Was Vermont Teddy Bear Company Crazy?

1087 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Business Ethics in Today's Corporate World

In 2005, the Vermont Teddy Bear Company produced a controversial bear for the Valentine holiday. The bear that was made was called “Crazy for You” and wore a straitjacket. It became an issue when the company was confronted for offending the mentally ill. After the problem became apparent to the organization, it responded by saying that it would continue selling the toy until the inventory was empty. It was put out for the public in January and was sold out by February 3. The ethical issue in this case is whether or not Vermont Teddy Bear Company handled the situation ethically correct.

A stakeholder in this case was the corporate body of Vermont Teddy Bear Company who approved of the production of the controversial bear. It believed that the toy was appropriate for the organization to sell. Also, employees of the plant who physically made the bear would be considered stakeholders. Although information is not available about whether or not they spoke to their managers about the possible issue, they would still be considered involved. Shareholders in the company would have also been affected by this situation. At the beginning of the controversy, they were probably not sure whether or not their investment would prove to be a beneficial one or not. However, after a few weeks after being sold out, the stock rose and proved to be positive for the shareholders. If the circumstances would have been different, the shareholders’ investments may have been low and they would have lost a large amount of money and would have been very upset at corporate for making a poor decision to produce the bear.

Looking at this situation from the outside, it appears that the bear could not have been a mistake. When producing a bear like ...

... middle of paper ...

... is a true right and wrong way to handle this situation, I think that the Vermont Teddy Bear Company solved this issue pretty well. According to the situation, the organization did what was both a benefit to the company and its social responsibility. I am not sure what it did after the incident was over, but it could have made up for the lack of societal responsibility. Otherwise, the firm made nearly the best decision it could in my opinion.

I think this unfortunate circumstance has made organizations look close into the products and services they offer. No one wants to clean up a mess that could be easily avoided. Even if they do it as a marketing plan that was found out by the public, it would prove to bring about a negative view of the firm. Also, I think it also stresses how companies influence society and how important it is for them to be responsible.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of The NASW Code Of Ethics

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many organizations have been destroyed or heavily damaged financially and took a hit in terms of reputation, for example, Enron. The word Ethics is derived from a Greek word called Ethos, meaning “The character or values particular to a specific person, people, culture or movement” (The American Heritage Dictionary, 2007, p. 295). Ethics has always played and will continue to play a huge role within the corporate world. Ethics is one of the important topics that are debated at lengths without reaching a conclusion, since there isn’t a right or wrong answer. It’s basically depends on how each individual perceives a particular situation. Over the past few years we have seen very poor unethical business practices by companies like Enron, which has affected many stakeholders. Poor unethical practices affect the society in many ways; employees lose their job, investors lose their money, and the country’s economy gets affected. This leads to people start losing confidence in the economy and the organizations that are being run by the so-called “educated” top executives that had one goal in their minds, personal gain. When Enron entered the scene in the mid-1980s, it was little more than a stodgy energy distribution system. Ten years later, it was a multi-billion dollar corporation, considered the poster child of the “new economy” for its willingness to use technology and the Internet in managing energy. Fifteen years later, the company is filing for bankruptcy on the heels of a massive financial collapse, likely the largest in corporate America’s history. As this paper is being written, the scope of Enron collapse is still being researched, poked and prodded. It will take years to determine what, exactly; the impact of the demise of this energy giant will be both on the industry and the

    Read More

  • Toxic Sludge: A Review and Recommendations

    1371 Words  | 3 Pages

    Schwarze, S. (2003). Corporate-State Irresponsibility, Critical Publicity, and Asbestos Exposure in Libby, Montana., Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 625.

    Read More

  • Phar-Mor: Case Study

    1415 Words  | 3 Pages

    The major groups that were directly affected are investors, employees, and suppliers. Here we should make the distinction between different types of investors. There are two major types of investors: insiders and outside investors. Insiders are the investors who know the information that is not known publicly and may benefit them in some way. Outside investors are the investors who only know publicly known information. In our case, outside investors was the group that lost the most. On the other hand, insiders, notably Mickey Monus and David Shapiro, were the one that gains millions on IPO. The group who suffered was employees of Phar-Mor. After the scandal was revealed, most of the stores were closed to cover up losses. As a result, thousands of employees got fired. Another party that was damaged by the scandal was Coopers&Lybrant, the firm that did the audit for Phar-Mor, lost its reputation as a firm who does an audit with integrity. The secondary effect of the scandal was the overall mistrust among investors. They thought that if a giant retailer can forge its accounting books, why smaller companies wouldn’t do the same. As a result, investors became reluctant in investing into businesses that caused harm to the economy as a whole. The last but not least group that was affected by the scandal is Phar-Mor’s suppliers. Mickey Monus was fiercely fighting with them to make the chipset deals to cover up his losses, sometimes using inappropriate pressure and causing suppliers making unprofitable deals. In additions, Monus forced them to pay fees and sponsor his basketball League using buyer power of his company. In addition, a lot of bills for supplies were unpaid for months by Phar-Mor. Some suppliers said that they hated doing business with Phar-Mor, but had no choice since it had an access to vast amount of customers.

    Read More

  • The British Petroleum Oil Spill and Lack of Response

    1465 Words  | 3 Pages

    The gulf Oil spill was bad; the company’s public relations strategy made matters worse. Their game plan was to stonewall the media, deny any responsibility and hope the issue would solve itself. Needless to say, that plan did not work—and they did not have a “Plan B.”

    Read More

  • Free Market Ethics Or Social Responsibility

    1613 Words  | 4 Pages

    As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.

