Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature to movie adaptation proces
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature to movie adaptation proces
Monster stories are stories that stir up a feeling of horror, and terror. The film Victor Frankenstein and the book Frankenstein; Dracula; Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde with an introduction by Stephen King, both focus on monsters. They all talk of a monster stories and their evils. However, despite this common topic, the evil displayed in the film and in the book is different and has its own intensity. A monster story is a story about a creature fashioned to evoke horror. The film and the novels Frankenstein; Dracula; Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde with an introduction by Stephen King deals with monsters and how they destroy humanity.
In the film and the book, there are universal attributes, but with minor differences in the way, the monsters were created. In the film Victor Frankenstein, the monster is Victor’s creation from dead human body parts, by Victor Frankenstein who live in double strife and turmoil. The monster is depicted as a disgusting, and horrible. Shelly writes, the monster was “Formed into a hideous and gigantic creature,” and a worst scientific experiment (Frankenstein 123). In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Jekyll creates a monster out if Mr. Hyde in his laboratory, whereas in Dracula, Dracula and his minions are unburied bodies of dead humans who lost their souls. Henry Jekyll created a monster out of Mr. Hyde so as to shake off his conscience while Victor was escaping from his status, by becoming a creator. On the other hand, Dracula came back to haunt the living people to escape from morality. The monsters were very different from each other.
Victor Frankenstein film and Dracula have many common highlights, but their personification of evil is different. Count Dracula had many supernatural powers, which he used to control the...
... middle of paper ...
...s differ in the way they came into existence and how they carried out their activities. In Dracula, the monsters had supernatural powers, which they used to take over the environment, and cause deaths. On the other hand, In Victor Frankenstein film, the monster was just a vengeful creature that took revenge on the people because they rejected him. In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Jekyll just made a shadow of himself, which he thought was evil. The stories give the audience an opportunity to get scared.
Works Cited
Shelley, Mary, Stoker Bram, and Stevenson, Robert Louis. Frankenstein; Dracula; Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde with an introduction by Stephen King. New York: Signet Classics, 1978. Print.
Frankenstein. Dir. Kenneth Branagh. Perf. Robert De Niro, Kenneth Branagh, Tom Hulce, Helena Bonham Carter, Ian Holm, Jonh Cleese, and Aidan Quinn. TriStar Pictures. 1994. Film
Now it is a lot clearer to understand the whole point of “Monsters and men” or who these characters are. In these three astounding pieces of literature, it might not be easy to distinguish them, but their actions truly make them who they are. Like the monsters in Beowulf can’t be thought of as anything other than monsters; because of their characteristics. But in the case of Frankenstein’s monster; the monster is only named monster. At first he is just about as innocent as a newborn. It is the people who made him the way he is. Everyone has good and evil inside them, so no one might actually determine who the monsters and the men really are.
Since the original novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, to the multiple movie adaptations, the monster is almost always predicted as the monster of the story. It may be his physical appearance, from his tall, broad frame, to the signature screws in his neck. It may also be his unnatural upbringing and interpreted evil characteristics. We have grown to fear the monster, which ultimately, has masked the true monster, Dr. Frankenstein. With each coming movie, the good side of the monster is brought to light, while the real monster shows his true colors.
Shelley, Mary. "From Frankenstein." The Example of Science. Ed. Robert E Lynch and Thomas B. Swanzey. New York: Pearson Publishing, 2000. 152-156.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: the original 1818 text. 2nd ed. Ed. D.L. Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf. Peterborough: Broadview, 1999.
There are a number of differences between the book and movie adaptation of Frankenstein. The first evident difference is that, in the book, the novel gets some books and learns on his own to read and write from them .Comparably, in the movie adaptation, the monster learned from watching the De Lacy family and how they communicated to each other. The book goes in great detain to explain the monsters education and how the books helped whereas, in the movie, little is shared of how fast the monster acquired education. The monsters education is reflected best in the book compared to the movie. In addition to this, the monsters appearance is very different in the movie compared to how he is described in the book. In the book, the creature taught himself how to read and write from the classic literature the Prometheus and Milton’s Paradise Lost, where he learnt to speak very clearly. In the movie, the creature is inarticulate.
