Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Misogyny in the Odyssey
The role of women in greek literature
Misogyny in illiad
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Euripedes: True Misogynist or Proponent for Women’s Power? According to the dictionary, Misogyny is defined as having a hatred for women. The word itself is originated from the Greek word mysoginia, which is apt because the play Medea was written by Euripedes, a Greek man. For hundreds of years, the world was run based on a patriarchal society, meaning, run solely by men; most likely being the reason why misogyny came about. Euripedes’s Medea, can be construed to have misogynistic undertones at some points in the play, but overall, it seems quite apparent that Euripedes wasn’t truly a complete misogynist because of the way he glorified and portrayed Medea’s strong character. In the play, although there were some scenes where women were outright scorned, (ie. the scene where Jason mentioned that women were unnecessary beings) the overall care and handling that Euripedes put into Medea’s character showed that he truly did believe that women could be powerful. “I will take them away myself / and bury them with this hand” (Euripedes 1427-8). In this scene, Medea is talking to Jason and she is telling him that she herself will bury her own children even if she has to suffer being with their lifeless bodies. That, coupled with the fact that she …show more content…
killed her own children, show that although she was vicious, she was able and willing to do whatever it took to enact her revenge on Jason.
She goes on to reveal what her plans for the future are, “I myself will go /
to live together with Pandion’s son / Aegeus, in Erechtheus’s city” (Euripedes 1434-6). Medea is just moving on with her life and not showing any remorse for what she had done. She felt victorious because she had caused Jason the utmost pain, thus achieving her goal of making his life hell. Because she is able to just go forth from this situation shows that Medea’s character is strong-willed and she has proven to be a very formidable opponent to anyone who wronged her. Which ultimately shows that Euripedes believed that women could be powerful, they could go on to do big things (although in this case Medea’s power proved that she would always and forever be a murderous barbarian). In many ways, it can be argued that Euripedes used Medea’s powerful character as a representation of the evil nature of women and how crazy they can get when wronged, which clearly is a misogynistic viewpoint because it makes women seem like a big threat to society. Among other traits, Medea can mostly be characterized as having a one track mind--she didn’t care for casualties or any consequences of her actions, she just did what she did all for her revenge. “(Jason) You are loathsome / You murdered your children / (Medea) Get out of here, go--/ go bury your wife/ [...] (Medea) Do you think you’re mourning (the children) now / Just wait till you’re old” (Euripedes 1442-5, 1448). This shows that even though Jason is just asking to see his slain children, Medea does not even budge on that. She will not give him the satisfaction of grieving over his children, she wants to make sure he is as tormented and depressed as she was when he left her. This fierce attitude that Medea has, shows that a woman who is wronged is not someone to mess with. Although she is murderous and a major threat, Medea’s dedication to achieving her goal can also be seen as commendable: she has a goal, she works towards that goal, gives up everything for it, and she achieves it. Which ultimately makes it seem as though Euripedes’ overall big picture is that women are smart, cunning, and sometimes vicious, but their voracity and strength knows no bounds, and that can either be a good or bad thing depending on the situation. Euripedes’ Medea as a whole is not a fully misogynistic play, it has parts where women are being shown contempt, but it also paints them in such a light that makes them look strong, courageous, and able to take care of their own business. Overall, the play exemplifieshatred towards women, but also respect for the power of women, one does not overshadow the other, they are both apparent. Which begs to question whether or not Euripedes was truly a misogynist. The scene outlined above, where Medea is showing no remorse for her actions and making Jason suffer, is truly an important scene in this play. It shows what great lengths Medea went through to make Jason pay for being hungry for power and leaving her for someone else, but it also proves to be an example of her character and truly how strong and willful she was. With strength, with power, with the willingness to do anything, a woman with a goal can do whatever task she sets her mind to.
Because she does not hold the same beliefs and ideals of the women in her new society, this escalates the Greek’s skepticism of her and leads to further rejection. Jason explains to Medea that Greek women accept traditional societal roles and the duties placed on them by men when he says, “It is only natural for your sex to show resentment when their husbands contract another marriage. But your heart has now changed for the better. It took time, to be sure, but you have now seen the light of reason. That’s the action of a wise woman” (Page 209-210), but Medea strongly refutes these beliefs.
While both women do wrong by the law of man, and Medea against the law of the gods, they do it for different reasons. In the beginning Medea kills many people and monsters with little or no concern of the consequence. When the story deals with modern times Medea kills out of pure revenge and spite for Jason. She plots for weeks to kill Jason’s new bride and poisons her, and then before she leaves the country she murders her two sons, she had with Jason, before she rides off in her bright white chariot.
Sophocles’ Antigone has as its backdrop a very rigid and conservative Greek society and Greek culture when it was certainly against the norm of a typical ancient Greek woman to rebel against a male authority. And therein lies the reason to believe that Sophocles’ protagonist in Antigone showed signs of early feminism. Antigone dared to raise her voice against a patriarchal order at a time when women in ancient Greece were generally fearful that rebellion against male authority would lead to unfortunate circumstances.
do you think this was so, and how justified do you think the accusation was?
Women have always been disempowered due to their gender in modern and ancient times alike. In Corinth they are expected to run the household and conform to social expectations of a dutiful wife. Medea, being an immortal and descendant from the gods has a certain power in intelligence and sly cleverness. Being a foreigner, Medea’s wayward irrational behavior was expected in this play as she was not born in Greece and was seen as an exotic creature. She comes across to the audience as a powerful female character in terms of violence. Some of Medea’s reactions and choices appear to be blown out of proportion as authors generally make characters seem larger than life; this creates a better understanding of the text and the issues which are developed through the characters.
