Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Portrayal of women in literature
Women empowerment from past to present
Portrayal of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Portrayal of women in literature
The Lack of Empowerment in Women
Is it acceptable for anyone to underestimate women and assume the feelings and attitude women feel in order to display them as weak? In the play Medea, The author Euripides does exactly that. All women are different and have contrasting emotions. They also act in different ways. Medea, for example, is very emotional and has trouble controlling her anger. She, along with the chorus of women, are underestimated and made to look worthless. Also with the emotions Medea portrays, she appears out of control. Meanwhile, the chorus seems to be afraid and helpless when it comes to important situations. It is not right to assume all women are incapable of controlling their emotions and providing help when it is needed.
…show more content…
Some might argue that the way Euripides does not empower women is invalid because Medea does manipulate Jason as well as her children to achieve her ultimate goal of murdering them. Euripides does not empower women because throughout his writing, he uses concepts of anti-feminism to imply that Medea, as well as the chorus, are weak and unavailing. First, when Medea is explaining how she saved Jason from the bulls that breath fire and helped him get the golden fleece, Jason thinks otherwise. He says to Medea “‘It would be better far for men/ To have gotten their children in some other way, and women/ Not to have existed. Then life would have been good’” (Euripides 18). It is obvious that Jason wishes that Medea, along with all women, were nonexistent. Euripides makes women out to be worthless except for the fact that the produce babies. He also uses anti-feminism by implying that men should be the only ones on earth, and if women did not exist, then everyone’s lives would be better. It is not a coincidence Medea acted with an outrageous and uncontrollable attitude by killing four males and one female. Conclusions can be drawn that Medea could have harmed mostly men as a result of being told women are of no importance. She could have potentially been trying to prove a point because she does not feel empowered. Also, When Medea takes her children into the house to carry out her plan of murder, the chorus says “‘Do you hear the cry, do you hear the children’s cry?/ O you hard heart, O woman fated for evil!...Shall I enter the house? Oh, surely I should/ Defend the children from murder’ ‘O help us, in God’s name, for we need/ Your help./ Now, now we are close to it. We are trapped by the sword’” (Euripides 41). As the children cry out for help, the chorus contemplates whether or not they should enter the house and assist the children. They spend so much time deciding yes or no that soon enough time is out, and both boys are dead. They also realize that what Medea is doing is wrong and refer to her as a “woman fated for evil” and a “hard heart”. Euripides does not empower the chorus of women because they are made to look helpless and have no control over the situation. He uses anti-feminism in the sense that women have the weaker hand in most situations. In this play, women are not empowered by the author, Euripides, because they are recognized as inferior and ineffectual.
Those who are against the idea that women are not empowered in Medea might say that because Medea pulls through as a “hero” at the end of the play, she is empowered. However, this point of view is incorrect because those who agree with it are not establishing the fact the Euripides uses anti-feminism against Medea. He does this to depict Men as being a higher rank than women. Medea describes women as “‘Of all things which are living and can form a judgment/ We women are the most unfortunate creatures’” (Euripides 8). Euripides uses Medea to express his opinions. He agrees with the statement that women are unfortunate, and for this time period, it was common for women to feel this way due to their lack of rights. There are only two living things that can form a judgment, and those would include men and women. Women are assumed to be the weaker of the two and do not get to express their opinions. Therefore, women of that era, are victims of anti-feminism. Another example is before medea is to be exiled, she says to the chorus “‘For in other ways a woman/ Is full of fear, defenseless, dreads the sight of cold/ Steel; but, when once she is wronged in the matter of love,/ No other soul can hold so many thoughts of blood’” (Euripides 9). It is clear that Euripides describes women as being full of fear, which applies to the chorus, and defenseless which applies
Medea. Medea is left defenseless when she is blindsided by Jason’s act of leaving her for King Creon’s daughter. This is true because when she first found out about the news, all she did was cry and complain about how he treated her. The chorus is “full of fear” because they truly are afraid to act out in important circumstances. To conclude, Women are not empowered by Euripides because he uses anti-feminism to display them as defenseless and delicate. Medea’s emotions get the best of her and make her out to be emotionally unstable. The chorus seems to be afraid of their own shadow the way they were represented through Euripides use of dialog. Since Euripides is a man, he can only assume the emotions and feelings of women. Through his writing and word choice, women are characterized as a lower rank in society. When being put in these categories, women have no other option other than remain there. Since they have no rights, they cannot speak out against it. If Euripides would have considered the mental emotions of women, then his play would have given women an opportunity to feel empowered.
