Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conflict Theory and Society
Conflict Theory and Society
Conflict Theory and Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conflict Theory and Society
Humans have resorted to violence for hundreds of thousands of years. Whether violence occurs because of certain changes to an existing system or disagreements within a community, governments try to use violence in a socially acceptable manner. Political structures were brought into various societies to help resolve conflicts among people, however these highly complex systems have not been completely successful. This is partly due to the fact that politics and violence have a direct relationship. In this paper the different roles of violence, within a political system to invoke changes and maintain order within a nation, will be examined. Specifically I will discuss when violence may be resorted to and when it may be successful.
Violence in general, is interpreted differently by various groups of people. Different cultures, and ethnicities may define violence differently based on their own values, and judgement. Each nation has different laws outlining what is acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. This variation on what constitutes as right and wrong, makes defining violence a complex task. According to Krug (2002), “Violence is the intentional use of force or power, threatened or actual against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in or has a likelihood of resulting in injury or death, psychological harm, maldevelopment or deprivation” (p. 13). This explanation covers most aspects of what is considered violence in most modern societies, however the fact that some countries possess inconsistent opinions as to what violence is, needs to be taken into account.
When thinking about violence and the gruesome nature surrounding it, we find it hard to understand why p...
... middle of paper ...
...insberg, B. (2013). Why Violence Works . the chronicle of higher education,. Retrieved March 25, 2014, from http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Violence-Works/140951/
Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S., Gleditsch, P. N., (2001). Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change and Civil War, 1816-1992, 95(1), 33-34
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Krug, Etienne G., World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. Print.
Maclean, G. A., & Wood, D. R. (2010). Studying Politics. Politics an Introduction (2 ed., p. 10). Don Mills: Oxford University Press
McPherson, J. (n.d.). A Brief Overview of the American Civil War. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/civil-war-overview/overview.html
Stoddard, Brooke C., and Daniel P. Murphy. The Everything Civil War Book : Everything You Need To Know About The Conflict That Divided A Nation. Avon, Mass: Adams Media Corp, 2009. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 4 Nov. 2013.
Turner, Thomas R. 101 Things You Didn’t Know about the Civil War. Avon: Adams, 2007.
Kelly, M. (n.d.). Overview of the American Civil War . American History From About. Retrieved November 14, 2010, from http://americanhistory.about.com/od/civilwarmenu/a/civiloverview.htm
McPherson, James M.; The Atlas of the Civil War. Macmillan: 15 Columbus Circle New York, NY. 1994.
Heidler, David S. and Jeanne T., Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: A Political, Social, And Military History Volume 2 D-I, ABC-CLIO Inc, 2000.
The Complete Idiot's Guide to World War II, Macmillan Publishing, New York, New York, 1999. Duis, Perry. The War in American Culture, The University of Chicago Press, 1994. Schultz, Stanley K. American History 102 Civil War to the Present. Copyright 1999 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin a href="http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/lectures/lecture21.html">http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/lectures/lecture21.html/a>.
Book Title: The American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research. Contributors: Robin Higham - editor, Steven E. Woodworth - editor. Publisher: Greenwood Press. Place of Publication: Westport, CT. Publication Year: 1996
Political violence is action taken to achieve political goals that may include armed revolution, civil strife, terrorism, war or other such activities that could result in injury, loss of property or loss of life. Political violence often occurs as a result of groups or individuals believing that the current political systems or anti-democratic leadership, often being dictatorial in nature, will not respond to their political ambitions or demands, nor accept their political objectives or recognize their grievances. Formally organized groups, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), businesses and collectives of individual citizens are non-state actors, that being that they are not locally, nationally or internationally recognized legitimate civilian or military authorities. The Cotonou Agreement of 2000 defines non-state actors as being those parties belonging to the private sector, economic and social partners and civil society in all its forms according to national characteristics. Historical observation shows that nation states with political institutions that are not capable of, or that are resistant to recognizing and addressing societies issues and grievances are more likely to see political violence manifest as a result of disparity amongst the population. This essay will examine why non-state political violence occurs including root and trigger causes by looking at the motivations that inspire groups and individuals to resort to non-conforming behaviors that manifest as occurrences of non-state political violence. Using terrorism and Islamic militancy on the one side, and human rights and basic freedoms on the other as examples, it will look at these two primary kinds of political violence that are most prevalent in the world ...
Violence, although at times is morally wrong, is sometimes the best way to solve a problem, to reach a goal. Because violence is an exhibition of a man's powers, violence allow an individual to show his might and his prowess. Therefore, both violence and power are attributed to an individual's or society's ability to achieve what they yearn to accomplish.
Structural violence is differentiated from direct violence both in terms of etiology and nature. D...
Hassler, Jr. Warren W. "American Civil War (United States History)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
Now that we have seen the shortcomings of two popular views of violence, Coady proposes his positive account; namely, that we ought to adopt a restricted definition. He begins with a dictionary definition (physical force with intent to damage/injure another), but he then observes that this is too restrictive and that we ought to include some psychological considerations. A restricted definition, Coady argues, is less morally loaded than the other two views given that it allows us to call an act a violent one without being committed (at least not as committed as the other views) to a certain ethical
Heidler, David Stephen, and Jeanne T. Heidler, eds. Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: a
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
In order to answer the question concerning the formation of states, it is necessary to clarify what constitutes a state; the Oxford English Dictionary defines a state as ‘a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government’. There are a number of ways and processes in which to analyse what state formation is, why they have formed and the way in which this has occurred. State emergence can be traced back to the creation of territorial boundaries in medieval Europe, such as the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, and its transition to a modern state can be attributed to the introduction of gunpowder in war (Hague & Harrop, 2010: 64). The formations of states have also been influenced by the growth of bureaucracy, administration and organisations. There are different theories as to the reason why states form, a certain few of which can be divided into the categories of rationalist, culturalist and structuralist perspectives. In this essay, these perspectives shall enter the debate in trying to justify the reason for state formation and the way in which it occurs. The most prominent feature in the formation of states appears to be the prevention and engagement of a state in war and its following consequences.