Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Attachment theory vignettes
Case study of attachment theory
Strength of attachment theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Attachment theory vignettes
In class we discuss the possible reasons why we may be attracted to certain people. The first reason is affect. Affect is when we tend to like people who make us feel good. Another reason could be propinquity. Propinquity effect is people are more likely to start a relationship with those who are geographically close to them. The fourth reason could be similarity. Assortative mating falls under similarity, which means people tend to match themselves with partners who are similar. However, there isn’t any link to similarity leading to a successful and stable relationship. People who are physiologically aroused when meeting people may lead them to higher attraction. Neurochemical Factors may also play a role in sexual attraction. Higher levels of dopamine enhance attraction and higher levels of serotonin decrease attraction. The last possible factor is physical attractiveness. While most people have individual preferences, attractive people are seen as likeable, interesting, successful, etc. Men tend to value attractiveness over women. …show more content…
Evolutionary theory are adaptations from our ancestors that are still present today, which are survival and reproduction. In regards to unequal parental investment, men benefit from one-night stands with fertile women. Women however benefit from long-term relationships with reliable men. In a study done by Clark and Hatfield, male and female undergraduates were randomly asked by a research assistant if they would go to bed with them. While 0% of the females said yes, 75% of the men said yes. A criticism of the evolutionary theory is what we say isn’t what we always do. Another criticism is this theory has trouble explaining sexual
...eir male counterparts. Darwin’s theory helps us understand the manner in which women were perceived and what sort of change Bellamy proposes to change this perception. It helps us understand the benefits and drawbacks that are likely to ensue as a result of Bellamy’s perception on who women are.
Human’s put a tremendous amount of brain energy and time into obtaining happiness, which is normally associated with finding the “perfect” mate. Many aspects go into the process that is used to determine if one person is better suited than another. Appearance, age, and personality all contribute to someone’s level of attraction to another. Opposites attract is a common myth stating that those levels of attraction are based of extreme differences between the individuals and that difference is what produces the attraction.
A significantly higher number of people from the group who expected a painful electric shock waited with another person. This showed the importance of social relationships in the reduction of anxiety and the sharing of experiences. However, why is it that we are attracted to some people more than other people?
Keith Henson a writer in evolutionary psychology once said that “Evolution acts slowly. Our psychological characteristics today are those that promoted reproductive success in the ancestral environment.” Evolution was first introduced by a naturalist by the name of Charles Darwin. Darwin had written an autobiography, at the age of 50, On the Origin of Species (1859) explaining how species evolve through time by natural selection; this theory became known as Darwinism. “Verlyn Klinkenborg, who writes editorials and vignettes on science and nature for the “New York Times”” (Muller 706) questions Darwin’s theory in one of his essays he wrote called Darwin at 200: The Ongoing Force of His Unconventional Idea. Both articles talk about the theory of Darwinism, but the authors’ use different writing techniques and were written in different time periods. Darwin himself writes to inform us on what the theory is, where as Klinkenborg goes on to explain why Darwinism is just a theory. Today, evolution is still a very controversial topic among many. It comes up in several topics that are discussed everyday such as in politics, religion and education.
Darwin's theory of sexual selection is an intriguing one because it offers an explanation of human striving and cultural value systems. The theory is that humans who are more sexually desirable will have more offspring and thus their traits will be passed on to future generations to a greater extent than those of less sexually desirable humans. As opposed to Darwin's other theory, natural selection, those who are the best adapted to their environment will be more likely to pass on their genes, or, "survival of the fittest", you might call sexual selection "survival of the sexiest." The theory is intended to in part explain why, when humans diverged from other primates, the human brain tripled in size in just two million years. At first glance, this theory also seems to explain much of the motivation behind human culture and achievement. Upon closer inspection, there are some fairly conspicuous problems with it, especially when it is extended to describe not only human evolution in the distant past but it the present, but it may still be the most plausible explanation available to explain why humans mental capacities have expanded so far beyond those of our primate relatives.
The two books examined in this paper, Martin Daly and Margo Wilson's Homicide and David M. Buss's The Evolution of Desire, suggest that human mating strategies have an evolutionary basis. The book written by Martin Daly and Margo Wilson supplies the theoretical groundwork and the book written by David M. Buss gives validity and empirical support for the theory. The two books make a strong scientific argument for evolutionary adaptations as the most crucial element to understanding human sexuality and desire. According to this argument, the key to understanding human sexuality lies in the evolutionary origin of our species.
