Proposal Determined healthcare systems routinely examine their environments internally and externally to locate significant trends and forces in the present and for the future which will have an effect on their performance goals and mission efforts. These healthcare systems understand who their stakeholders are, their needs and how best to meet those expectations and needs. These systems give attention to specific efforts on accomplishing goals that acquire opportunities in the whole environment while they continue to adjust their internal structures and functions. Precise aims are dealt with by uninterrupted sequences for performance improvements. Strategic directions for systems originate from the mission and directives. Strategic directions are identified by observing key stakeholders, addressing their interests and being proactive about responding to current, as well as, future shifts and trends in the systems’ entire environment (Skinner, 2001). The goal of this paper is to understand how microsystems can affect macro systems and vice versa when attempting to accomplish strategic direction within healthcare systems, how microsystems help to deliver on a healthcare system’s vision and delivery of that vision, how performance measures at both levels are used when looking at strategic drive, and how healthcare systems can begin to change inefficiencies to become more effective on both levels. This paper will further address: For strategic drive to be successful on both levels, each level should begin to have an understanding of why things are done in certain ways and how their work impacts others within their system; Organizations need motivators to improve strategic direction of the system; and Performance towards strategic ... ... middle of paper ... ...lding blocks for action. (2002). [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/icccglobalreport.pdf?ua=1 Kosnik, L.K. & Espinosa, J.A. (2003). Microsystems in health care: part 7. The microsystem as a platform for merging strategic planning and operations. Retrieved from Joint Commission Journal on quality and patient safety, volume 29, number 9, pp. 452-459. Nerenz, D. R. & Neil, N. (2001). Performance measures for health care systems. Commissioned paper for the center for Health management research. [PDF document]. Retrieved from Systemswww.hret.org/chmr/resources/cp19b.pdf Organization and service delivery. (2011). Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external/topics/exthealhnutritionandpopulation/exthsd/0 Skinner, H. A. (2001). Promoting health through organizational change. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
Given the long duration of patient quality problems, over ten years, at SGH, the communication plan may need to include not only the internal SGH stakeholders such as employees, but also external stakeholders both in the community, shareholders, and third party vendors. SGH is at greater business risk due to their previous attempts at improving quality and now potential lack of stakeholder confidence. Including stakeholders in the change management process allows the stakeholder’s viewpoint to coevolve with SGH to create a shared view of the change plan and how to measure change success (Windsor, 2010). Engaging with the stakeholders in change plan definition and focuses their energy on helping SGH with the change process, rather than undermining it (Windsor, 2010). Identifying all of the stakeholders for SGH, and engaging them in change communications and planning will assist SGH leadership in evolving the hospital towards a high patient quality
Due to WellStar being a multi facility health system, its organizational design is constantly being reviewed for simpler and more efficient processes. WellStar’s two smallest hospitals, WellStar Paulding and WellStar Douglas, previously under went reconstruction with regards to their hierarchical structure in Patient Access Services (PAS). WellStar Paulding, the smallest facility of the five hospitals, renovated their managerial chain of command in PAS. WellStar Paulding’s patient volume is less than half in comparison to the 4 additional hospitals. As a result, their staff is smaller and only requires minimal supervision. In the past WellStar Administrators requested supervisors for every department, a manager of the entire department, and a director that managed PAS’ management directly and PAS staff indirectly. Recent cuts ...
A strategic planning process is developed from a SWOT analysis (Harrison, 2010). When a nurse begins to plan strategically, this entails organization, adjustment and management to strengthen operations within the healthcare organization (Nelson-Brantley & Ford, 2017). Due to an ever-changing environment within a health
Honor Health is a hospital and physician provider system located in phoenix Arizona. Honor health is relatively new hospital chain, more specifically it is the result of a merger of Scottsdale hospital and the John C. Lincoln Health Network (Alltucker, 2013). Honor Health’s mission statement is relatively short, comprising only a single sentence. Their mission and vision statements are, “To improve the health and well-being of those we serve” and, “To be the partner of choice as we transform healthcare for our communities” (Honor Health, 2015). While their vision and mission statements impart a direction and goal for their organization, the vagueness of both statements may cause problems in guiding targeted strategic initiatives. This essay
The NHS has adopted a performance measurement system that is based on the concept of balanced scorecard in order to obtain a broader view of performance within the organisation (Department of Health, 2001). Although, measuring performance evaluation of health care system could be difficult, it can on the other hand serve several purposes and can help facilitate change and improvements in the effectiveness and quality of health care. It seems peculiar to focus on performance measures in organisation such as NHS, but even NHS is facing increasing competitive pressures when considering ageing populations increasing demand, improved treatment...
