Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of strategic marketing
Nature and scope of marketing strategy
Nature and scope of marketing strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of strategic marketing
Wrigley’s is one the leading chewing gum maker in the US and holds about 50% market share. Even though Wrigley’s planned to introduce pellet gum, Eclipse, in 1996 but held back the launch due to financial constraints. Adams a competitor and maker of Dentyne used this opportunity and Dentyne quickly became the third best-selling gum in the US. Eclipse the odor removing gum had a good start but missed its sales forecast by 24% even though they spent more money on its launch than any on other brand. The board is looking for a way to revive the brand and have employed Paul Chibe as the new Senior-Marketing officer. Below is the OTSW analysis: Opportunities: ∗ Polar Ice as the main product: Polar Ice the mint flavor that was recently introduced …show more content…
Threat ∗ Intense competition: There is an intense competition in the market with all brands coming up with new products. The first two Eclipse flavors -Spearmint and Peppermint- did not perform well to their expectations and failed in most category during the blind test against Dentyne’s flavors. ∗ Declining market for chewing gums: The chewing gum market being a slow growing market poses a threat for Wrigley’s. The competition from mint industry, specially the brand Altoids poses as the biggest obstacle for Wrigley’s to grow its sales. ∗ Wrong distribution channel and Pre-pricing policy: The placement of product and distribution to mass stores was not a correct strategy. Data shows that the velocity of Single pack was more in food store and convenience stores as more consumers but their gums from these store and not mass stores. Also, the pre-pricing policy would result in decreasing margin for the retailers and convenience and food store would not like to suffer the loss forcing the company to sell most of the quantity through mass stores.
Considering 4 elements of the marketing mix and the case discussion of the general trends in the industry, it seems that MCB is experiencing problem with place and determining its target market. The case provides many examples of the company's difficulties in gaining more retail locations, maintaining sufficient inventory level, and, the most important, improper positioning of its product, which impeded the MCB to reach its potential customers.
In this paper I will discuss the Wrigley Company and how it became one of the most recognized and largest branded companies in the world. When you think of Wrigley people tend to think of the gum products it is now for, as well as the commercials we all have grown to love over the years. Remember the double mint twins, what about, Juicy fruit, even big red- all are a part of the every expanding brand of Wrigley. One of the many achievements the company can tip its hat too is being able to say that it lead all gross product sales in the year of 2007. This is a major accomplishment considering that the US is one of the largest consumers on the planet- so the competition is fierce. But overall its leadership and management have given the come the wherewithal to withstand to new challenges the company has faced over the decades.
Constant innovationthis company's growth is driven by their constant innovation. Constant innovation is the key to their enterprises future. When they signed the tobacco settlement agreement in 1988 it fundamentally changed the way cigarettes are advertised, promoted, and sold in the US. This impacts every aspect of Philip Morris USA's marketing practices. While they are complying with this agreement they are also being responsible by marketing to adult smokers. They also have policies and practices in place to address all issues with their primary stakeholders along with their secondary stakeholders such as the general public, public health communities, parents, community leaders, decision makers, and the government (Altria, 2008).
Although Lafley has had success, the underlying problem remains. How will Lafley return P&G to its rightful place in Corporate America? P&G's solution to its problems is through product line extensions, expansion into non-premium brands, as well as acquisitions, licensing, reinforcing market orientation through consumer focus, and outsourcing. This recommendation was based on following items;
The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000 alone, consumers on average drank 53 gallons of soft drinks per person a year. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, followed by The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. Each company respectively has numerous brands that it sales. These top brands account for almost 73% of soft drink sales in the United States. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands sold. Colas are the dominant flavor in the U.S carbonated soft drink industry; however, popularity for flavored soft drinks has grown in recent years. The changing demographics of the U.S population have been an important factor in the growing popularity of these flavored soft drinks. The possible impact of this factor will be addressed later in the case.
