Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the compensation representation that compensates healthcare contributors for accomplishing pre-authorized objectives for the delivery of quality health care assistance by economic incentives. P4P is increasingly put into practice in the healthcare structure to support quality enhancements in healthcare systems. Thus, pay-for-performance can be seen as a means of attaching financial incentives to the main objectives of clinical care. However, reimbursement is a managed care payment by a third party to a beneficiary, hospital or other health care providers for services rendered to an insured or beneficiary. This paper discusses how reimbursement can be affected by the pay-for-performance approach and how system cost reductions impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare. In addition, it also addresses how pay-for-performance affects different healthcare providers and their customers. Finally, there will also be a discussion on the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of healthcare.
Discussion
How Reimbursement Is Affected By Pay-For-Performance Approach
Healthcare payers agree with the idea of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) to advocate for pay-for-performance in provider reimbursement on quality and efficiency. The fundamental system that most payers use to compensate physicians and provider associations embodies enticements for excellence and efficiency. Reimbursement can be affected by the P4P approach and other factors such as the claims process, out-of-network payments, legislation, audits and denials. While the same P4P approaches are attempts to commence incentives and new strategies into the healthcare, the underlying arrangement of the compensation system produces many per...
... middle of paper ...
...correctly with varied crowds of patients to reduce incentives to keep away from most patients is quite challenging. Finally, the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of the health care depends on incentives with "teaching to the test" to guarantee that the affirmative objectives are not attained at an enormous price.
References
Kongstvedt, P. (2013). Essentials of managed health care. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Langenbrunner, J., Cashin, C. & Dougherty, S. (2009). Designing and implementing health care provider payment systems how-to manuals. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
Papanicolas, I. & Smith, P. (2013). Health system performance comparison an agenda for policy, information and research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Walshe, K. & Smith, J. (2006). Healthcare management. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Abbey, D. C. (2010). Healthcare payment systems: Fee schedule payment systems. CRC Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=1uxIcqBAu_EC&dq=fee schedule payment system&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Nerenz, D. R. & Neil, N. (2001). Performance measures for health care systems. Commissioned paper for the center for Health management research. [PDF document]. Retrieved from Systemswww.hret.org/chmr/resources/cp19b.pdf
With the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has initiated reimbursement based off of patient satisfaction scores (Murphy, 2014). In fact, “CMS plans to base 30% of hospitals ' scores under the value-based purchasing initiative on patient responses to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, or HCAHPS, which measures patient satisfaction” (Daly, 2011, p. 30). Consequently, a hospital’s HCAHPS score could influence 1% of a Medicare’s hospital reimbursement, which could cost between $500,000 and $850,000, depending on the organization (Murphy, 2014).
113-117. Retrieved April 21st, 2011 from website: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/physicians_payment_aib_2010_f.pdf. D. Squires, The Commonwealth Fund, and others, International Profiles of Health Care Systems, The Commonwealth Fund, June 2010. Retrieved April 20th, 2011 from website: http://www.commonwealthfund.org//media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2010/Jun/1417_Squires_Intl_Profiles_622.pdf. Johns, M. L. & Co. (2010). The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'.
This group is more focused on satisfaction, access and quality of care. Providers, or practitioners, are also key stakeholders within an organization. The term provider can encompasses not only physicians and surgeons, but also nurses, physical and occupational therapists, technicians, and other members of a clinical staff. Providers fall into two categories, primary, which includes hospitals and health departments and secondary, which includes educational institutions and pharmaceutical companies. Providers are focused on the best treatments for patients and are involved in delivering health services and products. The final element of the MCQ model is the employer who by far is the largest paying and purchasing stakeholder of an organization. The employers focus is primarily on their return on investment within an organization. Cost and quality is a focus for employers when choosing health benefits but are mindful that access is just as important. Within the Patient Healthcare model, MCQ explains the interactions between the four elements of employer, patient, provider and payer while the Iron Triangle focuses on the factors of cost, quality, and access. The Patient Healthcare model charges healthcare leaders with the task of balancing satisfaction with the stakeholder (employer, patient, provider, and payer) in relation to cost, quality and access. This may be very difficult since stakeholders may have competing priorities. Changes and variations made in how healthcare organizations operate may have profound effects on how stakeholders perceive the quality, access and cost. For instance, a patient may consider cost to be a top priority when seeking healthcare and at the same time the healthcare organization may consider raising costs and therefore devaluing access and quality. Patients who begin to incur high out-of-pocket costs may begin to perceive a financial
Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System. Christopher J.L. Murray, M.D., D.Phil., and Julio Frenk, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
In recent times, healthcare organization across the nation are facing unprecedented challenges as they strive to improve the overall quality of care provided to their patient’s population, while improving their organization’s financial performance. Furthermore, uncertainty of new reimbursement models, diminishing reimbursement, and complicated compliance regulations are playing the role of a catalyst for streamlining the Chargemaster process in majority of healthcare organizations.
