Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of electronic devices on kids
The effects of electronic devices on kids
The effects of electronic devices on kids
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of electronic devices on kids
In today’s modern day world, technology has evolved so much that people do not have to be face to face to communicate anymore, some teenagers nowadays prefer texting as their method of communication. However, many scientists and researchers are starting to believe texting is bad for the teenagers growing brain and how it may affect their grammar. Nonetheless, these are just claims and have no actual proof behind it, texting does not have any drawbacks that would hurt grammar of the new generation.
After hours of countless research and reading over a dozen of articles about texting, surprisingly, not even a quarter of the articles showed any signs of texting have a negative effect on teenagers. In the article “No Lol Matter: Tween Texting May Lead to Poor Grammar Skills” by Shyam Sundar and Drew Singel, both writers discuss the drawbacks of overextended texting in “texting language.” The claim they make is that the more texts you send out and receive per day, the lower your score will be on the grammar test that they conducted on students. They also believe that if teenagers receive too much text messages from relatives and friends, that will ruin their grammar because apparently teenagers like to imitate their friends. Even though tests were conducted, the source is not reliable because there is no proof that every teenager will attempt to imitate their friends and relatives. Also, there is no proof that the people who texted more and got lower scores than the others were just not as smart as the other students who did not text as much as them. Another possible reason that the people who texted less got higher scores would be because if they are not so focused on texting, they would be spending their time concentrating on othe...
... middle of paper ...
...hough text messaging does not have any drawbacks that would hurt grammar of the new generation, many other simple factors play the role of hurting the grammar of today’s students.
Works Cited
Crystal, David. “Texting: Why All the Fuss?” Language Awareness Editors & Publishing Info. Print. 09 Dec. 2013.
Wood, Clare. “Text Messaging Does Not Damage Children’s Written or Spoken Grammar” NuffieldFoundation.org. 05 September 2012. Web. 09 Dec. 2013.
Diaz, Yamalis, PhD, Lori Evans, PhD, and Richard Gallagher, PhD. “Anti-Social Networking: How Do Texting and Social Media Affect Our Children?” The Child
Study Center. 14 November 2011. Web. 09 Dec. 2013.
Sundar, Shyam, and Drew Singel. “No Lol Matter: Tween Texting May Lead to Poor Grammar Skills.” Pennsylvania State University, upenn.edu. 26 July 2012. Web. 09 Dec. 2013
In the article, “Does Im Make U dum”, the author states how instant messaging has made us become “dum”. The issue of using popular texting abbreviations like, “lol”, “brb”, or “gtg” can either be an effective or unproductive way of expression. Using abbreviations through texting are so commonly used by children, teenagers, and adults. Statistics show that children are younger than ever for when they are first exposed to mobile phones and text messaging. A 2005 ChildWise study that one-in-four children under the age of eight had a mobile phone.
It's taking over our lives. We can do it almost anywhere. What is it? It's texting! Texting is a reliable, easy and convenient form of communication that is most commonly used by, but not limited to millenials and those in the workforce. Many people use it as a way to express themselves as well. In Michaela Cullington’s article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?” she targets two different attitudes in relation to texting. Cullington explains that there is often an assumption that students who use abbreviations when they text, will bring those same abbreviations over to their formal writing pieces. Cullington then adds that the other attitude in relation to writing skills and texting insists that texting is harming student’s writing capabilities. Because of her research as well as experiments done by other colleagues of hers, it shows that
Text messaging is a technology that contributes to the great decline of the English language. The English language is often butchered through the use of text messaging. In Orwell’s essay, he states “An effect can become a cause, reinforcing the original cause and producing the same effect in an intensified form” (446). Main stream society is too lazy to correct any grammar and punctuation in a text message, leading to the assumption that it is not important, after all it is only a text message. Thus, this shows the English language is in decline, when society is to lazy to take a few extra second to correct spelling and punctuation errors . One would not be able to write the same way in an academic essay as they would in a text message. If one would do so, that student would receive an F. No English teacher, or for that matter any teacher, would be thrilled nor impressed reading an essay filled with these common texting erors.
Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.
As explained in The Global Achievement Gap by Tony Wagner, “there is a core set of survival skills for today’s workplace, as well as for lifelong learning and active citizenship” (14). One of the seven skills Wagner listed can be tied directly to social media and how it hinders the development of strong communication skills. Instead of having a face to face conversation, teens are sending messages as a means of communication without the actual verbal part. Texting has made communication easier for young Americans by making unpleasant phone conversations a thing of the past and making a quick “Hello” much easier. This trend slowly builds a habit of poor communication skills. As previously mentioned, 75% of teenagers text regularly, and one in three sends more than 100 texts per day. We can see that texting is the preferred method of communication among young people. To make messages quick and maintain a steady flow of conversation, acronyms and dropping nonessential letters are used to shorten messages. Instead of typing out “laugh out loud” they’ll use acronyms like “LOL” to signify they find it amusing.. They’ll also use homophones like “gr8” for “great” and drop letters from words like “would” to make “wud”. It is obvious to see why texting and messaging through social networks negatively
“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.
I personally think that texting does indeed have tremendous effect on formal writing, Texting has its costs and benefits. So while we texting we could use the spellcheck feature to correct our spelling mistakes as guide or a teacher to help us spelling it correctly next time. On the other hand, we might have become dependent on such Features. Auto-correct doesn’t pick up all of the errors for example sometimes when you write a sentence with the word to, the device may not recognize that you are using the wrong word.
Is texting killing the way human beings communicate socially to each other. Is texting ruining language as we know it today. These are questions we are asking ourselves today. In the video John McWhorter: Txtng is killing language. JK!!! and the article Is text messaging ruining English? by Jane Solomon Explores how the English language is being changed by the teenage population.
In the sources that I found about text message and teen literacy, it showed and also informed me on how teens take the next talk to the classrooms in schools and how it creates bad grammar among themselves. During my research I found out that many kids and kids use shorthanded text and it affects their literacy in so many ways. We as teens don’t think that our findings will benefit anyone unless they want to have a short knowledge in grammar. As teens we don’t really see how doing something wrong can harm us. Such as texting shorthanded, and with silly faces. It affects our literacy by not knowing how to correctly punctuate their words, grammar and speaking. In the research that I looked up, that teens send about one thousand eight hundred
Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R U Txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(1), 46-67. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?q=texting+spelling+grammar&id=EJ862013
Twenty yrs ago no1 wudve wrote lik dis. Now, however texting is so popular that teens write in abbreviations in their spelling and writing some times. There have been a few studies into how texting effects teenagers and young children’s grammar, so if there are any errors in this paper, blame it on texting.
Step onto any college campus and take a look around. You will find clumps of students standing around in circles, phones in hand, typing away. What is it they are doing? Texting. Ever since the first text message was sent in 1993, the use of text messaging as a means of communication has spread like wild fire, especially amongst the adolescent generation. And with this new form of communication a new language has appeared; text-speak, the shortening of common words into abbreviations and acronyms (Drouin 49). While texting and the text-speak language seem to have been welcomed by many, what affect is this new technology having on the way we communicate? Is it possible that texting is negatively affecting our ability to use formal written communication, or is this idea just a myth perpetuated by negative media attention? And what changes has texting brought to the way we communicate person-to person? Are these changes positive, negative, or perhaps a mixture of both?
Verheijen, L. (2013). The effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy. English Studies, 94(5), 582. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1412363616?accountid=3783
“Texting in Class a Growing Problem.” TheKanson.com. 7 December 2010. Singel, Ryan. The.
On the other hand, Crystal believes that texting helps a child’s grammar. “The most important finding is that texting does not erode children’s ability to read and write. On the contrary, literacy