Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of literature of hydroponics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of literature of hydroponics
All in all, this was a very fun and hands on experiment. The abiotic features, such as, the water and the soil, had drastic changes to them as well, and the biotic features; such as, the wheat grass and the anacharis plant, were majorly affected in this experiment, our hypothesis was that we thought that we could neutralize laundry detergent, vinegar and distilled water, so that there won’t be any difference in the growth of the wheatgrass, and the health of the anacharis plant between the control bottle and the two test bottles. We were also observing if one type of vinegar/laundry detergent solution polluted the water more that the other. We made the prediction that the white vinegar would pollute that water more because apple cider is made from more natural substances. My group and I were incorrect, about our hypothesis, but the prediction about the pollution was correct. Both of the wheat grass plants from both of the test columns eventually died.
For example, by day 5 the control bottle has already grew to about 9 cm tall, the white vinegar was 5.5 and the apple cider was 6 cm. The control did very well during this whole experiment growing an average of 2 cm per day, the white vinegar bottle grew about 0.6 cm per day until day 8 and the apple cider vinegar test grew about 1 cm per day until
…show more content…
We noticed that the white vinegar was more polluted by the 5th day. The white vinegar was the most polluted out of all three bottles. We noticed by the 8th day the two test bottles have gained almost an unbearable odor, and the anacharis plant started to decompose in the white vinegar column, which most likely caused the growth of another living organism, mold! So, there is more evidence that the solutions affected the biotic and abiotic components of the 2 test
Although, this experiment is not concluded outdoors, it is provided with efficient light that promotes growth. It’s provided with soil, seed, fertilizer, water and NaCl solutions, to test how salinity effects plant growth.
Many variations and species of plants can be found all around the world and in different habitats. These variations and characteristics are due to their adaptations to the natural habitat surrounding them. In three of many climatic zones, the arid, tropical and temperate zone, plants that vary greatly from each other are found in these locations. In this experiment, we’ll be observing the connection between the adaptations of the plants to their environment at the Fullerton Arboretum. The arboretum is a space containing numerous plants from different environments. The plants are carefully looked after and organized into their specific habitat. Therefore, we’ll be able to take a look at the plants within multiple
Lab 4: Energy Conservation: Hot Stuff!! The purpose of this experiment is to try to find the original temperature of the hot water in the heater using the 60 degrees C thermometer. Use your 60°C thermometer, and any materials available in your laboratory, to determine the temperature of the water in the coffee pot. During this experiment we calculated the original temperature of a heater after it had been cooled down, and we did this by measuring hot, cold, and warm water, with a thermometer that had tape covering 60 degrees and up.
The experiment started by labeling a piece of filter paper with my initials with the following A, B, C, oil, and H2O. I placed two drops of each unknown milk sample, vegetable oil, and H2O next to the labels on my filter paper and allow to air-dry. After these samples were dried, I placed the filter paper in a petri dish containing Sudan IV solution and stained the filter paper for one minute. I then used the forceps to remove the filter paper to the rinsing dish. Then, I rinsed the filter paper with water and collect the runoff in the dish. The last step, I placed the filter paper on the table and allowed it to
We used wheatgrass were 40 wheatgrass seeds, two empty pots, soil, and water. We first added soil for both pots and 20 wheatgrass seeds in each pot. My partner and I decided that we label pot one experiment which is “sugar and water” and pot two control which is “water” only. The experiment was for almost four weeks we had to make sure both get the same room temperature and water, so we can see the results after this amount of time. Both pots had same room temperature so both can have the same amount of sunlight also, the same amount of water which is a glass of water from the sink once a week. In the experiment pot we added a glass of water with one teaspoon of sugar and the control pot glass of water. Every week we used to see both pots grow almost the same. At the end of the experiment, my partner and I measured the length for both plants and we recorded the average for each plant, so we can know the rate of growth
The “Fast Plant” experiment is an observation of a plants growth over the span of twenty-eight days. The objective is to observe how plants grow and use their resources throughout the span of their life. In our lab we observed the Brassica rapa, a herbaceous plant in the mustard family which has a short cycle which makes it a perfect plant to observe in this experiment. Like other plants the Brassica rapa must use the resources in the environment to create energy to complete itʻs life cycle and reproduce. By observing the plant it is easy to see in what organ or function the plant is using itʻs energy and resources and if overtime the resources switch to other part of the plants. By conducting this experiment we are able to observe where and how plants allocate their resources throughout their life by harvesting plants at different points in their life.
