Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship and emotions
Essay on inner strength
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship and emotions
You shouldn’t change who you are just to impress someone. The Narrator in “Catch the Moon” learned this by confronting his emotions. The Narrator in “The Bass, the River, and Sheila Mant” learned this by realizing that it is not important to impress people. The stories are different because they have different themes. The stories are alike because they both deal with a guy trying to impress a girl. In the story “Catch the Moon” Luis was trying to impress a girl by finding a hubcap that she had lost to the back of her car. Throughout the story “Catch the Moon” Luis was going through rough times due to the fact that his mother had just died. Luis had really loved his mother so Luis was going to change his ways. Luis had learned after falling for the girl only one thing, that love can change any person. His mom and the girl pushed him to the point where he lets his feelings out. True love can bring out who a person is. Love made him nicer. He must not change the way he is to prove something to people. …show more content…
The Narrator did his best to impress Sheila but he had to top the twenty year olds that also liked her. When the Narrator took Sheila to go fishing he realized she didn't like to fish but the Narrator wanted to catch a bass. The Narrator realized that it isn't worth it to act like someone you aren't. After the fishing trip with Sheila he said to himself, "The thought of losing the fish still haunts him today so he will never choose something over someone he loves again". We must not be drove to who we are. The Narrator realizes that true love shouldn't be about changing who he is. Throughout the story the Narrator began to realize what was really going on. He must not change the way he is to prove something to
I am reading “The Bass, the River, and Shelia Mant” by W.D. Wetherell, The story is about a young boy trying to choose between a beautiful girl and his passion of fishing. In this journal, I will be questioning and evaluating.
James Duncan’s book entitled, The River Why, focuses around the main character, Gus, and how he changes throughout the book. In this book Gus is discovering what life really is and that the whole world does not revolve around fishing. After moving out of his erratic house he spends all of his time fishing at his remote cabin, but this leaves him unhappy and a little insane. He embarks on a search for him self and for his own beliefs. Duncan changes Gus throughout the book, making Gus realize that there are more important things to life than fishing, and these things can lead to a happy fulfilled life, which in turn will help Gus enjoy life and fishing more. Duncan introduces a character, Eddy, who significantly changes Gus’s views on what he needs in his life and she gives Gus a sense of motivation or inspiration. Eddy changes Gus by their first encounter with each other, when Eddy instills in Gus a need to fulfill his life and when they meet up again, completing his need. Fishing is Gus’s first passion but he loses it after he puts all of himself into it, and when Eddy comes into his picture Gus feels a need to have more in his life, like love. Through finding love he re-finds his passion for fishing and learns more about himself. When Eddy and Gus finally get together, he sees this “equilibrium” between his old passion, fishing, and his new one, Eddy. Duncan’s use of Eddy gives Gus a new found sense of purpose and to have a more fulfilled life is a critical step in Gus’s development as a character. This is why Eddy is the most important character to this book, because she gives Gus inspiration to find himself.
The story describes the protagonist who is coming of age as torn between the two worlds which he loves equally, represented by his mother and his father. He is now mature and is reflecting on his life and the difficulty of his childhood as a fisherman. Despite becoming a university professor and achieving his father’s dream, he feels lonely and regretful since, “No one waits at the base of the stairs and no boat rides restlessly in the waters of the pier” (MacLeod 261). Like his father, the narrator thinks about what his life could have been like if he had chosen another path. Now, with the wisdom and experience that comes from aging and the passing of time, he is trying to make sense of his own life and accept that he could not please everyone. The turmoil in his mind makes the narrator say, “I wished that the two things I loved so dearly did not exclude each other in a manner that was so blunt and too clear” (MacLeod 273). Once a decision is made, it is sometimes better to leave the past and focus on the present and future. The memories of the narrator’s family, the boat and the rural community in which he spent the beginning of his life made the narrator the person who he is today, but it is just a part of him, and should not consume his present.
I wanted him to love me…” Robert: “ …I don’t like you” Robert’s only problem with his son was that he had been born. However he didn’t love Stephen because he could not love any one. It was just simply because he did not like him. Robert: “its temporary, Elaine knows I love her.” These words emphasise even more that it was just his son he had a problem with and that he was devoted to his daughter.
To elaborate, after the narrator asks Sheila on a date, he brings his fishing rod because he never went anywhere that summer "without a fishing rod" revealing that fishing is what he likes to do and is important to him. He adds when he wasn't trying to impress Sheila Mant, he "was fishing the river for bass" explaining that he spends a lot of time fishing and he enjoys it very much. Before Sheila Mant, fishing has been his true passion. Nonetheless, the narrator becomes torn between Sheila and fishing. During the date, as the narrator discusses fish, Sheila pronounces that she believes "fishing's dumb" which created a dilemma with the narrator because fishing is what he cherished as extremely as Sheila. His rash desire masks his true passion and provokes the narrator to hide his passion from Sheila. Furthermore, the narrator hooks the largest fish he has seen inside his fishing pole and realizes that "Sheila must not know" because he would have given anything not to "appear dumb in [her] eyes." His superficial values and hunger for Sheila cause him to hide his passion in exchange for the possibility of Sheila's love. His desire for Sheila forces him to try to seem sufficient enough Sheila's love even if it means endangering his passion. Instantly, the tug of Sheila was too great for him and he extracted a knife and "cut the line in half" forcing his passion
...a woman through his words, he knows not true love and since he knows not the love of Roxane, she is unworthy of his love.
