provides us an example to imitate (Phil. 2:1-5; I Pet. 2:21), and frees us from bondage of the kingdom of darkness—Satan and sin (Acts 26:18; Col. 1:13), triumphing over evil (Col. 2:15). These passages of Holy Scripture affirm that an adequate understanding of the atonement requires all the facets for the beauty and richness of its reality to shine. May we not box in God where he does not explicitly box in himself. Rather, being pressured to limit ourselves to a single facet, why not live in the realm of the multi-faceted mystery of the atonement enacted by the love of
“Recovering the Scandal of the Cross,” (Green, Baker) presents an alternative means of thinking for Christians theologically. The author’s task of interpreting culture and communicating within a culture is incredibly difficult. Much of the biblical teaching of God is rooted into communicating to a specific group of people and a certain culture. Yet God has chosen the Bible as the method of communicating himself to the world. Green and Baker begin to lay the groundwork of historical influence of atonement from Anselm and Irenaeus. They later introduce ideas from Charles Hodge and penal substitution. There are four major models of explanations of the atonement: Christus Victor, penal substitution, satisfaction and moral influence. Although others are mentioned in the book, this sets the stage of the historic dilemma from which they can view atonement in their discussion of tradition.
Spirit), the nature of man and the need for salvation, and sin and the means of atonement.
As we have looked in to the Christian worldview of God, our humanity, the Son of God, and the restoration of our lives back into God’s purpose. Now we have a better understanding of what it means to be a member of the Christian community. God wants believers to dwell in union and in community having the same mind that is in Jesus Christ (Phil 2:1-11). This paper showed how God and Jesus Christ are at the fundamental core of all Christian beliefs regardless of the countless differences many Christians may
Since atonement theories are based on one’s interpretation of Scripture, as a result there is a vast amount of differing opinions throughout sects of Christianity. Theories can be split into two categories, subjective theories and objective theories. The former focuses on the humans response to the divine, while the latter focuses on what God has done and has to do. During Bach’s time, Lutheran orthodoxy, which focused on objective theories, and Lutheran pietism, which focused on subjective theories, were at odds with each other. One can view Bach’s St. Matthew’s Passion as a successful attempt to bridge the two.
The human experience is riddled with unpalatable truths that we discover as we journey through life. Influencing our values and attitudes by deliberately challenging the reader with humanity’s unpalatable truths, Ian McEwan prompts the reader to consider our own moral compass through the character of Briony Tallis. During the course of ‘Atonement’, McEwan demonstrates that actions and words inevitably have consequences on not only the individual but also those surrounding them. Throughout the three fundamental stages of Briony’s complicated life, her coming of age story has developed in the unpalatable obstacle of atoning for her mistakes. In misunderstanding, Briony appears naive; she thinks she can control aspects of her own world, acting
John Wesley once said, “Nothing in the Christian system is of greater consequence than the doctrine of the atonement” (9). Thus, it is no surprise that the doctrine of the atonement has created debate among theologians seeking to identify the most suitable theory in understanding the heart of the saving work of Christ. The atonement means, “reconciliation, in this case between God and humans. It comes from a Middle English word, at-one-ment, which means “harmony”- literally, the state of one thing being “at one” with another” (Beilby 9). When thinking about the various theories of atonement, one may ask: Is the cross more for reconciling God’s wrath to humanity or for reconciling enslaved humanity to God? When comparing and contrasting the details of the Christus Victor and the Penal Substitution theories of the atonement, a major difference at the heart of the debate is whether or not Christ needed to die primarily to be an expiation, the Christus Victor model, or a propitiation, the Penal Substitution model. In other words, the two theological groups disagree on the
J. I. Packer presents a compelling summary of how believers should know God through Scripture as well as experientially in living the tenets of Scripture, a true experience of Christ living in us. Packer illustrates God’s nature through Scripture and His character of wisdom, majesty, personal unfailing lovingkindness, yet righteousness, judgment and wrath which do not diminish God’s nature or righteousness. In God’s judgement His wrath is justly shown against sin and those who reject Christ. While reading, a love beyond measure, God’s love becomes self evident. However this divine love is characterized in His terms and not ours. Packer’s key question is not asking if God is for us and again not solely for us on our terms but rather, are we for God? His question is also quality over quantity do we know much
If Christ on His cross intended to save every man, then He intended to save those who were lost before He died. If the doctrine be true, that He died for all men, then He died for some who were in hell before He came into this world, for doubtless ...
