Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of motivation in learning
Psychology 230 classical conditioning
The role of motivation in learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of motivation in learning
What is Watson’s Classical Conditioning? Classical Conditioning was found by Dr. Ivan Pavlov. Watson’s research was influenced by Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning Theory. Watson made a research on children’s emotions using the Classical Conditioning model. According to Watson, love, fear, and anger are the three kinds of emotions inherited by humans (Hall 1988). He believed these emotions could be learned through conditioning. He formed his hypothesis and carried out an experiment. John B. Watson’s classical condition experiment was on a child named Little Albert. This experiment was while a child was playing with a rabbit, smashing two bars to make a loud noise behind the child’s head. After hearing the loud noise the child became terrified of the rabbit (Hall 1988). What is Skinner’s Operant Conditioning? Skinner was the first to discuss operant conditioning. McLead (2007) explained that an operant condition means that using reinforcements given after a desired response could change behavior. There were three types of responses that can follow the behavior. Neutral operants, reinforces, and punishers were the three types of responses. According to McLead (2007), Skinner invented a box with levers and lights to test his theory. He placed a hungry rat inside where the rat learned to press the levels for different responses. One level would give it a piece of food and the rat would not receive food when the light was off. This box demonstrated the shaping of behaviors through operant conditioning. The two articles chosen on Watson’s Classical Conditioning were “Priority in the Classical Conditioning of Children and Vicarious Classical Conditioning of Emotional Responses in Nursery School Children”. The study of... ... middle of paper ... ...opmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 10, 6, 697-705. Carrera, F. ., & Adams, P. L. (January 01, 1970). An ethical perspective on operant conditioning. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 9, 4, 607-23. Hall, J. (1988). Classical Conditioning. In Psychology Word. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http://web.mst.edu/~psyworld/classical_conditioning.htm McLead, S. (2007). Skinner-Operant Conditioning. In Simply Psychology. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html Venn, J. R., & Short, J. G. (1973). Vicarious classical conditioning of emotional responses in nursery school children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(2), 249-255. doi:10.1037/h0035717 Windholz, G., & Lamal, P. A. (December 01, 1986). Priority in the Classical Conditioning of Children. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 4, 192-195.
In the following essay I will be looking into the study conducted by Watson and Rayner (1920) on a small child known as ‘Little Albert’. The experiment was an adaptation of earlier studies on classical conditioning of stimulus response, one most common by Ivan Pavlov, depicting the conditioning of stimulus response in dogs. Watson and Rayner aimed to teach Albert to become fearful of a placid white rat, via the use of stimulus associations, testing Pavlov’s earlier theory of classical conditioning.
One of the other ways that psychological conditioning is misused is when the babies are shocked to be made to not like flowers and books. “They’ll grow up with what the psychologists ...
Watson, J. B. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. The American Psychologist, 55(3), 313-317. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/
Classical conditioning lead Watson to the discovery of behaviorism. Ivan Pavlov discovered classical condition meaning that control of a stimulus-response reflexive relationship. “Watson assumed that human behavior and the behavior of animals were both governed by the same law of nature” (Jensen, 1). He demonstrated on his experiment with Albert that human emotional response could be
In observational learning, a child takes note of what his or her mother or father considers to be threatening. On the other hand, children can also be conditioned by their own life experiences through a process called operant conditioning (SOURCE). In some instances, children tend to generalize their fears, subsequently forming a phobia. For example, a young girl who became increasingly cautious of flying insects after an unpleasant encounter with a nest of agitated yellow jackets. After being assaulted by these creatures, she associated all flying bugs with the painful sting of a yellow jacket. Of course, children can also be classically conditioned to display a fearful response; that is, they learn to associate an unconditioned fear-relevant stimulus with a conditioned stimulus, provoking a conditioned, fearful response. One of the most well-known examples of this is an experiment involving a young boy, famously dubbed Little Albert. Little Albert learned to fear small furry animals in a laboratory setting when the presence of these creatures was paired with loud banging noises (SOURCE). From the aforementioned experiments and studies, it is undeniable that external circumstances and experiences assist in the configuration of fear in
The purpose of their study was to condition a child to fear a distinctive stimulus that typically would not be naturally feared by an emotionally stable child. During the experiment, according to Field and Nightingale (2009), they exposed a nine-month-old infant to a series of white items such as a white rat, rabbit, a mask with and without hair, burning newspaper, and other miscellaneous items without any conditioning. At this time Albert, while sitting on a mattress in the middle of a room, showed no fear as he reached out to play with some of the items or animals. Watson then decided to administer a loud clanking noise behind Albert in order to distress him. The next step was to pair the loud noise with the exposure to the white furry animal(s) or object. When the conditioning started prior to the presentation of sound Albert would try to reach out to the white objects. After a few presentations Albert quickly grasped the idea that he was to fear any white furry object when they were presented to him without the sound being administered. Albert’s fear of the objects would cause him to become upset and cry immediately. This notion showed that a neutral stimulus could elicit a conditioned response when under distress causing lasting
Classical conditioning refers to a type of learning in which a previously neutral stimuli took on the ability to stimulate a conditioned response in an individual (Gormezano & Moore, 1966). To prove that environment was more impactful than genetics, Watson conducted an experiment on an infant, little Albert. Initially, Albert showed little fear towards rats. When Watson repeatedly exposed Albert to the rat accompanied by a loud noise, the latter began to develop fear towards not just the rat but also other furry animals. Watson successfully showed that the acquisition of a phobia can be explained by classical conditioning (Watson & Watson, 1921). Regardless of their genes, the associations of the right stimuli can result in the development of a new behaviour in any individual.
