More handpicked essays just for you.
Victor frankenstein character analysis essay
Essay on victor frankenstein's character
Essay on victor frankenstein's character
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What exactly is a monster?
Frankenstein and Middlesex both have similar concepts of having a “monster” in their story. The authors of these stories are both from completely different eras. You have Mary Shelley writing her story in the United Kingdom, in 1818, then having Jeffery Eugenides writing his story in the United States, in 2002. Very unusual eras and locations for these stories to be written. A monster is consistently looked at differently and relevant to where they each belong in their time period. Of course the setup for these novels are different, but the main concept in book is having a “monster” casted out into each of their novels as their topic, a story about a “monster”. They both cast around a story that is made around their
…show more content…
narrator. All of the sides stories or ideas that are made from the narrator, are also casted differently from the authors.
Again, from the different eras the authors wrote in, gave more complete outlooks how to represent their “monster”. The authors both write in a brilliant format where they both write incredibly. Shelley's monster contains more of a evil perspective. Early 1800’s rarely allowed a different kind to be allowed around specific type of people, such as not being around white people. Eventually, Victor Frankenstein comes up with a idea bringing deceased back to the living world. A different thing created from the context of Victor and put into this world where being “different” is not allowed. Time continues, Eugenides writes his novel with a character of no gender. More maturity risen from the 1800’s greatly. Not exactly a evil outlook from this context, but more of a different circumstance. A human is acceptable for definition of Eugenides “monster”, but then again what do you call Cal in Middlesex? A monster? Maybe, maybe not. Eugenides gives off a non-normal subject. You have a monster. A “someone” or “something” that is not exactly human or even considered a person. What is determined from our mindsets is what sets the many …show more content…
different monsters in the world. Would you call the creature in Frankenstein a monster?
Many reasons to have this creature be named a monster from Shelley’s writing. Victor creates this thing from scratch. A thing to fade away the fear Victor receives all throughout himself. Creating a version himself goes to the complete opposite direction. A version of himself and the creature he creates is labeled as the monster? What about Vicor, if “himself” is this creature is the monster, should he maybe be considered the monster? Victor explains deeply, “ I am alone and miserable: man will not associate with me; but one as deformed and horrible as myself would not deny herself to me. My companion must be of the same species and have the same defects. This being you must create.”(Shelley, 103). Victor is lonely, and wants the companion that is exactly like himself. The dream comes true of a creature being born. Victors shame and prudence brought this “monster” into the world. Shelley clearly defines the feelings Victor appeals from the monster throughout the novel. The mistakes that were made. The trouble that was costed. Victor having to live in this society where he did something wrong, having to deal with what he had did. Frankenstein’s monster learned; growing up in London during this faded era, learning from person to person. Learning the wrong ways can come into effect when learning about what life consist of. Frankenstein’s monster is created out of fear and disbelief. Which then is created with wrong
materials and of course learns the incorrect ways of what life is suppose to be. Those positions is what makes this villainous “monster”. People are killed, people are affected. Shelley continues to give terrible situations towards the monster, situations where they’re unbearable. It is Victor's creation; the trouble that was brought, the lives that were tragically filled with this monster. The endurance that was brought from Victor to the monster. Seeing this, Shelley concludes that monster are not born, they are made. Now, what about Cal, is she/he a monster? This person is not a set gender; in that case this could maybe be considered a monster in some people's eyes. In the opposite direction, it could be a side effect in the person's creation. In Middlesex, Eugenides haves Cal’s grandparents in a institution of slavery, but he/she grandparents are brother and sister. That combination forms awkwardly in genetics which causes Cal to form a body with both body connections of male and female. Obviously this is not considered “normal” as someone would describe. This book was written in the 21st century. More of common type of writing is obtained in the novel than Frankenstein. Cal is confused who he/she is. This person is not a creature, or a scary image, it’s a person. Not considerably a huge defect of a person's like that should consider them a monster. The person him/herself has a good personality, nothing wrong, nothing evil or even consider bad in any terms. Cal did not share the visual problems of him/herself to anymore, does that mean that Cal even visualizes him/herself as a monster? A monster as not a normal being of any kind. Cal continues to think of what should be done so Cal can live as a normal person. Eugenides writes in more of a mature fashion as a lot of time continued through life, which of course gave writers more and more ideas what bring to a story. Not a suitable situation for Cal to be considered a monster. The monster in Frankenstein is something created from the deceased; a decaying corpse that is brought back to life. Cal is born as a normal person is, with different genetics attached with him/her. With this situation, a monster is born, and created from a different type of solution of grandparents. A person inside, with a outlook of a monster. Monsters are not just evil, and are suppose to scare and mess with people's mindsets of fear. It is more that. Monsters have more to them than a definition you would usually see around. Frankenstein's monster is different than the one in Middlesex. More time passed between the novels, so more ideas were passed to give more visualizations of what a monster is. Both of the novels greatly show what the differences in the time has to do with the way the book is representing their monster in their way.