In Professor Brian Finney’s essay “Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement,” he suggests that any attempt at atonement is “bound to fail,” and so the most one can do to repent their mistakes is to “imagine the feelings of others.” In many cases, visualizing oneself in the position of another can play a large role when seeking forgiveness. However, in Briony’s case, her attempt to use corrective fiction to make amends for the mistakes of her childhood is not enough for her to achieve full atonement.
In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus endorses agape, or selfless love (in contrast to eros, or possessive love), which consists of dedication to another person’s good, even at the expense of our own good and happiness. People should practice peace and nonviolence, return good for evil and love for suffering (“turn the other cheek”). This leads to a special conception of justice, called the “divine justice”, which is based on giving a person what he or she needs rather than deserves (e.g., in case of a crime, redemption rather getting even).
The Christian worldview is centered on the Gospel and places their beliefs in the essential teachings of the Trinity, the deity of Jesus Christ, and Jesus’ resurrection from the dead (DiVincenzo, 2015). This paper will explain who God is and what he created, what our purpose and nature is as humans, who Jesus was and what he did while on earth, how God plans to bring his people back into the right relationship with himself, and as a Christian how one is to live their life with an analysis of the Christian worldview.
...y disposition, man tends be nothing while God is not in his or her life. Since we came out of nothing in one sense, nothing sustains us from the total destruction the devil wants us to experience but the spirit and power of God step in. So, let us experience the scriptures in a deep way especially allowing the Holy Ghost to speak to us while we look at the portrait of God seen in Jesus. We must allow our self to know God on a personal level. In Ecclesiastes 12:13 says “All has been heard; the end of the matter is: Fear God [revere and worship Him, knowing that He is] and keep His commandments, for this is the whole of man [the full, original purpose of his creation, the object of God’s providence, the root of character, the foundation of all happiness, the adjustment to all inharmonious circumstances and conditions under the sun] and the whole [duty] for every man.
On the Incarnation of the Word explores a theology and ideology that is foundational to the Christian faith. Athanasius' reflection is rooted in the truth that God created because God desired relationship, the reality that sin broke relationship, and the certainty that God required reconciliation with creation. Athanasius' stance was that God chose to redeem His creation by becoming embodied in human form. " The death of all was consummated in the Lord's body; yet, because the Word was in it, death and corruption were in the same utterly abolished. " This theology depicts an image of God's intimate relationship with humankind.
Erickson (1998) says there are a few theories on the atonement depending on how your read certain scripture, the theories are as follows: The Socinian Theory (1998:801); This theory speaks of Christ on the Cross as a perfect example of what kind of dedication followers of God must do, there is no connection to a sacrificial death whatsoever. The moral influence theory (1998:802); This theory believes the cross was an example of God’s love and not much more. The Governmental theory (1998:806); This theory sees the death of Christ on the Cross as atonement and also as a picture to the believer as to how serious sin is, and it must not be taken lightly. The Ransom Theory (1998:810); In this theory it is proposed, and quite popularly so, that as slaves to the world of Satan, humanity needed saving, Jesus’ death became our ransom, his death took our place. With this theory, the identity of Jesus was concealed from Satan, so he would accept the ransom. Finally the Satisfaction Theory (1998:813); This theory speaks about Christ’s death as satisfaction in place of all man-kinds sin, it also speaks against the fact Satan needed a payment of any kind, and it isn’t centred on man.
... he was sent to earth to save human beings from sin and death. The teaching's of Jesus center around love. The way to salvation is do good works. Also too have faith in G-d and the Christ's resurrection.