Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do we use rhetoric
Uses of rhetoric
Fiction rhetorical techniques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In his essay, “The old Man at Burning Man,” Wells Towers presents several rhetorical “tools,” such as “twist a cliché” and “logic-free values”, to express how his father, his father’s friend, his family and himself attempt to speak their audience’s language (218, 228). This is expressed to the audience through dialogue as Towers references the conversations that took place at the Burning Man festival. In the dialogue, we see all the men, specifically the 69-year-old economics professor, Towers father, adapt very quickly to the “hippie” styled culture of the festival (Towers).
The first example of this is seen when Towers’ father says, “That was a rather unusual toast…She said, ‘Here’s to your hemorrhaging anus.’ And then I gave her a light, and I said, ‘The better to see it with’” (Towers). Here Towers’ father uses the tool “twist a cliché.” Towers’ father fits into the culture by replying with a witty response. He participates in the cultural “gifting” by giving the woman a flash light and speaks the language of his audience by using the rhetorical tool described above (Towers). The reader can see that Towers’ father is unsure of how to respond in this
…show more content…
situation, however he risks not fitting in by trying out his witty remark with the woman. Because the woman did not shame him or respond negatively, he achieved his goal of assimilating to the culture. Another example where we see Towers’ father fitting in is when he uses “logic-free values.” During a conversation between Towers and his father, his father says, “I just ask them, yeah.
My first thought was to do it surreptitiously, but then I discovered that tattooed naked boobs like to be photographed” (Towers). Here the reader identifies “logic-free values.” If the reader were to say this out loud and quickly, they probably would not think much of the comment made by Towers’ father. However, being able to read it, the reader sees the ridiculousness of the statement and recognizes the rhetorical tool. Towers’ father risked being slapped in the face by directly asking women if he could photograph them nude; however, do to the use of “logic-free values” he could do so and fit into the festival’s
culture. This was a very interesting essay that was filled with “code grooming” to speak the language if the audience. According to the tools presented by Heinrichs, Towers and his companions did a good job of assimilating to the culture.
The article “Sleeping in the Dust at Burning Man,” appeared in Tikkun Magazine, and is written by Ron Feldman. This article was published in 2013, however; Feldman attended the Burning Man Festival in 2010 and continues to return every year. Although he isn’t an expert on how the Burning Man Festival is related to the Judaism religion, he does include many quotes from his experiences as well as experts. Feldman also used quotes from a previously written essay by Fenton Johnson, who rejected the Burning Man. Strangely, Johnson’s disapproval increased the articles significance so the reader could hear multiple opinions. Throughout the article, Feldman includes his personal opinions on the festival, but primarily including comparisons of the Burning
Abbey and McCandless experience different degrees of separation from industrial living, but neither wholly rejects it. Abbey, a National Park Service employee in Utah, states “I am here not only to evade for a while the clamor and filth and confusion of the cultural apparatus but also to confront immediately and directly if it’s possible, the bare bones of existence” (6). While Abbey surround...
The novel ‘Burning Eddy’ is about a young man named Daniel who has had a rough life so far, along the way he meets an old Dutch lady named Eddy who changed his life forever. Throughout the novel, Daniel is faced with problems that will change his identity and the way he looks at life.
At first glance, the story “Barn burning” seems just to be about a tyrannical father and a son who is in the grips of that tyranny. I think Faulkner explores at least one important philosophical question in this story were he asks at what point should a person make a choice between what his parent(s) and / or family believes and his own values?
In Sherman Alexie’s “This Is What It Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona” and “Dead Men’s Path”, the reader is given a glimpse into two different stories but share many similar characteristics of traditions. Tradition is the handing down of statements, beliefs, legends, customs, information and cultures within a group of people from generation to generation. However, these two stories will reveal that the protagonists in these stories, Michael from “Dead Men’s Path” and Victor from “This Is What It Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona,” will ignore their own traditions that they face throughout the story. In other words, the protagonists are westernized and have forgotten their own culture, which reflects the theory of the melting pot. The ignorance of ancestry and traditions brings the worst fates into the lives of the protagonists in each story.
At the conclusion of his short story “Barn Burning,” William Faulkner strongly implies that Abner Snopes burns yet another barn, although whether he does or not is never made absolutely clear. In any case, his young son, Sarty, has run to warn the owner of the barn, Major De Spain, about his father’s intentions:
In “This Is What It Means To Say Phoenix, Arizona,” Alexie creates a story that captures the common stereotypes of Native Americans. For instance, in the story the narrator states, “Who does have money on a reservation, except the cigarette and fireworks salespeople?” (Alexie). This quotation shows that the narrator addresses the idea that all Native Americans must own businesses that sell fireworks and/ or cigarettes in order to be successful. In this example, Victor is shown to not identify with the Native Americans because he does not pursue the same job opportunities as many Native Americans do. Victor's character is used as a contrast to the stereotypes that , there he represents reality. Another instance in which the author incorporates a stereotype about Native Americans is when Thomas-Builds-the-Fire first makes conversation with Victor. Thomas-Builds-the-Fire informs Victor about the news of Victor's ...
