More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on breaching patient confidentiality
Introduction to ethics and healthcare
Being ethical and legal in healthcare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on breaching patient confidentiality
Kyle,
There are a lot of doctors out there who have a lot of patients and feel like they are under so pressure. However, in the case presented to us, I felt that the doctor put Valerie’s self-care on the line. The reason I believe this is because the doctor was almost complaining that she had too many emails and could not keep with every individuals information. I think that this was a violation because the doctor did not take the time to properly care for her patient who was in need. Valerie was also looking for comfort during this difficult time and was not given any sort of respect. Her confidentiality was most certainty violated. It was hard to know what age she was so I predicted either a teenage or a young adult. So, with, no matter
Learning from what Dr. Anna Pou had to face with the lawsuits she was dealing with makes me cringe. As Healthcare professionals, having to worry of possibly being sued for believing what is right for the patient or as a whole for the hospitals health is ridiculous. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Often time’s society look at courts cases as a battle versus two oppositions, but Dr. Pou’s case it is not. In her statements from national television she states saying her role was to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’.
For anyone who has ever worked in healthcare, or simply for someone who has watched a popular hit television show such as Grey’s Anatomy, General Hospital, House or ER know that there can be times when a doctor or health care provider is placed in extremely difficult situations. Often times, those situations are something that we watch from the sidelines and hope for the best in the patient’s interest. However, what happens when you place yourself inside the doctors, nurses, or any other of the medical provider’s shoes? What if you were placed in charge of a patient who had an ethically challenging situation? What you would you do then? That is precisely what Lisa Belkin accomplishes in her book “First Do No Harm”. Belkin takes the reader on
According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in
At first, I believed that a patient should have the say so and get what they demand. I didn’t feel sympathetic for the health care provider one bit. I was able to look through the eyes of a physician and see the trials that they have to go through. It is not easy making the decisions that they have to make. There job is based on decisions, and most of it is the patient’s. “There will certainly be times when I will be faced with a request from a patient or patient’s representative that I will personally find morally difficult, but one that is still legally and ethically acceptable. must be very difficult to work in an area with little control over what you want to do.” (Bradley 1). Even though I do not fully understand a health care providers everyday role, I do know that they are faced with painful options. I personally feel that I can not work in this field for that exact reason. Health care providers play an extremely important role in our society, and others need to look upon
The family is scared as to what might happen with the heart surgery. Justine’s mother is also afraid that her family might blame her for going ahead with the heart surgery if anything bad were to happen to Justine in the hospital during the surgery. The family is hoping that the healing or the praying ceremony scheduled at the temple might work and cure Justine, and hopefully surgery might not be needed after all.
Josie’s story was painful to watch as a mother. I can only try to imagine the pain and anger her family has had to endure. It saddens and angers me personally to know a mother’s concerns were dismissed without a second thought when she knows her daughter better than anyone else. I cannot understand why the nurses and doctors would not address her concerns, no harm comes from taking a few moments to re-analyze the situation. I do not think I could partner with the same people that caused the untimely death of my child. I understand Josie’s family did so to implement a safety protocol to prevent other families from the same fate, and I admire their bravery in doing so. No one should be in a situation where their wellbeing is at risk due to a medical error.
Providers must act in the best interest of the patient and their basic obligation is to do no harm and work for the public’s wellbeing. A physician shall always keep in mind the obligation of preserving human life. Providers must communicate full, accurate and unbiased information so patients can make informed decisions about their health care. As a result of their recommendations, providers are responsible for generating costs in health care but do not generate the need for those expenses. Every hospital has both an ethical as well as a legal responsibility to provide care, even if the care may be uncompensated.
Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient
...ort her actions, then Jack must do so as he is too responsible for making this situation known to the appropriate people. However, one must acknowledge how difficult this may be for Jack due to the long-standing relationship he has with Linda. It should also be apparent now that Linda’s actions are unjustifiable. She is not only acting unprofessionally and unethically by not delivering the medication but she is committing an illegal offence by falsifying records and stealing from the ward. To conclude, it is important to remember that the Department of Health and Children (2008) acknowledge that healthcare has originated in a world which is not flawless and that as humans, errors are possible. However, members of the healthcare system must try and prevent these errors from occurring where possible to ensure a high standard of care which is owed to the service users.
Normally it becomes difficult for medical records to be completely sealed up. The greatest factor that affects confidentiality is when clinicians turn to share medical information as case studies. In any case such data happens to be published in professional journals, then the patient’s identity is never divulged and the entire data that identifies the patient become either eliminated or changed. However, if at all the confidentiality is breached, the patient may have the right of suing, British Medical Association (2008).
Every patient that is admitted to hospital, or seen by a health professional has a right to his or her own privacy, and by ensuring professional boundaries are upheld this basic right can be achieved. According to Levett-Jones and Bourgeois (2011, pp. 237) confidentiality is an obligation made by a professional to respect the information given by a patient to healthcare professional. In today’s society through technology and social networks a patient’s privacy is far more vulnerable than it was in the past. By posting on Facebook anything about a patient or in discussion via internet or email to others a patient’s privacy has been breached and the trust created in a therapeutic relationship is no longer there causing what is known as a boundary crossing. Thompson (2010, pp.26) understands that “At times, boundary crossing may be unintentional”, but emphasizes that this behavior can lead to consequences. Pat...
I respected my patient’s rights through confidentiality. I had a primigravida mother who had a group of family members awaiting for her infants arrival. There had been some slight complications with the delivery and when the infant was born it had to be taking to the NICU. I know I could only disclose information to the patient’s mother and not the other family
What are the limits imposed on patient confidentiality by the legitimate interests of third parties?
Confidentiality is usually referred to as an ethical issue. The duty of confidentiality goes beyond undertaking not to divulge confidential information it also includes a huge responsibility of making sure that all written patient information is kept securely.
I feel that when dealing with patient communication confidentiality is the most important matter at hand. The patient has entrusted the doctor’s office to handle there help care with the utmost of care, professionalism and to keep their matters private. If a patient confidentiality was broken the entire office would be effected. Patients would no longer trust the doctor and his staff. When sending out any information you must always double check the patient name, email address/physical address, and fax number to make sure the information is being sent to the correct person.