I had the opportunity to read Frankenstein by Mary Shelley several years ago and it became one of my favorite books. My initial feeling was sorrow, what a wonderful story that has been slowly destroyed by Hollywood through the years. We think of Victor Frankenstein as a mad scientist trying to destroy mankind, and the monster having bolts in his neck with very little intellect. Mary Shelley’s book is completely different from the Hollywood version we are accustom to. The monster is intelligent and has emotions, the mad scientist or Victor was scared of his own creation due to his appearance. The monster initially showed no signs of evil in the novel, but where did he learn it from? Who is the real evil monster
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. D.L. Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press, 1999.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. For example, Victor creates the monster to be like himself. Another similarity is that the anger of both Victor and the monster is brought about by society. One more parallel between Victor and the monster is that they both became recluses. These traits that Victor and the monster possess show that they are very similar.
The novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley portrays two characters, Victor Frankenstein and the monster. Despite their drastically different appearances and lives, Victor and the monster have many similarities. Although, Victor Frankenstein and the monster share many similarities, there are four significant qualities. These include a need for family, a love of nature, a great want for knowledge, and an isolation from society. Though they're different in many ways, these similarities bond the two.
Frankenstein, and Othello are the same because Othello was mistreated because he was black. He was hated due to his appearance. He was a minority, and faced racism on a daily basis. The monster in Frankenstein was mistreated because he was ugly. He was bullied so bad because of his appearance. This caused the monster to be evil and do devilish acts. Both the monster in Frankenstein and Othello had good intentions. They were not treated properly which made them become bad people. Iago treated Othello horribly by using racial slurs toward him. Jekyll and Hyde were similar to Frankenstein because Jekyll and Hyde had two personalities just like the monster did. One side of Jekyll and Hyde was evil, and the other was good. The monster in Frankenstein was the same because he started out as a good monster, and had good intentions. He was treated so horribly by people because of the way he looked, that he turned
Monsters can come in various physical forms, but all monsters share the same evil mentality. A Monster is a being that harms and puts fear within people. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a prime example of how appearance does not determine whether a creature is a monster or not. In the story, Victor Frankenstein tries to change nature by creating a super human being. The being appears to be a monster. Victor becomes so obsessed with his creation and then rejects it. Victor is the real monster because of his desire for power, lack of respect for nature, and his stubbornness.
The book goes into greater detail regarding the monster’s hardships, has a more eloquent and persuasive monster and has a more heartbreaking ending. As a result a reader feels greater sympathy towards the monster in the novel rather than in the play. The monster begins his journey a purely innocent and kind being, but because he has to suffer the misfortune of having such a monstrous appearance he is condemned by society. Frankenstein tells the story of a benevolent being persecuted by man, and has the reader questioning who the real monster is.
Frankenstein and Middlesex both have similar concepts of having a “monster” in their story. The authors of these stories are both from completely different eras. You have Mary Shelley writing her story in the United Kingdom, in 1818, then having Jeffery Eugenides writing his story in the United States, in 2002. Very unusual eras and locations for these stories to be written. A monster is consistently looked at differently and relevant to where they each belong in their time period. Of course the setup for these novels are different, but the main concept in book is having a “monster” casted out into each of their novels as their topic, a story about a “monster”. They both cast around a story that is made around their
Throughout history monsters have been put in stories to inspire fear in other people. These monsters are developed with supernatural powers, in order to make them stronger and scarier than normal human beings. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and The Picture of Dorian Grey by Oscar Wilde are both stories about a man creating a monster. In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a monster using science, this monster is gigantic, strong, fast, and intelligent. In The Picture of Dorian Grey, Dorian Grey is corrupted by Lord Henry Walton, and he vows to have eternal youth while a painting of him ages. This combined with Lord Henry’s influence turns Dorian into a cold unfeeling monster with no remorse. Both Shelley and Wilde develop Dorian Grey and
Frankenstein shows that what looks like a monster in appearance my not be and what looks normal on appearance may be a monster. While a scary ugly creature may look like a monster a true monster is formed from within and is scene through actions. Along with this knowledge is power and power has the ability to make monsters. The pursuit to know more is a never ending road that leads to lies, secretes, and monstrosity. “How much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow,” while knowledge is boundless and beautiful an excess of anything can create a monster.