Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis statement about frankenstein
Thesis statement about frankenstein
Film literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Since the original novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, to the multiple movie adaptations, the monster is almost always predicted as the monster of the story. It may be his physical appearance, from his tall, broad frame, to the signature screws in his neck. It may also be his unnatural upbringing and interpreted evil characteristics. We have grown to fear the monster, which ultimately, has masked the true monster, Dr. Frankenstein. With each coming movie, the good side of the monster is brought to light, while the real monster shows his true colors. The first ever adaptation of the famous novel is the iconic Frankenstein, directed by James Whale. We may owe our thanks to this film for bringing the story, and unique characters, to life, and setting the stage for newer adaptations to come. Out of all the Frankenstein’s, I personally believe the …show more content…
monster in this film is the most frightening. This is the first time we get to actually see him, instead of creating a character in our imagination. This causes an initial shockwave of fear among the audience. His large frame, squared-off head, and large screws driven through his neck are enough to visit your nightmares. His demener throughout the film, add much more to that initial fear. A heavy, unbalanced step, along with the inability to speak, is terrifying. These characteristics have ultimately engraved themselves into the audience’s minds, blinding them to the underlying evil. The underlying evil, to which the audience was unable to see, was Dr. Frankenstein himself. His vile search for power is overcome by the monsters’ outward appearance. Although at the time of release it was bypassed, there is one big warning sign that stands out like a sore thumb. After Dr. Frankenstein successfully brought the dead alive, he exclaims “Oh, in the name of God! Now I know what it feels like to be God” (Whale, 1931). The search for power is one small thing, but the search for Gods power, is sinful. Regardless of religious beliefs, God is a symbol of the almighty, and the most powerful. To seek the ultimate power is evil. We can later catch him declares, “Well, if I could discover just one of these things, what eternity is, for example, I wouldn't care if they did think I was crazy” (Whale, 1931). To further the evidence of his insanity, he genuinely has no regards of what others might think of his doings. At this point, he is so consumed in power, he is losing his human characteristics. The release of Bride of Frankenstein, also directed by James Whale, is the turning point of the development of the monster.
Although it is the same monster we see in the previous film, more depth is added to the character. The first major breakthrough for the monster was the scene he encounters the blind man. This is the first time we see him be kind. The air between the two is light and friendly, creating hope for the monster. They even solidify themselves as friends, the first big stepping stone to the transformation of the monster we soon will see. Another big plot revolves around the monsters want for someone “like him”. This suggests deep down in that conscious of his, he has realized how different, and unaccepted, he truly is. When he finally gets his wish, he soon realizes it was never meant to be. Another big breakthrough for the development of his conscious. He makes the courageous, even humane, decision to end both of their lives. The monster knows they were never meant to live, because death was always their calling. We even catch a glimpse of a lone tear stream down his cheek because of his valiant
decision. Young Frankenstein, directed by Mel Brooks, showed the most change in Dr. Frankenstein himself. As the film opens, Dr. Frankenstein refuses to be related to the late Frankenstein who had a history of working in the supernatural science, by correcting the students on the pronunciation of his last name. Here, it is safe to assume Dr. Frankenstein wants no relation to him, or his work. Yet, as the film unfolds, his thirst for power erupts exactly like the previous films. From here on out, it is a constant cycle of emotions towards the monster. Dr. Frankenstein immediately rejects his creation, only to see the beauty in bringing the dead back to life all over again. Many believe Dr. Frankenstein’s choice to give part of his brain to the monster, so he has the ability to voice his thoughts to the townsfolk around him, as a sincere motive. This is another example of the blindness of the audience. The sincere gesture hides the underlying motive. Dr. Frankenstein’s choice was driven by his want for his creature to be unnaturally alive, along with the power he gained from it. The last film, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, directed by Kenneth Branagh, was the most monumental of them all. In this film, we see a complete interpretation of the monster. With his ability to talk, we are able to delve deep inside his conscious and what he is feeling. When the monster runs into the blind man in this film, he shows compassion for him and his family. He is able to comprehend the family’s’ distraught over the frozen crop, thus leading him to an act of kindness towards them. He also has a better grasp on who he is, and finds it quite troubling. He does find a means to make peace stating, “I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all” (Branagh, 1994). In the very end, the monster digs deep down into his heart to find love, and that little bit of hope that he clings to. Although we do see the monster lash out quite a bit throughout this film, it is directly a result of the treatment he had to suffer. These four movies work in harmony with one another to create a bigger picture. Looking back throughout the films, the monsters interpretation has continuously changed. Overtime, we are able to see his compassion, kindness, humanity, love, and hope. He did not just grow as a creature, but as a person. Anderberg wrote in his analysis, “The creature has feelings of joy, hope, despair – isn’t this what makes us human” (Anderberg, 2014). On the contrary, there is one character who remained consistent throughout the years, Dr Frankenstein. As we can see, he has always contained evil in him, it was just overseen by our inability to understand the monster. In fact, the monster is not a monster at all. The real monster of this story is Dr Frankenstein. He is a “reckless scientist who unleashed a creature on society that was helpless to combat the horrors and rejection that society placed on him due to his difference” (Anna Marie, 2014). His lack of guidance, and acceptance, was primarily the reason the monster himself came to be known as “Frankenstein”.
Both “Frankenstein” (1931) and “Bride of Frankenstein” (1935) portrayed characters and events differently than Shelley would have desired. Her novel had many deeper implications than the movie portrayed. James Whale and the many adapters/screenwriters involved in both films leeched onto the inhumanity of the monster and the terror he could create. The monster could not speak at all in “Frankenstein” but did learn to speak poorly in “Bride of Frankenstein.” However, when he is finally given the ability to speak, the monster is portrayed as a shallow character that indulges in simple pleasures.
In Frankenstein is shown, in a straight way, who the real monster is. Frankenstein ambitious to be recognized and playing god made him look like a life player, the real monster of the story. It is true his creation did terrible things and assassinated a little girl, but it was not on purpose.
Most Americans have some idea of who Frankenstein is, as a result of the many Frankenstein movies. Contrary to popular belief Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a scientist, not a monster. The "monster" is not the inarticulate, rage-driven criminal depicted in the 1994 film version of the novel. Shelley’s original Frankenstein was misrepresented by this Kenneth branagh film, most likely to send a different message to the movie audience than Shelley’s novel shows to its readers. The conflicting messages of technologies deserve being dependent on its creator (address by Shelley) and poetic justice, or triumph over evil (showed by the movie) is best represented by the scene immediately preceding Frankenstein’s monster’s death.
Comparing the Creation Scene in James Whale's 1931 Frankenstein and Kenneth Brannagh's 1994 Version There are many similarities and differences between James Whale’s 1931 and Kenneth Brannagh’s 1994 Frankenstein. They differ in the way that lighting, sound effects and camera shots are used to create tension and suspense for the audience. Some similarities that occur are the religious references which are present throughout the scenes. The purposes of the scenes are also the same, to create tension, suspense and to shock the audience; however they do this in different ways as the audiences the two films were intended for are very different. It would be easier to shock or scare a 1931 audience than one from 1994 as the special effects and camera techniques available in 1931 would have been very limited.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley became widely known as one of the best horror novels of her time and the basis for films that branched out of Shelley’s novel. Frankenstein was heavily inspired by the Industrial Revolution and the Romanticism. Therefore, Frankenstein’s monster appears to be Shelley’s representation of the Industrial Revolution and the society’s fears and anxieties regarding the rapid growth of science and technology.