* The GCP-FFD should also fix various posters in the retail outlets and supermarkets to promote its product. (Please refer Exhbit-11)
The Hershey Food Corporation is a very successful and quality business. Many products are manufactured by this corporation. Most relating, but not limited to chocolate. The corporation plays a role in deciding where products are produced. Hershey’s has expanded to both Canada and Mexico, which calls for many corporate decisions. There are an amazing amount of products associated with Hershey. These include Jolly Ranchers, Hershey Kisses, Hershey drink mixes, the entire line of Reese’s products as well as good old fashion chocolate bars. These products serve in the candy/snack foods division of sales. Society could do without them... but why would we want to?
The Frito-Lay product distribution location strategy is to sell in grocery stores, convenience stores and gas stations. Frito-Lay’s distribution strategy is from manufacturer to retailer and from retailer to customer, thus the retailers offer the company a location to sell their products and allows for intensive distribution ("P7distributioncasestudy - Fritolay"). Frito-Lay products are sold in the snacks area. Frito-Lay aims local customers in the countries in which they distribute their packed
Since there are many competitors, P&G must find ways to distinguish themselves from their rivals. The factors that determine these are marketing, technological innovation and accurate consumer feedback. In terms of marketing, the public must be aware of the product, what it is used for and what makes it better than other alternatives. In terms of technological innovation, the product should have some advantage over the competitors’ product such as low cost or high performance. In terms of consumer feedback, data should be gathered on what the customer liked about the product, what they did not. This will allow the product to continue to evolve into what the customer wants.
Pepsi Company (PepsiCo) owns many brands of beverages, snacks and other foods. Its major product, Pepsi Cola, is one of the most popular carbonated beverages. Besides that, PepsiCo owns the brands Quaker Oats, Gatorade, Frito-Lay, Tropicana, Mountain Dew, Naked, Mirinda and SoBe. In order to maintain, or preferable expand, its market share, PepsiCo constantly introduced new products under its brands. This is a marketing strategy known as Product Development. By modifying the formulas and ingredients, PepsiCo had invented and marketed more than 50 types of carbonated beverages under the brand of Pepsi. To name a few, Pepsi Free introduced in 1982, Pepsi AM introduced in 1989, Pepsi Tropical introduced in 1994, Pepsi Blue introduced in 2003, Pepsi Edge introduce in 2004, Pepsi Lime introduced in 2005, and Pepsi Ice introduced in 2007. Some of the products survive and being accepted by consumers, however large number of the new formula Pepsi had failed and been removed from the market shelves in as short as 6 months.
Pepsi Blue was first test-marketed in Bahrain for three reasons: first, the majority of residents drank Pepsi; second, regional marketers and bottlers had already begun re-evaluating the effectiveness of the company's white logo (which didn't work well in their market); and third, the city was a small test market with a tightly controlled sample population. The Pepsi Blue logo, tagline and new marketing materials were rolled out in half the market and its results were highly successful. Purchasers liked the new logo design and the majority believed that the packaging had improved and the taste remained the same. For those who believed that both the taste and packaging were different, the majority enjoyed the "new" taste.
Carbonated soft drinks lead the Soft drink market. In the U.S. the industry is majorly dominated by two companies i.e. Pepsi and Coca-Cola, whereby they dominate about 70% of the carbonated soft drinks market share. It is a high competitive market between these two giants who fight on who will have the majority of the market. Soft drinks have monopolized the industry year after year with their market dominance. The industry has massive economies of scale, large bottling and distribution networks.
In 1991, CP launched new products in the U.S market CP and held 43% of the world toothpaste market and 16% of the world toothbrush market. Other oral care products included dental floss and mouth rinses. In 1991, worldwide sales of CP's oral care products increased 12% to $1.3 billion, accounting for 22% of CP's total sales.
The company’s name got changed in 1968 to Hershey Food Corporation and it expanded its operations with different product lines, in addition to this, the company acquired other companies that manufactured similar products. The company is currently the leader in production of both non-chocolate and chocolate confectionery products all over North America. The company’s products are known and enjoyed in several countries around the world; the company is still committed to its vision and values and it continues to produce new products.
The “Top Challenge Trend” is likely that of “Faster Pace of Innovation” causing increased competition due to lower barrier of entry. (Carpenter, Bauer, & Erdogan, 2012) With the increase competitors from both major competitors like PepsiCo vs generic branding of sodas at cheaper rates. The market is flooded with new flavors and new competitors all the time.