Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character is what you are in the dark literary analysis
Trust in interpersonal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Although Utterson comes across as a serious man, he is well-liked and trustworthy which allows him to gain information from all walks of life such as Enfield. Furthermore, being a lawyer, he proves to be reliable and professional and thus is trusted with important papers such as Lanyon's letter and Jekyll's will. He also treats everyone equally and does not criticizes anyone. Especially, Utterson cares about his friends and would do anything to ensure that they are well.
Dunny to understand his function as "Fifth Business." Jung's theory suggests that the conscious part of Dunny's personality is brought out by Liesl.
Without examples to prove its significance or truth, any theory is meaningless in a pragmatic sense. Thus, Warren styles his protagonist around a real-world character in order to further assist his goal in writing the book - to warn would-be saviors of the people that "power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely," as Lord Acton once said. Both avant-garde men of the people are of ignoble descent - the real statesman born in Winnfield, Louisiana and the fictional raised on a farm in the unnamed state that serves as a backdrop for the novel. However, this common origin is only the beginning of similarities between the two. Both study for the bar exam as young men, and both pass it to receive their law degrees. Their experience in law leads directly to their first campaign for governor of their respective state, and both fail to win. However, both parley the experience and name recognition garnered by a gubernatorial run and soundly defeat their opponents to becom...
In Nathanial Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, the deceptive Roger Chillingworth could most certainly be considered a morally ambiguous character. Throughout the novel, Roger Chillingworth everlastingly remains misleading as to whether he lies on the side of good or evil. Even at the end of The Scarlet Letter, the knowledge of Roger Chillingworth is extremely nebulous. The mysterious Roger Chillingworth, although ultimately emanating to be evil, attests to be a challenge when determining his morality. Roger Chillingworth attempts to beguile us by enacting the role of a physician, and ensconces his relationship with Hester Prynne. He lives with Arthur Dimmesdale, vindicating that he is serving Arthur Dimmesdale a helpful medicine, while he is actually depleting the very life from his bones. Roger Chillingworth, therefore, achieves his moral ambiguity through deception, cleverness, and an unknown history.
He is the most unreliable because he keeps havimg memory lapses and he is unnessarily violent while killing people, which a sign of disorganization. These factors make the narrator the most unreliable. To be reliable is to be aware of what is happening and to be able to keep calm in times of great stress and trouble. In life, these are good indicators of if a person is reliable or
During their walk together, Utterson and Enfield come across the home of Edward Hyde. After relating his story about Hyde, Enfield refers to the place as "Black Mail House" (8).
The Inspector, straight form his introduction, is commanding and authoritative. Upon his entrance he creates, “…at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness.”(PG.11) The Inspector continues to create this impression as he progresses through his speeches and through his interrogation of the family. The Inspector remains confident, sturdy and composed, while people around him crumble and fall to pieces. His ‘solidity’ is proven by the fact he remains on task despite numerous attempts from Birling to digress from the points he is making. The Inspector is told to appear ‘purposeful’; this is shown where he explains to Birling that Birlings way of thinking “Every man must only look out for himself,” is not the case, and all warps of society are interlinked. The view is best illustrated in the Inspectors final speech, where he says, “We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.”(p.56). This idea is one that Priestley, himself believed in deeply, and many of Priestleys writing shared this very theme.
