What Does Catch-22 Mean In 1984

1326 Words3 Pages

In his dystopian novel, 1984, about the oppression of totalitarianism, George Orwell uses the anti-hero Winston Smith, a plain, unmemorable, middle-aged man to denounce the persecution of individuality. Winston rebels against the totalitarian regime―known as Big Brother and run by the Party―by having a secret love affair with a woman named Julia, but he is tricked and arrested by an inner-Party member named O’Brien. To break Winston’s inner rebellion and coerce him into surrendering to the Party, O’Brien subjects Winston to horrifying torture. He takes Winston into the dreaded room 101, the room in which supposedly nobody comes out of alive. Strapped upright in a chair, Winston Smith watches with horror as O’Brien fits a cage of vicious rats …show more content…

Most regulations in the military revolve around Catch-22, meaning that their foundation is paradoxical and unreasonable. Thus, reasoning in the novel is fractured by the distorted regulations that govern it. This distorted reasoning is used by the bureaucracy, which showcases the incongruence and ridiculousness of the war. Sick of flying his terrifying combat missions, Yossarian pleads with Doc Daneeka to ground him so he will no longer have to fly missions. Their conversation drifts to topics about craziness and those in the squad who could be grounded for being crazy. They then talk about Orr, who they both agree is crazy. As Yossarian questions him about the circumstances of being released from flying, Doc Daneeka …show more content…

The paradoxical rule Catch-22 forces Orr to keep flying even though he should be grounded for concerns regarding his well-being. The rule that should protect soldiers instead coerces them to continue putting their life on the line in a sick and twisted clause. Heller proves, as Kennard claims, that the regulations controlling war are absurd and destroy logic. All rational processes are gone as these retrograde rules control the soldiers. But instead of condemning these backwards rules, the bureaucratic systems in the war embrace them. They mold them to fit their goals, ultimately making the ridiculous rules a reflection of the bureaucracy. Orr’s paradoxical fate proves the irrational nature of war by providing an example of the complex and inconclusive result of war’s organization. This loss of all reasoning and truth eradicates the individual’s freedom; the soldiers must obey laws that given them nothing but the illusion of choice. War and bureaucracy’s absurdity, manifested by the illogicality of the Catch-22 rule, destroys individualism by eradicating free choice and forcing

Open Document