The narrator in the story does not know everything in the story, the narrator cannot understand everything in the story, and can only describe everything that happens in the story through, the narrator’s view, and thoughts, portraying that the story is told in the first person limited point of view. For example, when Sheila was describing how fishing was boring, or uninteresting for her, the narrator tries to think of ways why her dislike of fishing came through, but never really figures it out, “Now I have spent a great deal of time in the years why Sheila Mant should come down so hard on fishing/ Had she tried it once” (Wetherell 3). This shows that the narrator is desperately trying hard to figure out why does, Sheila, someone that the narrator hold in high regard, hates something that, the narrator also holds in high regard. Despite, the previous mentions that the narrator had learned so much about Sheila, the narrator was not knowledgeable on the topics that Sheila was talking about in the canoe ride with the narrator. “It was a few minutes before I was able to catch up with her train of thought/I had no idea whom she meant” (Wetherell 2,3), many instances were showed that the narrator had really nothing in common with Sheila, and could not give much
“The Bass, The River, and Sheila Mant,” written by W.D. Wetherell, tells the story of a fourteen-year-old boy and the summer in which he met Sheila Mant. After weeks of failed attempts and longing for the older woman who seemed just out of his reach, the boy worked
He teaches the kid what to do in order to successfully reel in a large, beautiful fish. Ironically, the narrator is the one who learns from the kid in the end. At the beginning of the story, everything is described negatively, from the description of the kid as a “lumpy little guy with baggy shorts” to his “stupid-looking ’50s-style wrap-around sunglasses” and “beat-up rod”(152). Through his encounter with the boy, the narrator is able to see life in a different way, most notable from how he describes the caught tarpon as heavy, silvery white, and how it also has beautiful red fins (154). Through the course of the story, the narrator’s pessimistic attitude changes to an optimistic one, and this change reveals how inspiring this exchange between two strangers is. This story as a whole reveals that learning also revolves around interactions between other people, not only between people and their natural surroundings and
Sometimes when decisions are made, they result in the most inconsidered consequence. In “The Bass, the River, and Sheila Mant”, the main character, a fishing fanatic, finally reels in a date with Sheila Mant, otherwise known as the woman of his dreams, who is uninterested with fishing. During the date, the main character rows Sheila down the river in a boat, where she states, “I think fishing is dumb, it’s boring and all, it’s just dumb.” (Wetherall 3). Meanwhile, an astronomical-sized fish is tugging on the main character’s line.
Throughout his life... was a man self-haunted, unable to escape from his own drama, unable to find any window that would not give him back the image of himself. Even the mistress of his most passionate love-verses, who must (one supposes) have been a real person, remains for him a mere abstraction of sex: a thing given. He does not see her --does not apparently want to see her; for it is not of her that he writes, but of his relation to her; not of love, but of himself loving.
It starts when Rainbow Fish, the most beautiful fish in the ocean is asked to share his shimmering scales, but he angrily denies them and turns all the fish reject him. All the other fish want nothing to do with him, nor do they want to befriend him. (As the story states) “From then on, no one would have anything to do with the Rainbow Fish. They turned away when he swam by” (Pfister 5). The author’s intention is to reveal to the audience how the other fish were not friends with Rainbow Fish due to his egocentric behavior. Rainbow fish was self-centered and believed to be better than all the other fish. He valued beauty, something that was of little value over his happiness. He then suffered consequences of those beliefs by being lonely.
Compare and Contrast Essay The common theme between “The Bass, the River, and Sheila Mant” and “Catch the Moon” is love. I am going to compare and contrast how two different characters approach love and how their choices, decisions, and consequences affect their lives. In the story “The Bass, the River, and Sheila Mant”, the narrator is attracted to this girl, Sheila Mant, so he asked her on a date, that is how he approaches her.
He is madly in love with Lady Brett, who loves him in return. However, they cannot complete their relationship because of Jake’s injury. Therefore, all he can do is helplessly watch as Brett dates other men. Their forbidden love is similar to the story of Romeo and Juliet, however this novel tells us about the scary ventures of love. Hemingway uses dialogue, imagery and omits descriptions of the characters’ emotions to show the tragedies of love.
Andrew in particular shares an insightful perspective in the relationship he has with Teresa, the woman with whom he admits to be attracted to. Andrew shares that, “After a time I realized she had come into the focus of my attention, I mean, I had to be interested in her, and at the same time I accepted the fact that I had to.” (Wojtyla, p. 24) From this quote Andrew shares a sense of purpose as well as reassurance as he identifies that what is happening to him lead to her, Teresa, being his ‘life’s companion’. However, from what he finds to be a sign towards his future, due to his attraction, he also shares that he was not however completely drawn to her as many would find true love be like but reassures himself and collects his thoughts in the realization that he does want her and would not want to change that. His attraction to her is uncontrollable and from this inability to change his feelings he knows that this, that he is meant for Teresa by some unknown spiritual force; as this force is constantly pulling him to her he knows to accept