Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of violence in literary
The use of violence in literary
Impact of violence on readers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What is violence? Violence can be described and shown in a very wide variety of ways, and can be used for many different reasons. Most of the time violence has something of a negative connotation, but, despite what some people think, violence can be used in a good way, too. In the novel Cold Mountain, Charles Frazier narrates a story from two different perspectives: Inman, the protagonist, and Ada, another protagonist. He describes the journey that Inman goes on through Cold Mountain in hopes of meeting his old girlfriend, Ada. Inman and Ada both face some hardships, but they both handle these hardships close to the best way possible. Throughout the novel, Frazier details several scenes filled with violence to show how it is used for survival, …show more content…
the good of others, and revenge. Inman faces many situations that are life-or-death, and sometimes, he survives by using violence. He has seen a lot in his days, and much of what he has seen is not pretty. Brent Gibson, in reviewing Frazier’s novel, shares insight on how “All [Inman] can see when he looks ahead is a world in which everything that makes life worth living is gone. He tells the blind man outside the hospital that he has been turned "hateful" by what he has seen” (Gibson). Even as Inman is just beginning his journey, he faces many challenges just by thinking about what he has gone through up to this point in time. Perhaps the biggest challenge of the novel is the dreadful Home Guard. As described by Inman, “Teague and his Home Guard roaring around like a band of marauders. Setting their own laws as suits them, and them nothing but trash looking for a way to stay out of the army”(Frazier 45). Inman does not like the Home Guard, and that is made quite obvious throughout the book. The Home Guard are a group of “police” who go around making sure people aren’t leaving the war, and if they are, many times the Home Guard will just shoot them on the spot. As Inman made his trek through the mountain, he ran into a preacher who was attempting to murder his girlfriend. Shortly after meeting the preacher, “[Inman] made a motion as if to backhand the preacher, but the man did not run or fight or even try to raise his staff to parry. Rather, he hunched his shoulders to take the blow like a cowed dog, and so Inman pulled up and did not strike. He reasoned that lacking the will to drive the man off, he’d just walk on and see what came about”(Frazier 152). Inman faces something of an annoyance when he meets the preacher for the second time, but instead of focusing on the preacher, Inman decides to let him go and just continue on his route. Although Inman wanted to hit the man, he realized that it would cause him no benefit, and therefore decided against it. Along the journey through Cold Mountain, Inman meets a strange man, Junior, and his family. It turns out that Junior turned Inman into the Home Guard, who “shot him through a number of times” (Frazier 228). Inman got shot by the Home Guard, but somehow managed to survive. At this point in his journey, the will to survive must have been low, but Inman fought through every situation, violent, or not. In this novel, violence can be used to not only symbolize survival, but also the use of it for good. Although violence is usually associated with killing and other bad things, Frazier shows how it can be used for the good of others.
One night, Inman was walking when suddenly he came across a preacher attempting to kill a girl he had an affair with. Inman, knowing this is clearly wrong, “leveled the pistol at the man’s head and put pressure on the trigger until he could feel all the metal parts of its firing mechanism tighten up against each other” (Frazier 113). Inman walks upon a man attempting a murder, and uses a pistol to ensure this woman lives another day. This is a brave act considering the circumstances, and details a way in which violence was used for good. Inman was a good man at heart, and this was revealed again when he met a young woman named Sara. Sara had just a hog and some chickens to last her the winter, and when the Federals came and took these, Inman knew he had to step in, so he “shot them with the LeMat’s” (Frazier 316). Inman decides that to thank this woman for her kindness, he would hunt down the men who stole her possessions, and steal them back. In order to do this, though, Inman had to use force to kill the men so they would not do the same to him. The phrase a vow to bear meant a lot to Inman, and it can best be described as Inman’s vow to never kill a bear again. The problem with his vow is that in order for him to continue his journey, he had to “pick up the LeMat’s and shoot the cub in the head”(Frazier 354). Although Inman does have a warm …show more content…
side to his heart, he seems to always be in situations where he either lives or dies. In this case, Inman had to shoot the cub for the good of himself and his life, and he later stated how he now knew the eighth sin, “regret”. In a review of violence in Cold Mountain, a writer for The Independent newspaper stated, “Frazier's upbringing was defined by contradictions. "I remember a little town surrounded by mountains, very few people and a whole lot of land. That was wonderful. But there was also plenty of violence and ignorance.” (Violence). Frazier faced an early life filled with violence, but also filled with a lot of good. This influenced his writing in that he became more prone to include violence in all types of situations, whether it was for the good of the person, or sometimes it was revenge. In contrast of using violence for good, there were also many times in which violence took place as a form of revenge.
