More handpicked essays just for you.
The tell tale heart character analysis essay
The tell tale heart character analysis essay
The tell tale heart character analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In life, many people strive to find a person that is reliable and to separate the people that are unreliable. Unreliable can be defined as an adjective meaning not dependable. Having read through the short stories “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe, “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and “Strawberry Spring” by Stephen King, it is reasonable to conclude that each of these stories has its own unreliable narrator. The most unreliable narrator, however, is the narrator/killer Springheel Jack from “Strawberry Spring” by Stephen King due to the narrator’s cognition problems and the violent nature of the murders. The narrator/Springheel Jack is the most unreliable because he has cognition problems. Some people may argue the …show more content…
Others may believe the narrator/caretaker form “The Tell-Tale Heart” is the most unreliable because he had killed very violently for no reason. In “The Tell-Tale Heart”, the narrator says, “I cut off the head and the arms and the legs….There was nothing to wash out- no stain of any kind- no blood spot whatever. I had been too wary for that. A tub had caught all-ha! ha!” (Poe 3). The belief that the narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” is the most unreliable is incorrect. The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” had killed very violently for a reason while, in “Strawberry Spring”, the narrator describes the murders, “But Springheel Jack killed her just the same, going unerringly for one of our own. The false spring, the lying spring, aided and abetted him - he killed her and left her propped behind the wheel of her 1964 Dodge to be found the next morning and they found part of her in the back seat and part of her in the trunk. And written in blood on the windshield - this time fact instead of rumour - were two words: HA! HA!” (King 4). The narrator in “Strawberry Spring” was violent for no reason. The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” was violent because he was trying to not get caught after he killed the old man. There are huge reasons for why they were violent and the other narrator in “The Tell-Tale …show more content…
He is the most unreliable because he keeps havimg memory lapses and he is unnessarily violent while killing people, which a sign of disorganization. These factors make the narrator the most unreliable. To be reliable is to be aware of what is happening and to be able to keep calm in times of great stress and trouble. In life, these are good indicators of if a person is reliable or
The authors, Ambrose Bierce of 'An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge' and Edger Allan Poe of 'The Tell Tale Heart' have unique styles to pull the reader into the story. Both authors use unreliable narrator and imagery to allow the reader to picture and follow the narrator's way of thinking. In the Tell Tale Heart, the man is very repetitious and his psychotic behavior is what intrigues the overall dark madness of The Tell Tale Heart. In Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge Bierce uses illusions to allow the reader to follow wherever his ideas lead which also intrigues the overall dark madness effect.
The narrators of both stories are reliable. The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” is reliable because he is telling a story about an event in his life he experienced first-hand. On the other hand, I feel he holds no creditability because he can’t see and accept himself as being a mad man. The narrator is disturbed by an old man’s eyes. The narrator shows this saying "I think it was his eye! Yes, it was this!" (Poe 1). The old man’s eyes are described as being pale blue that has a film over it. The narrator discloses how the old man’s eyes made him feel cold. As a matter fact, the old man’s eyes frighten the narrator instilling fear for his life when he looks at them. The man
An author’s use of an unreliable narrator can effectively provide readers with a first-person experience of mental illness. Two authors who have masterfully utilized unreliable narrators in their short stories are Edgar Allan Poe and Charlotte Perkins Gilman. These particular authors intended to induce fear, influence psychology, or both with their use of an unreliable narrator. Edgar Allan Poe, an American author credited with inventing the horror genre, wrote his short stories intending to produce “a single, intense response in the reader” (Art 707). In Poe’s frightening short story, “The Tell-Tale Heart”, he produces this response with the use of an unreliable narrator. Charlotte Perkins Gilman, an
The narrators in “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Cask of Amontillado” are both unstable murders. They might both be unstable but their personalities are drastically different. The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” is very impatient and impulsive. Poe shows that the narrator was impatient when he said “ But the beating grew louder, louder! I thought the heart must burst. And now a new anxiety seized me --the sound would be heard by a neighbor! The old man’s hour had come”(108)! Instead of waiting for the perfect time to kill the old man, the narrator acted impulsively, killing the old man because of his fear of the neighbors hearing
The story “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe is a short horror story about the narrator going insane and ends up killing a old man. It first starts off by the narrator going into the old man’s house spying on him. At night, exactly at midnight the narrator goes into the old man's house and watches him sleep. The narrator has a deep hate for one of the old man’s eye, he states it by saying, “One of his eyes resembled that of a vulture-a pale eye, with a film over it. Whenever it fell upon me, my blood ran cold; and so by degrees- very gradually-I made up my mind to take the life of the old man and thus rid myself of the eye forever” (Poe, 355). One night while spying on the old man his thumb slipped on a tin, which frightened the old man. The narrator then stayed quiet for a long time, but then instantly killed the old man. He hid the body all around the house. A neighbor heard a scream during the night so they called the police, which arrived at the house. The narrator acted calmly and let the police in to search the house. Then the police wouldn’t leave the
Gilman has the narrator start off as very reliable in the beginning and throughout the story slowly transition into an unreliable source. The story begins with the protagonist describing, the house they are staying in for the summer, the depiction she gives seems very clear. For example when Gilman writes, “A colonial mansion, a hereditary estate, I would Say” (302). This description comes off very vivid, leading the reader to believe the narrator as a reliable source, and by using the words “I would say” she shows confidence her in statement. With such opinionated writing the audience trusts the protagonist’s sanity, by clear recalling of events. Next she immediately describes her husband in the very next exert, as a well-edu...
