Why Guns Should Be Banned

704 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Does gun control increases crime rates

Banning guns

The news has had been full of stories about guns lately. The Fort Hood shooting for one, hit me close to my heart. Some people may be on the edge whether to ban guns or not. All the facts are not being put out for fear of public outcry or politically endorsed news. These facts should help you make your choice to continue allowing citizens without criminal records to be permitted to carry concealed firearms. Citizens with proper training can help uphold the law when police officers are not present. Armed citizens who obey the law are going to be the next best thing in a physical assault or armed robbery. According to a recent study with US News, Gary Kleck, a criminologist with the with the University of Florida, and Jongyeon Tark, a professor of criminal justice at the New Haven University, stated; “Kleck and Tark found that using a gun reduced the risk of property loss and minor as well as serious injuries to the victim, and that injury resulted from self-protection with the gun in only ten percent of cases.” So not only did they keep their property and remained unharmed they only had to defend themselves in ten percent of cases. Citzens with guns can protect themselves from harm (Gary Kleck and Jongyeon Tark/ US News np). An armed nation is going to bring down the crime rate of assaults and home invasions. …show more content…

According to Forbes magazine news contributor, Larry Bell, comments that “According to the Department of Justice gun-related homicides dropped 39 over the course of 18 years.” Also an addition of back-ground checks for gun purchases had an increase of 19 percent to a total of 19.6 million for all of 2012. These are just a few of numbers associated with the fall of gun crimes with the addition of gun sales increasing. It only makes sense that an increase of armed citizens would defer the armed assailants that prey on opportunity with lawlessness. (Larry Bell/Forbes magazine

Show More
Related

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gun Buyback Programs

    2320 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, as far as weapons policies go, gun buyback programs have been criticized as an ineffective means of curbing or preventing firearm violence. Thus, one must ask, does the purchase of firearms from private citizens by law enforcement impact the rate of gun crime, or would other means be more effective in combating this type of crime? According to the Journal of Economics, there are more firearms in the United States than people. Furthermore, the majority of homicides are committed with a firearm (Levitt, 2004). This may indicate that the availability of firearms contributes to gun violence.

    Read More

  • Gun Control: The Opposing Viewpoints

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many gun supporters will say that more guns bring down the crime rate. These same believers will give facts stating that the more guns in a state, the less likely gun owners will use them. “The chances of innocent people being the victims of violent crime, including murder, decrease—not increase—when access to guns is made easier” (Luik). Luik emphasizes that guns will not make any innocent people killers, it will make crime and death rates go down. They argue that the states with the lowest crime rates are the same states that have a higher gun ownership rate than any other state.

    Read More

  • Why Gun Control Is Not Enough Analysis

    670 Words  | 2 Pages

    He demonstrates when guns are found in every household, gun control can do little to restrict access to guns from potential criminals. (McMahan, 3) So, McMahan’s main premises comes into play, either everyone has guns, including criminals, or nobody has guns. “Gun advocates prefer for both rather than neither to have them” McMahan remarks, but ultimately that will just leave the country open to more violence and tragedies. “As more private individuals acquire guns, the power of the police declines, personal security becomes a matter of self help, and the unarmed have an incentive to get guns.” (McMahan, 2) Now everyone is armed, and everyone has the ability to kill anyone in an instant, making everyone less secure. Just as all the states would be safer if nobody were to possess the nuclear weapons, our country would be safer if guns were banned from private individuals and criminals.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

    1659 Words  | 4 Pages

    John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, stated, "States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes... The effect on 'shall-issue ' [concealed gun] laws on these crimes [where two or more people were killed] has been dramatic. When states passed these laws, the number of multiple-victim shootings declined by 84 percent. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90 percent and injuries by 82

    Read More

  • Gun Advocates! The Crème of the Crop of Americans

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    Firstly, the claims that guns contributing to higher crime rates are completely over exaggerated. Most people are spoon-fed by the mainstream media that guns contribute to higher crime rates. In fact, in large cities like Chicago it has been proven that laws like handgun bans have worsened crime rather than alleviate it. When they did this in Chicago, politicians were hoping that this would bring crime levels down (Peterson 25). In the midst of all this, everyone as soon as the politicians proclaimed it would work, was singing their praises and saying that it would, or so they thought. So did the handgun ban succeed? Not necessarily, the article A Splendid, Precarious Victory proves this point. The author Dan Peterson provides very gut wrenching statistics. It states, “in recent years, while the handgun ban was in place, the percentage committed with handguns has consistently been 70 percent or more” (Peterson 25). Clearly, this proves that the mainstream media, anti-gun groups and politicians have distorted the truth about just how hazardous gun control is. This disturbing information should be a wake up call to those who feel that gun control works. Finally, this proves that gun control is unproductive. These kinds of laws ...