In the late eighteenth century arose in literature a period of social, political and religious confusion, the Romantic Movement, a movement that emphasized the emotional and the personal in reaction to classical values of order and objectivity. English poets like William Blake or Percy Bysshe Shelley seen themselves with the capacity of not only write about usual life, but also of man’s ultimate fate in an uncertain world. Furthermore, they all declared their belief in the natural goodness of man and his future. Mary Shelley is a good example, since she questioned the redemption through the union of the human consciousness with the supernatural. Even though this movement was well known, none of the British writers in fact acknowledged belonging to it; “.”1 But the main theme of assignment is the narrative voice in this Romantic works. The narrator is the person chosen by the author to tell the story to the readers. Traditionally, the person who narrated the tale was the author. But this was changing; the concept of unreliable narrator was starting to get used to provide the story with an atmosphere of suspense.
Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein, is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise. Throughout the novel, Shelley investigates the idea of monstrosity. She makes the point that a monster does not have to be genuinely evil in order to be considered monstrous.
Frankenstein was and still is one of the greatest horror books written. It is still relevant to incidents happening today. Children dress up as the monster at Halloween and directors still try producing newer versions of the movie. People view the creature as a monster purely based on its aesthetics, “I had gazed on him while unfinished; he was ugly then…” Victor comments on the monsters looks a lot throughout the novel and as the story progresses the creature realises how hideous he is too.
As time goes on, many things tend to change, and then they begin to inherit completely different images. Over the years, the character, created by Dr. Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s famous novel, has changed dramatically. The monster, regularly called “Frankenstein,” has been featured in numerous films, such as Frankenweenie and Edward Scissorhands. Although, the characters in today’s pop culture and the monster in the well-known 1800’s novel have similarities, they are actually very different. The many similarities and differences range from the character’s physical traits and psychological traits, the character’s persona, and the character’s place in the Gothic style.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. For example, Victor creates the monster to be like himself. Another similarity is that the anger of both Victor and the monster is brought about by society. One more parallel between Victor and the monster is that they both became recluses. These traits that Victor and the monster possess show that they are very similar.
The monster of the novel is often misattributed with the name, “Frankenstein.” However, Victor Frankenstein can ultimately be considered the true monster of this tale. His obsession would lead to the corruption of his soul and the creation of two monsters—one himself, and the other, the creature. In attempting to take on the role of God, nature would become a monster to Victor and destroy his life. These elements of monstrosity in Frankenstein drive the meaning of its story.
At first, The Monster is very kind and sympathetic. He has a good heart, as shown when he collected firewood for the family on the brink of poverty. Like every other human creation, he was not born a murderer. All the Monster wanted was to be accepted and loved by Victor Frankenstein and the other humans but instead he was judged by his appearance and considered to be dangerous. The Monster says, “like Adam, I was created apparently united by no link to any other being in existence…many times I considered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; for often, like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me” (page 105). This line is an important part of the novel because the Monster lets it be known how like Adam he was created into this world completely abandoned and like Satan he is angry with those people who have found contentment and satisfaction in their lives. The rejection and unwelcome feeling he is faced with, is the main reason the Monster becomes a killer. Watching another family show love towards each other made the Monster realize how alienated he truly was. He did not know how to deal with his pain and emotions so he murders as
Monsters can come in various physical forms, but all monsters share the same evil mentality. A Monster is a being that harms and puts fear within people. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a prime example of how appearance does not determine whether a creature is a monster or not. In the story, Victor Frankenstein tries to change nature by creating a super human being. The being appears to be a monster. Victor becomes so obsessed with his creation and then rejects it. Victor is the real monster because of his desire for power, lack of respect for nature, and his stubbornness.
At first glance, the monster in Frankenstein is a symbol of evil, whose only desire is to ruin lives. He has been called "A creature that wreaks havoc by destroying innocent lives often without remorse. He can be viewed as the antagonist, the element Victor must overcome to restore balance and tranquility to the world." But after the novel is looked at on different levels, one becomes aware that the creature wasn't responsible for his actions, and was just a victim of circumstance. The real villain of Frankenstein isn't the creature, but rather his creator, Victor.
... the monster from the novel. At the end of the play he appears to Frankenstein, appeals to him for a little bit and then Frankenstein accepts him and they live together. The monster from the book undergoes a much harsher life and end, and as a result the sympathy a reader has for him far exceeds that of an audience member.