United States Navy Women
There are many women and men in the United States Navy but it was not easy for women to be able to join the military. Women have had a rough past and fight with gaining the right to join. Women in the Navy are one of the greatest additions to the Navy. Although opposers will say that they do not belong there, women in the United States Navy have proven that they do belong because many women have overcome gender-based biases, made great historical impact, and lead combat situations over men successfully.
The first reason that women in the United States Navy have proven that they do belong is because many women have overcome gender-based biases. In Brian Mitchell’s book ‘Women in the Military: Flirting with Disaster’ he clearly states his opposition of women being in the military. “Forthe opponents of integration, the requirement that the authority of the service ‘must be exercised within a program providing for the orderly and expeditious admission of women’ meant that there would be no ‘survival of the fittest’ in the admissions process: the services were compelled to admit some women one way or another.” He believes that women are not worthy of being admitted to the services and that it is a requirement forced upon the services to select amount women.
However, women do deserve it because many women have taken these criticisms in stride and have proven that they do belong. The numbers alone of women in the Navy is solid evidence of this. As of December 27th2013 the number of active duty women in the Navy was 53,385 which accounts for 16.4% of the branch. The only branch of the military which beats that is the Air Force with 63,552 active duty women which accounts for 19.1% of the branch. The sheer numbers ...
... middle of paper ...
..., which includes the front lines. Panetta's statement at a Pentagon news conference defends that women belong in combat:
Women have shown great courage and sacrifice on and off the battlefield, contributed in unprecedented ways to the military's mission and proven their ability to serve in an expanding number of role... The department's goal in rescinding the rule is to ensure that the mission is met with the best-qualified and most capable people, regardless of gender.
Women have proven that they belong and the ban on them being in combat has been lifted because they have shown that they meet not only the minimum requirements but go above and beyond.
So as you can see, women in the United States Navy have proven that they do belong because many women have overcome gender-based biases, made great historical impact, and lead combat situations over men successfully.
Within Megan H. Mackenzie’s essay, “Let Women Fight” she points out many facts about women serving in the U.S. military. She emphasizes the three central arguments that people have brought up about women fighting in the military. The arguments she states are that women cannot meet the physical requirements necessary to fight, they simply don’t belong in combat, and that their inclusion in fighting units would disrupt those units’ cohesion and battle readiness. The 1948 Women’s Armed Services Integration Act built a permanent corps of women in all the military departments, which was a big step forward at that time. Although there were many restrictions that were put on women, an increase of women in the U.S. armed forces happened during
During their time at the New York Navy Yard, women received the same treatment as men. There were many female ship fitters. In May of 1943, there were 1,080 women welders. The shipyard once fused two destroyers that had many bad parts into one good ship. Accomplishments like this are what brought on their nickname, the "Can do navy yard.
This is because women have proved themselves to be of equal capability as men, and they have already been serving in combat positions alongside men, though not legally. Fortunately, the Pentagon was able to see this and on December 3, 2015 Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter announced that they would be officially allowing women to serve in all combat positions in the U.S. armed forces. This change in military policy will allow more representation for women in the armed forces but it also represents a major leap towards gender equality, further closing the gap between men and
With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.
There was a time when women were unable to enlist and thought of as one who maintains her home and keeps her husband happy. That has changed along with the growth of our nation. Women are now able to join the military as well as serving in jobs of combat. Our servicewomen have gone through plenty and fought for where they are within our military ranks. So why are they feeling punished for being a female in the military?
The argument ‘Women in Combat for Wars Without End’ by Jack Kenny, argues that women pose as high risk members in the military. Kenny argues that there are far too many complications that come with women being a part of the military, and that the United States should not provide women with access to joining the military. His reasoning is based upon the weaseling the military will have to undergo to accommodate women, and that it's just not worth the trouble. Kenny’s argument is logical in that he provides instances and examples that make sense to use to support his opinion. Not only that, but he also offers a sound argument.
...into play that could affect how women perform in dangerous situations. Women are doing an outstanding job performing and magnifying their current positions in the military. We need to be satisfied and recognize our limitations as humans and soldiers. The role of women has always played an important role in military history. By leaving them out of combat their reputation can remain untainted.
Gender integration in the military has always faced the question of social acceptance, whether society can accept how women will be treated and respected in the military. Throughout the history of the military, our leadership has always sought ways in how to integrate without upsetting the general public if our females were captured as prisoners of war, raped, discriminated or even blown up in combat. My paper will discuss three situations pertaining to the first female submariner, fighter pilot and infantry graduate. I will also discuss some of the arguments that male military leaders and lawmakers opposed the integration of women: lack of strength, endurance, and the disruption of unit cohesion. I will end this paper with my personnel experience as a female NCO responsible for other female subordinates within my command and share some of their experiences while deployed in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
There is a chance in each cycle of basic training that some women score above the minimum for women. In our world today, we have the Feminist group, that fight for equal rights for women in todays society. You would believe that this idea of equal rights for women would carry on to the military, right? Wrong, there is inner turmoil on this idea amongst the group.
However, women are not barred from entering every aspect of the military. They can serve on surface ships, submarines, combat aircrafts, and fly
At no point was our mission drafted with gender equality in mind. This crusade for equality will cost our nation for years, possibly even decades to come. I am sure you have heard the old adage “time is money”, that adage rings true with this looming decision. As the government works to allow women access to the infantry, unnecessary tax dollars are being spent, that could otherwise go to the bettering of our fighting force. The first thought that comes to mind is the selective service.
Currently, approximately 203,000 military members, or 14.5 % of the military, are women. Still, some have doubts about how useful they can be. Though women have been efficient in tactical operations and on the front line, some claim they are unfit for service. Women deserve an equal chance in military positions because they possess the ability to work with men physically and have the same mental capacity as men, even outperforming them in
One of the most controversial topics of the early 2000’s is whether or not to accept women into combat roles, on the front lines, in the U.S. military. Plenty of men and women around the country are attempting to instate equality of the genders in the 21st century. This would be a gargantuan step in equalizing the genders, as being a decorated member of the military is one of the most highly respected achievements among most cultures. Women should be allowed to serve on the front lines if they have the ability to meet all of the same standards of a male candidate including, but not limited to physical ability, because of yearning for equality of the sexes, better diversity amongst the military, and by having the ability to choose the best possible candidate for the job in question.
Intro: One of the first things people say when asked if women should be allowed on the front line is that they are incapable of doing what a man can do, but that is not accurate. The comparison of males and females and their abilities is more of a societal image than a reality. Yes, there are differences, such as a man cannot have a baby, but beyond that, the reality of it is there are short and tall, small and muscled, brave and scared people of both genders.
Today quite a few people say that women should be allowed to be in the military. The problem with women is they are not physically up to the conflict. Women require special attention specially when it comes to hygiene. They are emotionally driven and they let their feelings take the better of their judgment in almost all situations. They cannot stay in close quarters with men since they will only be a distraction.