    Read More

  • Why Guns Should Not Be Banned In The United States

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine... you are driving down the street to see your loving family. You stop at a gas station and a guy comes in. He has a bandana and bad intentions. All of a sudden, he loads a pistol and aims it towards you. What are your options? Try to visualize, a guy going to see his wife and kids, but when out of nowhere a person pulls you aside and then points a pistol at you. Over the course of years, ninety-three United States citizens are killed with guns. Due to these reasons, it seems it is necessary to get rid of guns because of the 21,175 suicides, 505 deaths due to accidental/ negligent discharge of a firearm. Guns should be banned for civilian use, due to too many deaths from unregistered users, misuse, and increased crime rate.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gun Banning

    1065 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun control and gun banning have been a highly controversial issue since all the gun crimes hitting the news in America. Crimes like Sandy-Hook , Aurora , San Berdindno , and Oregon have lawmakers thinking about banning guns by enacting laws that allows them to. Lawmakers believe guns are the prime suspect in all these gun violence crimes and they believe it well reduce murder and violence. Banning guns well do nothing to reduce the mass killings. If a criminal has the intent to commit a crime nothing can stop them. Also a criminal doesn’t abide by the law that is why they are criminals. Gun banning would only disarm the legal law abiding citizen leaving them defenseless. Also the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constution and the Bill of Rights. If lawmakers have the courage take away one Constutional right they will have the courage to keep going, I have three logical reasons why gun banning well not work.

    Read More

  • Why Guns Should Be Illegal

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States, there is a famous saying to justify gun ownership “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” It is true that the person with the gun is the one who is doing the killing but the gun makes it easier to have a massacre. However guns are useful for police, security, and military so they could protect themselves and everyone around them. Americans are not obsessed with guns; the American people are tired that their 2nd amendment rights are being violated. Police violate the citizen right to bare arm and will detain them. The sell of guns are being banned in some states, which makes it harder for citizen to own a gun. When someone chooses to carry a knife for protection the law will try to violate his or her right.

    Read More

  • Gun Control: The Right To Self Control

    1850 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the same year the UK flooded the country with over 20,000 cops so the homicide rates would decrease. John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, gun rights activist, once said that "The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them”.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Concealed Carry

    2162 Words  | 5 Pages

    This is caused because the more guns there, are the less violence there is. Dangerous criminals will think twice about robbing someone that has a gun. A victim with a gun is no longer a victim because they can not fight back against the attacker. Therefore, they can save their lives and save lives of the public which need help at that moment. Lott states, “The estimated annual gain from 1992 from allowing concealed handguns was over $5.74 billion” (House Report). This states that when a decline in violence goes down the amount of money goes up. Concealed guns can only benefit everyone in multiple ways. Concealed weapons can help create the feeling of safety and reduce violence. No one wants to live in

    Read More

  • Stricter Gun Laws Essay

    998 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I believe in 2nd Amendment, but not war weapons on streets”, quoted President Barack Obama ("Barack Obama on Gun Control", n.d., para. 3). The debate on whether stricter gun laws will help deter crime has gained much attention since crime rates started to increase. Many research studies show that stricter gun laws are very effective at inhibiting crime. Arguing on the affirmative side, stricter gun laws will help deter crime by banning ownership of military-style assault weapons, by banning weapons with high-capacity magazines, and by creating new gun regulations that delays the process of gun ownership while significantly limiting weapon access at the same time. If stricter gun laws are incorporated into the system, we will be able to envision a bright and crime-free future ahead of us.

    Read More

  • Reasons for Gun Control

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some of the reasons for gun control are that it will help the government get a control on us.Hitler in world war 2 used gun control against the jewish people to better control and corral them. Historians have documented most everything about it except what made it so easy to attack the defenseless Jews without fear of resistance. Their guns were registered and thus easily confiscated.(stephen halbrook)If the government started registering guns and know their location left and right they could overthrow us with a flick of their wrist. Imagine your local police coming to your doorstep in your house and taking your only good form of self defense.Then turning right around and kidnapping your children and kids and including yourself.I mean thats what the jews were facing during the holocaust.This is why so people do not support gun control for fear of government taking over us and loss of their guns.also some people use guns to provide food for their family thru the form of hunting.you take away their guns you take away their ability to provide for their family.I believe the government doesn't have a right to take our guns to get a hold on us.But its actually better when the government lets us carry weapons around in our everyday lives.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Handgun Ownership Be Banned

    358 Words  | 1 Pages

    People who do not research the owning of handguns and form their opinion off of what they see on the news are left in the dark. One of the most misunderstood concepts is that more guns cause more violence. This is false more guns do not mean more homicides. In 1973, the handgun stock was 36.9 million and the homicide rate was 9.4 per 100,000. In 1992, the handgun stock was 77.6 million but the homicide rate dropped 8.5 percent. In 1994, the U.S. bureau of justice static's made a survey that stated 100,000 lives are saved by handguns. According to criminologist Gary Kleck, guns are fired in only about 24 percent of cases in which they are used for self-defense.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Why Guns Should Be Banned?

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...s the homicide rate increase. Next, people with guns are easier to commit suicides than people without guns. Finally, the freedom to own guns makes people worried.

    Read More

  • Why Do Handguns Be Banned Essay

    662 Words  | 2 Pages

    Handguns can be easily concealed, so they are the weapon of choice for people who choose to use them for self-defense. Unfortunately, they are also the weapon of choice for criminals. Since handguns are easy for criminals to steal, handguns are available on the black market; this makes handguns an attractive choice for criminals. Some gun control supporters believe that completely banning handguns is the best way to protect citizens. However, banning handguns fails to protect people because the laws are ineffective, banning handguns prevents people from an effective means of self-defense, and the laws do not solve the real problem, which is the gun owner.

    Read More

More about Why Guns Should Be Banned

Open Document