The current health care system can be difficult to navigate and often medical centers need management tools to help them develop strategic plans within their organizations. The SWOT-Analysis is one strategic tool that health care centers can use to formulate a roadmap for their organizations. The SWOT-Analysis examines internal capabilities (strengths and weaknesses) and external developments (opportunities and threats) when determining a strategic plan for an organization (Van Wijngaarden, Scholten, & Van Wijk, 2012). Van Wijngaarden et al. (2012) explains for SWOT-Analysis to prove meaningful throughout an organization, it is important for stakeholders to be part of the brainstorming to identify its’ internal capabilities and external developments. However, there are a few drawbacks to the using the SWOT-analysis tool that are important for health care centers to remain cognizant of when developing their strategic blueprints. Helms and Nixon (2010) state the SWOT-Analysis can be vague and too simplistic when developing a strategic course for an organization; it can be difficult to classify variables into the four SWOT quadrants; and no definite strategic path is identified after the SWOT-analysis is completed. For these reasons, they explain it can be helpful to use additional analysis tools in addition to the SWOT-analysis. One such tool the U.S. Army Medical System uses is the balanced-score card. The balanced-score card can assist health care centers in the clarification of their strategic objectives and goals, and facilitates communication throughout the organization (Chan, 2006). Chan (2006) also reveals balanced-score cards allow for constructive employee feedback l...
Papanicolas, I. & Smith, P. (2013). Health system performance comparison an agenda for policy, information and research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
The overall goal of performance management is to ensure that an organization and its subsystems (processes, departments, teams, etc.), are optimally working together to achieve the results desired by the organization. Performance management has a wide variety of applications including measuring the leader performance, such as, staff performance, business performance, or in health care, health outcome performance measures. To manage and measure performance of leaders are directed to the organizational strategic goals and mission. The primary reason to measure and manage performance of leaders is to drive quality improvement. The Clinical performance of a leader are derived from evidence-based clinical guidelines and measurement allows an evaluation of an important outcome of care for patients, and it is a proxy to understand the effectiveness of the underlying systems of care. Just as there are evidence-based care guidelines for many conditions, there also are established measures that indicate how leaders has effectively guidelines and has translated to
According to the case study, “Leaders can examine their departments' alignment to achieve organizational goals at four different levels. In terms of scope, from most extensive to least extensive, these four levels are re-engineering, restructuring, work redesign, and job redesign.” The constant change in health care delivery systems affects HIS departments and it trickles down to employees. According to the case study, there must be a corresponding realignment of goals to match these changes in order to prevent adverse effects on employee performance. Health information managers must perform detailed analysis before an impending change to make sure it does not result in worker overload, which can create unrealistic and unachievable goals. All job related functions are goal oriented, and thus, any change of function must be accompanied with a relative change in goal. Goal misalignment can generate added stress and job dissatisfaction. The case study suggests that goals must be influenced by a thorough examination of sector changes, organizational changes, and employees' perceptions.
At Mayo Clinic, the organization is driven by the needs of the patient and providing an unparalleled experience through integrated clinical practice, research and education for all patients. Analyzing the strategic plan for Mayo Clinic and identifying and summarizing long-term and short-term plans helps to develop an outlook for the future. “US News & World Report ranked Mayo Clinic as one of the 21 “Best Hospitals” in the United States in 2009” (Jones, 2010, p. 52.), and has been on this list for last 20 y...
The world of the healthcare environment is fast-paced and implementation of new healthcare technology requires an organization to have a strategic management plan. Subsequently, in order to start building the strategic management plan one must understand the external competitive forces that influence a strategic management plan by doing an environmental analysis, which is the first step involved with strategic planning and strategic thinking to understand the external environment (Ginter, Duncan, & Swayne, 2013, p. 40). Environmental analysis involves assessing the “trends, events, concerns in the general environment and in the healthcare industry, and the service area” (Ginter et al., 2013, p. 41). Moreover, environmental analysis attempts
At its most fundamental core, quality improvement of healthcare services and resources requires disciplined attention to the measurement, monitoring, and reporting of system performance (Drake, Harris, Watson, & Pohlner, 2011; Jones, 2010; Kennedy, Caselli, & Berry, 2011). Research points to performance measurement as a significant factor in enabling strategic planning processes and achievement of performance goals (Tapinos, Dyson & Meadows, 2005). Thus, without a system of measurement that accounts for the performance behaviors of healthcare professionals, managers and administrative employees, quality improvement remains a visionary abstraction (de Waal, 2004).
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
The current dynamic healthcare environment is undergoing a tough competition due to various factors such as the cost, quality care, production, efficiency, and safety care. So, the healthcare system requires a significant change to implement strategic management in all its sectors. Additionally, it is important to formulate appropriate tools to execute these strategic plans effectively, and one such great tool is strategic alternatives. Since, one-size-fits all analogy cannot be applied to every single healthcare organization, so it is very important to closely evaluate the healthcare environment, and then select a suitable alternative strategy. In addition, it is unlikely that a single strategy will suffice for an organization so for the success
With regard to the healthcare organization, it is essential to develop strategic plan and a clear vision so that the patient focused care will be at par with the organization process that is conducted on operational and on a daily basis.