Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the media can be influenced by society
The influence of media in society
V for vendetta book and film essay questions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How the media can be influenced by society
Setting in V for Vendetta
The graphic novel, "V for Vendetta" was set in 1997-1998 in London, England succeeding a nuclear war in the 1980s. In this post-apocalyptic era, the effects of the nuclear war had changed and destroyed the world for the worse which was evident through the environmental degradation in London. Usually, an apocalypse results in limited resources like food, and chaos as people are looking for someone to lead them while they are confused and scared. In many apocalyptic films, there is a social change where usually a corrupt leader uses propaganda to manipulate his people by using their fear as an advantage.
The graphic novel was set in the future from when it was published, informing the audience about the future events
…show more content…
that could lead England to fascism while Margaret Thatcher was president. It is a story of London in the 1980s but taken further to evoke fear and warn the audience that one day the world could be as messed up as the story. This can be seen through Evey's flashbacks where she talks about events in the 1980s where America and Russia had started a Nuclear War with explosive nuclear missiles. The consequences of the war had led to the abolishment of the continents; Africa and Europe. London was flooding as the Thames barrier had been damaged and there was pollution which is seen when Evey says: "the sky was all yellow and black…Dad said London was finished". The flooding had destroyed crops in the countryside and Europe was greatly affected by the bombing meaning that the resources in London were low and the economy was in a crisis. In reality, there was a nuclear standoff in 1983 where the US and the Soviet Union were both stockpiling nuclear missiles.
However, there was no war as both sides knew that the consequence of bombing would injure too many innocent civilians. Also at the time that the novel was written, conservatives were in power of England under President Margaret Thatcher who viewed that those who didn't fit within the norms of society should be discriminated against; those people included demographic groups which opposed the traditional moral values such as feminist and socialists and homosexuals. In the book, Evey's dad was taken away because he used to be a part of a socialist …show more content…
group. Although in the text, fascism had dominated, there was an anarchist (v) who was opposed to the Norsefire regime and aimed to establish a new world order where there was freedom to live instead of submitting to the government. This was done through violence and destruction as fear which was the only way people would listen. V wears his mask to show his allegiance to Guy Fawkes who was another anarchist in the 16th century who also opposed the government of that time. Guy Fawkes attempted but failed to blow up the houses of parliament so V destroys the houses of parliament for him. By getting rid of the houses of parliament it shows his intent to suppress the fear civilians had with the government and hoped to nullify their dependence on the leader. Another building that was blown up was the Head which served as the Leader's office, the central institution of the Norse fire government. When Evey sends off V with a Viking funeral, she puts him inside a train which would explode at the Head. By doing this, the destruction portrayed a new beginning of change and independence from the Norsefire regime. A likely reason that the train was used to abolish the Head could be because before the Norse fire government took control, trains served as convenient transport for the public. Contrastingly after the Norsefire government took control, there were fewer people on the trains as it was only for those who were higher up in the social hierarchy like the finger men. So in a way, the train was a symbol of the disempowerment of the public which overthrew the government and at the end of the story. It could also evoke a sense of rebelling with the thought that if normal people couldn't use the train so couldn't the government. A contemporary example of this setting is in America under the rule of Donald trump who, like the leader in V for Vendetta, discriminated against many, in this case under the rule of trump Muslims have been deported out of the country.
Similar to V for Vendetta, the state is run by a dictator who surrounds himself with people who think alike to him. Trump also uses the public's fear of ISIS to his advantage by promising to build walls to stop immigrants coming into the country. In the novel and in America 2017, civilians just want to know that they are safe and have become reliant on the government to do the things they don't want to
do.
