Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The utopian idea
The cons of a utopian society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The utopian idea
Have you ever thought of our society, our rules or what we do compared to other societies? The Giver (By: Lois Lowry) had a… so called perfect society, or known as Utopia. Even though they mostly live in peace, imagine not having to make your own choices, or obtaining knowledge from the past and the present. So this society, or Utopia, does have peace. But is peace all you need, or are there sacrifices you have to make to have it?
Our society has books. We have book stores, bookmarks, we have many things that involves books. With books comes more knowledge including non-fiction and even news articles. But sadly this society also has hunger and starvation. Though to get food you need to get money, and to get money you need to work. Either
…show more content…
No BOOKS! In “The Giver” it says “...This rooms walls were completely covered with bookcases...He couldn't imagine what the thousands of pages contained” (Lowry pg.74). In this sentence this doesn’t just explain that there’s no books, but what little knowledge they had. Like it said “He couldn't imagine what the thousands of pages contained”. He probably doesn’t even know about animals or how their society was. There is a bright side though, no one in the society starves “You have never been starving. He been told. You will never be starving. Now he was. If he had stayed in the community, he would not be.” (Lowry pg.173-174). He never starved, until he ran away. This is proof that he never starved, at least in the community. Now comes the toys. Though they don’t call them toys they call them “comfort objects”. It’s also morley stuffed animals than stuff like plastic toys or action figures “What’s his comfort object called?” Lily asked, picking up the stuffed creacher…”Hippo” said father (Lowry pg.21). Also going back to the books, they don’t know what a hippo is. So their knowledge is very low. Back to the toys, this tells you that you still need something to keep them …show more content…
“The Givers” does not, think of this. Is our society perfect? No, but theirs is supposed to be. Books bring knowledge and knowledge brings opinions, and opinions leads to individuality. So is having a Utopia worth getting books taken away, or do you want books and live in our world. Now compare the food, some people in our world starve. No one starves in “The Giver”. Stopping hunger is very serious, if people stop starving, it would solve many problems. So it would probably be smart to be in “The Givers” society in this situation. Last comparison is basically the same, comfort objects or toys in our society. I don’t really know if they have plastic or rubber toys, but they still have stuffed animals. I guess everybody needs something to keep kids or newborns from crying and whining. Especially at night, EVERYBODY NEEDS
with tree limbs. The only toys I had to play with were the contents of the care
Utopia seems like a wonderful idea where everything is perfect and no one suffers. Three stories address this topic and show how even the best ideas have their downside. The Giver tells of a society where everything is the same and no one has to worry about making a wrong decision. Fahrenheit 451 tells of a society that bans book in the interest of preventing unhappiness. The society in Logan's Run is full of pleasure but only for 30 years. In practice though, these utopias present each of the protagonists with a problem where they question how perfect their perfect worlds really is.
In Chapter 2 Toys Aren’t Us Elkind explains how most children have too much and can not focus on what is important. “All of these changes have impacted the personal, and social skills, attitudes, and values children acquire from toy play” (Elkind, 15). When Elkind mentions changes he means how toys
Imagine a society just like ours now only books were banned. You could never own one, read one, or have one. If you ever had a hope of reading you would have to memorize all the books you wanted to keep. the rest of the books would be burned never to be read again. The book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is about a society where your imagination of having no books is true. People protest by memorizing books in hopes of one day being able to read again. If I had to memorize a book I would memorize The ugly duckling by Hans Christian Andersen.
