Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perfection in modern society
Essays about utopias
Essays about utopias
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Perfection in modern society
People say no one is perfect for a reason. Utopias can’t exist because no one can be perfect. Imperfection is normal but perfection is impossible.Utopias societies can’t exist because no human being is perfect. Also, kids & adults break rules all the time and this would make a society not a utopian society. Another thing is people would leave because of anger or just disappointment. No people equals no utopian society.
Utopias are first not possible to exist because of all of the people who break rules..For example, The giver is a Utopian community but they have seemed to fail that because on page 14 paragraph 5 Jonas states, “They were not allowed to ride bicycles before then. But almost always, the older brothers and sisters had secretly taught the younger ones.” This shows that they break the rules of their utopian community so the aren't one because they are not all the same people. This quote is just telling us that kids break the rules and this means
…show more content…
The did not act like a Utopian society.Article 1 Paragraph 14,”While many people believe that utopias are doomed to failure because of human nature, it’s much more useful to approach utopia as the ultimate governance challenge.” This quote supports my claim because the government could not be a utopia. In article 1 paragraph 13, “Finally, if you’re going to suppress your members’ worldly desires, you need a mechanism for self-selection. Several religious sects, like the Old Order Amish, have successfully stifled material interests over multiple generations.”
This quote supports the main ideas because people all have to want to have a utopian community and not all want it or follow the rules.
The last reason I believe that people can not have a utopian society is because some other rules made it harder. It makes it hard for the rule creators to find a good
it should be learnt that the search for „utopia‟ is a contemplative one, and can never be
The authors therefor saw the ‘utopian’ societies to be a trap for weak minded publics, and that once in place, such systems would be able to perpetuate indefinitely due to the efficiency at which they protect and propagate themselves. Through fear, diversion and sedation the utopia can maintain a strong grip on the people it encompasses before anyone realizes the sacrifices made. The popularity of these books does rule out the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however. The state of people is not about to change, and their ignorance will continue regardless of the harshness of the wake up calls issued.
A utopia is a community which possesses highly desirable or perfect qualities. The beginning of the book Anthem, written by Ayn Rand, is supposed to be represented as a utopia, but the reader soon discovers that it is actually a dystopia; which is merely the opposite of a utopia. The main character of the book, Equality 7-2521, explains to the reader that there are many laws and regulations that the people of City must obey such as: not to write or have their own thoughts, citizens can’t have individual names, and the citizens of the city also have to refer to themselves as “we.” Equality 7-2521 soon realizes that a society that lacks individualism does nothing to make the community prosper; meaning there must be a stop to the collectivism within the city.
Imagine a world where there are no crimes at all, where there are no personal possessions, and where religions are practiced everywhere - the “perfect” Utopian society, essentially. The general purpose of this society was so that “Man could live with his fellow Man and find personal fulfillment without doing harm to others.” It’s almost a given that this Utopian concept has been deemed as mankind’s ideal world, thus it having been sought after so fervently. With that so, it’s almost a foreign idea that perhaps, the concept of a Utopian society given could prove not to be as perfect or ideal as thought - perhaps, it could be self-destructive in itself, a non-permanent society. Yet, the question remains: how exactly is that possible?
how a utopia would not be good: The Receiver feels the pain of knowing there is more to life than life in the utopia, the community has no variety, and the Chief Elders take away all aspects of freedom humans have. For today’s society, living in a utopian society may not be far away. We today could undergo a terrible disaster and feel the need to live in a utopia. However to live in a utopia is to live like “ants,” and humans were not meant to be
Is a utopia possible in a human society? The article, “Mimetic Desire and the scapegoat” by Brian Mcdonald describes how humans are intertwined with mimetic desire and scapegoats. Mcdonald gives an example of three children who display both of these features. The short story, “The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas” by Ursula Le is about a town of which is considered happy and joyful, but at the cost and misery of one child. Then, there are those who leave and never come back to Omelas. Both of these stories are laced into one another. As humans a utopia or a perfect society cannot exist due to the reasons that define us as, “human.”
The definition of Utopia is, “an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.” The rules and controls listed above and the many more that are in the book “Anthem” describe a society trying to become collective but in a utopian way. The purpose of these rules and controls is to keep the society collectivist. Fear is what runs this society. “.
