Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Catholics and the Protestant Ireland
Catholics and the Protestant Ireland
Catholics and Protestants from Northern Ireland: quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Catholics and the Protestant Ireland
Throughout their campaign for a free Northern Ireland, public support for the actions of the PIRA varied. Certain actions of the PIRA both garnered support for them, and caused a loss of that same support. Initially, the PIRA had support from the majority of the Catholic population of Northern Ireland, as they had been largely discriminated against by the Protestant/unionist government, and British military (Brian, 2000). However, the events of bloody Sunday triggered a major shift in support towards the PIRA, as both Catholics and Protestants were outraged at the events that had occurred (BBC, 2017). The PIRA received a large influx of new recruits, as protests broke out across Ireland, and around the world (Conway, 2010). Additionally, anti-British …show more content…
The expressed goal of the PIRA was to establish a united Irish socialist republic by routing the British from Northern Ireland, however, the PIRA failed to do so (Horgan & Taylor, 1997; English, 2004). In fact, not only did the PIRA fail in their campaign, but their actions set back their goal of getting Britain to withdraw from Northern Ireland (Evans, 2017). To achieve a unified Irish Republic, the PIRA had to unify the population, which consisted of both Protestants and Catholic (Drake, 1991). However, their actions only exasperated hostility between Catholics and Protestants, as Protestants were often painted as perpetrators of persecution by the PIRA, and were regularly attacked by them (Evans, 2017; English, 2004). Additionally, another reason the PIRA failed in their goal was due to their military strategy. The leaders of the PIRA insisted on fighting a ‘long war’, and while that tactic may have worked in Vietnam, the PIRA failed to realise that the Northern Vietnamese had a large amount of international support from countries like that of China, while they did not (Ranstrop & Brun, 2013). This led to the weight of the conflict being carried by people who weren’t prepared to engage in this form of conflict, as many had drug dependencies, mental illnesses, or came from broken homes (Ranstorp & Brun, 2013). As a result, the PIRA were not able to effectively close out their war with the British, instead having to opt for an accord with them (English, 2004). However, the PIRA’s campaign was not an absolute failure, as it brought about the Good Friday Agreement. The Good Friday Agreement was put into place to help end the conflict between the British and the PIRA, and brought in new mechanisms, such as cross-community voting, that gave Irish nationalists a fair say in key legislation (O’Kelly, Doyle & Boland, 2010). Although
The aftermath — No More Vietnams — is well-covered in Appy’s work. The No More Vietnam mantra is usually presented as avoiding quagmires, focusing on quick, sharp wins. Instead, Appy shows politicians have manipulated No More Vietnams into meaning greater secrecy (think Central America in the 1980’s), more over-the-top justifications (“You don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud”) and an emphasis on keeping American deaths inside the acceptable limits of the day to tamp down any public anti-war sentiment.
The Vietnam War: A Concise International History is a strong book that portrays a vivid picture of both sides of the war. By getting access to new information and using valid sources, Lawrence’s study deserves credibility. After reading this book, a new light and understanding of the Vietnam war exists.
Fussell, Paul. "Vietnam." The Bloody Game: An Anthology of Modern War. Ed. Paul Fussell. London: Scribners, 1991. 651-6.
Hall, Mitchell. "The Vietnam Era Antiwar Movement." Magazine of History, 2004: 13. eLibrary. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
Source G: "The Vietnam War and Its Aftermath." American Voices. Glenview: Scott Foresman, 1995. 821-47. Print.