As Inman is about to leave the preacher tied to a tree following the discovery of his attempted murder, he decides to punish the preacher in a worse way than death. Inman writes a note about what the man did, and as he does, the preacher cries desperately “Then shoot me. Just shoot me here and leave me hanging. -- Don’t think there’s no charm in that offer” (Frazier 122). Inman decides that instead of killing the man, he is going to let the town know what the man did so they would beat him. This shows a crude side of Inman as he seeks revenge for the girl that the preacher tried to kill. As Ada’s father, Stobrod, and the Georgia boy are walking down a trail, they come along the feared Home Guard. The Home Guard, once again, shows its relentlessness when they “tripped the triggers and wood chips flew from the great poplar trunk where balls struck after passing through the meat of the two men” (Frazier 369). By deciding to kill the two men, it shows a sign of revenge for them leaving the war. The Home Guard somewhat creates their own laws, and if they discover that you turn your back on “their” country, it is already decided how you will end up: dead. Earlier in the novel, Inman got turned into the Home Guard by a man with the name of Junior. Inman miraculously survived the gunshots of the Home Guard, and decided he wanted to pay Junior a quick visit. During
this visit, of course, Inman “stepped to Junior and struck him across the ear with the barrel of the LeMat’s and then clubbed at him with the butt until he lay flat on his back” (Frazier 234). The violent killing of Junior really allowed the reader to visualize how angry Inman was with this man. The man had gotten Inman’s friend, Veasey, killed, and nearly got Inman, himself, killed by the Home Guard. The battle between the Home Guard and Inman seemed to be one that would never be resolved, but after a very long trek, the rivalry came to an end. In a description of the scene, Bill McCarron wrote, “What again is significant, then, is not that he is killed at the end by the Home Guard, but that he dies in his lover's arms, dreaming "a bright dream of a home" (p. 353), and that he has sacrificed his life--not to the meaningless violence of a politically motivated war hundreds of miles away, but to protect his "family" on the homefront” (McCarron). The end of the Inman’s life came by the very people whom he hated the most. The Home Guard and Inman sort of had an ongoing battle throughout the entire book, which was wrapped up with Birch’s revenge on Inman, who killed his boss. By ending it this way, Frazier tied the knot on both the good Inman did (sacrificing his life for his family), and the battle between Inman and the Home Guard. Frazier’s novel was filled with scenes upon scenes of violence and war, but he didn’t just use these to show Inman’s power, he used them to detail how it was used in good ways, whether that was for survival or for the good of others, and the bad ways, specifically in terms of revenge. He presents Inman with challenges that were very tough to overcome, but in the end, Inman finds a way to beat these challenges and meet his lover, Ada. Although he doesn’t get to live with Ada, the satisfaction he had with just simply seeing her again made it seem that his journey was complete. Frazier did an incredible job at showing how Inman used violence in many ways, not just for bad.
shocked by the randomness and brutality of the act, in much the same way it was
In Cold Blood is the true story of a multiple murder that rocked the small town of Holcomb, Kansas and neighboring communities in 1959. It begins by introducing the reader to an ideal, all-American family, the Clutters; Herb (the father), Bonnie (the mother), Nancy (the teenage daughter), and Kenyon (the teenage son). The Clutters were prominent members of their community who gained admiration and respect for their neighborly demeanors.
This lesson will examine the impact of Harper Lee on Truman Capote 's true-crime novel, 'In Cold Blood. ' Lee helped her childhood friend with much of the research for the book, although she was not credited when the book was published.
In this day and age the term “murder” is coined as a word used in everyday language, albeit fifty years ago in the [rural] heartland of America, that word evoked emotion out of the entire town’s population. Prior to writing In Cold Blood, Truman Capote had written several pieces that lead him to writing a piece of literature that would infuse fiction and nonfiction, thus In Cold Blood was created, albeit after six years of research (“Truman” 84). "Truman Capote is one of the more fascinating figures on the American literary landscape, being one of the country's few writers to cross the border between celebrity and literary acclaim…He contributed both to fiction and nonfiction literary genres and redefined what it meant to join the otherwise separate realms of reporting and literature." ___ In Cold Blood takes place in the rural heartland in America, capturing the lives of the Clutter family in the days preceding their murder. The story shifts to the murderers, Dick Hickock, Perry Smith, and the lives of the men prior to the events that ultimately unfold in the murder of the Clutters, although the actual events of the murder are not revealed until later in the story through Perry’s flashbacks. At this point of the story the narration switches between the fugitives and the investigation lead by Detective Alvin Dewey of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. Truman Capote's novel In Cold Blood delineates justice in order to depict the disruption of an all-American society.