The NHS has adopted a performance measurement system that is based on the concept of balanced scorecard in order to obtain a broader view of performance within the organisation (Department of Health, 2001). Although, measuring performance evaluation of health care system could be difficult, it can on the other hand serve several purposes and can help facilitate change and improvements in the effectiveness and quality of health care. It seems peculiar to focus on performance measures in organisation such as NHS, but even NHS is facing increasing competitive pressures when considering ageing populations increasing demand, improved treatment...
In Medicare's traditional fee-for-service payment system, doctors and hospitals generally are paid for each test and procedure. This drives up costs by rewarding providers for doing more, even when it’s not needed. ACOs continue to utilize fee for service by creating incentives to be more efficient by offering bonuses when providers keep ...
...lthcare system is slowly shifting from volume to value based care for quality purposes. By allowing physicians to receive payments on value over volume, patients receive quality of care and overall healthcare costs are lowered. The patients’ healthcare experience will be measured in terms of quality instead of how many appointments a physician has. Also, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements are prompting hospitals, physicians and other healthcare organizations to make the value shifts. In response to the evolving healthcare cost, ways to reduce health care cost will be examined. When we lead towards a patient centered system organized around what patients need, everyone has better outcomes. The patient is involved in their healthcare choices and more driven in the health care arena. A value based approach can help significantly in achieving patient-centered care.
When one examines managed health care and the hospitals that provide the care, a degree of variation is found in the treatment and care of their patients. This variation can be between hospitals or even between physicians within a health care network. For managed care companies the variation may be beneficial. This may provide them with opportunities to save money when it comes to paying for their policy holder’s care, however this large variation may also be detrimental to the insurance company. This would fall into the category of management of utilization, if hospitals and managed care organizations can control treatment utilization, they can control premium costs for both themselves and their customers (Rodwin 1996). If health care organizations can implement prevention as a way to warrant good health with their consumers, insurance companies can also illuminate unnecessary health care. These are just a few examples of how the health care industry can help benefit their patients, but that does not mean every issue involving physician over utilization or quality of care is erased because there is a management mechanism set in place.
The revenue cycle is known as the process by which healthcare providers receive reimbursement for care provided. Bringing in revenue is necessary for the efficient operation of any healthcare facility. The revenue cycle consist of all the steps involved in patient care starting from bringing in the patient, meeting their needs, and receiving payments for services provided (Gillikin).
The fourth key point is payment models. In order to make sure quality health care is given across the board you have to follow the money. In this section it talks about an idea of restructuring the payment scheme. Using bundled payments “offer the potential for promoting equity by redirecting resources to health care values...
reimbursement determinations. As a result, the camaraderie among physicians has developed into a more aggressive approach to impede competition (Shi & Singh, 2012). Little information is shared with patients in regards to procedures or disease control. The subjects are forced to rely on the internet for enlightenment on the scope of their illnesses (Shi & Singh, 2012). Furthermore, the U.S. health care system fails to provide adequate knowledge on billing strategies for operations and other medical practices. The cost in a free system is based on supply and demand and is known in advance of hospital admission (Shi & Singh, 2012). The need for new technology is another characteristic that is of interest when considering the health care system. Technology is often v...
In the midst of changes occurring in the United States one experiment currently taking place is with new reimbursement arrangements called pay-for-performance. In pay-for-performance physicians performance becomes tied to quality. Pay-for-performance is likely to face challenges ahead as it is implemented and utilized in the United States through adoption of electronic medical records. This paper will cover those possible challenges along with addressing general concerns.