The Little Albert experiment (Watson and Rayner 1920) was a controlled classical conditioning study on phobias, conducted on a nine months old infant. Little Albert was put through a series of emotional tests to see how he would react to various stimuli. He was presented with a variety of animals, however, on the whole, Little Albert showed no fear. Again, Little Albert was presented with an animal, this time a white rat. As before, Little Albert showed no sign of fear at the initial sight of the rat, however, when a sudden loud noise occurred, Little Albert would become hysterical. This continued as Little Albert got older, this time, he’d repeatedly be presented with a rat followed by a loud noise, by now all it took was for Little Albert
John Broadus Watson (1878-1958) has become well known for being the founder of behaviorism as a school of thought throughout American psychology. His view on psychology consisted of seeing it as a science of observation on behaviors. He believed that one must first observe a behavior in a certain environment or situation, then predict and determine the connection between the two. Much of his theory was based on the work of Ivan Pavlov’s observations through classical conditioning. Watson claimed that the process of classical conditioning could be used to explain any behavioral factor in human psychology. Classical conditioning involves the pairing of two different stimuli in producing a learning response from the participant. His belief on the topic was that single differences in behavior were caused by different experiences of learning.
Venn, J. R., & Short, J. G. (1973). Vicarious classical conditioning of emotional responses in nursery school children. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 28(2), 249-255, doi:10.1037/h0035717
I. Introduction of classical conditioning Classical conditioning also called as Pavlovian conditioning or respondent conditioning. It is a kind of learning a new behavior through association that when a conditioned stimulus (CS) is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US) and evokes a conditioned response (CR). It also is a learning process that occurs through associations between an environmental stimulus and a naturally occurring stimulus (Cherry, 2014). Classical conditioning has much strength such as can help to explain all aspects of human behavior and many of advertisers will use classical conditioning to advertise their produces, however it also have some weaknesses such as all classical conditioning responses must involve a reflex and classical conditioning is a completely physical process, learning is not important as reflected in scenario. This paper will talk about the strengths and the weaknesses of classical conditioning theory followed by a brief description of the scenario and the strengths and weaknesses of applying classical conditioning on it.
Burrhus Frederic (B.F.) Skinner, an American behavioral psychologist, is best known for his experiments on changing behavior. With behavioral psychologists Pavlov and Watson as his inspiration, Skinner formulated his theory of operational conditioning. His idea of “shaping” behavior is prevalent in the parenting and teaching techniques of children and students.
Jhon B Watson, a behaviorist, conducted an experiment inspired by the Russian psychologist Ivan Pavlov to determinate the classical condition in humans. Little Albert experiment was conducted in a 9 month old baby whom a rat is showed to see his r...
Retrieved 2 December 2015, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html Thompson, L. (2000). Making the team. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. YouTube,.
This essay will first explore what classical conditioning is by using Ivan Pavlov’s famous experiment with dogs to explain how it works. It will then go on to describe how classical conditioning led to more research by Edward L. Thorndike and B.F. Skinner in the study of instrumental behaviour (Gleitman et al. 2011). It will also mention briefly what similarities can be found between operant and classical conditioning before explaining in detail what operant conditioning is (Skinner’s experiment with the operant