The approach towards freedom is hard to achieve against a totalitarian government, but possible to win with the people’s belief. 1984 by George Orwell and James McTeigue’s V for Vendetta portrays the same idealism of the anti-heroes, Winston and V. An anti-hero is “a protagonist who lacks the attributes that make a heroic figure, as nobility of mind and spirit, a life or attitude marked by action or purpose” (“Antihero”). Winston is not courageous, peaceful, and self-centered along the path of freedom for Oceania, whereas the anti-hero, V, is violent in his actions, impatient and careless in his pursuit to free London from the totalitarian government. As a matter of fact, V and Winston have the opposite behaviours; this is significant because it helps to compare the approach of the anti-heroes toward freedom. At the end of 1984 and V for Vendetta, the result of their approach is different from each other; Winston gives up on the liberation of Oceania, while V dies knowing that London is freed from Norsefire Party.
In dystopian literature, the future of society and humanity is presented in a negative standpoint. Utopian works frequently illustrate a future in which the everyday lives of human beings is often improved by technology to advance civilization, while dystopian works offer an opposite outlook. Examples of dystopian characteristics include an oppressive government, a protagonist, and character nature. Although the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and the film V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue display different perspectives of a dystopian society, both share similar dystopian characteristics, which include a government who asserts power over citizens, a protagonist who questions society, and characters who are isolated from the natural world.
In the novel 1984 and the film “V for Vendetta”, the protagonist for both stories are captured while performing various acts of rebellion against the totalitarian government, of which is controlling their city. In punishment, the government tortures them with harsh, inhumane methods that are similar to those used in dictatorships during the 1900s like the USSR under Stalin’s rule. However, both protagonists are tortured by different sides, and by people from completely opposite ends of the political ladder: one a government agent, the other a rebel. Although the themes disclosed in relation to the purpose and meanings of torture are similar, the overall message and final opinion that is expressed and conveyed to the recipients are complete opposites.
Overall, the V for Vendetta film does represent the graphic novel very well. Even though it is not exactly the same as Alan Moore wanted, it is a product of its time and Alan Moore’s help. And even so, the film was still similar to the original graphic novel because of its
V for Vendetta is a graphic novel written by Allan Moore. It is a story full of comedy with V as the protagonist who is out to fight and destroy the government and affects innocent people. The novel was later adapted into a film and directed by James McTeigue and written by Wachowski Brothers.
With experience comes information and awareness. Every person interprets experiences differently, which in turn makes it difficult to determine the morality of something. In Alan Moore’s novel, Watchmen, Moore uses the marriage between pictures and words to present the different personalities of various characters and what they think is best for society. Throughout the story, Alan Moore explains that ignorance is humility and humility is wisdom, which is the only way of achieving true knowledge.
The setting of the film, as a whole, displays Marxist ideas of capitalism. One of the foundational themes of Marxist thought is that, within a capitalist society, there will be a distinct polarization between two classes: The ruling class (bourgeoisie), and those whom they rule over (proletariats) (Korczynski, Hodson, & Edwards, 2006, p. 33). V for Vendetta takes place in a not-so-distant future version of a dystopian England.
Film Analysis - The Notebook Introduction The film is portrayed in the past and present scenario setting. It is based on a young couple’s love and passion for one another, but are unexpectedly separated due to the disapproval of the teen girl parents and the social differences in their life. At the start of the movie, it displays a nursing home style setting with an elderly man named Duke (James Garner), reading to an elderly woman named Mrs. Hamilton (Gena Rowlands), whose memory is inevitably deteriorating. The story he reads to her is a love story about two teenagers named Allie (Rachel McAdams) and Noah (Ryan Gosling), that met in the 1940’s at a carnival in Seabrook Island, South Carolina.
In The Shawshank Redemption, a film directed by Frank Darabont, Friendship is a prominent theme that is explored throughout the story of Andy Dufresne, Ellis Boyd “Red” Redding and their imprisonment and subsequent friendship. Darabont uses a range of techniques in this film to convey that theme of friendship, such as lighting, dialogue, music/score, Camera angles, mise-en-scene and camera shots.