People often use vinegar to clean with or make salad dressing. The red gummy soaked in vinegar for 10 hours and grew .3 centimeters. That is less than the gummy bear in Coca Cola grew.
The scientific techniques that were mainly used in the conduction of our investigation were the identification of bacteria through the use of a microscope, putting together a Simple Distillation Kit, treating Petri Dishes with Agar on them with the boiled, distilled or radiated water and calculating the coverage of bacteria on the amount of area treated on the Petri Dish. All of these scientific techniques were a crucial part of our investigation. Without all of these techniques we wouldn’t have been able to conduct such a successful experiment.
My first experiment was on a critter count. The critter count involved us to take rocks out of the creek and count all the critters that are on the rocks we find. If we find a lot of group 1 critters, critters that can’t be by pollution, then the waters aren’t polluted. If we find a lot of group 3 critters, critters that can be by pollution, then the waters are polluted. Group 2 critters are critters that can be in both, but not a lot of pollution. My group and I found lots of group 1 critters(63) which was a good sign. We also found 26 group 2 critters, so the water was polluted, but not by a lot. We found 13 group 3 critters, so we know now that the water is slightly polluted, but it is still clean.
Aim: To determine what effect agricultural runoff has on surrounding environment, and to find what solutions can be made to reverse any damage.
There were five test solutions used in this experiment, water being the control, which were mixed with a yeast solution to cause fermentation. A 1ml pipetman was used to measure 1 ml of each of the test solutions and placed them in separated test tubes. The 1 ml pipetman was then used to take 1ml of the yeast solution, and placed 1ml of yeast into the five test tubes all containing 1 ml of the test solutions. A 1ml graduated pipette was placed separately in each of the test tubes and extracted 1ml of the solutions into it. Once the mixture was in the pipette, someone from the group placed a piece of parafilm securely on the open end of the pipette and upon completion removed the top part of the graduated pipette.
In our Biology Lab we did a laboratory experiment on fermentation, alcohol fermentation to be exact. Alcohol fermentation is a type of fermentation that produces the alcohol ethanol and CO2. In the experiment we estimated the rate of alcohol fermentation by measuring the rate of CO2 production. Both glycolysis and fermentation consist of a series of chemical reactions, each of which is catalyzed by a specific enzyme. Two of the tables substituted some of the solution glucose for two different types of solutions. They are as followed, Table #5 substituted glucose for sucrose and Table #6 substituted the glucose for pH4. The equation for alcohol fermentation consists of 6 Carbons 12 Hydrogens 6 Oxygen to produce 2 pyruvates plus 2 ATP then finally the final reaction will be 2 CO2 plus Ethanol. In the class our controlled numbers were at Table #1; their table had 15 mL Glucose, 10 mL RO water, and 10 mL of yeast which then they placed in an incubator at 37 degrees Celsius. We each then measured our own table’s fermentation flasks every 15 mins for an hour to compare to Table #1’s controlled numbers. At
Saleh, M.A. Abdel-Rahman, F.H. Woodard, B.B. et al. (2008). Chemical, microbial and physical evaluation of commercial bottled waters in greater Houston area of Texas. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A. 43: 335–347.
Introduction According to an online lab manual, Kirby-Bauer test is a highly standard test used in many labs for antibiotic susceptibility for many years. The use of this test is to determine the sensitivity or resistance of bacteria to antibiotics. It is a highly standardized procedure that makes use of Mueller-Hinton agar. For basic a bacterium is swabbed on the agar surface, and then antibiotic disc containing certain concentrations are placed on the center of a plate, pressed firmly so they don’t move, and then incubated.
The sample was subjected to steam distillation as illustrated in Figure 1. A total of 50ml of distillate was collected while recording the temperature for every 5.0 ml of distillate. The distillate was transferred into a 250ml Erlenmeyer flask and 3.0 g of NaCl was added. The flask was cooled and the content was transferred into a 250-ml separatory funnel. Then 25.0ml of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken for 5 minutes with occasional venting. The aqueous layer was discarded and the organic layer was left inside. About 25.0ml of 10% NaOH was then added and the mixture was shaken as before. The aqueous layer was collected and then cooled in an ice bath. It was then acidified with enough 6.00 M HCl while the pH is being monitored with red litmus paper. Another 25.0 ml of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken as before. The hexane extract was saved and a small amount of anhydrous sodium sulfate was added. The mixture was then swirled for a couple of minutes then filtered. A small amount of the final extracted was tested separately with 1% FeCl3 and Bayer’s reagent.