Violence is regularly used in novels because, “It can be symbolic, thematic, biblical, Shakespearean, Romantic, allegorical, transcendent. ...Violence in literature, though, while it is literal, is usually also something else. That...punch in the nose may be a metaphor,” (Foster 49). There are two types of violence found in literature: intentional violence and authorial violence. The first type of violence is typical violence such as shootings, stabbings, drownings, and hit-and-run accidents to name a few. In this category, characters will inflict this type of behavior on themselves or on another character. The second type of violence, however, is meant solely to further the plot without another character’s intention. An example of this “narrative violence” is a death resulting from natural causes or a tragic accident that did not involve another character. Violence created by a specific injury that authors cause characters to visit on one another or on themselves. Both types of violence have similarities and differences. In both, the characters are killed off with the same goals of furthering plot or creating stressful situations for the characters. A difference between the intentional violence and narrative violence is that narrative violence does not involve a guilty party like intentional violence does. To Kill a
Truman Capote finds different ways to humanize the killers throughout his novel In Cold Blood. He begins this novel by explaining the town of Holcomb and the Clutter family. He makes them an honest, loving, wholesome family that play a central role in the town. They play a prominent role in everyone’s lives to create better well-being and opportunity. Capote ends his beginning explanation of the plot by saying, “The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle, kindly people, people I knew --- murdered. You had to believe it, because it was really true” (Capote 66). Despite their kindness to the town, someone had the mental drive to murder them. Only a monster could do such a thing --- a mindless beast. However,
Brian Conniff's article, "Psychological Accidents: In Cold Blood and Ritual Sacrifice," explains how Truman Capote's nonfiction novel demonstrates the psychological trauma that the murderers and the townspeople of Holcomb face after the murders of the Clutter family. Conniff begins his article by stating that in the last twenty-five years imprisonment and execution has reached an all-time high level of obsession among the American public. Since this type of violence has been so normalized it is rarely properly understood (1). With this in mind, prison literature has continually suggested that "the most fortified barriers are not the physical walls and fences between the prison, and the outside world; the most fortified barriers are the psychological walls between the preoccupations of everyday life . . .and the conscious realization that punishment is the most self-destructive kind of national addiction" (Conniff 1).
Truman Capote put-to-words a captivating tale of two monsters who committed four murders in cold blood. However, despite their atrocities, Capote still managed to sway his readers into a mood of compassion. Although, his tone may have transformed several times throughout the book, his overall purpose never altered.
Time froze on September 11th , 2001. The horrendous event that took place on this day shocked the world. Fear, horror and grief were felt during and after this ‘cold blooded’ crime was committed. Time also froze on November 15, 1959. This was the day that the Clutter family was brutally murdered in Holcomb, Kansas. Although this crime is much smaller than 9/11 it still brought fear to a town that once had its doors unlocked. Truman Capote wrote about this murder in his book In Cold Blood. It explains how Richard Eugene Hickock and Perry Edward Smith were able to commit these appalling crimes. Their cold blooded nature is perfectly depicted in the way they executed these murders. Dialogue and symbolism were used to validate their inhuman attitude.
A central theme in Frazier’s “Cold Mountain” is solitude/isolation, the loneliness that many characters in the novel experience guides them in their search for meaning in a world that is torn by war and hardships. Inman (a soldier/warrior that is battle fatigued and is trying to get home) feels a sense of overwhelming loneliness and growing confusion with the human world because of his war experiences. He is also plagued by a spiritual desolation that is suggested when he listens to many talk about their tales of hardships, but he rarely shares details of his own past. But through his loneliness he cultivates an otherworldly spirituality, similar to the goat-woman, (an old lady Inman meets in his travels that feeds him and gives advice) that
Cormac McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian” does a marvelous job of highlighting the violent nature of mankind. The underlying cause of this violent nature can be analyzed from three perspectives, the first being where the occurrence of violence takes place, the second man’s need to be led and the way their leader leads them, and lastly whether violence is truly an innate and inherent characteristic in man.
Capote's structure in In Cold Blood is a subject that deserves discussion. The book is told from two alternating perspectives, that of the Clutter family who are the victims, and that of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. The different perspectives allow the reader to relive both sides of the story; Capote presents them without bias. Capote masterfully utilizes the third person omniscient point of view to express the two perspectives. The non-chronological sequencing of some events emphasizes key scenes.
Although many people defend the Old West saying that it was not very violent, the Old West was indeed very dangerous. The Old West was not as violent as Egypt is today but it still was drastically hostile to both the Americans and the Native Americans. How might you depict the Old West?
Violence is unavoidable in life, in the same way it is also unavoidable in literature. In literature violence contributes to the meaning of the work as a whole. In the story Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck violence serves as a build-up of the plot. Violence is a major theme in this book and is brought out physically, emotionally, and psychologically. Violence is used a way to achieve justice in the story, as well as an outlet for the despair and limited possibilities that define the ranch.
According to Lacey (1997) violence can be described as the act of being violent or more narrowly, the act of exercising physical force.