Unresponsive Universe Frankenstein

1556 Words4 Pages

Man’s Confounding Relationship With an Unresponsive Universe
Humanity has continuously fumbled around in the dark, searching for a light that may shed knowledge on the plethora of questions we constantly ask ourselves. Unfortunately, the universe is often reluctant to answer these questions. How do we respond? By stumbling around in the dark together, attempting to explain the silence through philosophy and religion, conceiving humanity’s strongest ideas. From Plato’s enlightened theory of the forms to Nietzsche’s pessimistic ideals of nihilism, humanity has often found means to express our own condition. Camus, author of The Stranger, elaborates on the idea of the truly absurd, which is an existentialist philosophy explaining man’s accidental, …show more content…

Throughout the novel, Frankenstein occasionally blames fate to his unfortunate downfall, but it is still highly evident that he is missing a sense of structure within his own life. Recalling the events of his past, Frankenstein convinces himself that “natural philosophy is the genius that has regulated [his] life” (Shelley 35). From the beginning, Frankenstein continuously claims a lack of control over his own life. Additionally, Frankenstein laments over his torment when working on a second, female monstrosity, hoping that once he is “enfranchised from [his] miserable slavery, [he] might claim Elizabeth and forget the past…” (Shelley 152). Comparing his second experimentation to slavery, Shelley clearly creates a protagonist that not only blames fate for his wrongdoings, but also maintains little authority over life’s decisions. Similarly, Mearsault effectively acts as a detached bystander within the toiling mechanizations of life, observing and acting without appearing to hold full dominion over his own life. The famous words that begin The Stranger already reveal absurdist/existential ideas the novel is full of, stating that “Mamam died today. Or yesterday maybe...that doesn’t mean anything. Maybe it was yesterday” (Camus 1). Mearsault’s passive demeanor reveals …show more content…

To explain, in Frankenstein, the monstrosity suffers a pitiful existence in solitude, expressing an intense desire for companionship as a means to end his own suffering. During the initial stages of his existence, the monster observes the social conventions of humanity by watching a small family. “What chiefly struck me is the manners of these people,” he ponders, “and I longed to join them” (Shelley 109). As a response to his own isolation, the monster initially holds a passionate desire to connect with other beings; when he is withheld from such an opportunity, rage and hatred consume the monstrosity. Eventually, Frankenstein longs for a companion to commiserate with; an individual “whom [he] can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being” (Shelley 144). Shelley reveals an imperative relationship man must have with society, and suffocating oneself from these conventions only results in misery. However, unlike a literal sense of solitude, Camus’ protagonist remains figuratively isolated from humanity, acting with immense passivity when concerning the events of his own life. When holding the vigil for his own mother, Mearsault claims that he couldn’t hear the other attendees at the vigil, stating “it was hard for me to believe they really existed” (Camus 9). The statement reflects the idea that one can be aware of their own existence, but

Open Document