There are many ways in which evolution can be criticized scientifically, but most of those criticisms are highly specific. There are countless examples of genetic characteristics, ecological system...
Attraction may be influenced by many factors. One possible explanation to explain attraction is the sexual selection theory firstly proposed by Darwin (1871) which includes two related processes. Intrasexual section was the first process which described the tendency of one sex to compete amongst themselves for access to members of the opposite sex. The second process intersexual selection which explained the inclination of members of one sex to selectively choose certain members of the opposite sex as partners. Intersexual selection was usually selected by females as they were the choosier and selective sex than males in mate preference. In addition Darwin (1871) also suggested the evolution of characteristics that offer reproductive advantages to organisms compared to survival advantages. Survival is vital to organisms as it affects reproduction, and those who are successful at being chosen by the opposite sex will evolve as they give organisms reproductive advantages.
“Animals are adapted to their conditions in subtle and marvelous ways (Boyd, R., & Silk, J. 1997:2).” It is commonly recognized that Darwin identified adaptations through Natural Selection: traits that are advantageous to survival will be retained in the population through reproduction. Natural Selection further indicates that traits will survive when they are most beneficial to an individual’s fitness. While Natural Selection and Mutation effectively explains adaptive fitness qualities and variance among populations, it fails to explain species beautiful ornamental traits that are not necessarily beneficial to fitness. The extravagant tails of a male peacocks, the neck of a giraffe, and bright colored plumage of birds are attributes designed to maximize reproductive success. Muscularity, sexual dimorphism (general size difference between sexes), male beards, penis size, calculated fat storage (in the breasts and hips for women), and co-parenting are adaptations in humans explained through sexual selection: specifically, through competition. Natural and Sexual Selection are competing and paralleling factors that define human evolution. While Natural Selection may define the necessity to impart certain genes, Sexual Selection quickly allows adaptations to occur through competition. Evolution
Evolutionary Psychology has been controversial since its rise in the 1990s, with critics and proponents debating its merits as a science. While critics (e.g. David Buller, Elizabeth Lloyd) have extensively criticized the fundamentals of Evolutionary Psychology, few philosophers or scientists have challenged them. Given the growing influence of the evolutionary behavioral sciences within mainstream science like Psychology and Anthropology, it is important analyze the critiques and see if the arguments against Evolutionary Psychology have merit. This paper will focus on two of the most often cited critiques of Evolutionary Psychology: the critique of the concept of the modular model of the mind and the critique of the two “signature achievements” in Evolutionary Psychology, Martin Daly and Margot Wilson’s Cinderella Effect and David Buss’s studies of male-female differences in jealousy. I will describe and respond these critiques of Evolutionary Psychology, making the case that these critiques are not valid and have little merit on scientific basis of Evolutionary Psychology.
Evolution is one of the most well supported theories throughout science and is one of the best explanations we have to help us understand the diversity of life forms. There are so many parts to evolution and with each of them having various explanations it is understandable that there are also numerous misconceptions surrounding the theory. Whilst when the theory of evolution was first introduced it produced a fair bit of controversy, it was widely accepted by many biologists. Despite this, it continues to be a difficult and debated topic and so misbeliefs about it largely exist. For these reasons it is important that we study evolution and begin to understand the truth behind these misconceptions.
A primary reason that Tom and Summer are able to be interested in and be attracted to each other is due to their close proximity. They work at the same job which means that they will spend more time with each other and have more interaction. The propinquity effect tells us that the more time a person spends with someone, and the more interaction they have can lead to a higher chance of that person having a closer relationship with us.
It may seem obvious to some why people mate, however there are many facets to human mating. Psychology has shown that reasons for mating have gone beyond the scope of love and physical attractiveness. People may search for mates who resemble archetypical images of the opposite-sex parent, mates with characteristics that are either complementary or similar to one's own qualities, or mates with whom to make an exchange of valuable resources (Buss 238). Although these theories play a key role in understanding patterns in human mating preferences, evolutionary psychology and sexual selection theory provide more concrete frameworks for explaining human mating.
...at seem to contradict Darwinian Theory and either significantly reduce or eliminate an organism’s fitness. However, that is not to say such an explanation within evolutionary psychology cannot exist, it merely means a sufficient one does not currently exist.
Sexual attraction refers to desirability as it relates to a sexual connection; individuals are sexually attracted to those they would perceive as a mate in some way. This attraction can be rooted in a variety of factors, including those both tangible and intangible. Sexual attraction often refers to physical attraction, or being aroused by a person’s physical traits. These can include appearance, smell, or voice. However, sexual