Gender plays an important in any society. The role of women in society has been tested and Medea is the one who wants to attempt to change the way women are seen and perceived. When Jason leaves Medea, she is devastated and outraged. She turns on the city and kills the King, Princess, and even her own two kids to get back at Jason. Medea is not seen as a threat to the city because of her role as a women of Corinth, but in the end she will cause devastation and an uproar in civilization. Medea tells Jason “To turn me out, to get yourself another wife, even after I had borne your sons! If had still been childless I could have pardoned you for hankering after this new marriage. But respect for oaths has gone to the wind” (489). Medea is angry with the choices made by Jason, she does not see that his choices are to help his family not to reject them. Medea being a strong willed women will turn her anger on her city and cause havoc and disrupt civilization and the order in Corinth. In Comparison, Titus’s daughter has no voice she is silenced because she is a women who has no necessary input so she cannot spe...
In ancient Greece, women lacked many of the fundamental rights held by men. Medea feels that this is unjust. These feelings are shown on page 195 when Medea states “...we must pay a great dowry to a husband who will be the tyrant of our bodies; and there is another fearful hazard: whether we shall get a good man or a bad. For separations bring disgrace on the woman and it is not possible to renounce one’s husband…” After being rejected by the one she loved, she beings to question the morals of those around her. She assumes that Greek women are weak and naive for allowing men to treat them this way; allowing men to cast them away at their heart’s content.
In Euripides Medea, Medea is the morally ambiguous character. In part, Medea can be seen as good because she wanted to live with Jason and her two children in Corinth as a family and enjoy a happy life. So it is understandable that Medea becomes devastated and an emotional wreck after Jason leaves her for the princess. He claimed by marrying the princess, he could bring the children up in a well-being and make more royal children. Medea became a distressed. Hateful, and a bitter woman at Jason. Medea mentioned, “we women are the most unfortunate creatures.” Medea acknowledges that the women don’t have much choice in the marriage and if they want a good life, they need a man to control them. And that woman would be much better off if they had
Euripides shows his views on female power through Medea. As a writer of the marginalized in society, Medea is the prime example of minorities of the age. She is a single mother, with 2 illegitimate children, in a foreign place. Despite all these disadvantages, Medea is the cleverest character in the story. Medea is a warning to the consequences that follow when society underestimates the
“Medea,” a play by Euripides, depicts the difficulties that befall women and how their suffering from mistreatment, turned her to commit violent and terrible transgressions. Medea’s display of ceaseless demoralized actions led to the death of nearly her entire family. The text depicts powerless women that live under the rule of their husbands in a male-dominated society. Medea rises against societal norms during this time by her strong belief in her own ideas, she rises to power, and begins to challenge the idea of a strong, heroic character. The character Medea shows great power by rejecting her gender role that society placed her in.
The exchange that takes place between Medea and the Chorus serves several purposes in Euripides' tragedy, The Medea. It allows us to sympathize with Medea in spite of her tragic flaws. It also foreshadows the tragic events that will come to pass. Finally, it contrasts rationality against vengeance and excess. The Chorus offers the sane view of the world to the somewhat insane characters of Medea, Jason, and Creon. As the passage begins on page 176, the leader of the Chorus reveals that she has high regards for Medea despite the fact that she is "savage still." She acknowledges Medea as a foreigner and an outsider and yet is sympathetic towards her. This alliance is apparently based on female bonds rather than on any kind of national loyalty. Medea wastes no time before she begins lamenting and cursing those who "dared wrong me without cause." The Chorus tries to comfort Medea, hoping that this might "lessen her fierce rage / And her frenzy of spirit." They show real concern for her well-being, as well as for the well-being of her loved ones. This unselfish attitude is in stark contrast to the attitudes of the main characters in the tragedy, who all seem to be extremely self-serving. So in just a few short lines, it's already become apparent that while the chorus doesn't necessarily agree with the way that Medea is handling her situation, they are sticking by her and supporting her. This idea supports one of the important themes of the play: the battle of the sexes. Medea now has a chance to get a few things off her chest. She addresses the "Women of Corinth," reminding them that of "all things that live upon the earth and have intelligence we women are certainly the most wretched." She discusses the sad lot that women must deal with in marriage and again stresses the fact that she is an outsider, "alone, without / a city. Her speech is clever and compelling.
Medea and Lysistrata Medea and Lysistrata are two Greek literatures that depict the power which women are driven to achieve in an aim to defy gender inequality. In The Medea, Medea is battling against her husband Jason, whom she hates. On the other hand, in Aristophanes' Lysistrata, the protagonist Lysistrata plotted to convince and organize the female gender to protest against the stubbornness of men. In terms of defining the purpose of these two literatures, it is apparent that Euripedes and Aristophanes created characters that demonstrate resistance against the domination of men in the society. Despite the contrast in the characters of Euripedes' Medea and Aristophanes' Lysistrata, the two playwrights depicted how gender inequality can start a fire.