Throughout the length of Shakespeare’s tragedy Othello there is a steady undercurrent of sexism. It is originating from not one, but rather various male characters in the play, who manifest prejudicial, discriminatory attitudes toward women.
As she is "Faced with her husband's cold pragmatism, Medea responds according to her nature." Euripides really stresses the "otherness" of Medea's nature: she is "of a different kind", described in terms of nature and animals: she is "a rock or wave of the sea'", "like a wild bull", "a tiger". Yes, she is a little dangerous, but she is driven by her hear; that vital force which distinguishes the body from the corpse and has been crushed by Jason's betrayal.
Those who are against the idea that women are not empowered in Medea might say that because Medea pulls through as a “hero” at the end of the play, she is empowered. However, this point of view is incorrect because those who agree with it are not establishing the fact the Euripides uses anti-feminism against Medea. He does this to depict Men as being a higher rank than women. Medea describes women as “‘Of all things which are living and can form a judgment/ We women are the most unfortunate creatures’” (Euripides 8). Euripides uses Medea to express his opinions. He agrees with the statement that women are unfortunate, and for this time period, it was common for women to feel this way due to their lack of rights. There are only two living things that can form a judgment, and those would include men and women. Women are assumed to be the weaker of the two and do not get to express their opinions. Therefore, women of that era, are victims of anti-feminism. Another example is before medea is to be exiled, she says to the chorus “‘For in other ways a woman/ Is full of fear, defenseless, dreads the sight of cold/ Steel; but, when once she is wronged in the matter of love,/ No other soul can hold so many thoughts of blood’” (Euripides 9). It is clear that Euripides describes women as being full of fear, which applies to the chorus, and defenseless which applies
Euripides casts Medea as a clever and spiteful woman because he is a misogynist. In his eyes, women are mean and hateful creatures who know nothing of the world except their own house and their own bed. Medea is known to be clever because she is cunning and manipulative which is im-portant because if she was not, she would not have been able to carry out her plan for revenge. My fa-vorite quote from Medea says, “You have / the knowledge, not mention woman’s nature: / for any kind of noble deed, we’re helpless; / for malice, though, our wisdom is unmatched” (Euripides 416-19). Ba-sically, the negative connotation that comes with the word clever implies that women are useless for anything in the real world, but when it comes to affairs of the bedroom, th...
Feminism has been one of the most important forces in shaping our modern-day society. Thanks to the women's rights movement, females today enjoy rights and freedoms that are unprecedented in the history of Western civilization. However, it was not always this way. Whereas modern literature that contains feminist messages barely gets a second thought, readers in our time are intrigued and impressed by feminist works coming from a decidedly male-biased past. Two of the greatest works of Western literature, Antigone and Othello, written by the two great dramatists Sophocles and Shakespeare, have been said to illustrate feminist ideals in the "distant" past. Antigone, which embodies these ideals throughout and is primarily concerned with the inequity of gender roles, is such a play. Othello, while it contains occasional feminist sentiment, still keeps its women in conventional female roles and thus is not a feminist work.
... takes matters into her own hands and doesn’t wait for a man to handle things for her. Also, her internal conflict that is visible throughout the entire play signify that she actually thinks for herself, and is strong enough to need to make serious decisions on her own, regardless of her gender. All of this goes back on the traditional Greek society, and helps make Medea into a play that is ahead of its time. With Euripides challenging the notion of misogyny, he creates Medea to show how powerful and dangerous a woman can be in a story, even though it was never heard of in the modern eras.
In Greek society, the role of women was considered to be insignificant compared to the Greek men. The women had very few rights, no room to voice personal opinions, and a very bleak future with few options for a better life. According to Moses Hades, professor of Greek studies, women in ancient Greek plays are known to be the main characters and take the role of the villain, victim, or the heroine. In Euripides’ play Medea, Medea, the main character, plays all these roles. She represents the heroine by helping her husband secure the Golden Fleece prior to their marriage, and then portrays the victim by being betrayed by her husband, and finally the villain by murdering her loved ones. Therefore, Euripides follows the standard format for a Greek tragedy.
Before delving into the worlds of Othello and David Laurie, we have to define misogyny first. The most basic definition of misogyny, found in Merriam Webster’s dictionary, is a hated for women. There is another definition, though, one that fits the discussion better. Christine E. Hutchins, from On the Issues Magazine, defines it an unnatural/unjust subordination of one part of the population [women] by another [men]. Hutchins builds off the simple definition to make a definition that fits into everyday society. Today, we do not see many men that hate women; some yes but none who vocally denounce them and make their opinions known to the public. But we do see men who view women as inferior. All men, almost all, have it in the back of their subconscious mind that they are better than women; better in the sense that they are stronger, smarter, less emotional, etc. This thinking is a watered down version of the misogyny that used to go on in earlier, less educated times. It is a thinking that has been passed down from generation to generation of men and even women. Two examples of misogyny are Othello and David Laurie. They show how misogyny has grown yet stayed t...
... mentions how men are allowed to seek out other forms of company when they become bored with their wives, but women are not allowed to do this and all they can do is bear this mistreatment in silence. Therefore being a female is Medea’s flaw that permits for Jason to be able to leave, and also Medea’s status as a foreigner is a contributor to this, because one of the reason’s that Jason uses during the play to defend his actions of leaving, is the opportunity to marry into the royal family, which he explains will be prosperous for all of them. Therefore Medea is not able to compete against the wealth and respect that being married to the princess of Corinth will bring.
This mutual suffering between Medea and the Chorus raises issues such as the treatment of women at the time when this play was written. When Medea married Jason, she married herself to him for life. She was expected to be totally obedient and to accept whatever her husband willed. For her to look upon another man other than her husband would have been totally unacceptable. Whereas Jason marries another woman while he...