Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The study of comparative politics
International relations concepts
International relations concepts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The study of comparative politics
My enthusiasm for international affairs and political science is rooted in opportunities to visit countries in Europe and Latin America. Walking on Normandy Beach, for example, was a transformative moment before I started college. Later I developed a particular interest in Latin America after experiencing its considerable history and vivacious culture firsthand while abroad in the Dominican Republic, Argentina, and Uruguay. Differences in political institutional stability, economic modernization and cultural diversity cultivated my intellectual curiosity as to why some nations experience unique cultural, political, and economic development paths. Studying the conditions that promote cross-national diversity is now my passion amid the field …show more content…
However, specific courses and readings at this level furthered my interest in the field of comparative politics and political economy. A course in comparative Latin American politics integrated my interest in military history with democratization in the developing world and outlined historical junctures explaining the current political landscape of the region. My keenness for this subject increased exponentially while travelling abroad to Buenos Aires, Argentina, for a taught comparative politics seminar. In the classroom, I learned of the atrocities committed during the Dirty War by the Videla Junta. In the streets of Argentina, I witnessed the Madres de Plaza de Mayo continuing to march in protest nearly forty years after the military abducted innocent children from these families. Lastly, the haunting faces of the disappeared on the windows at the ESMA museum are images I will never forget. For me, comparative politics lends the analytical tools to unpack and comprehend such political episodes, especially with respect to institutions and institutional …show more content…
For example, Professor George Philip became a mentor to recent alumni of my undergraduate program and I would prioritize taking his class. Military politics in Latin America is one of Dr. Philip’s many areas of expertise and I hope he would consider supervising my thesis. The intimate program size and structure, along with the opportunity to conduct ample independent research peaked my interest in this method of study. Moreover, I am very impressed with the caliber of professors and visiting lecturers who speak at LSE, and hope to take full advantage of attending guest speaking events offered. My undergraduate mentor Professor Ken Mitchell, received an MSc in development studies and went onto Oxford to complete a PhD, initially introduced me to LSE. Additionally, former Monmouth University students I view as role models, Ryan Kelly, Payal Patel, Julie Miller, and Allison Matz have completed an MSc in the department of government. Subsequent to my last trip to the United Kingdom, I soon realized that I could see the city of London as a place where I could work and live. At LSE, I know that I would be part of revolutionary research on the forefront of modern political
This paper will be exploring the book The Vanguard of the Atlantic World by James Sanders. This book focuses upon the early 1800 to the 1900 and explores the development of South American political system as well expresses some issues that some Latino counties had with Europe and North America. Thus, Sanders focus is on how Latin America political system changes throughout this certain time and how does the surrounding countries have an effect as well on Latin political system. Therefore, the previous statement leads into some insight on what the thesis of the book is. Sanders thesis is, “Latin American’s believed they represented the future because they had adopted Republicanism and democracy while Europe was in the past dealing with monarchs
Models for post-revolutionary Latin American government are born of the complex economic and social realities of 17th and 18th century Europe. From the momentum of the Enlightenment came major political rebellions of the elite class against entrenched national monarchies and systems of power. Within this time period of elitist revolt and intensive political restructuring, the fundamental basis for both liberal and conservative ideology was driven deep into Latin American soil. However, as neither ideology sought to fulfill or even recognize the needs or rights of mestizo people under government rule, the initial liberal doctrine pervading Latin American nations perpetuated racism and economic exploitation, and paved the way for all-consuming, cultural wars in the centuries to come.
All throughout the 20th century we can observe the marked presence of totalitarian regimes and governments in Latin America. Countries like Cuba, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic all suffered under the merciless rule of dictators and military leaders. Yet the latter country, the Dominican Republic, experienced a unique variation of these popular dictatorships, one that in the eyes of the world of those times was great, but in the eyes of the Dominicans, was nothing short of deadly.
As the Latin American nations set out to construct a new government and society in the 1800´s, two opposing models aroused regarding which one would best benefit the countries. ¨Civilization vs. Barbarism¨ by Domingo Sarmiento, a recognized Argentinean revolutionary, contrasts Jose Marti´s ¨Our America¨ ideology which critiques U.S. capitalism and focuses on developing a good government based on the needs of the nations and each nation´s autochthony. Contrastingly, Sarmiento, guided by his beliefs in democratic principles, declares his preference towards the European urbanized way of life as the key to progress and stability for the nations. Despite the differences in the models proposed by Marti and Sarmiento for the New Nations to follow,
Burns, E. B., & Charlip, J. A. (2007). Latin America: an interpretive history (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Burns, E. B., & Charlip, J. A. (2007). Latin America: an interpretive history (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
When my first grade teacher asked me what I wanted to be in the future I told her, “I want to be a doctor.” My answer stayed exactly the same when my eleventh grade English teacher asked the question. Ever since I was little science has always captured my interest. I was fascinated by the way our body worked and how everything had an explanation behind it.
Harry E. Canden. , & Gary Prevost, (2012). Politics Latin America. (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
The historian Ronn Pineo wrote “Beginning in the 1980s nearly all of Latin America began to take part in a great experiment, the adoption of capitalist free market economic policies.” (1) This great experiment began with the promotion of democracy and free market that promised a better future for Latin America. Neoliberalism, the economic ideology that promotes free-market capitalism, laid the foundation for many of the US military interventions and economic policies that caused a dramatic transformation of Latin America. This promise of a “democratic” government came from a policy initiative labeled as polyarchy. Polyarchy is “ a system in which a small group governs and mass participation in decision making is limited to choosing leaders in elections that are carefully managed by competing elites” (Lecture: Polyarchy and Resistance). It, however, was a sales pitch to continue Latin America’s subordinate position in to the global market. As a result, much of Latin America, by the late 1980 through the early 1990s, transitioned into this form of “democracy”. Consequently, Latin America suffered and still suffers today from underdevelopment, high levels of socioeconomic inequality, and immigration. Globalization of capital, off-shore production, and new technologies have created structural barriers and have
Burns, E. B., & Charlip, J. A. (2007). Latin America: an interpretive history (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
By the fall of 1981, the Argentinean government under the leadership of General Galtieri and the military junta was experiencing a significant decrease of power. Economical...
Wiarda H. J. and Skelley E. M., 2005, Dilemmas of Democracy in Latin America: Crises and Opportunity, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc
Scholars have debated not only the nature of Iberian colonialism, but also the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. Historian Jaime E. Rodriguez said that, “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that when independence emerged in Latin America, it was a positive force. However, as time progressed, it indeed does cause conflict.