Women Should not go to War!
Today quite a few people say that women should be allowed to be in the military. The problem with women is they are not physically up to the conflict. Women require special attention specially when it comes to hygiene. They are emotionally driven and they let their feelings take the better of their judgment in almost all situations. They cannot stay in close quarters with men since they will only be a distraction.
Women cannot be physically up to combat for this reason, women in P.E. have lower standards than men have to execute which extends a woman’s vulnerability in combat. In other words, there should only be one standard for the military, which is the men’s standard and even if a woman beats a certain
…show more content…
man the best woman can still never compete with the best man. Not to mention the political pressure the military is operated through. The Military is impelling through so much pressure that it was forced to lower its standards.In addition to lowering its standards they now have a less capable force. This also means that women will be placed in dangerous situations. In military situations, conditions can land dire effects, which means living in harsh conditions where women are not prepared to withstand if they are used to living in sanitary conditions. A uttermost glaring example is the fact that women have periods that require special attention. A woman who has a period will undoubtedly be in pain and unable to focus because of mood swings. Periods also require further hygienic conditions than possible if you are assigned in a place where bathrooms and water are scarce. Women also can obtain a pregnancy during a battle. This results in woman having to leave battle or having a battleship change course, just to drop off a pregnant woman. This also means a waste of taxpayer money. If the pregnant woman is a commander this means that a unit will be without a leader for long periods of time. This also makes the unit vulnerable. Occasionally, different jobs suit different people such as, the military. The military is most appropriate for men. In times of need countless men are drafted into the military. Furthermore, men are just not ready to treat women as equals.
Men fight in wars because of women. Women should never fight alongside men.The reason several people say that women are equal to men is because they assume that since it is a free country each person is equal. However, science and logic adds up to them being wrong every time. Woman are just not fit enough to be engaged in combat. Although women in the past have proven themselves that does not mean our own selves should just let a random woman who wants to join the army join because they would have to score the same P.E. standards as men would. Aforementioned women would just have a troublesome time attempting to be at the same standards as men and then they would then probably bail out. Besides exercise, various, countries that we face in combat today are in disgust when they see women on the field, if a female on the field is captured I’m willing to bet that she will go through much heavier torture than what the men receive. For this reason the people who are saying women should go to war are absolutely jeopardizing the female’s survival.
Women are emotionally driven, which could pose as a considerable problem in combat since it could put them and their peers in harm’s way especially when it comes to killing another person. Emotions should not effect the woman while in combat. Emotions affect the skills needed to fight in combat. In deep combat situations women can have a tough time on whether to defy orders
or to listen to them. In the future when you see or hear a poll to vote on whether a woman should be allowed to go to war or not, I implore you to vote against it. Since the reasons I presented before you are indisputable.
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
In the Upfront Magazine Article “Women Warriors”, author Rebecca Zissou told the story of two women who recently graduated the Army’s Ranger School, but whether they would be able to serve alongside their fellow male graduates was unknown. Zissou also delved into the issue of whether or not women should be allowed to serve in combat positions. However, I believe that women should be allowed to serve in combat positions in the U.S. armed forces.
With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.
When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.
...ffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at a substantially higher rate and of a more serious nature than men, despite the fact that they are exposed to substantially less combat danger. Thus, women may be less likely than men to kill and more likely to pay a heavy psychological cost for it when they do."
...nto a situation of high testosterone, women are not considered to be a threat. Military research now however, has shown that women have the physical stamina to endure battle and do not disrupt the cohesion in the male units and can also be mentally tough without breaking when under fire. Women are not only discriminated against in the military, they are also discriminated against in Philosophy, religion, and Popular Culture.
Historically, women have been excluded from combat roles. On the surface, it is because men, who have always thought of themselves better and stronger than women, believed that females could not handle the responsibility of holding a combat position and women are rupturing the socially constructed gender norms that were set in place. According to Nicole Dombrowski, “no other topic concerning women’s role in war creates as great a debate as the question of women’s active participation in combat units.” The benefits for the expansion of women’s roles in the military advantage not only the women but the military as well. In comparison, the drawbacks of expansion of women’s roles are usually disadvantages to the men within the military.
During WWII, the initial acceptance of woman in the military was controversial because they were deciding whether just needed more people, whether they should be an official part of the services, and whether they could perform the jobs. Most people were concerned that women would obstruct the view of American culture because they would be considered “masculine”. By 1944, women proved to be effective in helping during the war. Some were even trained to shoot guns next to the men. In 1994 the DOD (Department of Defense) created a policy that prevented women from combat with their male colleagues. They also could not be assigned to units below the brigade level, whose number one objective is combat on ground. Over the years women have showed that they are physically, mentally, and emotionally able to keep up with men in the military.
The problem of women fighting in combat along with their male counterparts is not a one-sided problem. Elizabeth Hoisington has earned the rank of Brigadier General in the U.S. Army, leads the Women’s Army Corps and believes that women should not serve in combat because they are not as physically, mentally, or emotionally qualified as a male is and that ...
With a woman in combat, it would keep our service larger. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009). Men take up 67%, with woman serving 22% of all of the military in the United States of America today. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009) Imagine if that percentage of woman got larger. It would push the men to be better than them, equally making our nations military larger. Therefore, if we have more military, we have more defense for this
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
If women are able to meet the physical and mental standards, then based on equality they should be able to be in combat. It’s been proven by D’Ann Campbell that mixed units in the military are stronger and work better. The U.S. military should enlist more women to strengthen and improve their
Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.
Should women be allowed in the military? My answer was at first a resounding “no.” However, once I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the combat exclusion law that prohibited women in the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to hold combat positions; however, the Army can assign these duties as they see fit (Schroeder). Some people assume that Americans are not ready to see a woman wounded or killed in war; however, there are female police officers that are wounded or killed daily (Schroeder). How can we rationalize that a woman has the right to die protecting our local communities but not our country? If a person chooses to be in a combat field, and can pass the physical demands required, gender should not be an issue. The arguments of physical differences and cohesion among the troops are valid arguments but not substantial enough to prevent women from serving in frontline combat roles within the military.
Throughout Christian history, countless heresies—Gnosticism, Arianism, etc.—have challenged its legitimacy. Humanity, being of physical nature, delights to view encounters with God in the physical. This trait makes a relationship with God more understandable to human nature. Many heresies place themselves as mediators for God, or man being the center of existence, as the Gnostics for example. However, Theocentrism is a belief in which God is center to existence. The importance and worth of people or the environment are ascribed to God’s one-time creation, while ignoring the trinities work in the world—much like the Deist ideology. Theocentrism, through the costume of meekness, equability, and mindfulness is believed to contribute to the formation