Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
School uniform policy research paper
The school uniform policy
School uniform policy research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: School uniform policy research paper
What are the Veils Laws? The Veils laws where created in 2011. These laws started because kids were going to school in their full faced hijabs and schools did not agree with their decision’s. From the article Taking the veil by Jane Kramer, we can see how all these problems started. These laws prohibited women from wearing full-faced Hijabs in public places. The places include any government operated businesses. Also, it doesn't allow them to wear such clothing in school. The biggest group of women who wear these hijabs are women from Islam. The biggest issues with these laws are the people who it affects religion and their freedom of speech. In the article from Marie Clair Magazine, We can see the Muslims make up ten percent of the …show more content…
People should be allowed to wear whatever they want to. No one should be forced to change what they believe in. Also, no one should be forced to wear someone that they do not want to wear. In the Marie Clair article women where being attacked for being fully clothed and looking different from everyone else. This example shows how people can hurt you and be completely rude to you because you are dressed differently. No one should have to fear for their lives because they wear a Hijab. All Muslims are not terrorist. People have to learn to stop seeing the bad in people. This meaning does not associate a one-time event with every person. Just because one person committed a terrorist attack and they where Muslim does not mean that every Muslim is a …show more content…
While in high school my school had an extremely strict dress code. Mainly this dress code was towards the girls of the school and not boys. The boys only could not wear mussel shirts and shorts that were shorter than three inches above the knee. We were not allowed to wear skirts or dresses that came three inches above the knee. We were not allowed to wear what the teachers, principals, or other faculty defined as tight clothing. We also were not allowed to wear short sleeves that were not more than three finger lengths long. The list goes on and on, but these are just some of the things we couldn't
For some women wearing a veil is not something that is forced on them but rather a choice of their own. Martha Nussbaum and Maysan Haydar are both authors that try to explain their reasoning that veiling isn't an oppressive tool used against women. Martha Nussbaum's article “Veiled Threats”, is a political and philosophical take on why banning the burqa is a violation of human rights. On the other hand Maysan Haydar’s article “Don’t Judge a Muslim Girl by Her Covering”, is a more humorous and personal take on why veiling shouldn't be as judged or stereotyped. Though Nussbaum and Haydar have equal goals this essay is being used to understand the main argument, claims and whether or not each article has any weaknesses.
Women have always been thought of as something that needed to be controlled in Muslim culture. Their bodies are a source of shame that must be covered during prayer and also in the public (Mir-Hosseini 2007: 3). Veiling, done by a hijab or chador, is when women either wear a headscarf to cover themselves or they wear a veil that covers their entire body, excluding her hands and eyes (Mir-Hosseini 2007: 1; Mir-Hosseini 2003: 41; Berger 1998: 93; Smith-Hefner 2007: 390-391; Brenner 1996: 674; El Guindi 1999: 6). Veiling is used as a tool for oppression. By having women veil themselves, it enforces the control by the male run and male dominated society (Mir-Hosseini 2007: 7). Also, the punishment for women appearing without a veil transitioned as the concept of veiling was addressed, transitioning from seventy-four lashes, to being arrested and held between ten days and two months for being “immodest” women and offending public morality, or fined 50,000 to 500,000 rials (Mir-Hosseini 2007: 8). The oppression of veiling is perpetuated through the thought that it is a woman’s religious duty to wear one, condemning foreigners and women in society if they refuse. Although it is a tool for oppression, there was resistance the oppression. In ...
Schools typically justify their dress codes by maintain that it’s important to keep the classroom free of any distractions, however, that language actually reinforces the idea that women’s bodies are inherently tempting to men and it’s their responsibility to cover themselves up.
The author talks about how this was not something that happen overnight, but has been discussed about from a very long time such a 1989. The views of people that the author chooses to look at are Ernest Cheniere, who raised the statement of banning headscarves in public schools in 1994 and Francois Bayrou minister of education in 1994 who saw muslim headscarves as a way of proselytizing. Then Joan Scotts talks about why the timing played into affect, how racism such as colonial legacies were effected, secularism, individualism of the veil, Muslims being looked as threats, how uncivilized Muslim people were, and sexuality. Joan Scotts goes into detail in all the sub topics and shows how does this affect a common Muslim girl that wears a hijab and how does the French government view
According to greatschools.org, “Enforcing a strict dress code can place the focus of school on clothing and rules, rather than on education.” Most schools have specific uniforms that a child must wear in order to attend. Many children that go to school, have single parents and / or more than one ...
