Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fahrenheit 451 ray bradbury essay
Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451
• Fahrenheit 451, a novel by Ray Bradbury
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over the centuries, mankind has tantalised itself with the prospect of a perfect world. These
visions of „utopia‟ remain objects of contemplation rather than practice, as societies of such
flawless nature must tend to the individual ideals of all, yet prevent them from interfering with
one another through a means of control. A paradox is thus introduced, as the imposition of
restraint ultimately undermines the insatiable freewill of individuals. Ray Bradbury‟s
Fahrenheit 451 and Suzanne Collin‟s The Hunger Games provide insight into utopian
societies and their eventual demise, leading to the portrayal of „dystopias‟. Fahrenheit 451
candidly hosts criticism to the rule of totalitarian government, realised through the
subordination of individual (and thus conflicting) ideals. The Hunger Games depicts a
political and scientific utopia in the Capitol; an idyllic city that exists in the deprivation of
freewill. Through representation of pertinent social themes, Bradbury and Collins expose the
defective concepts of utopia that ultimately undermine their establishment in reality.
Within any idyllic society, power and control must ensure the ideals of individuals are kept
within acceptable bounds – a form of political correctness. Ray Bradbury‟s Fahrenheit 451 is
a cynical prognostication of this ideal. Through the abolition of intellectual mediums such as
books, the government upholds a false utopia through the riddance of ideals that could
refute such delusion. The firemen‟s incineration of books symbolically represents the
relegation of values such as objectivity, criticism and analysis, which supposedly reside in
the written word. As a result, confidently self-reg...
... middle of paper ...
... of power, control and freewill in The Hunger Games and
Fahrenheit 451, it is demonstrated that humans are of uncompromising nature and thus
undermine the realisation of utopia. Within these texts, it can be realised that no population
can be controlled without imposition on their freewill and thus happiness. As a result of this,
it should be learnt that the search for „utopia‟ is a contemplative one, and can never be
attained conclusively. Perhaps however, a perfect society resides in the search; once
proclaimed by author, Daniel Lettle, “Nothing, not even a Utopia, can necessarily make the
pursuit of happiness a successful one that ends in capture. The best society can merely
allow every individual to flourish in the pursuit”.
Works Cited
Bradbury, Ray. “Fahrenheit 451.” New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks 2013.
In Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, Guy Montag is a firefighter who burns illegal owned books, but later on begins to question his profession and an in turn, his life causing him to question the government's actions. The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins tells the story of Katniss Everdeen, and how her life changes when her little sister is reaped into the games, but she volunteers for her and unknowingly rebels against the government. Even though Katniss and Montag both defy their governments in different ways, they both have a negative view on the higher power.
Fahrenheit 451 and the Hunger Games are both intertwined with a futuristic version of human entertainment and a society absent of religion. Both societies are subjected to gruesome and brutal activities as a form of enjoyment. The desire for a thrill and an adrenaline rush dominates the minds of most people. In Fahrenheit 451, it’s very likely that many people succumb to their deaths from accidents but can easily replaced by members of the parlor family who they accept as their own. In the same way, The Hunger Games consists of exactly what the title suggests. They are annual games, which include starving and murder and serve as society’s primary source of entertainment. Most people don’t enjoy watching the games but, the Capitol forces the districts to watch for it believes they are a good source of entertainment. Seeing how the Hunger Games are basically murdering each other until the last child is standing, it relates closely with the kind of entertainment that the society of Fahrenheit 451 provides with the adrenaline and thrill of the same kind. The people in Fahrenheit 451 like their source of entertainment in the way they approach it but the instances of conformity remains the same. This is unlike that of the people of the districts in The Hunger Games. There is indeed a difference between the two societies yet, in the Hunger Games there is less time for many because so many people are working toward survival, while in Fahrenheit 451, entertainment is something that people do daily. The existence of adrenaline entertainment is similar in both societies. Yet they differ in whether or not the people actually like the entertainment.
