Was Strategic Bombing Justified

1180 Words3 Pages

World War II introduced many new forms of combat to the battlefield. Technology was modernizing and countries were industrializing, thus producing new forms of combat including more efficient tanks, many new kinds of rifles, and bombs. Bombs were used on both the Allied and Axis sides to bomb the other. On the Allied side, the United States and Britain used a tactic called “aerial bombing” to bomb German and Japanese industrial cities. Aerial bombing is defined as “an air attack on a ground or naval target” (Thefreedictionary.com). Although some sources can argue that strategic bombing was an unjust tactic altogether, others can argue, as well as provide evidence, that strategic bombing was justified, to an extent, in World War II.
On September …show more content…

Soon after, Japan’s allies Germany and Italy, declared war on the United States as well. “In February 1942, the British Bomber Command gained approval from Churchill to target Germany's industrial cities and their civilian populations.” (Choices.edu). This strategy of dropping bombs on heavily populated industrial cities is known as “Strategic Bombing,” and it soon became the most used tactic for the bombing of cities in World War II. On April 8, 1942, Britain’s Royal Air Force attacked the city of Hamburg in Germany. The German air force, known as the Luftwaffe, responded to this by bombing Britain. Little did the British know, this bombing would go on for the next 76 nights as well as daytime air raids. This became known as “The Blitz” (Bbc.co.uk). The Blitz destroyed many places in Britain and resulted in “around 30,000 Londoners left dead, with another 50,000 injured” (Robinson). This tremendous amount of damage and casualties is just one example of why Britain and the United States’ use of aerial bombing was justified. To fight back against the Germans, Britain and the United States teamed up to bomb Germany - Americans would bomb by day, the British would bomb by night. This tactic was just as dangerous as it was effective. Bombing by day had its advantages, like targets being more visible. However with targets being more …show more content…

The answer could simply be that the Allies figured that this would wipe out the military efforts of the Axis, thus resulting in the Axis surrendering. The Allies thought that if the people of a country loses hope in the war it is just as important as the military giving up. This, to an extent, is a valid statement because as the Allies continued to bomb the Axis powers, the governments of the Axis began to see that they were losing too much of their supplies and people ultimately resulting in their surrender, the victory of the Allies, and the end of World War II. Because the Allied Powers won the war, hypothetically saving the world from fascist control, their use of strategic bombing is

Open Document