In his article, “To Be Patriotic is to Build Socialism”: Communist Ideology in Vietnam's Civil War, Tuong Vo challenges a standard view of the civil war between North and South Vietnam – the war is power struggle between the two camps. Based on newly available documents and other primary sources, Vu argues that “[V]ietnamese communists never wavered in their ideology loyalty during the period when key decisions about the civil war were made (1953–1960)...a modernizing socialist ideology rather than a mere for national unification was driving the Vietnamese civil war from the north” (Vu 2009, 34–35). In the same vein, Zinoman in his forthcoming article, Nhân Văn–Giai Phm and Vietnamese “Reform Communism” during the 1950s: A Revisionist Interpretation, challenges a well established view about the NVGP movement, a surge of domestic political protest that peaked in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam during 1956 that takes its name from two incendiary journals – Nhân Văn [humanity] and Giai Phm [masterworks]. He points out that foreign scholars and local intellectuals interested in the NVGP affair succeed “in conveying a plausible image of NVGP as a robust movement of political dissent against the party-state” (Zinoman forthcoming 2011, 3).
“Vietnam: A Mistake of Western Alliance” is not the only piece of writing by Mark Atwood Lawrence about the Vietnam War. He has written two books on the topic: Assuming the Burden: Europe and the American Commitment to War in Vietnam and The Vietnam War: A Concise International History. He has also written other essays about the war and co-edited The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and Cold War Crisis. He received degrees from Stanford and Yale and is a Professor of History at The University of Texas at Austin (Mark Atwood Lawrence).
In the early 1900s, Irish nationalists were fed up with the British rule that had dominated Ireland since its existence. The Irish in this situation closely resemble the American Colonists prior to the American Revolution. The Irish felt as if the British did not represent them well and they wanted to run their own country and govern themselves. There were many small rebellions and confrontations between some Irish citizens and the British army all throughout Ireland’s history with the purpose of lowering the morale of British troops that occupied Ireland, or in rebellion to specific actions by the British. However, there never was any organized uprising with a goal of completely eliminating the British like the Easter Uprising in 1916.
The Irish Republican Army was a well-known terrorist organization originating in Dublin, Ireland. The IRA (Irish republican Army) used irregular military tactics including ambushes, sabotage, raids, and petty warfare against the United Kingdom. The IRA raged Guerilla warfare against the British, creating the Irish War of Independence. Even though the Irish Republic Army is no longer active, in their time they wreaked havoc any many different people. In this essay, the description of the group, historical and past events of the group and recent activities will be discussed.
Gilbert, Marc Jason. "Vietnam War." World Book Student. World Book, 2010. Web. 21 March 2010.
Meaning that they had no chance to develop socially meaning that they were at the mercy of the Protestant government. Nearly all MPs were Protestant and because of they wanted to help their own people. Catholics had many difficulty in altering their situation because the Protestants held all political power and did their best to keep it from them. There has always been conflict between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.
English persecution of the Irish people is one cause of the tensions in Northern Ireland. Before 1793 Irish Catholics were persecuted by British law. Catholics were not allowed to buy and sell land, get proper education, marry Protestants or vote. This fueled problems in Ireland. After 1793 Britain was afraid, after loosing America, that a revolution would happen in Ireland. So the restrictions on the Irish Catholics were done away with. This however angered the protestants who formed the Orange Order, who was against the Catholics. This all came to a head when in 1798 when a small rebellion broke out.
At the outset of her pioneering study, A Kingdom United, Catriona Pennell sets out that she seeks to shatter the myth of ‘War Enthusiasm’ in Britain and Ireland, which she does so very convincingly throughout the book. Pennell uses a plethora of sources, including national, regional, and local newspapers; recorded interviews; pamphlets; leaflets; magazines; committee minutes; memoirs; letters; photographs; police records; sermons; government records and many more. Whilst dispelling the myth of jingoism Pennell does seek to persuade the reader that there was, as the title aptly suggests, a common and general support for the war across Britain and Ireland in 1914. For Pennell, this support and the mass volunteering does not necessarily translate
127-131] In addition to regular assassinations and shootings, the attack modes of PIRA also include suicide bombings, car bombings and other inhumane methods, which are recognized as terrorist acts. In 1972, the political attacks reached the peak. [ Sutton, An Index Of Deaths From The Conflict In Ireland, 1969-1993.] At first the leadership of PIRA thought this would be a “short but successful war”, but the hope of a quick victory abated in the mid-1970s.