The hijab, while not always popular, has seem to be customary for most women to wear in the Islam world for good or for bad. Prior to the 21st century the hijab was not very popular and was looked as a rarity, but now most women adopted this clothing choice for a multitude of reasons. Many women choose to wear it because they feel god instructed women to wear it, to highlight modesty, to show faith in god, or to show Muslim identity. There are many reasons women wear the hijab, even if the veil is forced upon them because of family members; However, the sight of the veil concerns many women activists whose main priority is to insure equality for all women. Many women activists don’t like the veil to be forced upon women and the idea
Varying Issues Corresponding to the School Dress Code Numerous cases have been presented and highlighted in the media based off of accounts from angered parents and students protesting the school dress code. Multiple reports are taken from females who experience the shorter end of the stick due to increased fashion interests and sexist mindsets of their school staff. Shame suits are humiliating outfits that those who break the rules must wear as a form of punishment, most of the time these consist of extremely unflattering clothes that have written phrases on them indicating that their appearance is due to their violation of the school rules. Punishments indicated a risk to the violators education caused by missed classes. Few in society do approve of the dress code as it controls female students’ modesty, banishes distraction, and preserves the professional atmosphere inside a school.
The veil affair, or rather the scarf affair, in France is a controversial topic, which resulted in the creation of legislation prohibiting "conspicuous" signs of religious affiliation in public schools. This article of law, was pointedly aimed at young Muslim girls who wore the hijab in state schools. Proponents of the law argued that it was a defence of laicite, a French principle which is described as delegating religion to the private sphere, and out of the public civic sphere. Joan Wallach Scott writes, that such legislation, or separation is the state acting to protect individuals from the claims of religion. Scott, further says that laicite, is an instrument of the state to create acceptable forms of religion, which has justified the exclusion and
International human rights standards protect the rights of persons to be able to choose what they wish to wear, and in particular to be able to manifest their religious belief. Thus, Human Rights Watch in their report, focusing on the hijab ban for state officials in Germany, said that: “Restrictions should only be implemented where fully justified by the state, and be the least restrictive necessary”.1 Proclamation of wearing the hijab in public institutions as illegal is undermining the autonomy of individuals, their right to choose, their right to privacy and intimacy, and their self-determination. In addition to this, several European countries such as Germany and France directly prevent women wearing hijab to work or attend school in the public state institutions, which further intensified already negative attitude of Western public towards wearing hijab.
In the western society, skirts and dresses are traditionally female clothing. A ban on this clothing would be seen as ridiculous, which is not any different than the ban on the Muslim veil. The burqa can be seen as oppressive to women, but the “burqa ban” takes away Muslim women’s rights, and women should have the right to choose how they worship their religion. The main support for the ban on Muslim veils is that they are the manifestation of the unjust treatment of women.
Unbiased rules like dress codes will not make a certain group of people feel singled out and can consequently focus more acutely on their education. While the physical aspects of dress codes then and now are on opposite ends of the spectrum, they are quite similar in the enforcement and punishment facet of dress codes. In the sixties, dress codes were enforced by detentions, having an immediate change in outfit, or being sent home. The way the administrators
We should be allowed to express how we feel and dress the way we want and not get looked at
The representatives in support of religious symbols in schools of the state of Columbia believe the decision for implementing a law to ban headscarves and other religious symbols should not be enforced. This is because this decision will violate most rights from the International human rights treaties including the right to religious freedom and practice, the right to education as well as the right to privacy of the individual. Religious symbols are not all required to be worn by all religions, however the head scarf is extremely important for Islamic women. Unlike other religious symbols such as the cross that can be taken off, the head scarf is part of what it means to be a Muslim woman and it is essential for it to be worn in public spaces.
Nevertheless, what else is oppression than dictating what women can and cannot wear? Government regulation threatens and ignores the choices of women who personally want to dress in a way that respects their religious values. Quite to the contrary of what a few apparently believe, bans that purportedly exist so men will be unable to force wives, daughters, and sisters to wear concealing clothing such as the burqa or niqab, have accomplished nothing, as few women in areas enforcing bans were previously obligated to wear religious veils. In fact, more women in France have begun to wear veils since the outlawing of niqabs and burqas in 2010 (Jung). Which simply reiterates the fact that women can and do choose to don religious garb, and that the
Kids and teens have the right to pick out what they wear, sure it may take a bit longer, but in the long run it is worth it. Everyone has the right to express themselves freely and by the way they look. It can tell what kind of person they are. Think about it, you go into a school that has uniforms you see everyone wearing the same stuff who is who? What kind of personality could they have, maybe one like being a brick in the wall. Walk into a school without uniforms and you can instantly tell anyone’s personality by what they wear, so they express their emotions through their clothing.