Forty-one percent of a couple’s first marriage ends in divorce, according to mckinleyirvin.com. Also, Seventy-five percent of children with divorced parents live with their mother while forty-three percent of children growing up nationally, are raised without their fathers. Many factors leads to the decision of the child’s custody, although mothers usually win. However, what if both parents are capable of providing a decent life for the child? Unhealthy relationships between parents can question the true intent behind child custody. After reading Pop Quiz 7 in, “Octet”, from Brief Interviews with Hideous Men by David Foster Wallace, parents used money, vengeance, and love in the battle for child custody. Similar to the situation
Morality and ethnics are two terms that closely resemble one another. Morality and ethnic both have to do with the concept of what is considered as right and wrong. However, there is a distinct different between the two. Morality is the principle that concerns itself with what is right and what is wrong based on an individual’s personal opinion and thoughts. Ethnics are a set of rules that are considered as “right” and are set out by an external source. Two types of philosophical ethnics are deontology and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism focuses on maximizing happiness while deontology focuses on duty and rationality. If one was given the option to save the life of one person or save the life of five, how would one respond? Those who believe in utilitarianism have a different mindset as to how to solve this crisis. However, like any theory that exists, there are always strength and weaknesses to those theories.
A film bursting with visual and emotional stimuli, the in-depth character transformation of Oscar Schindler in Schindler’s List is a beautiful focal point of the film. Riddled with internal conflict and ethical despair, Schindler challenges his Nazi Party laws when he is faced with continuing his ambitious business ideas or throwing it all away for the lives of those he once saw as solely cheap labor. Confronted with leading a double life and hiding his motivations from those allegiant to Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, Schindler undergoes numerous ethical dilemmas that ultimately shape his identity and challenge his humanity. As a descendent of a Jewish-American, Yiddish speaking World War II soldier who helped liberate concentration camps in Poland, this film allowed for an enhanced personal
As time goes on, history has a way of getting distorted from its most truthful form. Time causes people to drift away from accuracy and become more interested in what they want to remember. Hollywood has a reputation of creating films that cater more to the average viewer, rather than the history buff. Inglorious Basterds, by Quentin Taratino, take very liberal liberty with a history story, and creates a story that will sell to the crowd. This may seem dubious, but it is often not such a bad thing. Hollywood can take a story that may have one connotation, may it be serious or dreary, and turn it into something that evokes different emotions, will still addressing historical issues or topics. Taratino chooses to film a movie of this type because of the way he can portray a very serious topic in way that no one has before. He picks the topic of World War II and the Nazi’s, but does not take the generic portrayal of it. Many previous movies of this subject have been released either show heroic American that battle insurmountable odds, or forsaken Jews that fight threw the worst. While it may seem dark to make a movie that takes a serious subject so lightly, it is part of the process of history. As it becomes more and more distant in time, there is less and less truth and seriousness put into it. It is seen in many other Hollywood movies, such as The Patriot (2000), 300 (2007), Braveheart (1995), and Django Unchained (2012). The interesting thing in many of the movies like these, is the enemy is often portrayed in an extremely negative, almost so extreme, they could be compared to the Nazis. Hollywood uses that Nazis as the level setter for enemies, it does not get worse than them. It is interesting to see how Taratino portrays the ...
Strong, brave, and powerful are usually the words that come to mind when you think of a traditional war hero. In Tim O’Brien’s novel he uses war heroes that aren’t what people usually imagine when they think of a war hero. They are straight out of high school, and most of the soldiers in his novel are cowards. They are scared of going into the war and even when they have a chance to save one of their friends they just let them die. Not using traditional war heroes allowed Tim O’Brien to show that not all heroes are heroic and courageous, and that they were just normal people going into a war they didn’t understand.
The quote “all’s fair in love and war” means nothing is out of bounds when it comes to love and war; everything is fair game. Nicholas Sparks, Norman Rockwell, and Robert Frost do an excellent job depicting this quote in their work. Nicholas Sparks is famous for his romantic novels; many of which involve a man in the military falling in love with a woman and doing whatever it takes to be with one another. Norman Rockwell’s paintings are simple but also show the love and war. Though Robert Frost’s poem are not particularly about love and war; he does have many poems about love between two people as well as poems about war and what it takes to survive. All three people are extremely talented and I enjoy all of their work.