Throughout history, people have made numerous futile attempts to create an Utopian society. The term "Utopia" depicts an imaginary ideal state. Such a state is described in The Giver. In The Giver, Jonas's community believes in the renunciation of personal property, rights, one's unique characteristics and of binding personal relationships (such as marriage). This society is believed to be perfect, free of pain and sorrow; everything is under control and "same".
The Utopia Reader defines the word utopia as “a nonexistent society described in detail and normally located in time and space.” (p.1) I would best define utopia as a fictional dream- paradise land where everything is peaceful, perfect and all runs smoothly. There is no crime disease, or pain. People are happy, kind and fair and have each other’s best
The expression "utopia" in reality explains to "nowhere," because human natural world just doesn’t allow excellence. As an individual being, I can form my own utopia by implementing my accountability and regulations on myself. For Perfect society I cannot do anything but if we get together we can bring a change but still we cannot develop utopia; for the reason that we cannot determine people’s judgment.
To begin, an overview of utopian history is needed. The utopian lineage is as old as the Earth itself. Specifically, it started in the Garden of Eden, which is considered the ultimate utopia. After that, the next major utopia is described in Plato’s The Republic. According to Plato, as along as the major people classes live justly with one another, the overall society will be in harmony. Next published was Thomas More’s Utopia.
...urgeoisie and the industrial system in general (especially when comparing it to our current economic crisis), it seems to me that the moral values in Utopia are extremely significant to the development of humanity. Of course, as with a text like The Bible, not all things are meant to be taken literally. I do not concur with everything More wrote about in Utopia. However, I do believe that the overall “act with good intentions and good things will come to you” philosophy is a very important one for all humans to adhere to. I am a bit of a cynic when it comes to human nature, and sadly, in seeing the parallels between Marx’s grievances and our modern state of economic and political affairs, I have little hope that any sort of change in our own government would be successful. Human nature is to be greedy, and unfortunately, I do not think that is ever going to change.
... world. Everyone would live, act, and look the same in this society. I don’t agree with Plato’s or Mores theory because I don’t think a person should work and achieve a nice home and have to switch houses with someone that might not have a nice as place as what I had. I agree with Lucian because if you work harder than someone else then shouldn’t get the same amount of money as them. Whatever job they do is how much money they should get not everyone gets the same amount. People could not think for their selves because it was dictated to them. After figuring out about this society, they are not perfect. They have some good things in their society like you don’t have to pay for anything or you go to the hospital without any fees or copays. In the end, Utopia will always be a different society that everyone would want to live in but hate it when they did. (More, 2011)
Our fascination with utopias stems from our attraction to and pursuit of progress within our own society. We study utopias with the hope that our society will someday evolve into one. But what often goes unnoticed is that if our society improves enough to become utopian, it won't be able to improve any longer. Hence, it will be rigid and unchanging, the complete opposite of what it was as it evolved to its elevated state. This is an awful truth for us because we place value and virtue in the ideas of desire and progress. Our reason tells us: once in an ideal land, desire cannot simply cease to be, because desire is part of our human nature. And our reason is right. An ideal society should accentuate our human nature, not suppress it. As we desire a perfect society we know that a perfect could not exist without our desire. And as long as we desire, we hope for progress. The idea that an utopia wouldn't allow such progress to occur is enough to make us stop believing in utop...
Because they are described in a detailed manner, the Utopia book itself seems to be enough to be a blueprint for the future. However, Thomas More clearly stated that he just wishes Europeans to follow some good qualities of the Utopian society—“there are many things in the Utopian commonwealth that in our own societies I would wish rather than expect to see” (97)—because he himself knows that it is impossible for any country to be like Utopia. This is apparent, because Utopia is possible on the premise that every factor comes together to create this ideal society. Even the geography has to contribute to this premise, as Hythloday explains the geography of Utopia as the place where strangers cannot enter without one of them (39). Moreover, from diligent and compassionate Utopians’ characteristics and their ways of life, they seem to be successful in reaching the fullest of every aspect of their life including physical, intellectual, social, spiritual, and emotional, when it is hardly possible to even have one person like that in real life.