First, Before the monster is created Victor says that he hopes this creation would bless him as his creator, and that the creature would be excellent nature and would be beautiful. After the creature is created Shelley creates sympathy for him by Victor’s description of him in a unique yet horrific way, “he’s ‘gigantic,” “deformed,” “yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath” this makes the creature abhorrent to typical humans. When thinking of the descriptions together, Shelley has created a vivid, unnatural image of the monster in the mind’s eyes. The language Shelley uses is powerful and emotive “shall I create another like yourself, whose joints wickedness
The monster tells Frankenstein of the wretchedness of the world and how it was not meant for a being such as himself. At the end of his insightful tale the creature demands a companion of the same hideous features but of the opposite gender to become his. Victor only has the choice to make the monster or suffer a lifetime of horror his creation would bring upon him. Which the creator ultimately agrees to make the female monster to save the lives of his family but gains a conscious that fills with guilt of all the destruction he has created and creating. When the monster comes to collect the female he tears her apart and the monster vows to destroy all Victor holds dear. The monster’s emotional sense is consumed with rage against Victor, murdering Frankenstein’s best friend. Though when the monster’s framing ways do not work to lead to Victor being executed, he then murders Frankenstein’s wife on their wedding night. This tragedy is the last for Victor’s father who becomes ill with grief and quickly passes within a few days, leaving Victor with nothing but his own regret. Shelley doesn’t give the audience the monsters side of the story but hints that the remainder of his journey consisted of being a shadow to that of his creator. It is at the graves of the Frankenstein family when the creature makes an appearance in the solemn and
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
Victor had created the creature with the vision from his dreams of a strong, tall perfect being with no flaws. His years of study with the unnatural and science had come to this final conclusion and masterful idea that he was determined to finish. To his surprise, he had created the opposite, “For this I had deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.” (Shelley 35) Victor is saddened by what he thinks of as a failure. He leaves his own apartment to go sleep in his court yard outside following his creation. He begins to isolate himself from the creature because of his fear of the creature’s outward appearance. He loses all hope for the creature without even learning anything about him. The fact that Shelley begins to refer to the being that Victor created as a “creature” shows Victor’s ignorance and lack of acceptance. It is Victor’s prejudice that blinds him of the creature’s true potential due to the unwanted preconception that follows the creature as he finds meaning in
Both books raise questions of the characteristics of creation, of Nature and Nurture. Frankenstein appears
Victor Frankenstein was the creator of the monster in the book. He was an ambitious man who had high hopes and dreams for himself, but this characteristic was the cause of his downfall. He had a ruthless desire to obtain forbidden knowledge- a knowledge that only God was worthy of having. This lead him to lock himself in his laboratory, disregarding his family, friends, and health. His one purpose was to create life. In his quest to create a human being and bestow the power of life, Victor eventually did create a creature, but this lead to a situation
Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein, is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise. Throughout the novel, Shelley investigates the idea of monstrosity. She makes the point that a monster does not have to be genuinely evil in order to be considered monstrous.
Examine the Concept of Monsters and the Monstrous in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Miss Hutton “Frankenstein” has a variety of monsters and monstrous things/incidents within it, however I am jus going to focus on some main aspects of the monsters and monstrous. Shelley got the idea for “Frankenstein” whilst she was on holiday. AS well as being challenged by Lord Byron to produce a horror novel, she was also influenced death many times; she was abandoned and had a literacy upbringing. Shelley relates her story to fears which were carried by many humans at that time.