In the beginning of the film, it is the day of Andy’s birthday party. All of Andy’s toys are afraid that they will be replaced by new toys and that Andy will forget about them. The toys want to know what his new presents are
“I still collect toys.Toys are a reflection of society. They are the tools that society uses to teach and enculturate children into the adult world. Toys are not innocent.” (Burden). When you think of toys you probably think about dolls or Hot Wheels. What you probably don’t know is the toys can vary into anything. Toys are usually used to entertain yourself, but what if they represent more than just that. It can be a famous cite, make you question society, or just make you think about how we’re treating each other. Anything can be a toy. You just have to be creative to make it more than a toy. Chris Burden, an amazing artist, famously known for creating artwork that reflect on society, in most of his work he used toys to help him. Burden is famously known for two pieces of artwork, Shoot and Urban
Living in a perfect world is like living in an anthill. An ant does not think on it’s own, make it’s own decisions, and doesn't really have any own identity, just like the utopians. It is not worth living in a perfect world. The utopian society we are introduced to in the book, The Giver, has many different characteristics that make the perfect life unbearable. Examples of these things are The Receiver, the community, and the chief elders.
In order to preserve the structure of humanity, people must have freedom of expression, free will, and equality. Any attempt to create an utopia must respect, honor, and nourish these human needs; for without them the society will eventually become a dystopia. An analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and The Giver by Lois Lowry, proves that any social structure that hopes to achieve utopia must insure that the citizens have their basic needs met, opportunities to pursue personal goals and dreams, and freedom to be unique.
Throughout history, people had made numerous futile attempts to create an Utopian society. The term "Utopia" depicts on an imaginary ideal state. Such a state is describe in The Giver. In The Giver, Jonas's community believes in the renunciation of personal properties, rights, one's unique characteristics and of binding personal relationships (such as marriage). This society is believed to be perfect, free of pain and sorrow; everything is under control and "same". This serene society greatly contradict with the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in.
The book The Giver is a dystopian book because you don’t get to make any of your own decisions. You would never know the truth about release. You would never experience life how you should experience it. The world may seem perfect from someone’s view inside the community, but from the outside it is harsh and horrible. Their world could be turned into a utopia eventually, but as of right know it is a
Humans have aspired to create a world without conflict or struggle for as long as history can account. What we aspire to is known as a utopia. While many contemplate about how they would best shape society and attain perfection, there is no such place where this has been accomplished. This is because we as humans are imperfect beings susceptible to greed, fear, and mortality. Within these flaws conflicts arises and many times a compromise must be made. In both The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas, by Ursula K. Le Guin, and The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, a community is depicted that had attempted to attain a utopia. In some ways these communities had managed to benefit those that lived within them; however, we eventually learn these places
Have you ever wondered why the world we live in isn’t a Utopia? The community in the Giver was destined to fail because of the lack of truth toward the citizens. Some evidence for this statement comes from the short story Harrison Bergeron, where characters like him find flaws in their community. Another story to back up the statement is from Monsters Are Due On Maple Street, evidence from here shows that people think of differences as a bad thing. The last article that provided evidence was a article on Genetic Engineering, this shows that there are always a con to a pro.
Life is a very valuable asset, but when lived on someone else’s terms its nothing but a compromise. The seemingly perfect image of Utopia which combines happiness and honesty with purity, very often leads in forming a dystopian environment. The shrewd discrepancy of Utopia is presented in both the novel ‘The Giver’ by Lois Lowry and the film ‘The Truman Show’ directed by Peter Weir. Both stories depict a perfect community, perfect people, perfect life, perfect world, and a perfect lie. These perfect worlds may appear to shield its inhabitants from evil and on the other hand appear to give individuals no rights of their own. By comparing and contrasting the novel ‘The Giver’ and the film ‘The Truman Show’, it can be derived that both the main characters become anti-utopian to expose the seedy underbelly of their Utopian environment which constructs a delusional image of reality, seizes the pleasures in their lives and portrays a loss of freedom.
... in the toy industry is to make toy safety the number one priority and to fulfill the customers’ needs.
When asked why Lowery used a dystopian society she stated, “ I chose the setting because I wanted to give the reader a warring that society will never be perfect.”(Lowry) If she would have chosen a different setting the book I do not believe the book would have been the same. Lowry stated, “that when writing The Giver created a world that existed in her imagination only. She got ride of all the things she feared and disliked: violence, prejudice, poverty and injustice.