Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Isolation and identifying bacteria lab report
Identification of bacteria in microbiology
Isolation and identifying bacteria lab report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Isolation and identifying bacteria lab report
Results
The unknown bacterium that was handed out by the professor labeled “E19” was an irregular and raised shaped bacteria with a smooth texture and it had a white creamy color. The slant growth pattern was filiform and there was a turbid growth in the broth. After all the tests were complete and the results were compared the unknown bacterium was defined as Shigella sonnei. The results that narrowed it down the most were the gram stain, the lactose fermentation test, the citrate utilization test and the indole test. The results for each of the tests performed are listed in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1:
TEST PURPOSE REAGENTS OBSERVATIONS RESULTS
Gram Stain To determine whether a bacteria is Gram-positive or Gram-Negative. Crystal violet,
…show more content…
Each test that was used in the lab for the unknown bacteria had been performed on many different bacteria and shown that each test has different results depending on the bacteria given. The first test, the Gram stain, confirmed that the unknown bacterium was a gram negative bacilli. After performing the remainder of the tests and comparing them to the twelve negative bacteria that it could be out of it was basically a process of elimination. Basically looking at all the results and seeing which tests separated positive verses negative results the most. After reviewing all of the tests the first test that stuck out besides the gram stain was the lactose fermentation, followed by the citrate utilization test and then by the indole test. The lactose fermentation test eliminated seven of the 12 bacteria. From the five bacteria left the citrate utilization test eliminated who more of the bacteria, and last the indole test eliminated two of the three bacteria left leaving only one bacterium left. After comparing the results to the results of the 12 tests and separating which tests were positive and negative for each it was obvious that the bacteria had to be Shigella
I identified the genus and species of an unknown bacterial culture, #16, and I applied the following knowledge of morphologic, cultural and metabolic characteristics of the unknown microorganism according to the laboratory manual as well as my class notes and power point print outs. I was given an incubated agar slant labeled #16 and a rack of different tests to either examine or perform myself; the tests are as follows: Gram Stain; Nutrient Gelatin Test; Carbohydrate Fermentation; Dextrose, Lactose and Sucrose; IMVIC tests; Citrate, Indole, Mythel-Red and Vogues Proskauer test; as well as a Urease and TSI Test. Materials and Methods/Results Upon receiving the Microorganism (M.O.) #16, I prepared a slide by cleaning and drying it. Then, using a bottle of water I placed a sterile drop of water on the slide and used an inoculating loop, flame sterilized, I took a small sample of the unknown growth in my agar slant and smeared it onto the slide in a dime sized circle and then heat fixed it for ten minutes.
The purpose of the Unknown White Compound Lab was to identify the unknown compound by performing several experiments. Conducting a solubility test, flame test, pH paper test, ion test, pH probe test, conductivity probe test, and synthesizing the compound will accurately identified the unknown compound. In order to narrow down the possible compounds, the solubility test was used to determine that the compound was soluble in water. Next, the flame test was used to compare the unknown compound to other known compounds such as potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and calcium carbonate. The flame test concluded that the cation in the unknown compound was potassium. Following, pH paper was used to determine the compound to be neutral and slightly
Forensic Science Introduction: Someone in a restaurant has suddenly fallen ill and a mystery powder has been discovered with the victim. As the chief investigator, your duty is to identify the mystery substance through a lab. In this lab, it will consist of five known compounds and one unknown compound. Your job is to distinguish which one out of the five substances is the mystery powder. To figure out the mystery matter you will have to compare their physical and chemical properties and match them with the appropriate compound.
In this lab project, the microbiology students were given 2 unknown bacteria in a mixed broth each broth being numbered. The goal of this project is to determine the species of bacteria in the broth. They had to separate and isolate the bacteria from the mixed broth and ran numerous tests to identify the unknown bacteria. The significance of identifying an unknown bacteria is in a clinical setting. Determining the exact bacteria in order to prescribe the right treatment for the patient. This project is significant for a microbiology students because it gives necessary skills to them for future careers relating to clinical and research work.