Victor Frankenstein, the main character in Mary Shelley’s novel, is the creator of the monster. When Victor created the monster, he believed he created the monster for the betterment of humankind, but he actually created the monster because he desired to prove to the world that an average human can do Godly acts. The desire to create the monster goes back to Victor’s childhood. As a young kid, Victor’s passions always lied in science and chemistry and in college; he became obsessed with the idea of creating life out of inanimate objects. He then decided to specialize in Alchemy. Within Shelley’s book Frankenstein, Victor said:
Despite popular belief, Frankenstein is not the name of the monster but instead its creator. Victor Frankenstein created the “tremendous and abhorred” (page 76) creature that is known as the Monster after he discovers how to give
Monsters can come in various physical forms, but all monsters share the same evil mentality. A Monster is a being that harms and puts fear within people. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a prime example of how appearance does not determine whether a creature is a monster or not. In the story, Victor Frankenstein tries to change nature by creating a super human being. The being appears to be a monster. Victor becomes so obsessed with his creation and then rejects it. Victor is the real monster because of his desire for power, lack of respect for nature, and his stubbornness.
As a romantic novel Victor is responsible, because he abandoned his creation. As an archetype novel, Victor is the villain, because he was trying to play god. Finally, Victor as a Gothic novel, Victor is at fault, because, he and the creature are two different parts of the same person. If Frankenstein is looked at as a romantic novel, Victor, not the creature, is truly the villain. When Victor created the creature, he didn't take responsibility for it. He abandoned it, and left it to fend for itself. It is unfair to bring something into the world, and then not teach it how to survive. The creature was miserable, and just wanted a friend or someone to talk to. On page 115, the creature said, "Hateful day when I received life! Accursed the creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust." This line shows the agony the monster was in, because of how he looked when he was created which led to even Victor running away from him. If Victor didn't run, he could have taught the monster and made his life happy. After the creature scared the cottagers away he said, "I continued for the remainder of the day in my hovel in a state of utter ...
In 1817 Mary Shelley wrote her famous novel Frankenstein. Over the years, this story has become a favorite tale of many people around the world. It has been adapted several times as it has been retold. While the original tale shares many similarities with newer versions, it has been modified to make the story more appealing to current generations and the world of film. The movie Frankenstein shares similarities and differences with Shelley’s original tale. Aspects such as characters, plot, and setting were modified when this famous tale was brought to life.
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley uses the motif of monstrosity to convey the theme that a person’s outward appearance is not what makes them a monster but rather their actions or inactions that classify true monstrosity. Despite the fact that the monster Victor Frankenstein creates is a literal example of monstrosity in the novel there are many parts that give meaning to monstrosity within character’s actions. Although Victor appears normal, since he is human his ambitions, secrets, selfishness, and inaction makes him a monster himself. Along with monstrous characters the pursuit of knowledge that is seen in Victor, his monster, and Walton in Frankenstein prove that knowledge can be a monstrosity. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is created using the life stories of different characters in the novel. The novel itself could be seen as a monster created similarly to Victor’s monster.
For Frankenstein created a monster who had no identity, and was willing to murder all of Frankenstein's loved ones if Frankenstein did not create another female creature. Victor Frankenstein refused to create another female monster to accompany his monster. Thus, the monster felt that he had no choice but to take away Frankenstein's family, just to show how Victor Frankenstein would feel being alone in the world. The murder of William Frankenstein (Victor's younger brother) caused Victor to believe that his own creature had murdered his younger brother because "nothing in human shape could have destroyed that fair child." (Frankenstein, pg.74) Frankenstein knew from then on that he had "turned loose into the world a depraved wretch, whose delight was in carnage and misery." (Frankenstein, pg.74) Frankenstein's monster caused "the death Frankenstein not only blamed the murders of his loved ones on his monster, he blamed himself for creating the monster. Throughout Frankenstein, the words "friend, monster, daemon, vile insect, enemy, and abhorred devil" were used by Frankenstein to describe the monster he had created.