Charlotte Bronte once said, “Women are supposed to be very calm generally, but women feel just as men feel. They need exercise for their faculties, and a field for their efforts as much as their brothers do. They suffer from too rigid a restraint, too absolute a stagnation, precisely as men would suffer; and it is narrow minded in their more privileged fellow creatures to say that they ought to confine themselves to making puddings and knitting stockings, to playing on the piano and embroidering bags” (Bronte). In the play Medea, Euripides diverged from the traditional role of Greek women through Medea’s characteristics and response to her plight. In delineating the role of women, Medea was unlike any other Greek character. Medea was portrayed as capable and resilient woman who would refuse to back down no matter the obstacles. Nevertheless, women in the Greek culture had very few rights. Housework and bearing children were their main obligations. They were basically no better than slaves. In the ancient Greek society, Medea would not fit well among fellow Greek women. Her role as a woman in the play was downtrodden. However, her determination and courage caused people to fear her. She was a woman who turned her back on her family and killed her own brother in order to help her husband.
The tragic play Medea is a struggle between reason and violence. Medea is deliberately portrayed as not a ‘normal woman’, but excessive in her passions. Medea is a torment to herself and to others; that is why Euripides shows her blazing her way through life leaving wreckage behind her. Euripides has presented Medea as a figure previously thought of exclusively as a male- hero. Her balance of character is a combination of the outstanding qualities of Achilles and Odysseus.
In ancient Greece women were viewed as many things. They were not viewed as equivalent to males by any means. Women were portrayed usually as submissive domestic, and controlled. They played supporting or secondary roles in life to men, who tended to be demanding of their wives, but expected them to adhere to their wishes. In the tragedy Medea, written by Euripides, Medea plays the major role in this story, unlike most Greek stories with women playing only minor roles, but she also demonstrates many behavioral and psychological patterns unlike any other Greek women. In Euripides’ Medea the main character, Medea, Displays many traits that breakdown traditional Athenian misogyny by displaying her as proactive in taking her revenge, having cruel and savage passions, and being a very manipulative women.
Women have always been disempowered due to their gender in modern and ancient times alike. In Corinth they are expected to run the household and conform to social expectations of a dutiful wife. Medea, being an immortal and descendant from the gods has a certain power in intelligence and sly cleverness. Being a foreigner, Medea’s wayward irrational behavior was expected in this play as she was not born in Greece and was seen as an exotic creature. She comes across to the audience as a powerful female character in terms of violence. Some of Medea’s reactions and choices appear to be blown out of proportion as authors generally make characters seem larger than life; this creates a better understanding of the text and the issues which are developed through the characters.
In the plays Medea and Hippolytus, both by Euripides, the female psyche is a point of focus that is not explored in many other Greek tragedies. Through these plays, we can discover the way women were viewed in Ancient Greek society, as well as their concerns. We can also pay attention to how women are portrayed differently between the two plays. In Medea and Hippolytus, the women we spend the most time with are Medea and Phaedra. These women have vastly different values, but the cunning and determination they use to get their way are not as different as one may believe.
... takes matters into her own hands and doesn’t wait for a man to handle things for her. Also, her internal conflict that is visible throughout the entire play signify that she actually thinks for herself, and is strong enough to need to make serious decisions on her own, regardless of her gender. All of this goes back on the traditional Greek society, and helps make Medea into a play that is ahead of its time. With Euripides challenging the notion of misogyny, he creates Medea to show how powerful and dangerous a woman can be in a story, even though it was never heard of in the modern eras.
In Greek society, the role of women was considered to be insignificant compared to the Greek men. The women had very few rights, no room to voice personal opinions, and a very bleak future with few options for a better life. According to Moses Hades, professor of Greek studies, women in ancient Greek plays are known to be the main characters and take the role of the villain, victim, or the heroine. In Euripides’ play Medea, Medea, the main character, plays all these roles. She represents the heroine by helping her husband secure the Golden Fleece prior to their marriage, and then portrays the victim by being betrayed by her husband, and finally the villain by murdering her loved ones. Therefore, Euripides follows the standard format for a Greek tragedy.
Euripides’ play, Medea, is an ambiguous narrative relating to self-serving feminism. Depending on one’s viewpoint, the title character can either be one of the most unconventional delegates of women’s rights or an oblivious saboteur willing to undermine the cause. With all factors from the play taken into account, signs point toward the former. Medea was a pioneer of feminism, acting as a driving force behind breaking the stereotypes assigned to women. Despite being a foreigner and having a questionable moral compass, Medea succeeds in being a benefactress even if it wasn’t the goal she had in mind.