The purpose of this laboratory is to learn about cultural, morphological, and biochemical characteristics that are used in identifying bacterial isolates. Besides identifying the unknown culture, students also gain an understanding of the process of identification and the techniques and theory behind the process. Experiments such as gram stain, negative stain, endospore and other important tests in identifying unknown bacteria are performed. Various chemical tests were done and the results were carefully determined to identify the unknown bacteria. First session of lab started of by the selection of an unknown bacterium then inoculations of 2 tryptic soy gar (TSA) slants, 1 nutrient broth (TSB), 1 nutrient gelatin deep, 1 motility
Shigella flexneri, a facultative anaerobe belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, is a Gram-negative rod that is the causative agent of diarrhea and dysentery in humans. Potentially life-threatening, S. flexneri's effects include bacteremia, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and toxic megacolon (4). The principle disease of diarrhea and dysentery caused by this pathogen is known as shigellosis. 10-100 organisms are sufficient to cause disease, and transmission is generally from person-to-person by way of fecal-oral (2). Shigellosis can be characterized as a disease with over 60% incidence in children ages 1-5 (6).
Many steps were taken in order to narrow down and figure out which bacterium unknown 413 is. One of the first step taken in identifying unknown 413 was to do a gram stain. The gram stain, which was purple, resulted in gram-positive cocci. The gram-positive eliminated all the possibilities of unknown 413 being any gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis etc. The cocci morphology result eliminated any possibilities of it being any bacteria that are a rod. This left five different genera: Staphylococcus, Lactococcus, Micrococcus, and Enterococcus as a choice for the unknown.
The dichotomous keys show process of elimination taking place and several steps that were performed to the two unknown bacteria. Bacteria number one was concluded to be either S. aureus or E. faecals. As shown, a gram stain was performed to bacteria 1, because it helped in separating the bacteria into Gram negative or positive. Bacteria 1 was Gram positive bacteria, so the next step was to eliminate the bacteria that were bacilli, because under the microscope the bacteria was shown to be cocci. Then a lactose test was performed, because it helped me in determining the bacteria metabolism (if lactose was utilized as a sugar by the bacteria) (“Phenol Red Broth”, n.d). Lastly, with the help of process of elimination a MSA test was performed to
Identifying microorganisms can provide information on diagnosing diseases and discovering the most beneficial treatment possible. The purpose of this assignment was to identify an unknown microorganism using biochemical tests and various methods that were learned in my microbiology laboratory classes. In this paper, I will discuss the processes of how I came to identify my unknown microorganism.
I believe that the first unknown solution is made up of molecular compounds. This is because the solution had very little conductivity, meaning there was not an equal amount of ions broken down in the solution. The solution had no scattering, which means the molecular compounds were fully dissolved in their solvent, which was not water. When tap water was added to solution 1, the color changed from green to blue. If water was the original solvent, we would not see this color change. The absorption spectrum follows most of what the color green would absorb on its own: red, blue, and purple wavelengths. However, there was some absorption of the green wavelength. The first solution has the highest overall absorbance
The main purpose of this lab was to identify unknown bacteria, every student got different organisms. By using different types of procedures, we obtain results in order to classify the bacteria as gram positive (+) or gram (-) and from there, continue with the processes ending with the name of the bacteria. All the material including a flow chart was provided from the instructor.
The gram stain was negative. The bacterial cells observed under the microscope were pink in color from the safranin stain, but all traces of the crystal violet were washed away with the alcohol wash. The bacterial cells were observed to be small and bacillus or rod shaped.
...ng based on the Kauffman classification system, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), miltilocutus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MVLA), multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Pathogenic E. coli can also be categorized phlyogenetically to 5 core groups, defined as A, B1, B2, D, and E, with Shigella toxin forming in different groups. Commensal E. coli that inhabits the normal flora of the lower intestine is grouped in phylogroup A. Based on the variety of colonization and virulence factors linked with each pathotype, there is no a single method that can be utilized to diagnose and detect all pathogenic Escherichia coli strands. Therefore, numerous biochemical tests, molecular approaches and typing methods have been developed to isolate and identify E. coli from other bacteria that inhabit the body and to distinguish the different pathotypes of E. coli.
Diagnosis is important not only for prescribing effective drugs but for preventing the evolution of resistant microorganisms (Mori and Notomi, 2009). Traditionally, the microbiology laboratory identified etiologic agents of infectious disease by the direct examination and culture of clinical specimens. Methods of identifying and differentiating microorganisms responsible for microbial infection mainly relied on microbial morphology, staining properties of the organism and its growth variables. However, a major restriction is that >99% of the microorganisms observed through a microscope are not cultivable by these direct techniques (Rastogi and Sani, 2011).
The gram stain showed bacteria that was rod-shaped. Therefore, I search a picture of Klebsiella pneumoniae and it looked close to what I saw under my microscope. Furthermore, I concluded that the regular soap did not get rid of this bacterium.