However, each man has their own unique character that influences their technique in impressing. The character of Nicholas, the sly and provocative young scholar, contrasts with the characters of John, the innocent but naïve old man, and Absolom, the credulous and fake romantic. Despite John’s sense of moral and genuine love, his blind trust in Alison causes him to fall easily into Nicholas’ scheme. Absalom, despite having a similar immorally selfish passion as Nicholas, albeit veiled, also fails to win Alison due to his lack of cleverness in comparison. Chaucer presents Nicholas’ immoral yet clever character as a foil to John and Absolom’s innocent and discreet personalities, respectively, in order to emphasize and implement the theme of admiring cleverness rather than morals into his
While Herman Melville’s lawyer in "Bartleby, the Scrivener" appears to have undergone a significant change in character by the story’s completion, the fact remains that the story is told through (the lawyer’s) first-person point-of-view. This choice of narration allows the lawyer not only to mislead the reader, but also to color himself as lawful and just. In the lawyer’s estimate, the reader is to view him as having not only made an effort to "save" Bartleby, but as a man who has himself changed for the good, ethically speaking. What the lawyer fails to acknowledge in his retelling of events is his inability to communicate with Bartleby not because of Bartleby’s shortcomings, but because of his own. The lawyer’s perception of "man" is tainted, for he does not view people as individuals, but as tools -- as possessing a usefulness and/or function. He is not attempting to reach the soul of a man; rather, he is attempting to exploit the use of a machine.
The lawyer, although an active member of society, alienates himself by forming walls from his own egotistical and materialistic character. The lawyer asserts, "All who know me consider me an eminently safe man" (Melville 131). The narrator is a very methodical and prudent man and has learned patience by working with others, such as Turkey, Ginger Nut, and Nippers. However, the lawyer's constant concern with his own self-approval cheapens his benevolence toward Bartleby. In fact, the lawyer is not able to see the desperate plight of Bartleby due to his unwavering concern of what the scrivener can do for the lawyer's self-approval instead of what he can do for Bartleby. In this sense, the lawyer's "wall" is a sort of safety net for his own ego. He does not allow Bartleby's irrationality to affect him because he does not believe that such a thing exists or matters. His materialistic sense does not acknowledge Bartleby's mental p...
The Lawyer assumes he has all the power when he is dealing with Bartleby. He states “he is an elderly man” (http://www.bartleby.com/129, p. 1) and has practiced law for thirty years. The Lawyer assumes that his age and experiences make him a better judge of what is right or wrong with the people he employs. The Lawyer also worked for a prominent member of his community, John Jacob Astor, and would like to think he is on a similar level as his idol. So, if a reader had any question of his qualifications this should suffice. The Lawyer exerts his power over his employees like Turkey, an employee he gives a coat not because Turkey needed a coat but because the Lawyer believes he should be more presentable if Turkey is working for him. Turkey di...
Anthony Trollope, in defiance to Greiner’s article, tells the reader exactly what each character is feeling during any situation. However, Trollope’s The Warden places characters in situations that enables the reader to sympathize, by giving them adequate background on the characters, such as their personalities and values, and clearly describes the situations the characters have been placed in. Trollope gives the reader everything that they need to know about the events in place in the life of Mr. Harding. Beginning with how he received his position as Warden, to his relationship with the people of the village and hospital, and the circumstances that led up to Mr. Bold’s legal action against the hospital in regards to Hiram’s will.
The main character of the story is John Worthing, a Justice of the Peace in Hertfordshire where he owns a country estate. In his country estate, John is force to uphold a respectable and serious demeanor because of his position in society. To escape this serious life, Jack creates his fake brother named Ernest. John, nicknamed Jack, describes his reasoning for his fake brother by saying that because of his position as a guardian to a Miss Cecily Cardew he “has to adopt a very high moral tone on all subjects [...] and a high moral tone can hardly be said ...
In the beginning of the book, Utterson conveys the story of the first time he laid eyes on Mr. Hyde. The story is of a time late at night, when he trampled over a young girl. In the story, Utterson describes Hyde as a Juggernaut. He calls the man hellish. The reader is attracted to the cruelness of Hyde.
Anthony Marston was very inconsiderate, he shows how discourteous his actions were when he says, “I've just been thinking-- John and Lucy Combes. Must have been a couple of kids I ran over near Cambridge. Beastly bad luck” (Christie 69). He does what he wants when he wants, he made it sound like running over two kids was no big deal. His drove to his liking not by the law, “He let in the clutch with a roar and leapt up the narrow street. Old
Enfield is a relative and friend of Mr. Utterson. They walk together although not much conversation is spoken.