Throughout the novel, Kathy is considered an unreliable narrator. Seymour Chatman’s concept of unreliable narrator states:
"The Tell-Tale Heart" consists of a monologue in which the murderer of an old man protests his insanity rather than his guilt: "You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded . . ." (Poe 121). By the narrator insisting so emphatically that he is sane, the reader is assured that he is indeed deranged. E. Arthur Robinson feels that by using this irony the narrator creates a feeling of hysteria, and the turmoil resulting from this hysteria is what places "The Tell-Tale Heart" in the list of the greatest horror stories of all time (94).
The story, written roughly 6 years before Poe died, is one of the more prominent examples of an unreliable narrator within Poe’s collection. The reader, in the beginning of the story, is told by the narrator himself that he is thought to be an unreliable narrator, by way of his assumed mental instability.
When a child is born, he or she does not see the same things an adult sees. The baby does not understand language and cannot make the distinction between races or gender or good and evil. While it is impossible to go back in time, novels allow readers to take on a new set of eyes for a few hours or days. They give a new perspective to the world, and sometimes provide a filter to the things seen in the world. Unreliable narrators give authors the flexibility to lie to and withhold information from readers, providing new perspectives into the narrator as well as the other characters of the novel. Authors use unreliable narrators not to give more information to the reader, but to withhold information in order to further character development.
Although Strawberry Spring’s narrator had multiple kills, the narrator from The Tell-Tale Heart knew the man he had killed, it was not someone random. The kill in Poe’s story was dear, unlike the kills that occurred in King’s were easily more gory. To support this, “... and a picture of the girl that had apparently been cut up with a pair of sheers” (King pg:3). This goes to show just how gory King’s narrator’s murders were. This goes to show that this narrator is more unreliable because he gives no thought to the victims, even after they are killed. He had no respect for them whatsoever. Another way the narrator is more reliable is that throughout the killings there was a pattern; only girls. The narrator had a conversation with his wife saying, “She thinks I was with another woman last night. And oh dear God, I think so too” (King pg:8). This provides proof that the narrator has been with other women and all of his victims are women. Leaving him as a liar, cheater, and perpetrator. The narrator from Strawberry Spring is more unreliable than the narrator from The Tell-Tale Heart because he has more kills that are more gory and have a
In the first lines of “The Tell-Tale Heart”, the reader can tell that narrator is crazy, however the narrator claims the he is not crazy and is very much sane, because how could a crazy person come up with such a good plan. “How, then, am I mad? Hearken! And observer how healthily – how calmly I can tell you the whole story,” (Poe 74). The reader can see from this quote that narrator is claiming that he is not insane because he can tell anyone what happened without having a mental breakdown or any other problems that people associate with crazy people. This is the begging of the unreliability of the narrator. Here the reader is merely questioning the amount of details. The narrator then goes on to explain how he didn’t hate the old man but he hated his eye.
Deviant characters and people exist in both stories and the real world. Being deviant is just being different and going against the norms of society. Most stories are created by the use of a deviant character. The main character is usual different and stands out in society. These deviant characters consist of characteristics that fall into two groups. They have concepts and details. Concepts are the motivation behind the character and the details are their actions preformed to identify these motivations. In “The Tell- Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe, “The Pedestrian” by Ray Bradbury, and “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner the authors all used at least one deviant character to compose their story. In “The Tell-Tale Heart”, Poe creates a character that is out to do whatever he wants even if it causes harm to others. In “The Pedestrian”, Bradbury creates a character that goes against the rules set by authority and thinks that he can do whatever he wants. In “A Rose for Emily”, Faulkner creates a character that does not follow any rules just to get what she wants. All of these characters personalities go against norms. Based on the readings deviance can be defined as a person that goes against the norms of society.
Through the first person narrator, Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" illustrates how man's imagination is capable of being so vivid that it profoundly affects people's lives. The manifestation of the narrator's imagination unconsciously plants seeds in his mind, and those seeds grow into an unmanageable situation for which there is no room for reason and which culminates in murder. The narrator takes care of an old man with whom the relationship is unclear, although the narrator's comment of "For his gold I had no desire" (Poe 34) lends itself to the fact that the old man may be a family member whose death would monetarily benefit the narrator. Moreover, the narrator also intimates a caring relationship when he says, "I loved the old man. He had never wronged me. He had never given me insult" (34). The narrator's obsession with the old man's eye culminates in his own undoing as he is engulfed with internal conflict and his own transformation from confidence to guilt.
One of the reasons that Christopher can be trusted as a reliable narrator is because he is very honest in his thoughts and actions. Some characters