What would happen if an utopia wasn’t all that perfect on the inside? Judging by just the appearance of something may lead to a situation of regret and confusion.” The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson address the theme of religious and traditional symbolism.” The Lottery” demonstrates how something that seems so perfect on the outside isn’t all that great on the inside.
Is there such a place where ideal perfection exists? Can our views on social, political, and moral issues ever concur with one another? The answer to these questions is simple - no. The world we live in today is full of social, political, and moral imperfections that hinder our ability to live a life free of evil. In Ursula LeGuin's The Lathe of Heaven, this imperfect lifestyle is the foundation on which the desire for a utopian society sits. The American Heritage Dictionary defines reality as the totality of all things possessing actuality, existence, or essence . For George Orr, the protagonist in the novel, his dreams actually become reality. Through his gift of effective dreaming, Orr can alter elements in the "real world" and is terrified because of it. In Orr's view, "This gift has been given to a fool, a passive nothing of a man" (LeGuin 121).
The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both great examples of dystopian fiction. A dystopia is a fictional world that takes place in the future that is supposed to be perceived as a perfect society, but it’s actually the opposite. Other things that a dystopian society might display are citizens both living in a dehumanized state and feeling like they’re constantly watched by a higher power. Dystopias are places where society is backwards or unfair, and they are usually are controlled by the government, technology, or a particular religion. The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both in the dystopian fiction genre because the societies within them show the traits of a dystopia. Both of them also have characters that go against the flow of the normal world.
In order to preserve the structure of humanity, people must have freedom of expression, free will, and equality. Any attempt to create an utopia must respect, honor, and nourish these human needs; for without them the society will eventually become a dystopia. An analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and The Giver by Lois Lowry, proves that any social structure that hopes to achieve utopia must insure that the citizens have their basic needs met, opportunities to pursue personal goals and dreams, and freedom to be unique.
The so-called Utopia – the quasi-perfect society – flourishes in Margaret Cavendish’s “The Description of a New World, Called a Blazing World” and Sir Thomas More’s Utopia. While the former is a dreamlike account of fantasy rule and the latter a pseudo-realistic travelogue, both works paint a picture of worlds that are not so perfect after all. These imperfections glitter like false gemstones in the paths of these Utopians’ religious beliefs, political systems, and philosophical viewpoints.
In Utopia Land is bountiful, foes are afar, and the economy is always seemly predictable. This fairy tale of a political philosophy and economic theory is sought after by the idealist and seen as a naive attempt the better society by the realist. This work requires an imagination, an ability to suspend disbelief for interpretation and application. More wrote this work as satire, upset with the current political conditions of Europe and and reviewing these ideals just as so; however, with more realistic applications with the time of conception and tomorrow on distant planets.
This serene society greatly contradicts the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in. Utopia is an imaginary state, which consists of people who believe they are more capable of living in a group than alone. In such a community, the welfare of the group is the primary interest compared to the comfort of individuals.
Everyone is probably not going to live in perfect world, however perfection is the best people can do at that point in time, yet a utopia is a paradise that looks as if humans can never seem to maintain and accomplish in life
With the following of the American Revolution, Western Utopianism was created. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, it was seen in this new found utopianism that it was realistic and possible to create utopian societies. With no monarchial rein, it...
everything is perfect. However, I think that utopias are bad because when people gain power, they
Frank E. Manuel and Manuel Frtizie, Utopian Thought in the Western World. London: Belknap Press 1982
Manuel, Frank E. and Fritzie P. Manuel. Utopian Thought in the Western World. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard Press, 1979.
In the nineteenth century, man believed in the perfectibility of mankind and in the real possibility of an ultimate utopia, a time when man could all live together in peace. However, the events of the twentieth century have weakened that belief. Both cold and hot wars have followed each other in succession. Revolutions and civil wars have taken place and totalitarianism has become a fact that can hardly be ignored. Therefore, the modern age has become a time in which more anti-utopias have been envisioned than ever before.