    Read More

  • Goodbye Fears Monsters

    916 Words  | 2 Pages

    Implications for personal integrity and character: Their unethical decision may not reflect their personal character, but with the alternative options they have many opportunities to invent a practical toy that can give customers an option.

    Read More

  • Tobacco Industry Ethics Essay

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    As a race, humans are easily persuaded and quick to judge others who do not follow their beliefs. This leads to people not spending time evaluating whether something has both right and wrong facets. Many highly debated issues, such as abortion, drinking-age and religion, are controversial because there are ethical arguments for each side. These ethical dilemmas are not confined to personal situations, but spread to politics, governments, and businesses as well. A highly controversial debate in business ethics is the production and distribution of tobacco products. Many people will debate that the selling and promotion of tobacco products is unethical due to the threat these products pose to consumers’ health. While this health risk is of high concern, the emotional ties that people have to this argument constrict their ability to look at both sides of the case.

    Read More

  • Business Ethics: McDonnell Douglas' Lack of Solidarity

    1798 Words  | 4 Pages

    The reason I chose to write about this company McDonnell Douglas is because I felt that what they did was appalling and demonic. They dehumanized the passengers and only seen profit margins. One may say that McDonnell Douglas imps did not know the meaning of the word “solidarity”: Solidarity is a principle of Catholic Social Teaching. This principle means the firm and preserving determination to commit oneself to the common good. This principle incorporates other principles like Human Dignity, Community, Common Good, Stewardship, and Option for the Poor, that is what we are to demonstrate in our actions. This principle does not always come into play with many corporations; Furthermore when things like this come into play, one may say that a company is participating in unethical business practice. This is the reason why an American commercial aircraft industry company named McDonnell Douglas failed to reach their full potential in designing aircrafts. Their lack of ethical appropriate behavior has shown many that the expense of a change of a product is more important than losing lives over something that could have been prevented. There are three ways this situation could have been avoided but yet was not: First, finding an ethical way of putting the consumer long term goals first and increasing profitability (ex. maintaining a good company image). Secondly, look at the short term effect of being unethical, and receiving high profitability and long-term effect of being caught and having to file bankruptcy finally; McDonnell Douglas has an ethical responsibility for the lives of the people who use their product. McDonnell Douglas had a responsibility to the people to provide them a quick trouble free flight to and from their chosen...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: My Hunger For Danger Food

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    We weren’t licensed for bear, so we didn’t want to shoot it. Heck, we had no quarrel with him; we figured we would wait it out in the tree. But it wouldn’t leave once it smelled us. Shots in the air; no effect. An hour later waiting, no deterrent. We were near a creek where the bear could have it’s value meal. But it wanted something more. It wanted a human snack. And it got it. It rushed with such force at our tree that we both were knocked out of it and the bear ripped off chunks of my father’s leg before we could shoot it enough times in the face to make it run away and skip dessert – me and the rest of my

    Read More

  • Statutory Rape Case Study

    1165 Words  | 3 Pages

    As goes for John, the female who was 19 and the 250 pound baby tiger that walked out of the improperly latched cage nothing happened. So no harm was done, but if that baby tiger were to attack John and seriously injure him or even kill him. John’s family could sue We Ship Your Furries Company and who ever locked the cage door for negligence. Negligence is failure to take proper

    Read More

  • Mattel and Toy Safety

    1305 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our week five case study, Mattel and Toy Safety, involves toy safety inspection and product recall concerns among outside contractors. In 2007, the infamous toy company, Mattel, recalled a very large number of toy products covered with lead-based paint that were manufactured in China. Mattel responded to the massive toy recall by increasing the testing of all products and reassuring its customers that they will take affirmative action to correct the recall issues as soon possible. In my opinion, I believe Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner regarding the safety of it toys because as soon as Mattel was aware of a European merchant finding lead paint on their toy products, Mattel conducted an immediate investigation.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis Of The Film 'The Corporation'

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    This film has opened up a new perspective to me about the mindset of many of the people that have and are running many of the most noticeable household name brands that we have all come to know since childhood. The film does a very good job of explaining how businesses and corporations have not only grown but evolved over the last 40 plus years. We all know that at the end of the day, a company’s goal is to make money. “The Corporation” gave me a very in-depth look at the extent that major corporations will go to in order to keep their company successful and profitable. With many of the companies that were mentioned in the film, the average person such as myself, would never know that the companies that we support and patronize have taken part in modern day slavery to give use the products that we have come to love. The part of this that was most troubling was the fact that these business practices no matter how unethical we find them are in fact legal and do not

    Read More

  • Animal Cruelty: Educating to Eliminate

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some people do not consider certain acts of animal cruelty to be cruelty or they do not care. Normally the people who think like that are the ones who are actually causing the animal abuse themselves. Animal abusers sometimes do not see any wrong in what they are doing because they do not care what the animals feel. They do not think if the animals are happy or being hurt, they just continue doing what they are doing because to them it is not cruelty towards the animal. Some, though, do not believe that t...

    Read More

  • Parental Decision-Making

    1533 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will examine this ethical dilemma further, including why it is an important issue...

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Movie, The Insider

    1442 Words  | 3 Pages

    It seems obvious that large corporations have a tendency to ignore the negative effects of their actions in favor of profit. This example, although sensationalized, still says to me that with power comes responsibility. It affirmed my belief that a corporation’s goal cannot be just to provide profit to shareholders, but there must also be an element of social responsibility.

    Read More

More about Was Vermont Teddy Bear Company Crazy?

Open Document