Traditionally, conversations about the Civil Right Movement refer to the career of Martin Luther King as a non-violent integrationist or Malcom X as a dominate separationist. James Baldwin who also played a major part in the Civil Rights Movement, although he did not dedicate to either side of the extremes. It was often seen that his view stuck the chord of both Malcom X and Dr. Martin Luther King. In his book The Fire Next Time, James Baldwin analyses the position of blacks in America a century after the Emancipation Proclamation which supposedly gave blacks their freedom. Within this book he expresses his views on both social and political integration. He uses the essay “My Dungeon Shook” as a plea to his nephew the importance of acceptance
Understanding literary elements such as patterns, reader/writer relationships, and character choice are critical in appreciating William Faulkner's Barn Burning. Some literary elements are small and almost inconsequential while others are large and all-encompassing: the mother's broken clock, a small and seemingly insignificant object, is used so carefully, extracting the maximum effect; the subtle, but more frequent use of dialectal words which contain darker, secondary meanings; the way blood is used throughout the story in many different ways, including several direct references in the familial sense; how Faulkner chooses to write about poor, common people (in fact to the extreme) and how this relates to the opinions of Wordsworth and Aristotle; and finally, the relationship between the reader and writer, Faulkner's choice of narrator and point of view, and how this is works successfully.
Determining whether the God you praise and worship is choleric because of your presence by the sins you’ve created is at never ending battle in the 17th-18th centuries. Upon the Burning of Our House is a poem, with nine stanzas, written by Anne Bradstreet explaining her understanding and ability to live and learn from sin to God. Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God is a work, written as a sermon by Jonathan Edwards, who preaches to all the non-Puritan sinners. His belief is that if they don’t convert and take blame for their sins, God’s anger toward them will be unbearable and force them to the pits of hell. Analyzing Bradstreet’s and Edwards’ works, a reader can distinguish the personality of the two writers and the different views of God
An Analysis of Jack London's To Build a Fire. In her cultural criticism of Jack London's "To Build a Fire", Jill Widdicombe explores the question of whether the story's protagonist might have perished from the extreme cold of the Klondike winter even if with a traveling companion. She describes the brutality of the winter weather and, alluding to the man's confidence in his ability to survive the weather, describes it as "behavior most of us can understand" - especially if we are accustomed to warmer surroundings. She states: "the extreme cold of frosty landscapes--or "The White Silence", as London describes it--is so quiet and abstract that it does not immediately appear to be lethal".
After a fellow Native American man is describing his father’s ritual, he exclaims “I mean, come on, I’m a loser…my whole family is filled with losers”(36). The parallel structure of the two sentences creates what the man believes to be a truthful statement masked by a jesting tone. In order to cope with the man’s true thoughts on his Native American family, he comically pawns off an insult. When the narrator is wondering the hospital, another individual asked why his dad had to get his feet cut off. The man asks if it was caused by “Vodka straight up or with a nostalgia chaser?” He replies, “Both.” “Natural causes for an Indian”(37). The short dialect the characters have illustrates the commonness of alcoholism in Native American society. The casualness in which they talk about such a detrimental issue indicates that they are coping with their cultural problem by acting like its normal, which disassociates themselves from other Native Americans. When they continue to talk to one another, the narrator thinks, “This guy was talking out of his ass. I liked him immediately”(36). Both men don’t fully understand their Native American integrity, so they are embarrassed by it. In order to ease their embarrassment they say things on a whim, never knowing if they are real aspects of Native American culture or not. By “talking out of his ass” they are able to mask the fact that they feel a loss of identity with their own
Allen Ginsberg’s “A Supermarket in California” paints a vivid scene in the minds of readers and uses allusions and symbols in order to express the wrongs of society, such as consumerism and negative views of homosexuality. However, for having such radical beliefs during a time period in which members of society conformed to strict ideas, the speaker, along with many individuals, are alienated and in turn, wish for extreme change and even another life. Ginsberg conveys a vital message that carries through to the year 2010 even more. Materialism does not make a person, it is insignificant. What is imperative is the natural world; beauty, individuality, and real human interactions as these are concepts that make an individual.
...about how nudity was becoming more accepted by mainstream media “instead, it could be nestled quite nicely next to advertisements for barbeques, automobiles, and suburban homes.” This change ultimately took away the limitations of expressiviness In the subculture.
Karen Rhodes analyzed to build a fire in a cultural context. He believed "London's works were written so that he could survive in a world he increasingly came to see as "red in tooth and claw""(1). It is obviously the story of a man fighting the stresses of Nature. According to Rhodes, to build a fire was drawn from the year London spent in Canada's Yukon Territory. London depicted arctic and very cold conditions throughout the story. Rhodes believed to build a fire represented London's Naturalistic Flavor. "It pits one man alone against the overwhelming forces of nature"(Karen Rhodes, 1). He also believed to build a fire can either be interpreted as the Pioneer American experience or can be read as an allegory for the journey of human existence (Karen Rhodes, 1). According to Rhodes, there are two versions of to build a fire; the first one was written in 1902 while the second one was written in 1908. We are studying the 1908 version." It has come to be known as everyman trekking through the Naturalistic Universe"(Karen Rhodes, 1). To build a fire is indeed the story of a man trekking through the universe alone except for his dog. The man's death at the end was the culmination of the story. " His death came through no lapse of observation, no lack of diligence, no real folly but the nature of himself and his environment" (Karen Rhodes, 2). I think his is a fine criticism of London's to build a fire. London had made use of his life experiences in writing the story.